30 billion could end world hunger

But selfish whites rather spend hundreds times that money on war.

Whites also waste millions of tons of food every year while PoC are starving.

Let that sink in.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bjO7QMP4h-Y
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Why is it our job to help everyone else?

Spending money on nonwhites IS a waste though.

How will 30 billion "end" third world hunger?
who do we need to pay this 30 billion to?
how will they then make sure that nobody is ever hungry?

NO. Fuck off with this stupid fucking repost piece of shit slide thread. Fuck you and anyone else that posts this garbage non-argument every day.

Everyone else STOP replying to this, it's horrible bait posted every day.
Do something more constructive with your time.

Racist

Normie Facebook arguments like these keep the mind nimble.

Cost to end world hunger is 30 billion this year, 45 next year, 67,5 the year after that, 101,25 the year after that... and that keeps going until you can no longer subsidise the population growth in developing countries, resulting in even more catastrophic disaster.

Blacks spend their money on jewelry and shoes. It is entirely their fault they never migrated to more bountiful lands.

This. Came here to say this.

Do nothing, and the cost to end world hunger next year will be 20 billion. The following year 10, and so on... Soon the world will only have people with enough agency to not shit out kids they can't feed.

737 billion is the price we pay for global security, thus it's the price to only have a "world hunger cost" at 30 billion.

Without the 737 billion for our military, the cost to end world hunger would be a thousand times higher.

Stop making this thread. You know that wouldn't work, unless the money is spend on sustainable development of agriculture (for which you probably need a lot more than 30 billion) and the African population growth is curbed by other means than starvation. Malthus was right-ish.

Pretty sure creating the infrastructure required to ensure that food relief goes where it needs to would cost more than $30 billion, ignoring food cost itself.

you'd have to spend it on transportation and infrastructure. There is easily enough food grown and made for everyone, but it rots in warehouses and on shelves before it can ever reach the "hungry"

But how many intercontinental freeways and hyperloops can 30B buy? Maybe 2 freeways 5,000 miles long each, and you still don't have the trucks, drivers, gas stations, maintenance, security, etc. to actually move the food.

> Give negroes free food.
> Allow them to glourish and reproduce
> Negro Population grows exponentially
> Whites made extinct.

Do not feed the vermin.

If you "solve world hunger" then their population explodes further, the resources sent to them is strained because they cannot actually produce those resources for themselves, and that cost becomes 60 billion in fifteen years, then doubles again to 120 in thirty, doubles again in forty five, and so on, until the US cannot actually support the cost anymore, and now you have 4 billion starving people.

Not to mention that international aid is, by most educated Africans, considered a bandaid absolving shitty governments of fault or need to appeal to their citizens. Why bother having a fair election or satisfied constituency when your citizens are poor and uneducated, and just a means of getting sweet, sweet USD?

I only care about my countrymen. I dont give a fuck if some Africans starve.

youtube.com/watch?v=bjO7QMP4h-Y

Nah it would just be cheaper to slaughter all third world niglets.

30 billion wouldn't end hunger because then the niggers would just breed more

>1 post by OP

God damn it you thread sliding nigger

What if we just declare war on hungry people?

you are fucking retarded

it was the past aid that went to africa that made this mess
the hungry niggers got fed and than duplicated once more
kys

>pay 30b to feed the world for 1 year
>poor people well fed now fuck
>1 year later everyone is hungry again with hungry kids
>need 60b to feed world hunger
>pay 60b for 1 year
>same shit happens as previous year
>need to pay 120b next year

a never ending loop

More like $30 billion down payment. Africa is cursed to live in poverty due to their degeneracy.

How much to double world hunger?

War reduces excess population.

Feeding starving 3rd worlders causes an explosion of excess population.

Let that sink in.

also gr8 b8 m8 r8 8/8

>US Defense spending
>white people

Let this sink in FAGGOT 100 years ago Africa had less then 500 million people . Along come western nations and bring food to the Africans . Now they have over a billion and in a hundred years 50 billion , who knows but instead of millions dying billions will die . Let that sink in faggot our food aid has made them dependent and more of them compounding the problem .

>be African
>have 5-8 kids, only a couple gets to adulthood
>get food and medicine
>still have 5-8 kids
>most of them survive
>more food and medicine needed
>they have 5-8 kids
NEED MORE FOOD AND MEDICINE YOU RACIST

>30 billion could be wasted on helping human vermin reproduce

ftfy

ahahaha the absolute STATE of germany

Saddam Hussein and Mu'ammar Al Kaddafi

Africa was just too large and too tribalistic before they got cucked, so they didn't even have any real sort of national identity until sixty years ago, and even then they still categorize themselves more by race and language than by country.

Africa is what happens when you have weak government and no economy. What they need is totalitarian, but mostly benevolent, rulers who'll go full dictator and whip a big section of the country into shape, and step aside for more open and self-determining rule once they're an actually functioning country.

That pasta again
Sup Forums please, have the right gesture: sage, ignore and report the slide thread from the cockroach shiteater.
I hope you die painfully OP.

>Send 30 billion to oogaboogaville.
>Its political leaders and warlords suddenly have private jets and fleets of Bentleys.

Let the niggers in Africa starve and world hunger can be fixed for $0

>1 post by this ID

>$30 billion could end world hunger

For how long? How much food? How many people? From where do they get the food? Money doesn't equal food, food equals food.

I hate shit like this.

>Africa is what happens when you have weak government and no economy. What they need is totalitarian, but mostly benevolent, rulers who'll go full dictator and whip a big section of the country into shape, and step aside for more open and self-determining rule once they're an actually functioning country.
That's what Mugabe was.

But who cares about >PoC? They have their own brains.
sage

Youre going to declare war on yourselves?

Anyone who is incapable of the basics of survival and live only as a burden were never meant to live at all.

Natural population control exists if you let it. Survival and extended lifespans must be earned.

For how long!? A Day? A Week?

All these "$X could stop so and so tragedy" never put a timeframe. It's not like the little shitskins are just going to need one meal for the rest of their lives to beneath clouds of disease-ridden flies.

30 billion to buy the food, 30 trillion to build the infrastructure to transport it. Another 3 trillion to protect it from African warlords.

Don't believe the niggers. Nobody's starving here, not even the homeless.

Replace whites with joos and your statements would actually make sense. Whites don't control the banks or the NWO fuckingn stupid nigger.

The joke
Your head

The world just doesn't care. It's about "muh feelings" and "muh incidents", not long-term economic growth and quality of life for the majority.

>30 billion could end world hunger

Obama doubled US national debt in 8 years.
That means Obama's only presidential achievement, transgender bathrooms, cost nine thousand billion dollars.

Pay 30 BLN $ to africans in food.
Instead of progressing on civilizational ladder - niggers only multiply.
Now you have more hungry niggers and nothing gained.

We’ve given billions over the last 50 years and most of the “””developing world””” is no better off. Ditto goes for the areas the USSR (and more recently China) propped up.

They just can’t keep money and aid from tumbling through their fingers and straight into a 12-year-old prostitute’s ass-crack.

Sure, if they acted like Westerners 30 billion would solve this permanently. They don’t, so no amount of money will solve it.

let us celebrate kfc day

Obama's real presidential achievement was putting back on its feet the american economy through his stimulus plan, something that didn't happen in europe thanks to austerity.

God you are either incredibly stupid or in bad faith if you think transgender bathrooms really matter.

International organizations estimate that there are at least 4 billion people in the world living in poverty. That means for each one of them, you'd spend about $7.50. That would feed them for about a month if we give them the absolute minimum of rice and beans.

What OP is saying is that Oprah Winfrey has a Golden opportunity to end world hunger, still have >$1.5 B.
Why won't Oprah Winfrey end world hunger, Sup Forums?

The stimulus happened under Bush and Congress is the one that controls taxes and spending, so the Republican Congress stewarded the comeback of the economy.

How about instead of giving billions, we just don't cancel their debt?

>30 billion could end world hunger
Then the thousands of """""charities""""" out there should have ended world hunger by now. Its not about money, its about the hungry people being too stupid to improve their quality of life in any way.

Sage.

Maybe you dimwit apes should stop shitting out kids that you're too stupid and lazy to feed.

SAGE same fucking slide thread. Same goddamn image. I'd use the US military to end hunger by killing them all, it'd cost about 15 billion.

>Be the economically responsible party
>Get ignored and have a bad plan pushed past you
>Fume for years about it
>Get into power again
>Don't have a plan to replace it despite having years and years to speak with experts and committees because your party is splintered between neocons and cons
>Try to force literally nothing through so you don't lose momentum
>Fail because you weren't responsible or organized
>Rapidly losing any sort of momentum and the fervor of consitituency fading

If Republicans had actually had a plan ready and put a muzzle on Trump so he didn't alienate moderates and let the left make literally everything any third party heard negative for the first few months, the US's government would have been cut and dry theirs for a decade at least. But they fucking dropped the ball like tards and are paying for it.

shut up man, really just stop.

We decrease 30 billion in defense to pay for it, then next year it will be 31 billion and we have to give them another 1 billion, and so on and then inflation starts.

Just stop okay man? Africa is a good place to grow shit they can start with creating a government and then grow food and sell it in markets.