Let me dispel any rumors you have about anarchism. Im a PhD who teaches at a state school who specializes in anarchism and Marxist theory.
Im aware that this is a very right wing forum and I'd like to share your thoughts with my class the common criticisms of anarchism, since most of my students are either leftists or too scared to dissent. Lets start a conversation fellas.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
archive.fo
archive.is
archive.fo
archive.fo
archive.fo
archive.fo
twitter.com
Nobody gives a fuck commie scum. You're not human your life is worthless.
>PhD who teaches at a state school
not a thing.
state schools can't afford phd professors and your flag gives you away as being uneducated.
that's one.
two, anarchy is a form of economics, not governance.
that's economics 101.
/thread
>protip: don't post it again.
Fuck off commie scum. Your kind is one of the worst.
>Im a PhD who teaches at a state school who specializes in anarchism and Marxist theory.
Ah yes, I see you are retarded
Fuck off
could you, in your best way, describe what happened here?
You'll get the bullet with the rest of them.
Now fuck off, subversive.
Sure anarchy's pretty good.
If it has private property and anyone who'd violate the NAP is killed, that is.
Anarchy and Marxism are exact opposites you idiot.
>Im a PhD who teaches at a state school who specializes in anarchism and Marxist theory
hi, my name is dr. emilio lizardo and i'm interested in your ideas. please leave your name and ss# so that i can subscribe to your newsletter.
Why are niggers retarded from an anarchist perspective?
>state schools can't afford phd professors and your flag gives you away as being uneducated.
obviously that's not a thing since I'm evidence of the contrary
>two, anarchy is a form of economics, not governance.
that's economics 101.
Anarchy is the state of having no unjustified hierarchies, it has an economic theory but that's not the whole story.
the supposed "left" party runs a candidate who is a card carrying global capitalist. What did they expect?
what a fag. go back to leftypol
Exactly how much work do you think is available to someone with a Ph.D in anarchism and Marxist theory?
They aren't the same but they're certainly related. Both are leftist and both have the same end goal which is a moneyless stateless society
Many reasons. Mostly it's due to colonialism, but yes some of it is genetic mainly due to living in an environment that provided them with food (fruits). They didn't have toil with the soil as much as say, the Europeans or the north east asians
Why did your little movement begin to protest the second Trump sworn into office ?
Im a Professor of Philosophy at a state school. My main interests, what I mainly right about and teach about is Marxism and anarchism.
two people cannot own something similtaneously
collective property is logicallly impossible
your entire philosophy is built on false premises and you are retarded
What is your thought on race/culture ?
Do you honestly believe in multiculturalism, and if so (if forced) then where has it ever been implemented with good results ?
...
I take the Chomsky approach to this. Protesting and attacking people does nothing except make us look like the bad guys.
>what I mainly right about and teach about is Marxism and anarchism.
I find it very difficult to believe you are in fact a Professor of anything, given the exceptionally poor quality of your grammar. I'll watch a while before deciding what I think you are.
Just give me an article and you just lost the game
>Im a PhD who teaches at a state school who specializes in anarchism and Marxist theory.
Proof with a timestamp faggot
Otherwise LARP somewhere else
simultaneously* id call myself retarded but i and u are right next to each other
>two people cannot own something similtaneously
What is marriage?
>your entire philosophy is built on false premises and you are retarded
List some of those
I think it definitely matters and plays a role in how people think. Ideally I'd like to see such distinctions done away with, but realistically the communes of the future are going separated across racial lines
how does it feel after all that school and work to be called a faggot on Sup Forums trying to standup for your jewish agenda
that's an incredibly stupid statement
but i know that if i debate it i'll get waterfalled by semantics that i'm not familiar with
two people can very well own something simultaneously
What are your thoughts on the EU and the concept of the type of neo-colonialism we see forming today, where international institutions like the EU, African Union, UN, Nato, Who, Unesqo and other organisations use cultural marxism to steal money for their own lobbyists investment projects ?
How come Antifa served as the advocate for the EU during Brexit and the French, German and Dutch election. How come they still support these kinds of internationalized unions?
Why am I evil because I'd prefer to live with my own race rather than low IQ outsiders who have very anti-social tendencies?
Sorry about my poor grammar/spelling, Im dictating my posts through siri whilst cooking
...
Here's an analogy. What is a house if it has no walls, no beams to support its roof, or a floor? That would be a random pile of planks. A pile may offer protection, in various spots at various times, but a structured house is sound.
But how come you never protested Obamas cabinet, which was much stronger in terms of both congress and parliamentary support ?
ill bite, I just finished some hw, I have time.
how does the act and labor of organizing workers in order to facilitate production work? is there a voting system? do people who are smarter and more capable organizing things get more goods?
in other words, why work harder for less?
I despise the EU as many of you well know anarchism is against large neoliberal organizations that undermine labor.
Again, Im against protesting as a means of achieving our endgoal
You're not. Im not necessarily against segregating communes along racial lines, as long as it's completely voluntary.
black and yellow > black and red.
/thread
>I think it definitely matters and plays a role in how people think. Ideally I'd like to see such distinctions done away with, but realistically the communes of the future are going separated across racial lines
Do you believe identity politics should ave replaced group identity, and wouldn't that diminish the effective strength of said working class groups and democracy ?
>Im a PhD who teaches at a state school who specializes in anarchism and Marxist theory.
Seems pretty counter-intuitive to your alleged beliefs. Oh nevermind that's right Marxists and Anarchists are the lapdogs of international finance. HAHAHA
Obama wiretapping has been confirmed, MSM 100% BTFO
WSJ is calling the Mueller shit a scam
>All Mr. Comey’s Wiretaps
archive.fo
> Did Obama Know about Comey’s Surveillance?
archive.is
The hill opinion piece reporting it as spying, look at this headline
>It looks like Obama did spy on Trump, just as he apparently did to me
archive.fo
New york post
>Wiretaps may prove Trump right — and that’s absolutely terrifying
archive.fo
Susan Rice admitted to unmasking just last week remember
>Trump rips Susan Rice over unmasking, says it’s ‘just the tip of the iceberg'
archive.fo
Meanwhile Samantha Powers was unmasking people daily
archive.fo
The normies are finally catching up
>as many of you well know anarchism is against large neoliberal organizations that undermine labor.
catalonia betrayed so many laborers that franco easily crushed them
Anarchists are fundamentally mistaken in believing that a world without unjustified hierarchies would be egalitarian. On the contrary, it woukd be extremely aristocratic. The bravest and most disciplined would be generals, the most productive and pragmatic would be CEOs, the most patriotic, selfless and judicious would be rulers, the most wise would be celebrities, etc. If this were the case these hierarchies would in fact be justified, and the people lower down the hierarchies would insist they remain in place
>a state school who specializes in anarchism
a you don't see the contradiction...
First your minions shitpost all over Sup Forums and now this? Don't try playing nice guy with me, son.
Fuck it, I'll bite.
Serious question. How can you look at history of Marxism, with one failed state followed by another, and say, "Gee...let's give it another try."
We are not talking about a bad play in football or failing an exam. Marxism has destoryed cultures. It has directly lead to the deaths of hundreds of millions of human beings and caused generations of suffering. The very risk of it happening again far exceeds any possible reward.
But you already know this. I could go into detail as to why it has always failed but I'm sure you know that too.
The problem here is that you cannot except the harsh reality. You are blinded by an ideal, a hope for utopia. Things might be shitty and there are things that need to be changed, sure. But Marxism and anarchism has always and will always make things worse.
Again, I do not agree with Obama or Trump or any government for that matter. What antifa does has nothing to do with what I teach.
To be honest with you, I think they are controlled by big money interests.
Good question.
>how does the act and labor of organizing workers in order to facilitate production work? is there a voting system?
What is produced is decided democratically by the workers themselves. Certain leaders are elected by the people to guide people in the right direction, but they'd be largely powerless. Basically what we would do is apply the democratic process we use to elect our government to the means of production ie factories offices etc.
>do people who are smarter and more capable organizing things get more goods?
Why would you want more goods? Everyone gets exactly what they need. This idea that you need massive amounts of wealth to be happy is an invention of liberalism.
>in other words, why work harder for less?
That's what we want. We want people to work only as much is required so that everyone gets their needs met. In the end we would like society to be focused on leisure rather than working.
>I despise the EU as many of you well know anarchism is against large neoliberal organizations that undermine labor.Again, Im against protesting as a means of achieving our endgoal
As am I, the problem with Antifa is that they destabilize populist elections and prevent dissent from economic and political bondage to international organizations.
Racism is just another form of discrimination, there is nothing special about it except that it is a reaction to multiculturalism, the left discriminate people based on their economy and party affiliation.
But for all intents and purposes we need to abolish the EU, this is in everyone's best interests.
>Anarchy
>Communism
Pick suicide
>What is produced is decided democratically by the workers themselves. Certain leaders are elected by the people to guide people in the right direction, but they'd be largely powerless. Basically what we would do is apply the democratic process we use to elect our government to the means of production ie factories offices etc.
someone hasnt looked at the data. you are advocating a very sexist system in which women cant vote (not that I mind)
and what is your end goal? if it's to be a complete faggot, you're there. unless you are truly retarded and cant think for yourself, theres no way you can actually believe socialism would work, or ever even get a foothold, here in the U.S.
also sage. you LARPing piece of shit.
Getting rid of capitalism would ensure that all hierarchies are justified
>Serious question. How can you look at history of Marxism, with one failed state followed by another, and say, "Gee...let's give it another try."
I can say the same thing about capitalism, really.
>Marxism has destoryed cultures. It has directly lead to the deaths of hundreds of millions of human beings and caused generations of suffering. The very risk of it happening again far exceeds any possible reward.
Capitalism does this as well.
> You are blinded by an ideal, a hope for utopia.
Capitalism is the most Utopian ideology out there my friend. The belief that anyone can become rich through hard work and that it will be 100% fair? Give me a break.
How would they not be able to vote?
the end goal is a moneyless stateless society.
why would you bother dicking around with anarchism when it's logistically impossible to implement in a large modern society? The democratic process does not work in heterogeneous populations
and we all just live on each others' niceness and high fives? how can you honestly believe that would last longer than a couple of weeks, at best?
>Again, I do not agree with Obama or Trump or any government for that matter. What antifa does has nothing to do with what I teach. To be honest with you, I think they are controlled by big money interests.
Yes, my thoughts exactly. Thanks
>Anarchy is the state of having no unjustified hierarchies
What makes a hierarchy "unjustified" or "justified"?
>I can say the same thing about capitalism, really.
Except capitalism has succeeded everywhere, there is not a single society on Earth today that isn't capitalist.
Practically speaking though, this requires people to make decisions about things they are largely ignorant of. Think about how dull-witted the average person is. Half of people are even slower than that. Imagine trying to get a shop floor to vote on whether to incorporate as an S Corp or a C Corp, and imagine you also have tight production deadlines. Imagine a snap military decision has to be made to repel an enemy advance, but a soldiers congress has to be called before the decision can be made. If you have a PhD you are likely in the top 10% of cognitive ability. Other people ARE as stupid as they seem. They watch sports and listen to kitschy pop music not because society has damaged them, but because they were born like that, with genetically limited cognitive and aesthetic potential
...
It's a front for commies, that's all we need to know. When the balloon goes up and we meet each other in the great free-for-all, you'll die like a good communist.
explain to me why is it wrong to steal
>the end goal is a moneyless stateless society.
How would that even work, we're forced into international cooperation, so there must be a system of exchange with other nations. As for internal labour, what would give workers incentive to work ?
Fuck off Bruce Smith
Fuck your beard, too
Marxist faggot
Where does freedom of association magically stop for you? Paying someone to use one's property to do any non-violent task x becomes illegitimate when/why?
Justified hierarchy: commies ruling everything
Unjustified: anything else
No, no, no, no my friend. You misunderstand capitalism. It isn't fair. It's not supposed to be. A capitalist society is one in which someone with the talent and the work ethic can succeed and move up the social ladder. It offers no promises to how far you can climb and offers nothing to those without drive or talent. It isn't fair because life isn't fair. It's not fair that some salmon are eaten by a bear. It's not fair that some seeds are blown by the wind to places they can't grow. It's not fair that some people aren't born talented enough to be a Tesla, an Einstein, or a Liebnitz. It's about the progress of the species through Darwinian Selection. Do you not believe that competition drives progress in the natural and human world's?
Secondly, do you really think people would be happy with only what they needed? Do you believe selfishness and greed can be bred/trained out of people?
Lastly, what makes you think that voting on how to run a productive enterprise is the correct way to go? What qualifies the janitor to have an equal say in how an automobile factory operates in comparison to a mechanical engineer in regards to design? Or to an accountant in regards to finance? Or to a logistics expert in regards to distributing the cars? Some people do not have the skills, education, or talent to participate in industry like that. How would these companies not go out of business or tear themselves apart from infighting?
How do you pay for leisures or what may be considered "extras"?
Its beautiful isnt it? Now that weve realized that society will do what it does we are free to do what we want.
We must break free of the chains of liberalism my brother. The existence of a free state/area today would be world news and govts around the world would be helpless at the thought of its people yearning to be free.
Missile defense systems and new technology give us a way to protect our own preferred way of life.
I hope that someday soon a commune and a fascist area can be neighbors.
i made this one night because i was bored (pic).
This is relavent, because when you make your paradise of babbling lunatics with no government or rules, whats gonna stop a foreign country from just stepping through the throw open door and taking over, rendering anarchism pointless?
because anarchism is a moral ideology from which good, libertarian policy comes.
I went there once. I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Not even Jews.
You're just making the argument for capitalism. It's got all the bad aspects of communism, except in a capitalist system people actually get fed. In Communist systems, you have to wait for 2 days to buy a paltry amount of ham. In a Capitalist system, you can wait 2 days twiddling your thumbs to buy an iPhone while you play on your old one.
And, you're free to buy land and go start a commune. I wonder why people don't do it? Probably because college "educated" Marxists don't actually labor or produce anything outside the context of academia. You have to eat the rich because you've never had to provide for yourself. You're a warm body. You're utterly useless. But im sure you'll be a card carrying member of the party after the revolution....
That's a stupid question. More places in the world than not are utterly incapable of defending themselves, yet no outside forces are preying on them.
Fuck off commie.
>implying the usa wouldn't be fucking hotcakes to the world
>implying im some commie
Who the fuck said it would be 100% fair by the way? It's fair in the sense that you have a shot. It's only Marxists who want to tinker around with the system and make it so all your blacks and browns and whites and vaginas aren't earning more than one another, inborn differences in capacity and capability be damned.
Why can't they into agriculture now?
>war with the richest people in the world who are tied to the interests of virtually every nation via global trade, and who are the most armed and aggressive people in the world is desirable for any group on earth
I AM LITERALLY KEKING RIGHT NOW
because they are black
Also you are a commie. You're a collectivist Borg hivemind faggot.
kys commie
Well, if your delusion of anarchy comes true, wouldn't this be more likely?
How does government not stealing your money make you have less guns or become poorer exactly?
Everything government does results in deadweight loss. Literally everything.
show me your degree
Including disbanding it.
You'll literally just face conquer
This is exactly what China is doing in Africa right now, you'll see
He's saying the first one to organize an army in an anarchist society would be able to take over and rule.
you're a commie who deserves to hang
that's nice kys and save me some helicopter fuel
share this
exactly
apparently i am too, for some reason.
got Double Noose™ hanging around anywhere?
lol fuck anarchy. Fucking John Locke was right on the money with his writings. Take your bullshit elsewhere. Bet you fucking hit any dissidents in your class with bike locks and auto Fs.
You aren't a real anarchist if you work at a state school.
You are supposed to hate the state.
there is no brotherhood
early christian communes lived under the assumption of near-end-of-the-world and general judgement by God.
nothing less impresive than God will make people try that hard to be equal
pretty people will get laid more, stronger people will have more 'shade', sociable people will have more friend..
rest of them will grow angry and envious, and clever people will start to cheat
all this brotherly concept is constructed by some kind of eternal-optimist with no imagination, and you teach it for money..
even in your utopia there will be caste-system
i mean if ALL of the things go right (how often that happens in real life?)
cant go up (formally), cant go down, you play with what you get born into.. loots of frogs and normies will hang themselves
seriously.. even if you commie shit will get 'properly implemented' human race will just hang themselves out of immovable sadness. nowhere to go to, nothing to aspire.
why are you trying to sell it as some kind kingdom of heaven?
You want a fella-conversation cause it gives you an intellectual boner.
Tell me this bonerman - is it worth it?
How much is worth "proper implementation"?
we know its not 100milions.. we've done that already
thats my question:
200mil ?
1000?
tell me
do you think anyone takes anarchism seriously, including anarchists?
>anarchy
>hierarchies
Pick one
That's exactly what happened to Mahno Anarchist Ukraine. That and inability to buy or produce ammunition because as soon as they heard these magnificent ideas of no property, literally all capitalists and managers self BTFO'd.
>Including disbanding it
No place in the world is like that. There are myriad governments weaker than the civilian population of single county of panhandle Florida.
k y s
c o m m i e
read above dipshit
holy shit. you're the guy with the long neck! bet you $50 you are.
>tell me this bonerman
i fucking love you top kek and all that shit
GAS THE KIKES
RACE WAR NOW
Speaking of Chomsky and Ed Herman: when they wrote "Manufacturing Consent" back in the late Eighties, they failed to foresee the rise of a Left Wing Bourgeoisie and, indeed, the State Capitalist Progressive Ruling Class that we have today, especially in the Bay Area.
As a student of Marx and the more anarchist Deviationists such as Proudhon, how do you account for this lapse, especially since Chomsky and Herman were so dead-on with "Consent"?