Question for 'murricans, and also Brits i guess:

Question for 'murricans, and also Brits i guess:
If you have any Universities which you can name that show the following tendencies: those that were once the top of the crop in the world, and have a documented statistical case of slowly losing their positions and losing their lead proportion as opposed to foreign educational institutions in both competitions and other areas indicative of success; has that slow demise been parallel and proportional to the slow rise of marxist/SJW retardation in those institutions in that time period? I'd also like for you to exclude affirmative action because I know that has effects on overall grading, i'm more focused on this student uprising and student policing and all that safespace SJW shit in the past decade or so.
Can it be defined as a legitimate correlation, even if in theory?

I'm just curious if there is anyone here who actually did a study on this and your opinions.

Never did a study, and I can't think of a specific top university that fits this outline, but what you are saying applies to literally the entire education system from beggining to end, and has slowly taken place over the last decades.

She's nice and thick.

s-sauce?

Harvard
Stanford
Columbia University

Cambridge springs to mind, probably not as cancerously advanced as say places like Berkeley but there certainly exists that element. FYI its more of a product of student politics here, the student unions seem to have what would normally be starbucks employees with worthless degrees occupying absurd positions like diversity officer or heads of unions spreading their bile and living like welfare recipients off students contributions towards said unions.

How to get stoned without weed.

Yeah, I believe that the very essence of Universities when they were established was that there was an effect of competitive uplifting and motivation through challenge between the various strata:
- The teachers have the massive experience that students don't, but they must give students a leeway in developing potentially new and creative ideas while securing the factual foundations.
- The students challenge the teachers and thus the teachers are forced to constantly perfect and reevaluate their field, but they also must respect the teachers for the lead in experience they have over students.
- The underclassmen debate and argue between themselves, and also with the upperclassmen, in an effort to expand the complexity with which they analyze and the amount of angles they can view subjects from based on soaking up other people's viewpoints, but they don't completely suppress each other's temperaments and views so some essential truths won't be ignored out of arrogance even if they are miniature in fraction.

Ultimately it should be a system where all thinking, no matter how controversial, can be dissected and analyzed and fairly debated much like all the subjects in medicine, instead of being ignored or even suppressed and censored because of sensitivities which then results in a lack of challenge and decreased learning potential.

It makes sense that straying from studying controversial topics and thus challenging oneself, as opposed to others who do apply this method, ends up in a more poorly trained and more restricted mind which leads to poorer results.

That's what I see with neo-Marxist SJW's, ergo my question.

thicc lady wearing cum rag on her head is hot wtf is this thread about again?

Well I doubt the Oxford Student's Union's meetings were always so obnoxiously stupid, I just turn off now because it's like an episode of Question Time except the audience is even more obnoxious and retarded.

Says a whole lot that sitting patiently and listening and all that other formal crap is considered a "white" thing.

It seems like the whole higher education system has become a joke excepting very specific fields like doctors or engineers.

You are Nikola Tesla 2kGy/z7m. You must release the thunder.

This

Batul/Fairuz/Nazima

She's an escort in London

As far as universities STEM fields are what matter, and Western universities can retain an edge when it comes to STEM fields, despite the growth of SJWs, but other areas like social sciences and arts are decaying.

Nah i'm dumb as shit in reality.
It's just that we Eastern/Southern/some Central Europeans have experience with Marxist Communist dogma, where it produced damage, how much damage, the tactics it used, etc.
So we can more clearly see through the bullshit of extreme leftism because we have the experiences of our predecessors passed onto us as cautionary education, and we can still see remnants of it.

Very true, though I did speak to a prominent (now retired) bio chemist a while back and asked for the low down on the future of shit like eugenics and designer babies as he's the prime source minus journalist sensationalism.

His answer?
He was seeing a lot of papers with Chinese names on them before his retirement. Good thing I say, I don't want to live in Idiocracy.

u dint!

He asked for TANGIBLE evidence that SJW bullshit is adversely affecting the Academy, and we have it.
As far as specific studies, there are oodles that dance around the fact that SJW/AA/safespace bullshit has caused this... but then the tapeworm doesn't contemplate it's own parasitism.

>what are all British universities

They've all gone to shit because they're now leftist, SJW circle-jerks only there to make money. The minute you walk into a lecture and the "professor" pops on a 20 slide PowerPoint that he's used for a decade, you realise it isn't a place for expanding yourself, it's a place to give you a gold star and a false sense of pride.

Fuck, i'd pay a lot to have such a whore for my personal use.

wow

U.S. student a t top public university here. STEM fields are stronger than ever, but most social sciences will die out unless they purge the Marxists from their fields. Certain humanaties still retsin credibility (philosophy comes to mind).

You'll notice the inflection in 1980.
1978 Bakke SCOTUS decision restricts strict quotas in College AA, but this definition (something the Court is supposed to do), opens the floodgates of Affirmative Action now that the majority of Universities are confident they can enact AA in a safer legal landscape.
>this is how things work. The 'restriction' actually leads to prevalence.

...

Pulling the underwear up and holding the belly in. Most muslim chicks are fat as fuck.

All of those universities are infected with that SJW crap, and that's where all the money is.
There is no other game. No competition exists or can exist against that.

Correlation is not causation ...
>Serb

Asking for correlation is not the same as asking for causation, except in your mind it seems. But it can lead to causation if evidence is provided in sufficient quantity.

No, it cannot. Ever heard of CFA? Don't try to push idiotic thesis onto Sup Forums and bait with thick Arab. Go to sleep.

HARAM

>evidence in sufficient quantity to prove something doesn't lead to authentication
Next post, you'll be telling us how evidence and scientific methods are a patriarchal tool of oppression.

Nope - you look like a humanist with no grasp of statistical methodology. Maybe in Serbia, this will fly but in the civilized world, you will just get mocked. Either step up your game or just get back to rising cattle or whatever you do in this country of yours.

Throwing random buzzwords won't fix the mistake of you mixing correlation and causation, and denouncing the pursuit of evidence. Your attempt of trying to dissuade someone from pursuing evidence, opinions, and truth, is a typically Marxist tactic. You had a chance at presenting yourself as trustworthy, but now you flushed that chance in the toilet and the only statistical methodology i can trust from you now is the one correlated to plumbing.