Is this true?

Is this true?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge
update.revolvy.com/topic/James Wenneker von Brunn&item_type=topic
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Sure why not.

no. most of the "right wing" ones are just regular crimes. the islamist bodycount is obviously orders of magnitude higher, but is also 100% preventable, which is important to note

Why do left-wingers have the best success:failure ratio?

You are kidding, leaf ?

does "right wing" terrorism include republican muslims?

Change 'right wing' to 'FBI/DEA/Homeland' and it's probably accurate.
Remember Ruby Ridge
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge

>incidents
>not bodycount
49 dead at pulse. The dead from right wing 'incidents' since 2001 is like 46.

Apparently the Investigative Fund is a part of the Nation Institute, which is run by "The Nation" magazine that is well-known for having a liberal bias.

Now it all makes sense. Looks like it is a very biased.

Cool, can we see what constitutes as "right wing terrorism" please?

no

Because they have the support of international cabals. Look up how groups like the FALN were funded.

So now they are organizing by number of incidents rather than kill count and not saying "After 9/11 only", but rather since 2008 arbitrarily.

If you just look at kill count, Muslims are worse.

>right wing
>~75 acts, ~40 foiled
>65% success

>islamic
>~15 acts, ~50 foiled
>23% success

>left wing
>~15 acts, ~5 foiled
>75% success

Remember guys, hide shill threads or sage them

Whites are 60% of the population.
Muslims are 0.8% of the population.
Of course you're going to see higher number of "right-wing" attacks (which is poorly defined).
The trick is to notice that the Islamic attacks are over represented and includes substantially higher kill counts.
These are misleading statistics to distract from the fact that Muslims want Sharia.

"Right wing terror" number is vastly inflated. It includes shit like drawing swastikas or hanging a Confederate flag outside your house.
Other numbers are accurate. America doesn't see nearly as much Islamist terror as the rest of the world.

Interesting the 2009 shooter was a neo-nazi at a Holocaust museum where he literally killed a black guard named Tyrone. When they raided his apartment they found framed portraits of Jesus and Hitler, as well as child porn.

update.revolvy.com/topic/James Wenneker von Brunn&item_type=topic

I wonder how many nazi larpers join to overcompensate for their pedophilia.

All of the incidents in the year of 2008 - with only exception being the Knoxville University Shooting - were either from left-wing (socialist and communist) factions or islamic terrorists.

Right-wingers are pro-death penalty for pedos, dude.
Nobody would support him.

note how they only say "incidents", they're basically including regular crimes in with actual terrorist attacks, if you search for terror attacks in the last 8 years by death toll you'll get muzzies at #1

It's a misleading truth.
It's true, only under conditions they picked and by definitions they made to make it look like Islamic Terrorism and Leftwing Terrorism are less common than Rightwing Terrorism.
I could name 10x more Antifa, BLM, and Islamic attacks since 2015 than I can Rightwing attacks in 30 years. ((((They)))) just don't consider all the property damage caused by Antifa and BLM or those 4 niggers that kidnapped an Autistic Trump Supporter and tortured him terrorism, but they will consider something like self defense terrorism.

>Some guy paints a swastika on a house
>Some islamist runs a truck into a crowd

"They're both terrorism!"