Should France become a monarchy?

Should France become a monarchy?

Yeah, duh. It all went downhill for France and western civilisation since the revolution

They'd need another coup first.

frogs are coward scum that don't deserve their own country

yeah it wouldn't be much worse than now to be honest

Franks are the greatest people living on this planet.

They have a serious problem with their lefties crazy how bad it's got.

that's not very nice user :3

nah. the only way to have anything close to a king is an elected autocrat like Putin.

French people is a mix of Gauls (so Celts), Romans and Germanic peoples (Franks for the most part), Gauls being the biggest part of the mix, so we aren't really Franks

Becoming a monarchy has literally only disadvantages. It makes a country look backward. A monarch doesn't really do anything. It's just a vastly overpaid mascot that lives in a palace on tax payers' money. Plus you have to finance the entire family, all princes, princesses and their cousins, their bastard children, etc. etc. etc.

No, they should become an Islamic theocracy.. and they will.

>Franks
in orange

No. Literally one of the worst places to establish a monarchy. Maybe a constitutional one would work but absolutism is totally out of the question. It would be about as retarded as establishing a monarchy in the USA.

Even if it would be stupid, France has been shit ever since it got rid of the king

Dont ask if France should go monarchy but what dynasty should they choice. So Bourbon or Napoleon?

The less soulless republics the better.

>Taking political advice from Germans

Basically you're wrong on everything (no surprise). The royal family actually makes money here. You can also give them power, rather than making them mascots.

They're also more accountable than your shadowy consortium of oligarchs and career politicians.

>It would be about as retarded as establishing a monarchy in the USA.
Or in the Roman Republic.

It still wasn't very great under the king. Lots of the peasantry were starving, really the only thing that was better was the army.
Monarchy was tried after the revolution and didn't work very well anyway and the policies from that monarchy was one of the leading factors of the Paris Commune.

Rome was a kingdom before it became a republic, it had history. The US was founded upon liberty and all that gay shit and a monarch is pretty much the antithesis to that.

>said the faggot with his failed country's flag

The ethnos that founded the USA existed before 1776. That Anglo-Saxon Colonial breed is more fundamental than the particular political expression it opted for during the rebellion. And Rome's monarchical past did not make it easy for the Julio-Claudians to establish their inherited power, far from it. Monarchy is to a large extent instinctive in humanity. Read Sir James George Frazer's "Golden Bough", on sacral kingship.