Why do so many economists think immigration is good Sup Forums?

Why do so many economists think immigration is good Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

ssb.no/innvregsys/
cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/31222/RSCAS_PP_2014_05.pdf?sequence=1
worldhealth.net/news/anti-aging-biotechnology-can-save-our-economy/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It supercharges evolution by introducing great genetic diversity.

Because they need to fight against dropping birthrates. White people need to fuck but the media oversaturates them with sexuality and they don't want any real sex anymore. Also protection is a curse.

Most consider human capital to be 'fungible' like real capital. So replacing White Americans with Mexicans and White Europeans with Africans is no big deal. They consider culture to be any importance and ignore any biological differences between different ethnic groups.

Black people as well?

Because it is.

Whats wrong with these considerations though? Why should economists look at anything other than skill and experience?

It fuels consumption, the more people who buy shit, the bigger the take.
Those who sell shit make money hand over fist while the cost of all the shitskins is publicly funded.

Bottom-tier expansion of the labor pool is good for the race-to-the-bottom shitfest that is underchecked capitalism.
These people will not wake up until you hunt down their families.

>Import poor man work of immigrants literally before the next massive automation

Take care with those future riots.

Cheap labour. Illegal immigrants work for cheaper wages than your average blue-collar white person so it's cheaper for companies to employ immigrants; Also illegal immigrants can't really complain to a union or the government about low wages and poor working conditions.etc At the end of the day employing immigrants in manufacturing and labour jobs is just a stop-gap method for companies to save capital before they fully replace humans with manufacturing robots who will be a massively cheaper to employ.

Refugees work

Not all immigration is low skilled. Even so low skilled immigration will pretty much inevitably drive down the price of many necessities raising living standards for the bulk of the population

because they are economists, and are thinking only about the variables they know

>Refugees work
No, the vast majority of them do not work and are nothing but a strain on welfare programs. Take Somali immigrants in Norway, they fled here ages ago and 3/4ths of them are not working or contributing in any way, shape or form.
Corporations lobby governments hard to let in anyone, promising it'll be good for The Economy when in fact it's all one big Ponzi scheme where we're left with the bill.

This. It's really retarded but it has a twisted logic to it.
It's the broken window fallacy all over again. Increasing consumption doesn't increase prosperity and more than breaking a window.

Now there are situations where immigration would be good, but low skilled immigration certainly can't coexist with the minimum wage. The minimum wage causes shortages in unskilled jobs, so the last thing you want is additional unskilled workers. Importing unskilled labor when we can't accommodate it is retarded.

Like all elites, they like cheap "ethnic" restaurants and cheap maid services that save them from having to learn to cook or clean their own toilet.

In their models of the impact of immigration on the econony you won't find any accounting for nigger crime, Islamic terrorism, or the fact that white people are killing themselves with elephant tranquilizer because they have nothing but white genocide to look forward to.

>Increasing consumption doesn't increase prosperity and more than breaking a window.
It increases prosperity for those who manufacture and install windows and they're laughing all the way to the bank.

> Immigrants do the jobs that we won't!

So you're admitting that you don't believe in paying people a living wage for their work, and want slave labor instead that drives down the value of unskilled labor and makes us all struggle.

>Take Somali immigrants in Norway, they fled here ages ago and 3/4ths
Source?

Refugees integrate to the labour market fully, its just a longer term investment.

forgot to add pic

I think people often overstate just what automation means for work. Automation prior to this point has only ever created jobs. A current example are kiosks in McDonalds. The reduced cost of service increased demand for product meaning many chains have had to add more staff to work in the kitchen. The same is true for all historical industries and likely all future automation.

South Africa is white, nigga.

ssb.no/innvregsys/

Not sure they split by countries, 42.3% of African immigrants/refugees currently in the age of employment who are not disabled etc work. A news article based on the statistics from above found that 3/4ths of Somali people Did. Not. Work.

I know you may not like it, but these are statistics from the official Norwegian bureau of statistics.
You Oceanic cunts aren't much better, with 62.6% employed.

Because (((economists))) don't care about cultural implications. All they care about is the cheaper labor that a million more pedros will bring

At this stage, America will have to turn poorer in exchange for white homogeneousy. No one will accept that because American exceptionalism has been thoroughly memed into daily life

It's great for GDP growth and cheap labor for businesses.
Terrible for average Joe.

Because they dont, but are part of the leftist cabal ( see “global communism!“ aka 'globalism' )

I believe in paying a minimum wage, which we have here in Norway. Which is also one you can life relatively comfortable with even with our high cost of living. What I don't believe in is rampant immigration and free flow of labour inside the Schengen treaty area, something which is fucking Norwegian workers hard.

80% black

Just reading through the wiki article it seems as if much of the Somalian immigration has been very recent and you'd expect such low employment levels. shows that you'll only really see full labour market integration after about 20 years. Other African groups (Morrocco and Ethiopia) have much better employment rates.

>Why do so many economists think immigration is good Sup Forums?

it's good for the short term profit margins of employers.

on paper, at least.

They'll say anything to stay on TV

Goyim it will raise the GPD by 2% for the entire native workforce to be displaced by slave laborours

This is literally their only argument.

That more money will be made by the entire country, but not by the middle class, but by the upper class, but they ignore this by focusing solely on GDP

It's amazing how leftist """economists""" can get away with oversimplifying and basically lying to fuck over the middle and lower class like this, they all need to get the bullet

Because only immigrants would do what basically amounts to slave labor.

they don't take into account the societal factors.
all they care is profit.

Because Illegal workers and businesses don't go through shitty regulations and shit like that.

immigration used to bring the best of the best. then they decided that not only can they bring the best of the best, but they can bring the worst of the worst to fill in the other side of the spectrum.

>Demand for low skilled labour doesn't real
Low skilled immigration is increasingly more important in the first world
cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/31222/RSCAS_PP_2014_05.pdf?sequence=1

The human race is now going through the biggest macroeconomic change in history. This change has two faces. First, life expectancies have nearly doubled in the West since the beginning of the 20th century. This change is even more rapid in formerly undeveloped regions as they catch up to Western technologies.
The other aspect is falling birth rates, which seem correlated to longer life spans. Fertility rates (births per woman) have fallen below replacement rates globally for the first time ever. And in many developed countries, fertility rates are alarmingly low.
A fertility rate of at least 2.1 children per woman is needed for native population stability in the West. It can be 2.5 or more where infant mortality is higher.
Japan and Germany are now at about 1.4 children per woman and falling. Singapore, Greece, and Spain are at about 1.3 births per woman. Within decades, whole nations will be at 1 birth per woman.
This means the next generation will be half the size of the last.

worldhealth.net/news/anti-aging-biotechnology-can-save-our-economy/

Need anti-aging biotech. Also, Globalists want a homogenous population to control.

Sitting at home pocketing welfare while doing all sorts of criminal shit as well sure sounds like slave labour.

In my country, there is a huge labour shortage. There's many more jobs than (qualified) people to fill them. To be honest, I think it is a positive thing to have educated tier non-muslim immigrants coming in.

Some of this is justified by shifting income to the investor class, though personally I've grown an unpleasant skepticism of the cultural influence exerted by the modern investor class.

You don't get welfare if you are illegal, and even legal immigrants don't get welfare till after like 6 years of being here.

Because they have found ample evidence that it is good.

Well. They don't. Most of those assholes are either paid off or are just fucking stupid.

Immigration isn't a bad thing but illegal immigration is. There has to be a screening process. Otherwise you'll end up with a bunch of fucking muslims trying to blow the place up. Or cartels that want to slaughter anyone that gets in their way. Or a bunch of lazy fucks that leech off our tax dollars (pretty much liberals in general).

Because (((economists)))

Unfortunately, there's no such thing as illegal here apparently.

>cheap labor
>imports degeneracy

It's a give and take, my friend.

They're paid to think so. An economist is basically a failed mathematician or physicist lacking integrity who will produce a model to find whatever you will pay him to find.

>You don't get welfare if you are illegal
top zoz
you realize they just collect it through social security fraud right? it's completely trivial.

Because immigrants don't drive THEIR wages down, and they want to keep enjoying cheaper goods & services from the plebs.
>WORKING CLASS BTFO

>economists

They are jews.

This

Implying Achmed have any education/experience in anything.

It becomes incredibly obvious if you remove borders as a concept and begin thinking of Africa as a limitless font of labor.

>EHMAJUN MUY SHAWK

>People coming from underdeveloped regions use more gov't aid than the inhabitants of a developed nation
Color me surprised

This kills the Australian

Economists: "Bank robbers are good because they get money for themselves that is good for the bank robbers."

Because "economists" are fucking retarded. Every economic measure shows that it destroys jobs that would go to Americans and be a huge drain on the middle class.

>so many (((economists)))

Who nose?

(((Economists)))

this
Many of them just consider people as numbers, and in such a case all people are equal. Reality doesn't work that way even in tiny societies though which is why most sane immigration policies worldwide have always encouraged only the best and brightest from other countries rather than poor huddled masses yearning for handouts.

- cheap labor
- much more likely to pro-create; birth rates of actual westerners are abysmal and you just can't sustain a country/economy/population without having the actual people to do it with
- more people = more people buying shit so easy way to fuel the economy

I think that's about it and more than enough reason to support it

>that pic
Is the left finally learning how to meme?