Why is this picture so hard to understand for right wing retards?

why is this picture so hard to understand for right wing retards?

>right wing retards
>retards

Total solar irradiance is not constant retard

wtf now I hate co2.

t. the rainforest

Why it is so fucking hard for climatecucks to understand the God will take care of the situation.

The left can't into memes.

ancap is right wing retard

>so hard to understand
They don't want to understand.

Saving the planet =/= short term financial gains.

Co2 doesn't do that.

That's what I'm wondering too. ...right-winged ppl are mostly uneducated so I assume they only get their info from Sup Forums/youtube. ...uneducated ppl are also easy to manipulate.

CO2 accounts for less than 1% of greenhouse gasses, yet all the bullshit propaganda about global warming is based on it.

Meanwhile water vapour forms the bulk of these gasses and humans have no effect on it.

Why is scientific empirical data in chart format so hard to understand for climate alarmists?

It's not. It happens, naturally, and has happened for billions of years without human aid. We are actually overdue for a mass extinction event.

So that's why you love your niggers and muzzies so much.

Why is this picture so hard to understand for left wing retards?

Oh wait. Of course. Because they prefer colored kindergarten pictures to real scientific data.

Why are libtards so easy to manipulate with cartoons and pictures?

how do you left retards explain 6 ice ages prior to the combustible engine? Take your jew al gore scam and shove it up your ass.

>complains about how the right is sceptical about man made global warming
>proceeds to show a graph from the last 200 years as proof, literally displaying only 0.000004% of the earth's total age

Why are leftcucks so easy to (((manipulate)))?

Why are complex non-linear systems so hard to understand for mathematically challenged left-wing 110 IQ range Dunning-Kruger retards?

NASA, which is the most trustworthy source on scientific matters on this planet, even says climate change is carbon induced. Your meme charts are worthless. CO2 levels has never been this high

>co2 levels rise
>causes better habitat and increase of plant life
>plants convert co2 to o2

I don't see a problem here. Believe it or not Mother Nature has a pretty good balance and every time the government tries to fix something it gets fucked up

No one is debateting there is more co2 than there was 100 years ago. The questions is if the current trend is consistent with historic fluctuations. Seeing how the climate is still recouping from the mini ice age of 500 years ago, I don't see a problem here

*once again

Btw OP, you're an absolute discrace to an app

schow me your best Oktoberfest

>co2 rise
>good
When CO2 rises, so does the temp of the earth. When that happens all the ice caps start melting and islands like Tuvalu will cease to exist. That is the problem and mother nature cannot fix that in a short amount of time

Why does the solar radiation get's blocked when it's reflected from earth but not when it enters the atmosphere for the first time?

o noes not tuvalu!

Climate change is the new Y2K or the world will end in 2012 bullshit. It's made up to advance the liberal agenda.

Obviously just someone hiding their flag.
No science can advance while simultaneously being held sacred.

Wow look at you fucking right wing retard with your reasonable scientific rebuttals. How dare you challenge the narrative with these ideas of yours, fucking Nazi.

This

Protip: The current Milankovitch cycle is towards cooling.

>(((NASA)))

Nobody gives a shit about Tuvalu.

And what about doggerland? Did the Neanderthals burn too many fossil fuels and cause that landmass to submerge? N

>no source
Not true at all either

Because they're retarded parrot sheep who hate science. Simple as that, really.

It isn't. It's the picture that shows increased CO2 is primarily caused by industrialization and that paying international organizations lots of money will stop it that's hard to understand for right wing retards.

I rather believe in an organization that sent a man to the moon rather than climate change denial stuff written on stormfront

More heat, more clouds
More clouds, more rain
More rain, more fresh water
More co2, more plant life
More plant life, more food

Also, clouds reflect sun light better than anything. Less heat getting in means less heat having to get out. Why doesn't anyone ever adress this?

So how many percent of climate change is caused by humans? Your turn.

>why is this picture so hard to understand for left wing retards?

Nobody at NASA today had anything to do with the moon landing. It's a diversity outreach program now.

About as meaningful to me as a flat-earth picture. Now back to reality: The measurable rate of actual temperature change is well within normal parameters. Your religion is fake. Al Gore scammed you out of a hundred million dollars because you're gullible and like feeling virtuous. In reality higher CO2 content in the atmosphere would resolve most of our agricultural problems.

Who the fuck cares, it''ll be thousands of years before anything happens

>trusting an organisation
Goodest goy imaginable

>stormfront
Never went on it. Isn't it shut down now? Or was that daily stormer?

100% of course, goyim.
Back then when the dinosaurs died out, that was also entirely caused by humans. Back then the humans didn't want to pay the kike, that was the problem. Otherwise you would still have dinosaurs around here.

>1 post by this faggot

>CO2 levels has never been this high
Try looking back a bit further, the Earth is older than 400k years.

Of course that happens. To a degree. But it will probably take out the people we want it to, and it would be foolish to a) interrupt a process that will serve the functions of war famine and widespread disease etc which previously maintained a social balance that have been largely eliminated and b) put limitations/regulations/taxes on our own economy which will invariably lead to technologies that will allow us to control the atmosphere if left to develop uninterrupted

>Rather believes
>Also beLIEves that (((NASA))) sent a man to the moon

Explain me something:
Do you really think a government would literally live stream such an event, even when something could go really wrong, like for example a space suit. Or even leaving the moon.

(((They))) simply wouldn't. Unless (((they))) knew nothing could go wrong, because it was inside a movie studio.

But well everything worked out perfectly. Just like 9/11. What a coincidence.

appeal to authority is not an argument. Present your data to counter mine.

>what are estimates
Were there temperature scales back than to prove your graph is right in the first place? The info you could get from Isotope dating records is limited.

I would find this funnier if most religious people didn't unironically think you are right.

Global cooling is white supremacy

Warming planet favors proud and noble POC

If you dont live stream it, how would you know if they actually went in the first place dumbass

We are all going to die because you anti-science right wing dumbos refuse to accept the truth that capitalism is at fault for everything.

>The measurable rate of actual temperature change is well within normal parameters.

What are the "normal" parameters of temperature change? How many degrees per century?

I have yet to here someone who isn't just bitching about global warming or climate change. They don't actually have any plan or solution, besides mass murdering everybody. When you ask any of them, they freeze up, because they can't say that the plan is mass murder. Try it

>NASA
>We wuz scientists and shiet
>Earth iz only 400 thousand years old

I think (((they))) should stop with their diversity program.

>I rather believe in an organization that sent a man to the moon rather than climate change denial stuff written on stormfront
An appeal to authority is not an argument.

Which earth is REAL???

I unironically think he's right.

Deal with it.

Serious Q: how can heat escape into space? It's a vacuum. Not conducive to heat conduction.

Why not videotape it and send it later and call it "live stream"?
Any way a regular human was able to verify that it actually was even a "live stream"?

You beLIEve all sorts of crap. Stop doing that.
Think!

You have to be over 18 to post here kid

They aren't too stupid to understand it.
They just know if they accepted it, then they would have to regulate their businesses.

I'm probably older than you, fucking retard with bad teeth.

>carbon ia responsible for79% of This shit
>ignores the fact that it doesn't mean man made carbon gas but all carbon, so volcanoes and shit too

How's that mental crutch working out for you? Still scared of the oblivion of death? Or you think your consciousness is going to somehow "live on".
topkek religiofag.

dont worry trump is going to fix it lmfao

Why is it so hard for leftwing retards to understand that no one is disputing whether CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and no one is disputing whether the earth is warmer.

What's in dispute is how much man has contributed to it, what can be done about it, whether the cost is worth anything being done about it, and whether the warming is more harmful than positive.

We can't even find an accurate measurement of how much human CO2 production has contributed to increasing the earth's temperature, yet leftwing retards are saying we need to live in caves and give up modern living.

Fuck you.

Also, thinking God would care about us, lol. He's probably got more successful planets that demand his immediate attention.

How's having no morals and pretending you can have morals without God?

Kek

>whether the cost is worth anything being done about it
This is the dumbest part of the argument.
"Derp, our money will keep us alive."

>relegating God to human standards of thinking and comprehension

It's like you fail to understand the concept of God who created a seemingly infinite universe, every particle of matter, and reality itself.

People who try to humanize God or apply limited human logic to God is the worst.

>Implying a degree of temperature change will kill us

You're retarded.

I know what happens next, the pig invests in another country's infrastructure and businesses until that country inevitably crumbles under the weight of socialism just like it has happened in EVERY SINGLE COUNTRY stupid enough to think farmers are doctors and vice versa.

I'll be glad when my generation comes to power, because they are so stupid and weak with these sorts of ideals and then the next generation which has put up with the degenerate bullshit will put an end to it just like they did the Weimar government.

Enjoy your helicopter ride, comrade.

H20 is the most prevalent greenhouse gas. The effectiveness of co2 as an insulator goes down logarithmically as concentration increases.

>Implying morals reside solely within the arena of religion.
Get the fuck outta here with that bullshit. You fucks invented Satan (praise be).
Back to r eddit with you.

The hottest it got this summer was 98F for us.
Last year was over 100.

Soooooo

>still clinging to the idea of morals without God in existence

I bet you're an atheist who believes in free will.

kek

And you know it stops at one degree, how? Did that faggot god tell you?

It is very simple:
- when it is warmer less CO2 dissolves in ocean water
- not dessolved CO2 stays in atmosphere
- more CO2 stays in atmosphere, it gets warmer
- circle closes...
Maby it is more about sinusoidal changes eh? Greenland wasn't named like that for shit and giggles.
Pic relatet.

So tell us leftfag retards? What is your big plan to stop the planet from warming?

Why is this picture so hard to understand for liberal retards?

Stop hiding behind that flag, Hillary.
You're a disgrace.

No, but as time advances our technology becomes more efficient and less reliant on fossil based fuels.

The situation solves itself.

You can turn off the internet and live in a cave if you'd like.

Found the retard!

>CO2 outside the troposphere
Amazing how people don't understand molecular weight

As per your religion, god gave us free will. That proves that he (and by extension, your religion) has zero to do with people having and exercising morals.
Fuck off religios fag - you're just mentally weak and are afraid of death. Religion is just a tool of the weak, the sick and the wicked.

...

Why is it so hard for libfaggots to realize that the greenhouse effect with co2 is minuscule when compared to water vapor?
Why is is so hard for leftydouches to realize that neither h2o or co2 is a pollutant?
Why do these stupid fucks believe in consensus over proof?

but anytime there is an anecdotal evedince you assholes jump all over that shit. Like hurricans or tornados or a heat wave or ISIS.

Nice argument.
"Temperature change doesn't affect climate because our technological advances mean it doesn't matter how much the climate changes!"
Back to bible studies, faggot. Go diddle some more kids with your pastors/paragons of "morality".

I'm bleeding from the edge.

Yes, God gives us free will.

What's your excuse for being retarded enough to believe in free will without God?

I don't give a shit about climate change, as long as it kills the niggers and jews with us.

Science!

Somebody answer me

>CO2 has the same properties of water, huehuehuehue
lol

I don't want to enter this shit debate, but either God has no control over you, or you have no free will.
>God is all-knowing, therefore there is some innate timeline that is immutable. Therefore we have no free will
or
>God isn't all-knowing because we have free will and can alter our timeline, therefore the Bible was wrong

>vote hillary or you're a sexist!
>do what we say or you're a racist!