Where were you when gender benders were BTFO?

Where were you when gender benders were BTFO?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_in_Bugis_society
youtube.com/watch?v=ocEouB1gi14
huffingtonpost.com/entry/dna-test-reveals-powerful-viking-warrior-was-actually-a-woman_us_59b68b72e4b0b5e531078e5b
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Female in this context means sex. Not gender.
Nobody was BTFO out here.

Back in my day sex and gender meant the same god damn thing.

Debunked before the title.

Women never fought in real battles unless out of desperation.

They were likely to die if the men failed to protect them, and very likely raped.

Rich women who were of noble birth, however, were buried with weapons out of symbology.

I'm not talking about vikings specifically. This is universal. Men have anywhere from 2 to 15 times as much upper body strength as women of the same weight.

Culturally sure, but not objectively.

Wasn't this proven to be bullshit anyway, and that it wasn't a "warrior" like the narrative tried to push?

Then why do they call it sex reassignment surgery?

3 year old Vietnamese warrior remains found with shell casings and live grenade tied to it. ageists btfo.

Because the genitals, which are most often associated with the sex of an individual, are reassigned to the female form.

Nah you're legit just changing the definition on the fly.

And either way, my point is the nuances between sex and gender did not exist until recently (15-20 years ago, maybe even a bit less).

>Nah you're legit just changing the definition on the fly.
Elaborate?
>And either way, my point is the nuances between sex and gender did not exist until recently (15-20 years ago, maybe even a bit less).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_in_Bugis_society

But no HuffPo is assigning them a sex, the same thing those evil doctors do at birth. People get mad when I call them men/women and they assume I'm talking about their gender, when in reality I'm talking about their sex.

>Teleports behind you...

There was a time when "gender" simply referred to categories of a thing, and then later a time when the word "gender" was used by linguists as a way of describing sexed vocabulary in various languages. Then there was the time when scientist-activists like John Money co-opted the work that linguists were doing and invented the idea of "gender roles" to justify their cockamamie theories, and then the time where intellectuals observed how language can be used to alter the public's perception of society, regardless of actual tangible reality and scientific research. Now we live in the time where gender and sex apparently have overlap in the minds of navel-gazing pseuds.

Doctors don't assign sex. They assign gender.

>Elaborate?

You're saying here that the sex is what DNA pertains to:
You're saying here that for some reason calling it sexual reassignment surgery makes sense:
Those two ideas are opposed to one another.

You're a very confused individual.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_in_Bugis_society

I didn't realize cultural appropriation was acceptable when your interpretation of foreign behavior happens to coincide with your particular brand of Western bourgeois indulgence

>huffpost
>dna confirms gender
>huffpost

Sex makes up DNA. By extension DNA makes up genitals. Genitals can be either female/male, that much is objective. To perform gender reassignment surgery is to change the appearance of a sex organ.

But the article just assigned this skeleton a sex, how is that not the same as a doctor assigning a sex?

but they don't call it gender reassignment surgery. That's my entire point.

>She
They assumed their gender. That once living entity could have identified as anything. So back the fuck off you misogynist piece of shit

I identify as a dude today, but if I have to go through divorce I'll change my gender to female and call myself the mom to get that child support and custody!

Sex reassignment surgery, that was a typo.

Sex is made apparent from the moment of birth via a sex organ, usually. I assume the researchers here have discovered this skeleton to belong to a female. Doctors don't "assign" sex. You are born with it. You however, are not born with gender.

>Sex makes up DNA. By extension DNA makes up genitals. Genitals can be either female/male, that much is objective
So there is a part that is subjective? Can you drop meme flag so I know to stay away from whatever society you infest? Thanks. Best.

>gender reassignment surgery
its called SNR you larping faggot

This. I was told a hundred times that 'sex' and 'gender' meant the same thing. I even asked one of my teachers in elementary school and she said they did.

Only in the past few years have I seen people trying to push this "gender means how you identify" bullshit.

SLAY QUEEN!!!

...

>Sex reassignment surgery, that was a typo.
Are you not following what I'm saying? Sex is being used interchangeably, as it should be.

ha

many keks

So if I go to a job interview and put down that my sex is Male, but I identify my gender as female, am I allowed to sue when they call me a man?

hehehe

I hope the bury me with a sword so archeologists think I was a powerful warrior too

Dude it's so confusing idk. Like if two dudes who are traps identify as females and date, are they gay or lesbian? We need moar answers!

>Can you drop meme flag so I know to stay away from whatever society you infest? Thanks. Best.
I prefer anonymity on the anonymous imageboard. I wish similar flags were on Sup Forums.

>Sex is being used interchangeably, as it should be.
It shouldn't be used that way though. Sex and gender are completely separate topics.

>So if I go to a job interview and put down that my sex is Male, but I identify my gender as female, am I allowed to sue when they call me a man?
I don't know relevant laws. You are asking the wrong person. If you're asking if I think that's justifiable, yeah. If you identify as female you deserve to be addressed by feminine pronouns.

keked and checked

Some people like the term "transbians". Others identify as lesbians. Some lesbians don't like to date transgender people, so they call themselves cis lesbians.

youtube.com/watch?v=ocEouB1gi14

>needing to be more anonymous on an anonymous image board
so your Canadian.

"Female" is clearly bigendered shitlordery, how do they know "she" wasn't identifying as male? I can't even ...

Gay in the nonretard way and lesbian in the retard way

You were making it out here: like everyone was on the same page, yet they're not, otherwise SRS would be called gender reassignment surgery.

But my sex is Male, why am I allowed to sue when they call me a Male, such as this very article is assuming this person is a Female without knowing how they identify?

We need to get the ADL on the line because this is a clear assault on the oppressed transgendered people in the LGBT viking community.

I hate these threads, some faggot reads a stupid post created by one of the most man-hating, biased and intellectually dishonest publication on the planet and then this faggot jumps to the conclusion that women are equal to men and in this case all viking warriors were female and the men just gave birth to the babies and knitted fluffy sweaters.

Big deal, during the battle of Stalingrad there was a handful of female snipers that had confirmed kills but it will be retarded to jump to the conclusion that men are equal to women and gender is a fairytale because you're always going to have that one exception to the rule.

But you cucks and man-hating feminists insist that men and women are equal when in reality history and biology proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that they are not, men are stronger and smarter than women, by and large, period and just because you find an exception and you try to disprove the rule is the biggest fallacy and a blatant disregard to logic and fact.

She wasn’t a warrior. This was fake news. The study’s authors came under intense scrutiny for their politicized paper.

WE WERE VIKEQUEENS N SHIEEITTT

I remember an episode of Forensic Files where they found the killer because their blood had no Y chromosome, so that meant they were female (when the police were initially assuming the killer was male.)

How much longer before some public defender tries to get their transgender client off by saying California state law makes it so they're really female, but the killer had to have been male? I don't think we'll ever get to the point where that actually works, but I don't think we're far off some awful defense lawyer actually trying that line in court.

Umm, actually we are talking about how HuffPo could just label someone something without knowing how they identified

Perhaps. Perhaps not.

If you identify as a female, wouldn't you want to be called my feminine pronouns? Maybe not, but it's a fair assumption to make
>inb4 assuming gender shitposting
I'm not an SJW retard.

Of course not everyone is on the same page on a controversial issue.

Bury you with a rampant rabbit and poppers instead, m8

>that commie is actually serious

huffingtonpost.com/entry/dna-test-reveals-powerful-viking-warrior-was-actually-a-woman_us_59b68b72e4b0b5e531078e5b
This is clearly a household grave of which the husband died overseas

/thread

The interview did not ask me for my gender, they asked for my sex. As a tansgendered female who's sex is male, I gave them my sex which was assigned to me at birth.

He was talking about science not some degenerate cultural pagan shithole.

Just because cultures in the past have indulged in this degeneracy doesn make any of your statements true.

>Antifa
>Implying I'm a communist

>The interview did not ask me for my gender, they asked for my sex. As a tansgendered female who's sex is male, I gave them my sex which was assigned to me at birth.

To simplify things, are you be calling what you want to be called? If the answer is no you have a very valid reason to be upset.

Proofs? I would assume they would do some tests besides "looks like some pointy decorative kitchen cutlery was nearby, must be Lagerthas remains"

If she was a combat hardened warrior the bones would have details of this, such as stress fractures, increases in Bone density from training, proof of wounds etc

Somebody needs to tweet this to the NFL to show them that even back then transmen (or transwomen? Still can't figure this out) were accepted.
Should trigger HuffPo as well, to assume that "she" was identifying as male in a male role, I guess that's not what they were aiming for here.

Is HuffPo calling this skeleton what it wants to be called?

Here's the HuffPost editorial board. Not one dude, and I doubt any of them are over 30.

Looking pretty white too, so they're racist as far as I'm concerned.

A person who has a male sex and decides to identify with the female gender should be refereed to as a transwoman. Calling them transmem invalidates them.

>ancom
>objectivity
good one

And they're ageist too!

No. That may or may not be an issue, I'm not sure.
It is a reasonable assumption that the person identified as female however, or at least fit into that role.

Are you assuming something you are not supposed to assume now?

In modern society it is reasonable to not assume someones gender. This is a fucking skeleton.

Back in my day you could be a man or a woman and like cock or pussy, no other options

Its still the same thing objectively. You can believe in fairy tales all you want but it does not change reality

But you should have it as common knowledge not to assume anything about someone no matter what period they come from as that could be an insult to the individual.

Jesus what has happened to you. Neither can be assigned, both are linked like teflon to each other. Gender reassignment is mutilation. Only by altering dna could you ever change sex. End of.

>But you should have it as common knowledge not to assume anything about someone no matter what period they come from as that could be an insult to the individual.
No. That's retarded.

>Jesus what has happened to you. Neither can be assigned, both are linked like teflon to each other. Gender reassignment is mutilation. Only by altering dna could you ever change sex. End of.
I've already addressed this. Gender and sex are completely different topics. They have nothing at all to do with each other.

the gender isn't "assumed" but revealed by the DNA results
her sex can no longer be assumed since her tits and vagina are long rotten and gone and she isn't able to tell us anything about her sexual orientation anymore

Sex = male/female = genitals
Gender = masculine/feminine = traits derived from biology (wide hips, broad shoulders) or socially constructed (high heels, ties)

No they are exactly the same thing objectively. Your shitty marxists attemptings at redefining everything to fit your cultural marxist agenda have no power here, now shoo.

So because my body is harboring a male skeleton that means it's OK for people in the future that may dig me up to assume I'm a male even though I'm a transgendered female who's sex is a male? All because it might not be social norms again?

gender is irrelevant. sex is real..

H+ can help us make both irrelevant.

Did they just assume her gender?

>are reassigned to the female form.

Woah woah woah.
Did you just assume that xir had a female vagina?
Fucking sexist racist homophobic bigot piece of human trash.

this needs to be memed

>Your shitty marxists attemptings at redefining everything to fit your cultural marxist agenda have no power here, now shoo.
Cultural marxism isn't real though.

No. You will be remembered as whatever you identified as; in the $CURRENT_YEAR we have more than enough resources to label you as a woman while you are buried.

Lurk more faggot, why do you even come here?

Where does DNA fit into that?

How would they know if I'm shot and put in a ditch somewhere? If we have the proper equipment/resources now to identify me, why can it not be done with this Viking skeleton?

I take great pride in spreading and discussing my philosophy, along with hearing alternative viewpoints. I imagine a feminine world. A world where there all men are feminine. Masculinity is an evil thing and must be eliminated for the good of the world in all of its forms. Be that in Islam, Christianity, or anywhere else. This is the ultimate redpill.

It's a viking skeleton from a viking period of time. What do you think?

And it was a black male-to-female viking/viqueen warrior. I ain't bullshiting you.

>gender
>socially constructed

So basically you are a mentally ill faggot. Why do all marxist/anarchist faggots always turn out to be like this?

It's almost as if there's something deeply wrong with them.

Then why did you let it get this bad you sick degenerate?

I will be an American skeleton from this time period, where our records will probably no exist. Just like Viking records and history are lost. Why is it OK for the people of the future to identify me however they like, just as the people of the present are doing to this skeleton?

Mentally ill? Aren't we all? : ^)))
I spread my ideology and make gains with it. You spread your ideology and you make gains with yours. We just have different goals. It's the only separator.

What will matter in the end is who influenced who, and how many people were influenced. In the end that group will control the flow. Rules and law will be made to suite them. Culture will shift to suite them. Those who disagree will be outcasted and shamed, lose their jobs, be humiliated and never breed and die on a bed of loneliness. I wonder who will find themselves there?

Time will tell.

Please explain why high-heeled shoes are considered women's footwear then and not men's.

Not trying to be an SJW, I just want to make sense of all this.

mother fucker...... my sides

Yes objectively

YOu can TOTALLY be a woman who likes manly stuff, who wears men clothes, who acts like a man.

But you remain a woman, you are just a woman with these traits.

SJWs have tried to convince us to let go of gender roles and stereotypes for decades and now they've decided that these same roles and sterotypes are what dictate your gender

Why would they assume the Viking person's gender like that?

What if they identified as male?

This is shocking. Such information would never hit the press if it was a male.

Gender as a word was created because sex had adirty stigma you cretin

That's just recent cultural marxist bullshit.

From what I'm being told it's OK to do when you are a person from the future in a time when we are specifically told it's a bad thing to do. All of this because a female skeleton was inside the body of this individual.

So if I, a transgendered female who's sex is a male because I harbor a male skeleton inside my body, die in a ditch it's OK for them to assume whatever they like of me when they find my skeleton.

because they are mainly designed for women
its a lot easier to get high heels in a 7 when a 11 for a reason
simply because women usually have smaller feet compared to men
how you dress says something about your sexual orientation/preferences
causing most people to call a guy wearing a dress a faggot for a reason
regardless, non of this will ever change your gender, no matter how hard some try