Mk_ultra_girl_c1961a

>mk_ultra_girl_c1961a

Now that the project has gone awry, what is your opinion on mind kontrolle ?

Re the millenials under the spells of the (((mind kontrollers))) ??

Other urls found in this thread:

chrisshepherd.org/terrorism-conditioned-learned-helplessness/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turn-On
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Now that the project has gone awry
>implying that exposing MK ultra (with the help of a victim) wasn't part of the plan
9 times out of 10 when projects like this are "exposed" it is done to desensitize the public and/or to carry on with their business unhindered.
>We'll never do this kind of thing, only under a different code name again, I swear!

The Director of the CIA in 70s ordered all documents related to MK destroyed. What survived isn't much

MKULTRA never stopped. It's only transformed into entirely new methods of mind control. Television became a household fixture shortly after the program 'ended'. Then they started funneling degeneracy into our brains a short time later.

But that's only just the beginning. MKULTRA just taught them HOW to brainwash people. Expose them to trauma, then feed them instructions on how to behave. That's the short version.

I personally think 9/11 was exactly the 'trauma' they needed. Every station in the country cycling through that footage, day after day after day. Most adults were shaken to the core. It was a universal trauma to our entire society. Once we were, culturally, all in a state of post-trauma, the instructions could be fed into our minds. Just look at the 2000s relative to the decades prior. Sure, they manipulated people quite a lot before 9/11, but there's no comparison. As a child of the 80s, I can tell you, there's never been anything like this before.

First, yeah, they used it to get us to go along with wars. That was the jewish subversion of patriotism - via the neocon control of the Republican party. They had the entire media establishment working on their side at that point, and they got all the stuff they'd been dreaming of. Increased surveillance, a tighter grip on the public consciousness, etc.

But then once they'd fully subverted conservatism (just look at country music from 2000 onward), they set their sights on the left. And that's where we are now. They've used their own actions in the 2000s to turn the white left into fucking commie zombies.

This time, instead of television, they used the internet. But once they were able to shift the average person into a lefty robot, they finally got the rest of the media to follow along. This was achieved after 2005, when Katrina happened. From that day forward, the media has been insanely leftist, and corporations, institutions, etc have all followed suit.

Basically this

interesting, can you elaborate further?

Sure man. It might take a bit.

So I've been working on this idea in my head. I was looking back at depictions of fathers from the 1960s onward. Just look at dads from the media in the early 1960s. Patriarchal, strong, firm, and decisive. By the late 60s, they were already showing signs of weakness. Then in the 1970s you got slightly more feminine dads, like Mr. Brady - who was always delicate, quiet, and more emotionally available. Then the 1980s came around and you started to see the weak, hen-pecked archetype come into being. They were always second fiddle to mom (who always knew best), and took a less active role in the familial events.Then the 90s came, and dad was reduced to a buffoon. If not a buffoon, he was abusive, domineering, and someone who the family needed to escape.

Anyhow I started to see these archetypes across the board. Moms changed. Kids changed. Rebellion became the 'thing' for kids. You could see it taking form in the 70s, but it hit it's stride in the 1990s.

Young adult men, in the 90s, were inundated with imagery of the shoe-gazer, loveable loser, and the underachiever as 'ideals'. Women always liked the quiet introspective guy in movies, even if he was a total pussy. Jocks became the biggest bad guys ever (especially after the 80s). See where i'm going here? They feminized men through media, and they did it slowly.

My belief is that they were slowly regressing adults to a childlike state. That childlike state, if you're familiar with MKULTRA, is the state of pure suggestion. It takes a lot to get someone there. It takes even more to get an entire culture there.

So they walked us up to the doorstep of childhood, up until they just had to do something big to finish the job. And after the 90's all they needed was massive trauma.

9/11 was the last straw for the adult mindset in America. We've never progressed since then. Now we're all adult babies staring up a the 'mobile' above our crib - technology. Anyway, this is my general idea on what they've been doing

Please do, I like your thoughts, and your opinion on ukip, EDL etc..

Great post. Do you think chan autists are somewhat resistant to this shit? Or somehow harder to keep under control even if the programming "takes" on some level?

I'm still convinced the "weaponized autism" of alt-right shitposters and memesters took them by surprise.

Maybe you just can't traumatize an autist the way you can a normie? Or autists are already so traumatized by life that a major terror attack just doesn't have the same psychic impact.

Also, I think if you look at the young adult archetype from 1960 onward, you can see this regression quite clearly.

Think in the 1960s. What did a man in his 20 or 30s look like? He probably had a suit on. He was venturing out into the establisment world, and he needed to be taken seriously. Hell, by 30, most men looked like REAL men back then. Because that's what they were. Adult men.

Then look at the 1970s. The hangover from the 1960s was still kicking, but you still had this aura of respectability to adult men. They no longer wore suits while young. Instead they wore bell-bottoms, heeled boots, and other 'informal attire' you might have seen teens wearing. But the imagery is still of a self-sufficient, independent man.

And the 80s is where the image of adulthood started to take it's turn towards youthfulness. The decade of excess. Goofy music videos that used imagery more appropriate to children's television. Think of the goofy outfits, zany colors, etc. Adults were like teenagers at this point. It was almost a decade-long graduation party. Drinking, drugs, fast cars, goofy television and movies. Now guys were wearing t-shirts and overcoats, or street wear well into their 30s. It was the era grown young men ceased to be men.

Now the 90s rolled around, and as I said above, they started pushing us back... back... into our awkward years. The pre-pubescent, awkward, uncertain adolescent. Too socially awkward to go to parties. Instead, they just stayed home and played video games. But it didn't matter, right? Because that was the cool thing to be! Lovable loser! Underachiever!

Think of Clerks, or Mall Rats, or other similar movies. Success was passe. Instead, we were all supposed to be quiet, inward, ponderous guys. The archetype was pre-adolescent.

More good shit there user.

But what do you do with an awkward teen? Teens are too rebellious. You want to regress them back to their childish mindset. That's the mindset that takes instructions, follows commands, and needs mommy to even survive. That's the ideal citizen to a big mamma government. A kid!

Well, we weren't all going to buy into even MORE childishness. Sure, by the late 90s, they had a lot of us watching cartoons again. But they had to give those cartoons 'adult' themes to make us sit down and mindlessly watch.

They got us with video games, which used to be seen as the pastime of young boys. Instead, you started to see men in their 20-30s dropping out of adulthood to play playstation and eat pizza as their nightly routine.

But it wasn't enough. Still too hard to manipulate. So what do? Well, MKULTRA taught us that the best way to get people back into an 'infant' mindset is to expose them to trauma.

Now I'm not doing 9/11 conspiracy here, but I think my theory kinda relies on at least the 'let it happen' theory. But if you think about it from my narrative, you can see why they would do it. In an instant, you had millions of grown adults crying for mommy government to keep them safe.

If you weren't an adult on 9/11, you might not know what I mean. It was traumatic. It was a different kind of trauma, but still... All of a sudden our ideas of safety were thrown out the window. Picture after picture of people jumping out of a burning building were burned into the backs of our retinas. I saw the buildings collapse probably 500 times before the end of 2001. I lived in Chicago at the time, so the feeling of being a 'target' were always at the back of my mind. Seeing the Sears Tower, or the Hancock building gave me a direct reference to what I'd seen on TV. Falling from that high, being trapped, being in danger from the airplanes that are overhead constantly. The threat of war. The threat of our teenage comfort being interrupted by explosions, etc.

Thanks user. I might just be rambling at this point, but whatever!

You are all on point, keep this going dudes

Other aspects are drugs and environmental pollutants ... Think fluoride and pharmaceuticals in the water

Renamed under a new project

nope. this is the kind of content we need a hell of a lot more of. keep it up, i'll be refreshing this thread til it 404s.
i was a little kid when 9/11 happened, but even in the last few years it's pretty obvious that the powers that be have been using trauma to exhaust and manipulate anyone who's sensitive enough to pay attention.

It has less impact on "autists" because they have better pattern recognition and have a constantly objective/logical outlook on life, allowing them to see through things, even if they are presented as ((facts))
They have a natural ability to draw their own conclusions, unlike most (modern) "normies"

you do realize that MKultra is very much used in the Hypno Porn. It is designed for late night, stoners / drug users. Then has "reverse therapy" videos, where they distort the pussies on girls and make them ugly and scary. Its terrible, traumatic, rampant, and promoted / executed by the left. That is all.

this is completely untrue. autists are skeptical but are insanely overconfident. if you can pull a single, simple deception over on them, they'll never be able to get out of it because they're almost incapable of admitting they're wrong.

Anyway, so that's the purpose I think 9/11 served. It didn't turn every adult into an infant. It turned the collective of adults into an infant. If that makes sense.

They'd walked back our development from a nation of grown men who could come together to put a man on the moon, to a nation of awkward teens who just can't be bothered to put in any effort over four decades. Then BOOM, one event got them 20 years of work in one fell swoop.

And now we, as a society, are fucking babies. We're little infants, begging for mommy government to protect us, to provide for us, to safeguard us, and to correct us when we exhibit too much independence.

I think if you sit back and look at the average television program, you'll know. "This is children's programming". You'll just feel it when you watch it. It's all for kids!

Look at social media. Even the 40-50 year olds posting on it just seem like little kids. Fawning over kittens, posting dumb memes, talking about what they saw on TV. As a society, we've been reduced to infants who accept programming from parents (the government).

Look back over the decades. Look at how the archetypal young adult was portrayed. Remember, these archetypes aren't a reflection of reality - they're instructions! They're instructions to the viewer on how to behave. These are lessons - how to be cool, how to be desirable, how to be successful, etc.

Then, look after 9/11. Look at how people act now. Look at the most popular movies and books. Look at how adults cite Harry Potter and Star Wars as if they're the cultural masterpieces of this generation. How they take their lessons in these little bite sized pieces handed down by the media.

This is MKULTRA. This was the application of the knowledge they gained through experimentation. I wish I was a better writer so I could sit down and make this into a researched book or something. I need more examples, photos, music examples, etc.

You're right I think, autists don't have those emotional triggers they operate on nor do they follow social "norms" that would persuade them into falling in line to fit in

It's very plausible but a lot of it could still be natural emergence phenomena. I'm still not convinced. Very plausible though.
9/11 affected me emotionally, too, so it's a great card to pull if you have a bigger goal.

>promoted / executed by the left
no disrespect user but i think it might behoove you to think about specifically who on the left is doing this. just because someone has bad politics doesn't mean they're monstrous control freaks. the problem is monstrous control freaks, not leftists.
in any case, if you're dumb enough to watch that shit i consider it almost darwinian. "oh no, watching sissy hypno porn did exactly what it said it would do, feel sorry for me"

just because autists are out of touch with their emotions doesn't mean they're unemotional. in fact it's super easy to emotionally manipulate autists because they have no idea it's happening.

"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before"-rahm emanual, mayor of chicago, student of saul alinsky, friend of obama

>like 2000 people died
>so traumatic
Why is 9/11 placed on the upper echelon of happenings when if you really, really think about it it wasn't a big deal? yes, planes crashing into buildings as a terrorist act and killing innocent people is both sad and tragic, but what about Hiroshima? What about any war, period? The "trauma" of 9/11 is so fucking blown out of proportion it's ridiculous.

Because it was broadcast live. It was an unprecedented event, too. An attack on our homeland? An attack that can't be easily detected? All this radar. All these missiles. All of this military hardware. And they got to us!

It was broadcast live into every home in the country. It was unlike anything else we'd experienced, and it shook us pretty bad. We had no idea if it was just the first wave of other attacks either. For a few weeks, everyone almost expected additional attacks of a similar scale.

Great job. Regarding popular music, I know it was always meant to be catchy so the target audience consisted of teens with a low attention span could enjoy it. But now it's gotten ridiculous. Could even describe it as infantile, just like you said. I dunno what it is about it. The sounds seem off.

>If you weren't an adult on 9/11, you might not know what I mean. It was traumatic. It was a different kind of trauma, but still... All of a sudden our ideas of safety were thrown out the window. Picture after picture of people jumping out of a burning building were burned into the backs of our retinas. I saw the buildings collapse probably 500 times before the end of 2001. I lived in Chicago at the time, so the feeling of being a 'target' were always at the back of my mind. Seeing the Sears Tower, or the Hancock building gave me a direct reference to what I'd seen on TV. Falling from that high, being trapped, being in danger from the airplanes that are overhead constantly. The threat of war. The threat of our teenage comfort being interrupted by explosions, etc.
You're mostly onto it.

The goal is to make people childish and emotional. Logic, integrity and discipline need to be destroyed.

Then, once they are emotional, you can just condition their emotions using propaganda. Show them a week of pictures of kids drowning at sea, and they'll let a million soldiers into their country.


Here's a theory about 9/11
chrisshepherd.org/terrorism-conditioned-learned-helplessness/

Yeah, but it happened AFTER the concept of 'father' was fucked up as the other user has theorized.
You might not find any strong men able to console you adequately anymore after such an event. But look who's ready for you, news anchors in respectable suits and with just the right demeanor. Who knows what does to you.

This and if you want to look into something that very likely was MK ULTRA related dig into this.

> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turn-On


> The show was created by Ed Friendly and George Schlatter, the producers of Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In. Bristol-Myers contracted with them to develop the show, and provided it to ABC for a projected 13-week run after NBC and CBS rejected it. A CBS official confessed, "It was so fast with the cuts and chops that some of our people actually got physically disturbed by it." Production executive Digby Wolfe described it as a "visual, comedic, sensory assault involving animation, videotape, stop-action film, electronic distortion, computer graphics—even people."

Men will naturally be driven towards powerful men figures, females will naturally driven to powerful men too.

The point it's that they equated powerful with economically successful and there they lost all control over that aspect of human nature.

jesus christ i looked at this thread to see if anyone knew anything interesting and I find a bunch of kids stroking each other off

Poor kid. Wonder what happened to her, well probably don't want to know desu

>Now that the project has gone awry,
Who said that? When was that said? Why would they say such a thing.

It's not gone awry. It's been improved and made into something else.

ah little baby gonna cry