Christian natsoc thread

just so were clear, the only occult shit was what himmler was pulling out of his ass. even hitler and his inner circle thought he was retarded, as germanys primitive pagan past was embarassing compared to romes. whitedragon.org.uk/articles/himmler.htm
hitler and everyone else in the party was a christian. there is nothing wrong with protecting others from those who wish to do them harm.
paganfags, no shilling. we know your d&c tactics. the viKANGZ werent cool.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity
pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith-based_foreign_aid#Current_trends
rt.com/news/334590-pope-francis-arab-invasion/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Right Wing politics are concerned with the long-term survival of Civilization

But Christianity is only concerned with personal salvation to become part of a nebulous afterlife for which no evidence exists, and for which this world needs to be sacrificed, which is best expressed in the way early christians like Martin of Tours refused to fight enemies of their nations, insofar killing in this world could cost them heaven; this is also why more modern christians like Martin Luther said (I quote):

- "it is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence" - Martin Luther

When Jesus says "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"...

... he is not kidding, or meaning the opposite, but actually setting down a morality where the world is a lie and only the afterlife is the real deal, so destroying your life in this world, "carrying your cross" as he says, is completely logical

Sup Forums "christians" seem to believe Jesus actually meant the OPPOSITE of all that, and that Jesus wants you to defend your family, that Jesus wants you to kill your enemies, to become prosperous, well-fed and rich in this world, and to avoid persecution and death!

Only a person that does not actually believe in the Heaven for the persecuted, the meek, and the martyred would actually re-interpret Christianity as a cult of earthly power which declares "the strong shall inherit the Earth", "my kingdom is of this world" and "you must destroy the enemies of your nation"

Only some one that just wanna use Christianity as an empty shell devoid of any true religious promises would claim that Paul and Peter misinterpreted Jesus when they submitted to their enemies and died to them while praying for them, instead of fighting the romans back and establishing a crusader kingdom, thing that one would expect them to do if Jesus meant "be a fighter and impose your will on your enemies" when he said "love your enemies and lend all they need to them without expecting anything in return"

But using Christianity as a shell devoid of any religious promises simply allows its poisonous morality to survive into the next generation.

You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "I didn't come to bring peace", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing what Jesus wanted is for them to put christian morality above the good-being of their own families.

You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times)

You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!

That is not going to fly.

Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".

Christianity can't cure a disease it caused

Pagan Romans were fundamentally free of the chains of jewish power, so much that they almost exterminated them all in their own homeland after the rebellion of Bar Kocheba

It would be Christian Europe that would fall under permanent jewish influence, with the jewish-controlled churches banning europeans from financing and loaning, giving them as a monopoly to jews

By the modern era, Christians were so throughly judaized, that they started to actively wish for the restoration of Israel so that the end of the world would finally come around and their civilization would die!

And why would it be otherwise?

A religion which such obsession with death, with promise is the end of the world, is fundamentally a time-bomb in the basement of a civilization

Do you really believe that the early christians that embraced their martyrhood to the lions said to themselves "I am dying to this lion so that the white race can survive, fuck jews!" or any such anachronistic reinterpretation that you have decided to give to their death cult?

- there is no "white genocide", what is really going is white suicide, with christian morality as its main driver

the abortion issue is a perfect example of white christians openly fighting against their own interests by wanting to increase the birthrates of blacks and other democrat sub-groups that do abort
there are numerous other examples of how Christianity actively makes white self-sabotage, but this one is extremely obvious

Tell me: do you really believe that USA would be better off with twice as many blacks? (The entire South would be deep blue for starters)

- That Jews took control of european finances and loaning and then global finances by proxy, is another example of how Christian Morality screws whites over
If the Churches had not been issuing numerous bans on white christians from practising usury (which is simply a way of saying "high risk financing"), jews would have never taken over that niche market
far from destroyin them, Christianity made Jews the masters of Europe. The occasional progrom more than paid for itself

- Support for Israel is a third way Christian Morality screws whites over, and it is far from a recent occurance or corruption. As early as 1600s, puritans already believed that a jewish Israel in the middle east was a prerequisite for the Apocalypse

- Christianity does not allow for racial divisions among Christians either "there is no jew or greek" makes it quite clear. Citing Paul made extremely easy for the anti-segregation preachers of the 60s to get the majority of whites on their side

> inb4 Turning the other cheek does not mean pacifism. Slapping someone's face with the back of your hand was an insult for a very long time.

no it wasn't. that shit was made up by radical black-nationalist liberal theologist Walter Wink to justify social rebellion in South Africa.

There are NO sources to it outside his books, nothing of what Josephus wrote about life in the ancient Middle East mentions anything close to offering the cheek or giving to your enemies your coat being an insult

Only a christian could claim something as absurd as love for his enemies

Only a right-wing christian could take that absurdity to the next level by killing his enemies while declaring his love for them

>as germanys primitive pagan past was embarassing compared to rome
More (((Christian))) reinterpretations of covering up of people's history and traditions.

Never trust Rabbi worshipers for history lessons. They hate the truth and want the world to end.

Question for Sup Forums "christians" claiming that the Pope is the anti-Christ

How would you prove that interpretation of "do not resist evil" by Pope or any mainstream christian leader is twister and out of context?

The context of the story is how christians should behave the opposite of gentiles, who love their friends and families, and hate their enemies

The larger context is a Gospel where all the main figures mentioned allowed their enemies to kill them without slaying them back: Jesus, Peter, Paul

What is true context of the paragraph?

How do you turn "Do not resist evil" into "FUCK OFF MUSLIMS!"?

YOU are the Anti-Christ, Christian of Sup Forums. You deny the words of Jesus because you don't wanna give up your earthly interests.

You "christian" people of Sup Forums/ seem to believe that Paul the Pharisee and Peter the Jew the grabbed their swords and killed the romans that wanted to execute them, come on

They were well aware that their religion demanded them to be submissive to their enemies and finally die to them, that is exactly the lesson they wanted the goyim to learn

Look, I know that you actually don't believe in the whole "infinite treasures in Heaven" thing, so you are trying to justify fighting for survival in this world where you can get actual treasures, but don't try to rewrite history please

In the Greek-Roman world, love meant "common feeling of mutual interest born out of shared experiences"

Early Christians expanded it to a commandment of loving people that we don't know, that we don't care about, just so that we can fill ourselves with misguided pride about how we are friends of mankind itself

and then come right-wing christians to twist tthe meaning even more

so here they want us to believe that the Crusaders loved every single damn person that they slaughtered in Constantinople

Because, according to Sup Forums christians, Love is not about shared interest, it is about telling to yourself "how I love that guy" right before cutting his head off

dude, if you wanna hate your enemies, just do that, and stop mentally masturbating about how better and so much more heaven-deserving you are than your enemies because you somehow declared that you loved him while killing him

christian semantics are enough of a mess as they are, and then Sup Forums christians wanna add an extra layer of absurdity and mental masturbation

Agape never has conveyed any sort of violent or agressive implication

even among christian writers it has always meant means "a selfless love that is passionately committed to the well-being of others", no implication of tough love whatsoever

see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity

> thus being meek does not being being meek and we can actually ignore 'Do Not Resist', and we can actually kill our enemies

that is where the schizophrenia of right-wing christians kicks in

>worship a Jew
>natsoc
Yeah, no.

Paul was anti-natalist, as things like wife and family would get in the way of getting people to worship his jewish god

> 8 Now to the unmarried men and women, and for the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.
> Are you free from such a commitment? Do not look for a wife.
> 32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— 34 and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord’s affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. 35 I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord.

That christianity is about "family values" is a meme. The main concern of every christian is the spread of this virus-like cult at the expense of their own tribe

> "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't become my follower me"- Jesus

the organic self-sustaining self-interested self-preserving society that Sup Forums wants is fundamentally incompatible with the "do not save for tomorrow, leave your family and spread my cult" dogma that both Jesus and Paul saw as the main duty of a christian

What he meant by this is that the normies need religion to cope with things, i wouldn't say this to a normie, but we're all redpilled here or at least most of us, maybe a little.

If Christianity is a religion of earthly power, why didn't it save the Western Roman Empire then? Why did Saint Augustine wrote that it was not a christian concern the existence or not of wordly kingdoms?

Why were Christians unable to save even their fucking holy land from the Muslims, if they are the religion of earthly power that you believe they are?

Why is the North Africa now muslim, if it was once christian and roman?

That they didn't manage to screw things completely over was an accident of history, not for lack of trying

and most importantly of all questions, why has Christianity become an enabler of the muslim invasion of Europe, if it is such religion of earthly power and "the strong will inherit the Earth" as you seem to believe?

why are all the christian mainstream churches pro-refugee, if christian doctrine says "hate your enemy, and do not lend to them all they want" instead of the opposite as you claim?

The strange thing is that "christians" like you are a minority within Christianity itself that they claim to represent, with everyone from the Pope to the Anglican Churches to the Protestant Churches actively cucking for the destruction of the West

The Pope literally points to the same verses that I do to justify his doctrine, yet you come here to tell me that he is wrong, and I am wrong, and even damn Jesus and paul were wrong tho, because some medieval crusader decided to recreate christianity as a earthly cult of power in order to sack Constantinople!

Jews are a very successful group that has become successful by monopolising finances through ethnic networking and promoting ideologies that demonize their own actions so that the goyim won't copy their success

so they promote anti-nationalistic Communism among the goyim while endorsing Zionism for themselves

that is why they promoted universalist Christianity among the goyim while keeping Judaism for themselves, and including it as the Old Testament within Christianity, so that they would remain the most important people of the world.

So there is no real contradiction once you understand how Jews work: Do as I say (Christianity), not as I do (Judaism, Old Testament).

then christians wonder why Jews dominate them!

The Swastika is a pagan symbol. If Hitler was a Christian, why didn't he use a cross for the German flag?

> le Jesus was violent this one time so we have to ignore "love your enemies" meme xDDDD

Sup Forums christians are right that Jesus didn't promice peace and niceness, he promised suffering and war

The core of the issue is what are the targets of the sword of violence he promises:

- people of your own household. Father against Son. Mother against Daughter
- money changers that were not hurting him or attacking any of his followers at all, and were the only way people that lived in a far away places of the empire could exchange their money to local currency and donate to the temple. Money changing has nothing to do with Money Lending. Money lending would not become the main economic function of Jews until 600 years later, when the Church banned the goyim from high-risk financing

For your enemies, he wants you to love them and to lend them everything they expect to you.

When his enemies arrived to arrest him, Peter tried to defend himself with the sword. Jesus reprimanded him for misunderstanding him, and then promised that Peter would deny him 3 times that night .

And why would Peter do otherwise?

Peter realized that he would die: "holy fuck he really wants us to die for him, his kingdom really is not of this world"

Of course he was going to fear for his life. He realized that Christians were never supposed to get power.

The religion never worked like that. His kingdom is NOT of this world. That is why Paul didn't try to create a crusader state. Because the only stable, non self-contradicting position christianity can take is the one of a pacifist paranoid minority that is protected by the weapons of someone with will to power.

"The meek will inherit the Earth" becomes a declaration of suicide when adopted by the strong

> le pope is a cuck because catholics aren't christian meme

this is an even greater point that can't be ignored

as soon as christians get rid of atheists, pagans and heretics they will be back to killing each other over what the insane kike Jesus actually said or not

Jesus promised that he would break families apart and that is exactly what his absurd declarations of war against nature do

Early Christians seemed to believe in what you call "fake corrupted liberal christianity". It is not a surprise: Sup Forums christians call citing what Jesus actually said "strawman"

Let me guess, what Jesus actually meant the opposite of everything he said!

When Jesus stopped Peter from attacking the Romans and asked him to follow his example and carry his own cross instead, do you believe that Jesus actually meant the opposite?

That he actually wanted Peter to start a revolt and start killing Romans? That he wants his followers to be assertive and defeat their enemies military?

When Paul said that you should never revolt against your Government, Paul was talking the opposite as well? That people were supposed to fight against The Romans to create the Kingdom of Earth and Deus Vult?

It is you who has created a religion in which Jesus always means the opposite of what he said, and early Christians were wrong

yet you call me pointing that out, strawmanning somehow

Do you even know what a strawman is?

> le JEWsus was BASED and his teachings were corrupted by KIKES meme

Literally all the followers of Jesus, and Jesus himself were kikes.

Among his followers there were many zealots, the most radical jews of them all, that wanted wars against Rome
But sure, he was "le anti-semite non-kike that kikes hated" right?

Now you are going to talk about how he disagreed with pharisees or whatever.

But why would the pharisees be discussing mosaic law with a non-jew? Never mind, what exactly did he denounce the pharisees for that makes him not a kike? Have you actually read the Gospel?

Can you point to a single value that Jesus denounced that wasn't valid?

Because the denounciations of Jesus were idiotic, insane, even marxist

There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to punish a slut! (Jesus didnt like slut shaming, quite liberal if you ask me!)
There he denounces the rich pharisees and promises the earth to the meek and the poor! (... and marxist)
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to live, instead of embracing death like him!
There he denounces them over a disagreement on how Mosaic Law is applied! (but Jesus was not a Jew I swear!!!)

You blindly may say "he disagreed with the kikes" as if that was something we needed to applaud!

I have to ask you "christians" of Sup Forums, what are these supposed teachings of Jesus that supposedly got corrupted by kikes? "Hate your enemies"? "Save treasures for tomorrow"? "DO resist evil"?

The opposite of everything Jesus said?

I mean really, is "but kikes killed Jesus" your only argument?

Muslims are hated by Jews as well, but Jews are smart enough to use them as a tool. The same way they use the insane anti-morality of Christianity to corrupt the ancient world and give themselves a privileged financial spot!

But if Jews don't like the own poison they created, that means that we shall drink it, according to you!

wtf I guess I love ISIS now!

> le Christianity made the west meme

absolute insane nonsense

western law system are based off Roman Law, which existed before Christianity existed

western languages are based on indoeuropean languages, Malta is the only western country with semitic languages root

Most of the religious symbolism of the West is pagan as well, christian trees, easter, etc

heck, the american constitution never ever mentioned Jesus anywhere, and has the separation of state and church as one of its most explicit declarations

the founding fathers and most of western people for the last 1000 years have been deists. Whenever they tried to take Jesus seriously, things went wrong very fast.

> le Christianity made Europe meme xD

Christianity made Europe... a mess...

That "conversion" of Europe involved a lot of killing of whites and destruction of history and art, even worse, it involved silencing scientists (i.e. Gallileo, Copernicus, Servetus) that went through the Middle Ages, so much that Islam got ahead of Europe during this period

> bu... but the surviving scientists were christians and even talked well of the kike Jesus!!!

see: pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/
> According to the poll, just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power; specifically, 33% of scientists say they believe in God, while 18% believe in a universal spirit or higher power.

Now that not being a christian is not a death sentence, most scientists don't give a fuck about pretending to worship a kike

Certainly, if Christianity was pro-Science, it would not be anti-world, and it would have not allowed Islam to get ahead of Europe and almost cuck it completely during the Middle Ages

I mean really: FUCKING ISLAM GOT AHEAD OF EUROPE

Is that the religion that you claim "made Europe"?

You believe in an era where the Islamic World was ahead of Europe, so much that our word for complex mathematics is ALGEBRA, an arab word!

But then, Jesus the Kike promised that.

He said clearly that, while men would love their enemies, men would have their enemies in their own household, so it is no wonder europeans were killing each other until well

> le Jesus wanted us to use swords against their enemies meme xDDD

Jesus stopped his followers from actually using any sword to attack their enemies, and reprimanded them for misunderstanding. When Peter realized that he would go "holy fuck he really wants us to die for him, his kingdom is not of this world" and denied him 3 times.

You may notice that Jesus made two sword references: the second sword reference was very explicit about what would be the target of the christian sword: Jesus didn't promise war against your enemies (that would contradict everything Jesus had said up to this point).

He promised war against your own damn family: "I do not come to bring peace, but to set a man against his own household"

Which is exactly that historically happened, Christians were extremely successful at killing each other and killing white pagans, all while completely failing to recover their Holy Lands from Muslims.

The sack of Constantinople by Christians and the Wars of Reformation between Catholics and Protestants weakened Europe so much that Muslims would occupy the balkans for 500 years,

All of this comes from the fact that Christianity is an inversion of reality, and the only way to claim otherwise is to actively ignore everything Jesus said except 3 or 4 quotes entirely removed from their follow-up verses or any context whatsoever.

You really believe that Paul was supposed to slaughter the Romans and create a crusader state of This World?? That all those christian martyrs got their own damn cult wrong?

ITT: Extremely deluded people that wanna follow the commands of a Jew that promised to make their families divide and even asked them to hate themselves and their own families (!!!!) so that they may perhaps-- have a slight chance of worshiping a Jewish War God for the rest of eternity

> muh synagogue of Satan meme

Revelation 3 provides no way or form to know who these "fake jews" are, as everything in the Gospel it is vague and contradictory

So you randomly have decided that the synagogue of Satan is the modern Jews, as if that would change anything at all

Jesus himself said that the world is of Satan, and he made it quite clear that the only way to oppose "Satan" is by opposing the World. Which is INSANE if your main concerns are the survival of a WORLDY civilization into the far future. A concern that Christianity makes completely pointless

Why are you even here? You have no skin on this game. According to you, the Jewish War God will WIN no matter what and slay your enemies

There is nothing on the line for Christians

They gave up on this Universe

Europe being Islamic or not is completely IRRELEVANT for a christians that believes in the plan of God

The plan which promised that God would come back after 1000 years of oppression and persecution of his followers

A christians wanting to oppose the oppression of his people is going against God's plan

And it is not some sort of twisted interpretation by the Pope or evil catholics:

- "it is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence" - Martin Luther

that liberals agree with Christianity is very easy to prove: they always attack the poor christian understanding of Science, but NEVER the morality of it

That is how liberals are so successful at portraying republicans as hypocrites for believing in a republican Jesus that loved guns and loved the rich and wanted lower taxes

if only Christianity was only about believing the Earth is 6000 years old!!

the main problem is that christians believe that a Jewish War God will destroy the Earth to save the people that "mentally talked to him in the correct way" whatever the FUCK that means, and then bring them to an utopia where they will worship him every damn second of eternity

who the fuck would want to live in such a jewish dimension of eternal servitude is beyond me. Even death and vanishing forever sounds like a superior option.

Dude you are the best poster on Sup Forums right now

I already pointed numerous examples of how Christian Morality itself sabotages white survival

Do you really believe that USA would be better off with twice as many blacks as it has now?

Abortion alone has split black birthrate in a half, otherwise we would be talking about african levels of black birthrates

What do i recommend instead of Christianity? Simple: Pragmatism

To recognize that what matters is the here and now. That Gods won't come to save us

That we are alone

That only ourselves can save us

Otherwise, it is game over

And Jesus is not going to cry about it, why would he? All he wants is to abolish the Earth and create a paralel dimension where everyone worships him 24 / 7

Our desires of this world, our need to fly and colonize the stars: Gone

I find it interesting that for something "divinely inspired" Christianity does not give us any insight into the Universe. If the Bible had mentioned there are 8 planets in this System, that there are worlds beyond that we can actually inhabit, that Stars are made of Hydrogen, which is part of what water is composed... May be then I would be believe "holy fuck it really is God-inspired!!!"

If Paul had made some huge scientific discovery thanks to this "revelation from the creator of the Universe", I would actually give this pharisee some credit

But all we got is endless pages of social critique, about how rich is evil, strong is evil, resisting evil is evil


I can guarantee you, there isn't a single chapter of the Gospel that I can quote that you would not call left-wing nonsense if it was said by a modern leftist instead of Jesus

(with the probable exception of some of the very trippy chapters of the Revelation)

oh, god you again! get out of here you stupid kike shill!

Triggered, spiritual kike?

> Jesus is the kikest kike I swear xDD

See:

* is not the

> I fugged

if it is a jewish invention, why do kikes hate us so damn much?

Kikes hate all whites, not Christians in particular. Your shitskin mind control religion encourages a massive persecution complex.

This is you. This will always be you. You don't care about your own fucking "pagan culture". You're just using it to shit on Christianity.

Keep telling yourself that, sweetie.

...

covered here:
> jews hate muslims, WTF I should convert to muslim now!!


Islam literally got ahead of Europe during the Middle Ages.

That Algebra is an arabic word is not an accident

who cares? if a few cucked liberals want to waste their own hard earned money on stupid african nigglets, it doesnt affect us. they are in their own country. it fine if they improve as long as they dont do it here.

Martin Bormann, Hitler, and Himmler all came up with Operation Dog Collar together.

They hated Catholicism and wanted to destroy the Vatican and install the Holy Reich Empire.

>he says while Christianity encourages the importation of hundreds of thousands of shitskins to the US and Europe

Holy shit, CIDF got massively triggered

>hey, let's get rid of jewry
>also praise YHWH and his circumcised, hannukkah celebrating son rabbi Jeshua, amen
How did that work out for him, user?

> a few cucked liberals

it is mostly christian churches

see:

While popularly held beliefs—and characterizations by US government officials—purport that many churches/temples/synagogues/mosques/etc. and faith-based organizations give money internationally, studies and news reports found that the overwhelming majority of religious-based international aid is Christian. There are many religious, historical and political reasons that explain why Christians more than Jews, Muslims and other groups, are more active in international development, charitable giving and participation. While Christian giving to places like Africa grew during the 20th century, Jews in donor countries focused their charitable giving and attention to the development of Israel and Soviet Jewry. Muslim organizations have long supported aid to other Muslim countries, but only recently are both religious ramping up efforts into the non-Muslim, developing world.

Some religions themselves are known to contribute more money to international efforts than others. Seven out of the top ten nations contributing dollars per $100.00 of Gross Domestic Product are predominantly Roman Catholic. Some examples of these top-givers are Austria ($0.20), France ($0.31), Luxembourg ($0.54) and the Netherlands ($0.69).


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith-based_foreign_aid#Current_trends

Good Shit Brother

>that pic
Top fucking Kek, Anderson is a cuck.

this

...

also see pic related

those nigs are not going to stay over there

We're all brothers in Christ, user, cool it with the racism okay? Except thos fucking GAYS, they must burn in hell!

Shalom!

my god, you are retarded. leftists and kikes have perverted christianity since the 60s you fuckwit. in 1940 they would have lynched someone for saying shit like that. modern christianity is just a hollow shell of the real thing.

Gee, I wonder (((who))) could have encouraged to breed them so much and banned contraception in Africa. If only we could find out!

rt.com/news/334590-pope-francis-arab-invasion/

>no true Scotsman: Christian edition
Thanks for playing, christcuck.

>perverted christianity

covered here:
Can you define "pure, not perverted christianity"?

> inb4 some bullshit about a guy that sacked Constantinople and gave turks the edge to take it over

not if we cut off their government funded foreign aid gibs. they will die by the truckload. theor donations have caused more harm than good by spiking their populations to unsustainable levels.

Show your flag, larping burger, and pray for Rabbi Jeshua

>Christianity started as a Jewish creed in Land of Israel in the mid-1st century. The first Christians were Jewish and the early spread of Christianity was aided by the wide extent of the Jewish diaspora in the Roman Empire.

Worshipping niggers is a proud Christian tradition.

>cut off their government funded foreign aid gibs
The perfect Christian thing to do! I am sure all Christian churches will be on board for it immediately!

fucking larper

Sheeeeiiiit

>worship
>a saint

and this is totally going to happen while the west is guided by christian morality, right?!?

can one of you christfaggots who claimed the bible has predicted literally everything weigh in on that? I want to see exactly how deluded you are

WTF? I hate Hitler now!

This is not about Christianity. Nazism objects to analytic philosophy. Atheism is a product of the latter.

Think about it like this: Color is not a property of the universe, it is a product of your mind. When your eye sensors radiation and propagate signals to your brain, and when your brain then creates this mental image of color, that is what you experience. Your whole experience exist within this mental projection of the external world.

What is then the foundation of morality? Subjective feelings of conscience, or objective logical arguments? Cristian morality is based on conscience, that is subjectivity. Marxism is based on objective morality, the idea that we can deduce moral truths from analytical thinking.

Nazism is more circumstantial. It argues that people have different internal representation of the world with a biological foundation. This creates racial differences in the foundation of morality. To create a harmonious society we must then purge it of people with a different racial psyche.

It is not a question of truth, but a question of what you found your truth on.

The story of Christ = Birth, Death, Resurrection = Paganism, the worship of the natural world. Worship of the sun ie the risen savior = paganism. Christianity uses old pagan beliefs that have been institutionalized this is why Christianity has has so much success through the ages. Pagan religion + institutionalizing it = Great success. sorry tho I dont trust the sneaky jew that controls christianities institutions, history and future. Jesus was a jew. Who controls the past, who controls the present, controls the future

Why do semites love their semantics so much?

race is way more than color newfag. lurk moar.

>post something factually incorrect
>Bah! just semantics!
Nigger, show your flag

You're such a good Christian, user!

It's called a hyperbole, user. It's a fact that Christianity and Christians have always been fond of their little nigger pets - a fact that contradicts the OP's delusion of a possible uncucked Christianity.

Hitler was Lutheran sent by god to be the second Martin Luther. He was not Catholic that is typical Catholic revisionism. When Hitler was on his deathbed surrounded by Goebbels, Eva, Himmler, Goering, etc. Jesus Christ himself climbed put of the ceiling and brang him up to heaven. Now he is hanging out with Luther, Jesus and God up in heaven looking down on us.

You just proved my point and you keep posting pictures of subversion as if they truly represented what they use to stand for. Christianity was never suppose to be multi cultural and race mix and it was punishable by death.

Matthew 7:6
Ezekiel 33:6
2 Peter 2
Joshua 23:7
Deuteronomy 23:2

The bible warned of blacks and how dangerous they are.
Exodus 23:29
Leviticus 26:22
Jonah 3:7-8

And it warned of the subversion Christianity is facing now.
Isaiah 1:7

Tolerance of this "progressive Christianity" and tolerance itself is condemned in Christianity.

"He who is not angry, whereas he has reason to be, sins. For unreasonable patience is the hot bed of many vices, it fosters negligence, and incites not only the wicked but the good to do wrong,"

>quoting leviticus
you do know thats the old testament code of laws for jews that they made for themselves, not the word of jesus right?

- "it is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence" - Martin Luther

Luther hating the Jews does not somehow prove him correct, unless you believe muslims are correct becqause they hate jews

>neither male nor females
I knew it! Traps are not gay!!

That quote means before God itself, not before any man on this earth.

everyone has some redeemable characteristics. for muslims hating gays and jews is one of them.

>Christianity was never suppose to be multi cultural and race mix and it was punishable by death.
Care to explain why the jewish god you worship gave Moses' son lepracy after he rightfully complained about his father marrying a nigger sow?
Keep your last sentence in mind while answering this question.

Luther never said that, stop reading (((Catholic)))) history books.

>newfag
Newfags are the people that discovered Sup Forums around 2008. The new wave of users around 2010 we called cancer. You however, we have no word for, because there are so few people left that tolerate what this place has become. They all left years ago, so please let me congratulate you: You won! The filthy remains of Sup Forums is yours now.

kek ->also AGAIN:

covered already:


>You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!


the situation is the same with your other cites, you expect us to remove them entirely from their chapters and paragraphs to mean whatever you want them to mean
Is that the only way your religion works for you?

By removing quotes from the rest of the chapter entirely?

Why Brigham Young? You could have chosen somebody else who wasn't a degenerate Mormon. They aren't real Christians.

That's from Galatians, user. A New Testament book. Just what kind of christcuck are you that you don't know that?

Well, if this was the average post back in the day, it really is sad to see where we are now.

The Ethiopians back then were more Egyptian then nigger. Try again faggot.

Cool! That makes it a-okay then! :^)

Also
>WE WUZ KANGZ tier

> what is "AN OPEN LETTER CONCERNING THE HARD BOOK AGAINST THE PEASANTS"?

> The words of Scripture that speak of mercy apply to the kingdom of God and to Christians, not to the kingdom of the world, for it is a Christian’s duty not only to be merciful, but to endure every kind of suffering — robbery, arson, murder, devil and hell. It goes without saying that he is to smite, slay and recompense no one. But the kingdom of the world is nothing else than the servant of God’s wrath upon the wicked, and is a real precursor of hell and everlasting death. It should not be merciful, but strict, severe and wrathful in the fulfillment of its work and duty

Not even close, but here's your (you).

>What do i recommend instead of Christianity? Simple: Pragmatism

>To recognize that what matters is the here and now. That Gods won't come to save us

>That we are alone

>That only ourselves can save us

>Otherwise, it is game over

I was with you until this. It's not a solution. Christcucks are a problem but at least they're still voting right wing. Atheists overwhelmingly vote left.

>Christianity was never suppose to be multi cultural and race mix and it was punishable by death.
What did you mean by this earlier?

Essential post in all of it. I truly believe THE spider in the web of the question how it was able for the tribe to shill and subvert white European societies - was Christianity. Universalism for thee, ethnocentric, racial tribalism for me; for us, the chosen people.

And this is evident by the fact that Christian Social Democracy is the by far greatest shill for non white mass immigration into Europe, anti-racism, sacrificing our ressources for the invaders and even giving our own children to die, so their sick and perverted sense of "moral superiority" can be satisfied.

(((Christianity))) is a disgusting death cult and terminal cancer in the heart of Europe and needs to bee rooted out for good, if white Europeans are to survive this century.

>solution
>voting
Pick one.

no, it is the antichristian attitude that promotes degeneracy to defy god! even hitler and his circle preferred christianity because of its moral foundations. the jews pollute everything. christianity is no exception.

> Christcucks are a problem but at least they're still voting right wing.
> imblying

Christians make up the majority of USA population. If they didn't want the current bullshit going on, they would have voted for Goldwater or for Buchanan, yet they didn't.

They love their extremely jew-compromised politicians like Trump and Reagan that end up selling them down the road and that make no serious attempt to undo the current social demographic trends.

White Evangelians literally won't vote for a politician that does not put Israel first

I mean really, why didn't the christians of the 90s, a far more conservative time, choose Bush above Buchanan? he didn't think Israel was above America, so what? it makes no sense

they are more interested in bringing above the end of the world through Israel than actually saving their country


Then you have the situation in Europe, where atheistic countries can be right-wing (Czechia) or left-wing (Sweden), and the same with Christian-majority countries (Poland vs Ireland in this example)

Blood, soil, loyalty, strength and honour. Sadly those are concepts absolutely alien to the US state. And it's not new. There's a reason why the tribe flourished in the USA like nowhere before. And why he could ally with bolshevism to kill other Europeans for their victory.

>even hitler and his circle preferred christianity
Why are you repeately invoking Hitler when you can't answer my question from earlier:

What is anti-Christian about what Merkel is doing?

how did Jews pollute a cult they themselves created?

heck, before Paul, Christianity was just a normal jewish sect founded by the brother of Jesus

Stop being an ignorant larper in every single post, it's embarassing. And Hitler despised Cucktianity. Rightfully so. Read Tabletalks and what he actually said about it in private.

It's because he's just a Larper, user.

Merkel is the highly religious daughter of a protestant pastor that repeatedly named her faith as the base for her motives and actions. Same with so many. But talking to burger laprers about their sandgod is like talking to a wall.

tabletalk is not a valid sauce. the kikes fabeicated anne frank. you seriously think they couldnt fake that? jews hate christians first and the most which is why they make faggots like you and most christians assume he was a antichristian satanist.