PAGANISM GENERAL

PAGANISM GENERAL

EDITION: MY COCK RAGES ON

ᛏᛏᛏ HAIL THE GODS, HAIL VICTORY,

This is a thread for the discussion of Paganism, the future of Homosexuality, Aryan Race, Culture, Traditionalism, Jewish Question and Christianity.

Many famous Pagans were homosexual, and societies like the Celts and the Greeks were well known for their homosexual war bands and sexual fraternity. Homosexuality, and worship of true European God's, was the natural state of man until the (((Christians))) came and destroyed our European culture.

ᛟᛟᛟ Places to start learning ᛟᛟᛟ

Varg's playlist "European Polytheism & Tradition"
>youtube.com/playlist?list=PLV1Xd_c5-wta8HSKFx15qdV5L-pm5XvZA

Survive the Jive playlist "Paganism"
>youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcroOUap-NylBcWAle2Dg_8bxpLkcSMlH

ᚦᚦᚦ Social Media ᚦᚦᚦ

Discord Code: w68tguT

Any questions, interested in learning, Christians on the edge, or just want to debate, feel free to join any of the groups above.

IMPORTANT! Before you have any questions, please check out the Q&A below:

>pastebin.com/aD6k77uh

ϟϟϟ Recommended channels and Media ϟϟϟ

Varg Vikernes
>youtube.com/user/ThuleanPerspective

Survive the Jive
>youtube.com/channel/UCZAENaOaceQUMd84GDc26EA

Midgard Rising Podcast
>soundcloud.com/odin010-010nido

Aryan Kitchen
>youtube.com/channel/UCMiZ7r52r6onVo9J5tCzNBg

Forgotten Roots
>youtube.com/channel/UCJpN-GBTchQaSVwBbefYMNg

DukeOfDurham
>youtube.com/channel/UCXrzcmZ9eIkQi-u2BPH_4ug/featured

Survival Russia
>youtube.com/user/Moscowprepper

Jackson Crawford
>youtube.com/channel/UCXCxNFxw6iq-Mh4uIjYvufg/videos

ᛟᛟᛟ PAGANISM MEGA, PDF, BOOKS, AND MORE ᛟᛟᛟ
>mega.nz/#F!MahAVQYR!M7fBxWWNIYh9fevOFHL7WQ

VSQUARED, CUTE HOMO ARYANS

>m.youtube.com/channel/UCbapiN5pkD1h7YVaCkJdOmg

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity
pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_themes_in_mythology#European_mythologies
sourcebooks.fordham.edu/pwh/gayvik.asp
independent.co.uk/news/science/atheists-more-intelligent-than-religious-people-faith-instinct-cleverness-a7742766.html
archive.is/zAcGx
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Why are LARPagans so fucking gay?

That image isn't very realistic.

Sharing strength through seed is one of the most masculine things a perosn can do. It's only (((Christianity))) and their Jew leaders who fear it because they can't control warriors in a sexual fraternity.

>the future of Homosexuality
there is no future for degenerates except a mass grave.

You've convinced me, I'll start sucking off the lads in my rugby team. For the glory of Odin ofcourse.

Fuck off (((Christian))) weakling. Homosexuality is the natural state of man. Greek philosophers wrote on the subject of homosexuality in the military. In Plato's Symposium, the interlocutor Phaedrus commented on the power of male sexual relationships to improve bravery in the military:

>... he would prefer to die many deaths: while as for leaving the one he loves in a lurch, or not succoring him in peril, no man is such a craven that the influence of Love cannot inspire him with a courage that makes him equal to the bravest born

Glorious. I will see you in the bath houses of Valhalla brother.

Why not just admit that you're an atheist that’s just read too many marvel comics?

Right Wing politics are concerned with the long-term survival of Civilization

But Christianity is only concerned with personal salvation to become part of a nebulous afterlife for which no evidence exists, and for which this world needs to be sacrificed, which is best expressed in the way early christians like Martin of Tours refused to fight enemies of their nations, insofar killing in this world could cost them heaven; this is also why more modern christians like Martin Luther said (I quote):

- "it is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence" - Martin Luther

When Jesus says "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"...

... he is not kidding, or meaning the opposite, but actually setting down a morality where the world is a lie and only the afterlife is the real deal, so destroying your life in this world, "carrying your cross" as he says, is completely logical

Sup Forums "christians" seem to believe Jesus actually meant the OPPOSITE of all that, and that Jesus wants you to defend your family, that Jesus wants you to kill your enemies, to become prosperous, well-fed and rich in this world, and to avoid persecution and death!

Only a person that does not actually believe in the Heaven for the persecuted, the meek, and the martyred would actually re-interpret Christianity as a cult of earthly power which declares "the strong shall inherit the Earth", "my kingdom is of this world" and "you must destroy the enemies of your nation"

Only some one that just wanna use Christianity as an empty shell devoid of any true religious promises would claim that Paul and Peter misinterpreted Jesus when they submitted to their enemies and died to them while praying for them, instead of fighting the romans back and establishing a crusader kingdom, thing that one would expect them to do if Jesus meant "be a fighter and impose your will on your enemies" when he said "love your enemies and lend all they need to them without expecting anything in return"

But using Christianity as a shell devoid of any religious promises simply allows its poisonous morality to survive into the next generation.

You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "I didn't come to bring peace", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing what Jesus wanted is for them to put christian morality above the good-being of their own families.

You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times)

You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!

That is not going to fly.

Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".

Christianity can't cure a disease it caused

Pagan Romans were fundamentally free of the chains of jewish power, so much that they almost exterminated them all in their own homeland after the rebellion of Bar Kocheba
It would be Christian Europe that would fall under permanent jewish influence, with the jewish-controlled churches banning europeans from financing and loaning, giving them as a monopoly to jews

By the modern era, Christians were so throughly judaized, that they started to actively wish for the restoration of Israel so that the end of the world would finally come around and their civilization would die!
And why would it be otherwise?
A religion which such obsession with death, with promise is the end of the world, is fundamentally a time-bomb in the basement of a civilization

Do you really believe that the early christians that embraced their martyrhood to the lions said to themselves "I am dying to this lion so that the white race can survive, fuck jews!" or any such anachronistic reinterpretation that you have decided to give to their death cult?

- there is no "white genocide", what is really going is white suicide, with christian morality as its main driver

the abortion issue is a perfect example of white christians openly fighting against their own interests by wanting to increase the birthrates of blacks and other democrat sub-groups that do abort
there are numerous other examples of how Christianity actively makes white self-sabotage, but this one is extremely obvious

Tell me: do you really believe that USA would be better off with twice as many blacks? (The entire South would be deep blue for starters)

- That Jews took control of european finances and loaning and then global finances by proxy, is another example of how Christian Morality screws whites over
If the Churches had not been issuing numerous bans on white christians from practising usury (which is simply a way of saying "high risk financing"), jews would have never taken over that niche market
far from destroyin them, Christianity made Jews the masters of Europe. The occasional progrom more than paid for itself

- Support for Israel is a third way Christian Morality screws whites over, and it is far from a recent occurance or corruption. As early as 1600s, puritans already believed that a jewish Israel in the middle east was a prerequisite for the Apocalypse

- Christianity does not allow for racial divisions among Christians either "there is no jew or greek" makes it quite clear. Citing Paul made extremely easy for the anti-segregation preachers of the 60s to get the majority of whites on their side

> inb4 Turning the other cheek does not mean pacifism. Letting someone else slap your face with the back of his hand was a form of social rebellion back then

no it wasn't. that shit was made up by radical black-nationalist liberal theologist Walter Wink to justify social rebellion in South Africa.

There are NO sources to it outside his books, nothing of what Josephus wrote about life in the ancient Middle East mentions anything close to offering the cheek or giving to your enemies your coat being an insult

In the Greek-Roman world, love meant "common feeling of mutual interest born out of shared experiences"

Early Christians expanded it to a commandment of loving people that we don't know, that we don't care about, just so that we can fill ourselves with misguided pride about how we are friends of mankind itself
Agape never has conveyed any sort of violent or agressive implication, as some Sup Forumslacks imply

Among christian writers it has always meant means "a selfless love that is passionately committed to the well-being of others", no implication of tough love whatsoever
see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity

Christian semantics are enough of a mess as they are, and then Sup Forums christians wanna add an extra layer of absurdity and mental masturbation: That is where the schizophrenia of right-wing christians kicks in
Only a christian could claim something as absurd as love for his enemies
Only a right-wing christian could take that absurdity to the next level by killing his enemies while declaring his love for them. So here they want us to believe that the Crusaders loved every single damn person that they slaughtered in Constantinople
Because, according to Sup Forums christians, Love is not about shared interest, it is about telling to yourself "how I love that guy" right before cutting his head off (mental masturbation, really)

dude, if you wanna hate your enemies, just do that, and stop mentally masturbating about how better and so much more heaven-deserving you are than your enemies because you somehow declared that you loved him while killing him

> le pope is le anti-Pope meme
> le christianity is corrupted meme
Question for Sup Forums "christians" claiming that the Pope is the anti-Christ

How would you prove that interpretation of "do not resist evil" by Pope or any mainstream christian leader is twisted, corrupted and out of context?
The context of the story is how christians should behave the opposite of gentiles, who love their friends and families, and hate their enemies

The larger context is a Gospel where all the main figures mentioned allowed their enemies to kill them without slaying them back: Jesus, Peter, Paul

What is true context of the paragraph?
How do you turn "Do not resist evil" into "FUCK OFF MUSLIMS!"?
YOU are the Anti-Christ, Christian of Sup Forums. You deny the words of Jesus because you don't wanna give up your earthly interests.
You "christian" people of Sup Forums/ seem to believe that Paul the Pharisee and Peter the Jew the grabbed their swords and killed the romans that wanted to execute them, come on

They were well aware that their religion demanded them to be submissive to their enemies and finally die to them, that is exactly the lesson they wanted the goyim to learn
Look, I know that you actually don't believe in the whole "infinite treasures in Heaven" thing, so you are trying to justify fighting for survival in this world where you can get actual treasures, but don't try to rewrite history please

I pray to Odin and Ragnar so that my peen gets raped by an army of thich blonde golden arse battle maidens.

>Its just like Jesus, fuckers never answer.

This guy gets it.

Christianity is a Jewish invention forced upon the European man because the Jews knew they could not control the homosexual pagan warrior. A group of virile men, in sexual fraternity with one another, has no equal.

Jewry feared this, and knew than men sharing strength through seed was unconquerable. They forced their kike religion on us in order to break the homosexual bond of brothers that pagan Europe was known for.

But it ends soon. Already brother is laying with brother once again. Christianity's grasp on the west is failing.

Christianity is anti-traditionalist in the biological sense, it has no worldy interest in our beings as animals
Everything animal about the human being is considered sinful

Paul was anti-natalist, as things like wife and family would get in the way of getting people to worship his jewish god.

If unmarried men followed the words of Paul, there would no be any civilization to begin with, people would stop marrying as it would interfere witgh their mental masturbation being a "good person" by telling others that they will go to hell

See:
> 8 Now to the unmarried men and women, and for the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.
> Are you free from such a commitment? Do not look for a wife.
> 32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— 34 and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord’s affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. 35 I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord.
t. Paul the Pharisee

Paul makes it EXTREMELY CLEAR that the main concern for every christian is the spread of this virus-like cult at the expense of their own tribe, and his main worry is that Christians may not devote 100 % of their time to the spread of the cult
Jesus made it even clearer:

> "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't become my follower me"- Jesus

the organic self-sustaining self-interested self-preserving society that Sup Forums wants is fundamentally incompatible with the "do not save for tomorrow, leave your family and spread my cult" dogma that both Jesus and Paul saw as the main duty of a christian

If his Kingdom is of this World, as Sup Forums Christians claim... if Christianity is a religion of earthly power, why didn't it save the Western Roman Empire then? Why did Saint Augustine wrote that it was not a christian concern the existence or not of wordly kingdoms?

Why were Christians unable to save even their fucking holy land from the Muslims, if they are the religion of earthly power that you believe they are?
Why is the North Africa now muslim, if it was once christian and roman?

That they didn't manage to screw things completely over was an accident of history, not for lack of trying

and most importantly of all questions, why has Christianity become an enabler of the muslim invasion of Europe, if it is such religion of earthly power and "the strong will inherit the Earth" as you seem to believe?
why are all the christian mainstream churches pro-refugee, if christian doctrine says "hate your enemy, and do not lend to them all they want" instead of the opposite as you claim?

The strange thing is that "christians" like you are a minority within Christianity itself that they claim to represent, with everyone from the Pope to the Anglican Churches to the Protestant Churches actively cucking for the destruction of the West
The Pope literally points to the same verses that I do to justify his doctrine, yet you come here to tell me that he is wrong, and I am wrong, and even damn Jesus and paul were wrong tho, because some medieval crusader decided to recreate christianity as a earthly cult of power in order to sack Constantinople!

Saying Christianity is jewdized is retarded. Under pagan Rome, Jews enjoyed full citizen rights, as in most of the pagan world, including Greece, Syria, etc. However, once Christianity became a political power, around the 4-5th centuries, Rome made it illegal for Christian citizens to practice Jewish customs, and even turned many pagan practices into Christian traditions.

By the turn of the 11th century, most European nations were already Christian and totally different from rabbinic or Talmudic Judaism. In fact, no christian nation has ever historically adapted anything from Judaism. (Which is why I use the term Christian values, not Judeo-Christian, as that never existed). There was no commonality in the practice of these two religions. Even the interpretation of biblical laws were different. In fact, even Jesus himself condemned the Jews of his day and all their unbiblical or extrabiblical laws. Jesus was one of the biggest opponents of "Jews", which is why they passionately hated him.

By the 16th century, many European countries already had a history of expelling Jews or making them pay extra fines/taxes to live there. Most Jews didn't enjoy full citizenship rights either.

The only reason why "Jews" have been able to get such power, wealth, etc, in these recent past centuries is because they hate Christians. Their whole purpose of gaining global power and influence is to destroy Christianity and Christendom (the Western world), or White people, who are the ones who spread Christianity to other peoples.

Jews were able to live with pagans because they mutually did not pose a threat to each other. They stayed separate for the most part, e.g. kept to themselves (in designated communities, e.g. Greece, Syria, etc). When Christianity came to the forefront, the world was turned upside down, and Christianity gained the most influence in every aspect of life. This turned certain "Jews" in power to become anti-christ, just as when Jesus himself came.

> le Jesus was violent this one time so we have to ignore "love your enemies" meme xDDDD

Sup Forums christians are right that Jesus didn't promice peace and niceness, he promised suffering and war. The core of the issue is what are the targets of the sword of violence he promises:

- people of your own household. Father against Son. Mother against Daughter
- money changers that were not hurting him or attacking any of his followers at all, and were the only way people that lived in a far away places of the empire could exchange their money to local currency and donate to the temple. Money changing has nothing to do with Money Lending. Money lending would not become the main economic function of Jews until 600 years later, when the Church banned the goyim from high-risk financing

For your enemies, he wants you to love them and to lend them everything they expect to you. When his enemies arrived to arrest him, Peter tried to defend himself with the sword. Jesus reprimanded him for misunderstanding him, and then promised that Peter would deny him 3 times that night .

And why would Peter do otherwise? Peter realized that he would die: "holy fuck he really wants us to die for him, his kingdom really is not of this world"

Of course he was going to fear for his life. He realized that Christians were never supposed to get power. The religion never worked like that. His kingdom is NOT of this world. That is why Paul didn't try to create a crusader state. Because the only stable, non self-contradicting position christianity can take is the one of a pacifist paranoid minority that is protected by the weapons of someone with will to power.

"The meek will inherit the Earth" becomes a declaration of suicide when adopted by the strong

Jews are a very successful group that has become successful by monopolising finances through ethnic networking and promoting ideologies that demonize their own actions so that the goyim won't copy their success
so they promote anti-nationalistic Communism among the goyim while endorsing Zionism for themselves
that is why they promoted universalist Christianity among the goyim while keeping Judaism for themselves, and including it as the Old Testament within Christianity, so that they would remain the most important people of the world.
So there is no real contradiction once you understand how Jews work: Do as I say (Christianity), not as I do (Judaism, Old Testament).
then christians wonder why Jews dominate them!

One of the many amazing prophecies of Jesus Christ from the Old Testament is that of verse 1 from Psalm 22:

>"O God my God, look upon me: why hast thou forsaken me?"

Many people have said, "Jesus said God has forsaken him on the cross, how could he be the Messiah?"
Jesus was invoking Psalm 22 on the cross. The Psalm was wrote around 1,000 years before Christ was born.

This is significant because a few verses later in the same Psalm it says this:

>"They have pierced my hands and feet."

Some renderings have it;

>"they have torn holes in my hands and my feet"

Strange. It would appear that Jesus Christ invoked a Psalm wrote 1,000 years before He was born that seemed to tell of His very unique death, crucifixion; which did not even exist at the time Psalm 22 was wrote.

Psalm 22 goes on to say:

>"They parted my garments amongst them; and upon my vesture they cast lots."

This is another strange coincidence. It is known that the Roman soldiers gambled, or "cast lots" on Christ's garments as He was being crucified. If Christ was utterly out of His depths and defeated; why does this Psalm--that was invoked as He was in unimaginable pain--foretell of exact circumstances of the very death He was experiencing? Circumstances that no one could have known?

Not only this, Psalm 22 ends by foretelling the great rise of Christendom, which was achieved based on the very death that Christ Himself was experiencing, that the Psalm undeniably addresses:

>"All the ends of the earth shall remember, and shall be converted to the Lord: And all the kindreds of the Gentiles shall adore in his sight."

Remember, at the time of Christ, only one tribe was expecting a Messiah. This Psalm called forth by Christ on the cross predicts His death to an exactitude, and it just happens to predict the unprecedented worldwide conversion based on this death.

How do atheists explain this away?

maybe because (((battle maidens))) is just modern hollywood bullshit like the horned helmets were in the europ paintings

> BUT le JEWsus was BASED and his teachings were corrupted by KIKES meme

Literally all the followers of Jesus, and Jesus himself were kikes.

Among his followers there were many zealots, the most radical jews of them all, that wanted wars against Rome
But sure, he was "le anti-semite non-kike that kikes hated" right?

Now you are going to talk about how he disagreed with pharisees or whatever.

But why would the pharisees be discussing mosaic law with a non-jew? Never mind, what exactly did he denounce the pharisees for that makes him not a kike? Have you actually read the Gospel?

Can you point to a single value that Jesus denounced that wasn't valid?

Because the denounciations of Jesus were idiotic, insane, even marxist
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to punish a slut! (Jesus didnt like slut shaming, quite liberal if you ask me!)
There he denounces the rich pharisees and promises the earth to the meek and the poor! (... and marxist)
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to live, instead of embracing death like him!
There he denounces them over a disagreement on how Mosaic Law is applied! (but Jesus was not a Jew I swear!!!)

You blindly may say "he disagreed with the kikes" as if that was something we needed to applaud!
I have to ask you "christians" of Sup Forums, what are these supposed teachings of Jesus that supposedly got corrupted by kikes? "Hate your enemies"? "Save treasures for tomorrow"? "DO resist evil"?

The opposite of everything Jesus said?
I mean really, is "but kikes killed Jesus" your only argument?

Muslims are hated by Jews as well, but Jews are smart enough to use them as a tool. The same way they use the insane anti-morality of Christianity to corrupt the ancient world and give themselves a privileged financial spot!

But if Jews don't like the own poison they created, that means that we shall drink it, according to you!
wtf I guess I love ISIS now!

(((Christianity))), and heterosexuality, are the two biggest evils forced upon the European man.

> le Christianity made the west meme

absolute insane nonsense

western law system are based off Roman Law, which existed before Christianity existed
western languages are based on indoeuropean languages, Malta is the only western country with semitic languages root

Most of the religious symbolism of the West is pagan as well, christian trees, easter, etc
heck, the american constitution never ever mentioned Jesus anywhere, and has the separation of state and church as one of its most explicit declarations

the founding fathers and most of western people for the last 1000 years have been deists. Whenever they tried to take Jesus seriously, things went wrong very fast.

> le Christianity didn't hamper Europe's science meme xD

why did Islam get ahead of Europe then?

> it... it didn't... I swear

Why is our world for complex mathematics ALGEBRA then? Did you think that europeans just tho it was a pretty word or what?

> bu... but the Gallileo, Copernicus, Servetus and all the other scientists that the Church persecuted were christians and even talked well of the kike Jesus!!!

see: pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/
> According to the poll, just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power; specifically, 33% of scientists say they believe in God, while 18% believe in a universal spirit or higher power.
Now that not being a christian is not a death sentence, most scientists don't give a fuck about pretending to worship a kike

> lol you are dumb, Europe took over the World thank to Christianity xDD

Then why didn't Europe take over the World during the Middle Ages, during the peak of the Church, when Islamic Armies had a string of victories from Egypt to Jerusalem to the Balkans and Greece, which they occupied for 400 years?
Europe took over the Americans in the 1500s, during a time where the power of the Church was collapsing because of the Protestant Reform, and the renewed interest in greek-roman culture had grown a product of the Renaissance.
Europe took over the Africa and Asia in the 1800s, after the French Revolution had destroyed the remaining power of the Church, and industrial revolution, followed by the scientific revolution, had demolished most of the dogmas of the Churches.

> le Jesus wanted you to use swords against your enemies meme xDDD

Jesus stopped his followers from actually using any sword to attack their enemies, and reprimanded them for misunderstanding. When Peter realized that he would go "holy fuck he really wants us to die for him, his kingdom is not of this world" and denied him 3 times.
You may notice that Jesus made two sword references: the second sword reference was very explicit about what would be the target of the christian sword: Jesus didn't promise war against your enemies (that would contradict everything Jesus had said up to this point).

He promised war against your own damn family: "I do not come to bring peace, but to set a man against his own household"
Which is exactly that historically happened, Christians were extremely successful at killing each other and killing white pagans, all while completely failing to recover their Holy Lands from Muslims.
The sack of Constantinople by Christians and the Wars of Reformation between Catholics and Protestants weakened Europe so much that Muslims would occupy the balkans for 500 years,

All of this comes from the fact that Christianity is an inversion of reality, and the only way to claim otherwise is to actively ignore everything Jesus said except 3 or 4 quotes entirely removed from their follow-up verses or any context whatsoever.
You really believe that Paul was supposed to slaughter the Romans and create a crusader state of This World?? That all those christian martyrs got their own damn cult wrong?

Sup Forums christians are extremely deluded people that wanna follow the commands of a Jew that promised to make their families divide and even asked them to hate themselves and their own families (!!!!) so that they may perhaps-- have a slight chance of worshiping a Jewish War God for the rest of eternity

>they dont come because Im not dark/arab enough

>Paganism general

This is the jewiest divide and conquer technique. If you fall for this meme, you deserve to be the goodest goy

I already pointed numerous examples of how Christian Morality itself sabotages white survival
Do you really believe that USA would be better off with twice as many blacks as it has now?
Abortion alone has split black birthrate in a half, otherwise we would be talking about african levels of black birthrates

What do i recommend instead of Christianity? Simple: Pragmatism
To recognize that what matters is the here and now. That Gods won't come to save us
That we are alone
That only ourselves can save us
Otherwise, it is game over

And Jesus is not going to cry about it, why would he? All he wants is to abolish the Earth and create a paralel dimension where everyone worships him 24 / 7
Our desires of this world, our need to fly and colonize the stars: Gone

I find it interesting that for something "divinely inspired" Christianity does not give us any insight into the Universe. If the Bible had mentioned there are 8 planets in this System, that there are worlds beyond that we can actually inhabit, that Stars are made of Hydrogen, which is part of what water is composed... May be then I would be believe "holy fuck it really is God-inspired!!!"
If Paul had made some huge scientific discovery thanks to this "revelation from the creator of the Universe", I would actually give this pharisee some credit
But all we got is endless pages of social critique, about how rich is evil, strong is evil, resisting evil is evil

I can guarantee you, there isn't a single chapter of the Gospel that I can quote that you would not call left-wing nonsense if it was said by a modern leftist instead of Jesus
(with the probable exception of some of the very trippy chapters of the Revelation)

Hahaha look the hetro-pussy Christians are too afraid to reply to your glorious wall of copy pasta.

This is why they will lose, they are weak, may your battle brother drain your seed well tonight brother.

>EDITION: MY COCK RAGES ON

You keep using the same title.
It should be a different edition every time.

to argue that Christianity can ever unify whites is just ahistorical

the core of the issue is that the Gospel describes a suicidal way of living, and christians have to carefully choose what to believe or not to believe, so there is a LOT, and I mean A LOOOOOOOOOT of cherry-picking and "this is the right interpretation and everyone else is a heretic"

even here in the Sup Forums, at the slightest disagreement over a quote by Jesus, the supposed unifier of the white race, the 1500s and 1600s get repeated all over as catholics and protestants call each other heretic
The only time where most of the population of Europe was unified under one single head of state was during the peak of the pagan roman emperors

it is only the rise of securalism that has allowed italian catholics and protestant swedes to ignore their differences and join the European political project, which, even if dominated by cucked politicians right now, have the chance to do a lot more for whites (Visegrád Group, which includes atheist Czechia)

...

>How do atheists explain this away?
Simple, when you write shit down after it happened it's easy to tell what happens next.

Fuck, I hate this guy. I don't know if it's the actor himself, or the pathetic rat he plays on the show, but I just want to break his fucking face.

Have you run out of copy pasted replied, because twenty in a row want great and all, but I'd like to see some more.

Atheism is a Jewish invention, btw.

> at least Christcucks vote for the right in USA

Christians make up the majority of USA population. If they didn't want the current bullshit going on, they would have voted for Goldwater or for Buchanan, yet they didn't.

They love their extremely jew-compromised politicians like Trump and Reagan that end up selling them down the road and that make no serious attempt to undo the current social demographic trends.

White Evangelians literally won't vote for a politician that does not put Israel first
I mean really, why didn't the christians of the 90s, a far more conservative time, choose Bush above Buchanan? he didn't think Israel was above America, so what? it makes no sense

they are more interested in bringing above the end of the world through Israel than actually saving their country

>Not wanting to suck his cock dry for strength as the All-father taught

(((Christian))) detected

>I actually quickly uploaded the first pic I saw but now that I look closely holy fuck! nordic women look like fucking transvestis kek

> who is Diagoras of Melos?
> who is Paul?

Greeks made atheism, a Jewish pharisee made Christianity

DEUS VULT

>makes this thread at 5 AM in the hope no anons will be awake to btfo him
>look mom! i'm trolling these racist heathens again!

Christian Morality attacks the foundations of the monarchy and capitalism, thus its spirituality is left-wing

Jesus saying that for the rich, powerful, strong (i.e. a monarch) it is almost impossible to go to Heaven, while the poor will inherit the Earth, you have a recipe for spiritual marxism that will become the real deal as soon as the Church losses its ability to prevent people from reading the Gospel directly
Under Christianity, a hobo is holier than the king, a beggar is holier than an entrepreneur, that contradiction can't last, and it didn't last

It is not an accident Europeans were the first people to violently remove their monarchs to replace them with utopian ideologies

YES FELLOW MAGAPEDE SLAY
DAUS VAULT
D
A
U
S

V
A
U
L
T

It should probably be noted that almost every single major figure in the atheist movement is Jewish. You could make a compelling argument that atheism is specifically being pushed by Jews in today's society, and they seem to largely be targeting western Christians and only them.

For example, Sam Harris, Chapman Cohen, David Silverman, Michael Newdow, Gregory Epstein, Sherman Wine, Bill Maher, Eric Kaufmann, and of course, Richard Dawkins's mother has a Jewish surname and was stated to have lived in the only Jewish suburb of the city she grew up in. But he hasn't explicitly named her religion.

But that's only a tiny part of the list. We could discuss the Jewish atheists who aren't pushing atheism so much as atheism-enabling political views like Marxism. For example Soklonikov, Trotsky, Deutscher, Lenin, Uritsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev and Sverdlov.

And what about atheist Jewish public entertainers that constantly run down Christianity? We can go ahead and recycle Bill Maher here and also include Jon Leibowitz, Stephen Fry, Woody Allen, Rob Reiner, Daniel Radcliffe, Larry David, David Silverman, and... I'm sure I'm close to the post cap, so rather than just name the rest of Hollywood, you get the point.

PURE COINCIDENCE though.

Secular Jews being secular jews does not change the fact that atheism predates Christianity by 500 years, and, unlike Christianity, it is greek in origin

An atheist does not need to give a fuck about what any secular jew has to say, as atheist does not imply any dogmatic belief system to begin with

Do you happen to have books or articles that explain this subject in depth? I'm very interested in learning more.

>It's just a coincidence that modern atheists and Jews are virtually indistinguishable

Every time.

> le republican vote meme

>that OP and OP's posts

>Glorious. I will see you in the bath houses of Valhalla brother.
kek
homopaganism bong poster is my favorite poster

>atheism correlates with iq
>jews are atheist
checks out

>Glorious. I will see you in the bath houses of Valhalla brother.

lmfao made me kek.

what are these ᛏᛏᛏ and why do I always see people spamming them in the GTA Online chat?

I really need an answer pls

This is the gayest, most retarded,dumb fucking hipster bullshit I've ever read

>Paul was anti-natalist
Wrong, God says "be fruitful and multiply".

>Christianity is anti-traditionalist in the biological sense
"Be fruitful and multiply and take a virgin wife of your own people."

Satanic pagan lies debunked in 1 minute.

>what are these ᛏᛏᛏ and why do I always see people spamming them in the GTA Online chat?


the're pagan runes LARPers and crypto faggots love to use them because muh heritage.

Also, if the Jews really did try to suppress this, then why are they pushing the LGBT+ agenda so aggressively in the 21st century? I'm honestly curious.

>rollo
noice, he's like my great great great great (30 something more greats) grandfather

>Goldwater
Republican votes plunged when Goldwater ran because he was a kike rat. Christians don't want Christ-rejecting Jews to run things.

Don't forget Jewish atheist prophet Christopher Hitchens.

It's the phallic rune. You and your brothers in battle scratch them on each other as you drain their cum to gain their strength and protection from Odin.

note the derogatory use of the word prophet, as if subconsciously knowing their belief system is inferior and wanting to drag down atheism to the same level.

Paul [the founder of your religion] was wrong then?

> tfw "christians" debunk the Gospel using the Jewish Torah

>You and your brothers in battle scratch them on each other as you drain their cum to gain their strength and protection from Odin.

lol about that.

> David F. Greenberg

Christians quoting Jews!!!

What a surprise!

/s

I'm glad Charlemagne killed so many of you niggers. God bless him.

Christianity is one of the four cornerstones of Western civilization that helped propel them beyond chinks and studies have shown that there's a strong inverse correlation with IQ and the number of gods you believe in. White people didn't give up paganism for Christianity for no reason, they did it for the same reason so many have given up Christianity now.

>/s
Get the fuck out of here and never come back
>>>/reddit/

> there's a strong inverse correlation with IQ and the number of gods you believe in.

kek, a subtle way of saying that atheists are smarter

...

#trigerred

>kek, a subtle way of saying that atheists are smarter
Multiply with 0 and see what happens, lol.

do you have any proofs for your claims pal?

#faggot

> quoting more books instead of actually referring any saga, aka actual primary sources

> so much that your second quote is filled to the brim with "may be", "probably", "suggests" and weasel words

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_themes_in_mythology#European_mythologies

The sagas in the Old Norse language include no stories of gay or lesbian relationships, nor direct reference to LGBT characters, but they do contain several instances of revenge enacted by men accused of being a passive partner in intercourse, which was considered "unmanly" behavior and thus a threat to a man's reputation as a leader or warrior.[35]

Of course
sourcebooks.fordham.edu/pwh/gayvik.asp

independent.co.uk/news/science/atheists-more-intelligent-than-religious-people-faith-instinct-cleverness-a7742766.html

go be a moron somewhere else

Archive please
archive.is/zAcGx

Lol, you're such a little liar. 1 Corinthians 7 is saying that you SHOULD take a wife or a husband and love them and never depart from them, but if you don't -- if you're a widow or if you can't marry -- then that is also OK.

>Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.

>But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.

>For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.

He's saying we're all different and even though not everyone will marry, this has nothing to do with your salvation. Not everyone can live up to God's word perfectly, and Paul saw it as his call to spread God's word rather than have his own family. We know from Genesis that God commands us to be fruitful and multiply.

READ YOUR BIBLE.

>Loki was literally a transgender
You live in denial heathen.

>heathen

great what's worse a deus vult LARPer or a pagan crypty faggot?

thats just spreading misinformation. that was written by a christian and spread by a jew.

like the user in a previous thread said "thats like asking burger king what are macdonalds burgers like"

>Loki, Odin, Thor, all cross-dress or do womanly things like seidr
n-nohomo though..

I remember when I was 13 too

>Pagans
>Reading

You are outright ignoring what he says to unmarried men

Why don't you post the rest of the paragraph?

>7 Now for the matters you wrote about:

> “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.”

> 2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. 3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4 The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. 5 Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
> 8 Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say:

> It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.

> 9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
> 10 To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband... etc

The key bits that explain the anti-human nature of Christian morality are right there
> “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.”
> 8 Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say:
> It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.

Do you really believe that?

That being a virgin is ultimately a good, moral thing?

Where Paul is coming from in this subject is quite explicit: he thinks of marriage, at best, as a necessary evil for some men, at worst, an obstacle for the worship of the jewish God

and it is not "my interpretation", it is what he is literally saying

...

if anything, they would be bisexual

Christian obsession with homos is quite a thing to watch

>That guy who has been coming into every single pagan thread for over a year, posting a reference to that book written by the homosexual leftist claiming Odin drank semen from dead men to gain wisdom.

I swear, it's one guy doing it. He / she must be THE most butthurt christfag in the universe. The supposition that Odin drank semen is totally speculated, there's no historical source. But that christposter though... Such butthurt.

>The supposition that Odin drank semen is totally speculated, there's no historical source
Read that Runes, Mandrakes and Gallows by Jeannine Talley. It's not very long but it makes a good case for it based on etymology and folk traditions.

Fuck off swamp jew

Stop quoting from Satanic Bible version you little pagan rat.

>It is good for a man not to touch a woman. Nevertheless, to avoid fornication.

TO AVOID FORNICATION. Did you hear that? You should avoid being a fornicator. Very simple, but I guess hard for a pagan to understand?

>I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I.

Did you catch that? He's saying that "EVEN IF YOU DO AS I DO", that is also good, because each of us have different gifts from God. Paul was selected to spread God's word an so he did.

>he thinks of marriage, at best, as a necessary evil for some men

HAHAHAHA, read your Bible! Paul is literally spending two entire chapters talking about FORNICATION and how fornication is an extremely wicked sin. And he saying that it's better to STAY UNMARRIED than to fornicate, but if you can't control yourself, THEN YOU SHOULD GET MARRIED instead of fornicating. "But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn with passion".

You literally can't even read simple scripture that Christians have read and understood for thousands of years.

THAT'S THE POWER OF THE PAGAN MIND HAHA.

Right, I'm sick of this shit.

I just joined you guys' discord for like 2 minutes to check it out, and read your FAQ.

I'll cut to the chase. Paganism is about making yourself strong. It's about following your own path, and recognising the validity and place in the world of multiple paths. That's why the gods all represent different human virtues and strengths. That's why some of them fight. It's a pluralistic point of view.

And here faggots like you are, displaying your weakness by showing that you need a Kike-esque code of restricted conduct to bind you in order to feel safe.

To put it simply, if you're the kind of person who unironically walks around telling other pagans "don't masturbate to porn" or "don't be gay" or whatever, you're not a fucking pagan lad. You're just another edgy, submissive faggot looking for something to kneel to. One step away from a magapede with your "glorious leader" mentality.

If you're not here to set yourself free, then fuck off. And if you're interested in becoming free, then stop by caring so much what other people enjoy. Otherwise you really might as well go and be a Christcuck, they have loads of (((commandments))) for you to follow and shame other people into following, you pussy

I-Is there a place in pagan society for boys who only want to love boys and don't want to fight?