Has BDSM to be degenerate?

How does Sup Forums think about BDSM?
Isn't literally owning women and command them to do your biddings exactly what all of you want?
I just got a formerly suicidal girl to hand over all decision-making about her body and life choices to me. So it's basically a classical patriarchal constellation.

It's kinda degenerate outside of the context of actual slavery, but only mildly so.

She will mostly do work in the house and garden. Maybe I will send her to earn some money, too. Prostitution or porn are both legal here.

Implying a majority of Sup Forums has ever touched a woman.

Many guys on Sup Forums are married and have children.

Hell, maybe I'm your father.

Oh wait, you don't know your father, because he left you after having a premonition about what a little faggot his son would become (which is ironic, because it was the lack of a father figure that made you into a faggot in the first place).

BDSM is an endurance sport.

Man, what a pooch.

>Many guys on Sup Forums are married and have children.
It's called larping.
Most of them also make a cool 90+k a year after taxes in stem and programming fields.
Have a beautiful virgin xtian wife.
Etc.
Reddit is that way.

look at that schnoz

this isn't Sup Forums in 2007 kid

this also isn't /r9k/

Diapers, however, are not degenerate.

Gonna have so many Sup Forums boyslaves in my tickle torment chambers on the day of m,y insurrection and rightful ascendance... wish you were here, anons!

Reddit

Is

That

Way

.

BDSM is okay but I prefer Kerrang or Drive Time

Or

Reddit

all the leather and fetish shit is
and also if you only keep it in the bedroom then yeah its degenerate

but women submitting wholly to their man is exactly what every real man should want as well as anyone who claims to be a traditionalist
I fully intend on finding a woman who will submit herself to enduring months of slave training and then brainwashing any thoughts of disobedience out of her and then marrying her
a lot of women are actually pretty receptive to this surprisingly and I already have some candidates

Copycat

also if you really have a willing slave then give proof with tits and timestamp and preferably collar

>everything I don't like is someone pretending
You're projecting the issues you see in yourself onto anonymous people and it's pathetic

Diapers is the most degenerated fetish I ever saw, maybe more than Blacked

also you're still a faggot if she looks as hideous as your pic

From a Frenchman that is praise indeed

What steps do I take to follow in your footsteps user? Help me

Just started banging a girl who keeps bringing up submission

>Isn't literally owning women and command them to do your biddings exactly what all of you want?
No. That is degenerate behavior. Men and women each have their roles and neither owns the other.

Unless your having sex for procreation only you're a degenerate faggot

you are the biggest faggot here take your ass to Sup Forums faggot and never come back unless you want a ride on the Nazi roller coaster of death

No I'm just stating that half a majority of the faggots on Sup Forums automatically start throwing out muh degenerate west every time a vagina gets mentioned and something possibly going near it that isn't going to cause it to shoot out a baby. See
That even spews from resident the faggots.

Fetlife is beta central; they have group warnings against alphas. Warnings lol

Checked

Yes but women need men to put them back in their place considering they are pursuing male gender roles making themselves miserable,angry and insane

>How does Sup Forums think about BDSM?

Depends on the BDSM and depends on who your participate in it with. If it's just one party who likes being bound and subservient to random people, then BDSM is absolutely a degenerate. If you're in a relationship/marriage where both man and woman are okay to be equally subservient to each other, then it's Aryan.

This is also my intention.

In my experience, there are a lot of women out there looking for dominant men and a lot of submissive men.

In a local forum, there are always ads from submissive men, mostly unanswered.
I had no problem finding girls who like to be dominated. This was one reason why I truly believed, that feminism is complete bullshit. Women themselves don't even want it.

Also this. Really can't get into this.

I've never been on fetlife even though I hear it mentioned a lot.

>both man and woman are okay to be equally subservient to each other, then it's Aryan.
I'm definitely not subservient to my girl. I care and look out for her, but I do as I like.

Have you ever been in one of these? Way too much work. You can't ever let your guard down. It's like being a pimp. I like to dominate girls when I'm horny and the rest of the time get stoned and play vidya.

Men should look inwards before anything. We must fulfill our own roles before we can begin telling women what to do.

I'm 31, and my current 20yo gf likes that stuff. Never was interested in it all until now. Spanking her ass is admittedly a bit enjoyable. Not really into the sadism of bdsm, but the domination and trust dynamics are nice. It makes me feel quite confident, getting a woman wet from not even a full swing of my wrist. It's like finally seeing the results from the effort you put into lifting.
Feels good.
Her former ex was/still is an emotionally fubar'd bitchy beta male, who is vidya addicted and a 14-hour a week job working neet submissive that describes himself as having bi tendencies. Meanwhile, she works a full time job, and makes for a tireless unappreciated housekeeper to boot, just like her mother. Call me a cuck or a degenerate if you want, but I've almost literally stole her away from that man-child, just by providing her a little masculinity in her left, and she's already admitted she wants 3 kids by me. And I have no shame. None. I ever knock her up, I'll marry her. You know how based having somebody doing your laundry and washing your dishes is when you work a job you pull routine overtime in is, that isn't you mom? VERY. Degen or not I'm gonna make my 30 year old ass some babies.

Fuck yeah cunt, wish I could share a beer with you.

Next time I drink one I'll think of ye, Aussie user.

I touched my cousins penis last year. We're both 39 and got curious in the hot tub. You're right though, never touched a woman. To be honest they're all too degenerate for my standards. I have a gf in the Philippines that I haven't met in person but I send money to to help pay her rent and plan on seeing her by next year hopefully.

Being this autistic.

Selling her to other men is complete cuck status for fucks sake germany youre worse than sweden at this point.

She is just my side bitch. But if anything, I would sell her out for lesbian porn most likely.

...

Check...one, one, two.

abuse

etiquette

>Isn't literally owning women and command them to do your biddings exactly what all of you want?
No, but I'm not a fucking nigger. Owning someone like a piece of property is totally degenerate and is a concept best left to shitskin pedo worshippers

>debrief

Do people actually believe there is a fucking debrief protocol?

Sluts are not having good sex
Is why they are sluts
They ain't getting fucked properly

Besides who fuckin enjoys hitting women?
its a means to end.
and that end is a sandwich
If you get the sandwich why hit?

BDSM is cuck-tier. It just satisfies her carnal desires for domination. Since it stays in the bedroom/chamber you only get to role-play the dominator there, outside (95% of your time) you'll be the submissive provider.

Yes you idiot.
People often discuss the scene they were just in. What they liked, didn't like, and what they may want to add in the future. That is a debrief.

Plenty of people carry it outside of the bedroom and have significant power differences in the relationship. It's kept toned down in public because it can illicit poor reactions from other people.

Radical islam is more interesting

They have cooties user. It's too risky!

I think Germany has a bad case of political bdsm

Don't think it should be confined to men'owning' women, but I'd that is the way it is practiced mostly, I am fine with that.

I wouldn't have a problem with women 'owning' men or same sex 'ownership' arrangements.

Possibly unequal distribution of power is optimal in a real sense. It is certainly superior to equal distribution of power where one party is not up to it. If the Dominant is 'good', it should work out fine.

It was pointed out to me on dual income households are at greater risk of disaster via one becoming unemployed. Equal distribution of power means double the risk that power is weilded badly.

And this means total disaster. He or she who can or would destroy a thing controls a thing and whoever controls the Spice controls the universe.

Relying on one party to be 'good' rather than two seems more likely to work out than relying on two. Though there should be the option of doing this.

Bdsm is only degenerate for the submissive. They can only begin to redeem themselves by leaving their relationship. Until they do that, they deserve every bad thing they get for being so degenerate, but cannot take credit for the good except in the eyes of their dominant partner having only earned a pat on the head from them.