Anti-woman shilling on Sup Forums

>spam /r9k/ with cuck shit
>have hillary clinton's campaign promote /r9k/ as the face of Sup Forums in the 2016 election
>promote anti-women hysteria on Sup Forums

Being anti-woman is being anti-white. Stop the shilling. Go back to /r9k/

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/btc/comments/72iqux/hello_rbtc_here_is_what_you_are_up_against/
archives.gov/education/lessons/civil-rights-act
kfor.com/2013/11/07/study-study-finds-women-work-more-than-men/
stateofourunions.org/index.php
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3634473/The-job-makes-happiest-Housewife-Survey-finds-stay-home-mothers-satisfied-profession.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Didn't Mexicans vote alot for Trump?

no

White women are the best women. Yerrow fever cucks btfo.

Nope.

What exactly is "other"? I'm guessing mixed race or Indians

oh hey a neat little thread where some faggot thinks hes in the majority on women here and that all the vehelment and ubiquitous posts about how we dont deserve rights and shit are just memelords and trolls.

your thread will fall to the bottom of page 10 and then you will if you have any credability reflect on the popularity of your point of view here.

Wome are evil, it's where the word "evil" comes from in the first place. Society absolutely depends on keeping the boot of patriarchal oppression on the neck of women. They shouldn't be allowed to vote, have abortions, divorce, drive, work, go to college, or have extramarital sex.

>he says with a Nu-flag

>blur blur blur feel righteous and superior and hate white women goyim

Fuck you shill

>go back to /r9k/
kek, roastie detected
wait until Artificial Womb Technology Flourishes into fully functional, full-gestation wombs are available to everyone

>WE(women) don't deserve rights
>He
10/10 sweed
also,
Tits/GTFO

>LMAO ROASTIE XDXDXD
>MUH SEXBOTS
You're an embarrassing loser

Where did I say "hate them"? I said they're evil and need to be ruthlessly controlled for society to function properly. Refute that statement if you can (you can't). Do you think Hitler let women join the military, vote, or have abortions?

Fuck off back to /r9k/

or Israel

Kill yourself kike

I never said I was a woman. I jus thate Nu-Flags.

>gibsmedat
Not a slut sorry.
Masterful troll, not even upset

Kek here we go with the ad hominem from the white knight cucks. Women have to be kept in the home and under absolute control or they become evil. There's no way around it and Hitler was well aware of this. If you're a feminist cuck you need to change your flag faggot.

You think your genetic filth would have access to this? Top kek, if you can't mate with real women you will be denied access to the technology too

Tits or GTFO

Woman, jew, christian, and nigger bashing are Sup Forumss bread and butter. Go back from whence ye came, newfag.

>w-white knights
If I ever see one of you anti-white, anti-woman male feminists in person I'm going to knock your teeth in

>white knighting for worthless roasties exactly like kikes want on an anonymous web board
>calling others kike.

>Go back to /r9k/

If only it were that simple...

reddit.com/r/btc/comments/72iqux/hello_rbtc_here_is_what_you_are_up_against/

Any chance Hiroshimoot will release data on the cities that spend the most time on Sup Forums? If he did, I suspect there would be striking similarities to the reddit data.

Loser

It's obviously strong independent brownies and white sjws.

The white woman demographic of the left have made it clear that they see themselves as the morally superior ones in comparisons to the rights whitewomen.

Being anti woman is being anti white. You're not a white nationalist. You're an idiotic embarrassment

Or you're a paid shill

>Being anti-woman
what do you mean with "anti-woman"?
i love women, doesn't imply i should let them do mens jobs.
And, just as a reminder, the elections were not "a woman vs a man", but "a specific man vs a specific woman".

>hurr durr im finna punch a nazi muhfugga
You could at least try and argue with me you dumb motherfucker

I can only assume op means women should have things like rights.

>what do you mean with "anti-woman"?
The /r9k/ anti-woman memer personality cult being promoted on Sup Forums so that society sees white racial identity as a bunch of pathetic internet virgins

This is literally nonsense. Even your own graphic shows that 48% of white women, and the majority of all women, are worthless. Why post an image proving it?

Fuck off

He's right though, I've been here years, and I'm a genuine female, most of the Sup Forums lads aren't insecure emotional cripples who hate white women.

Roastie

Despite all the propaganda, all the disinfo, 48% percent of women are 50x less worthless than embarrassing losers like you. Get your shit together.

Yea the white women who voted for trump where mostly married idiot single white women all voted for hillary

>this is why perma-virgin betas actually believe

No matter how much you want to think it's true, no woman is going to sleep with you because you put their pussy on a pedestal. All of these problems began with women voting. They have consistently voted for leftist programs. For more immigrants. For homosex. For interracial marriage. For welfare. For affirmative action. Etc.

Women will never be allies of the movement until you put them in their place instead of cucking out. It is precisely your mentality that gets women spreading their legs for blacks.

You haven't clearly stated your position. Do you disagree with the natsoc policies toward keeping women as stay-at home wives with no political power? If so, how much feminist theory do you agree with? What rights should women have? Should they be allowed to slut around and divorce men? Should they be allowed in the military and higher education?

Kike shill

Sorry meant for

>Only 1 in 10 more women than men voted for Hillary
>Despite all the baiting (((Trump))) did
>Despite all the feminism propaganda
>Despite all the "first female president" bullshit
>They still sided with race and culture
>And now kikes and their pathetic shutin puppets want to push anti-women shit on Sup Forums

>voting to destroy the white race is so much more better than not valuing the people doing it far more than they actually are worth.

The thing is, I do agree you aren't a white knight. You are very obviously a woman, and that's very clear from your posts.

Only women think shaming on an anonymous cartoon fetish site is going to change someone's opinions.

So fuck off. No one wants a dumb roastie on this page. You aren't one of us, and your goal is simply to make people believe that recognize women as what they are, hypergamistic degenerates, and wanting to change that is bad. It's not, and you have nothing of value to offer in changing that reality.

>put their pussy on a pedestal
ALWAYS the same lines from you brainwashed fucks.

>muh racemixing bait
ALWAYS the same shit from you people.

FUCKING KIKES

right about what? being anti women's rights is how pol is now. yet if pol is filled with people who think otherwise, where are they when these threads are created? its not like theyre rare or anything, theyre there everyday, this is the first thread I've seen in months and months made by some retarded polfag and not a shareblue trying to stir up shitposting. The best I can say is that the men you think support you wont even open their mouths once or twice a day to tell a fucking r9kek to fuck off women should be able to work or vote if they want to.

Your pussy isn't worth anything here, and all you have is "muh brainwashed, muh kikes"

You're obvious. Come back when you've learned some subtlety.

There's nothing wrong with the traditional family and traditional social roles.

There IS something wrong with pushing divisive, deliberately inflammatory, anti-family, anti-white, anti-woman personality cult identitarianism on social media because you're kike-brainwashed, shut in loser with nothing better to do with his life than try and drag others down into your pit.

>p-pussy
>It's not the jews!
Fuck you, kike.

>there is nothing wrong with pushing these things you all are pushing.
>there is something wrong with pushing these things you all agree with.

Seriously, fuck off.

Kek, try harder roastie.

Definitely a woman

You didn't answer my question

>r-r-roastie ;_;
t. jewish anti-family shill

You're either an unfortunate idiot who derives some sad personal value from putting down women on a 99% male board, or you're a jewish shill trying to carve up white community, as usual. It's a simple as that.

If you can't see the problem with the anti-family, anti-woman, anti-white personality cult being fucking shilled on Sup Forums, then you need to "seriously, fuck off"

>Definitely a woman
There are no women here you delusional male-feminist. You wish

Sup Forums is and always will be a Sup Forums colony.

She's never going to answer, because she's a liberal that is trying to shame people into accepting her worldview without facts or evidence.

Her first tactic was to shame everyone who disagreed with her with "muh virgin" holes arguing. Then it was loser, etc. Now she's actually adopted our language (kike, anti-family), but doesn't understand that these are final declarations, not arguments inthemselves. You have to show it first, then make the declaration, not claim it and then simply sit on that as enough.

Nigger I'm as pro-family as they get. That's why I know your shit is nonsense, because even if you pretend to be pro-family (hell, even if you were somehow delusional enough to believe you actually were) your actions here show you cannot be.

Either you don't believe in traditional roles for women, which is all anyone else here has been arguing for, or you have absolutely no idea what those are or how to achieve them.

You're the only anti-family person here.

>but doesn't understand that these are final declarations, not arguments inthemselves. You have to show it first, then make the declaration, not claim it and then simply sit on that as enough.
not that op isn't retarded, but you are equally stupid, the men here in this shit hole only pretend they do this by spouting some unsubstantiated bullshit that shows they really know nothing, followed by roastie or some shit;

Heres an easy example
"if you want human rights why u so miserable roastie?"
>links a fucking study from the 1970s ondwards, which shows women where much happier in a time period where feminism was running wild and they could both vote and persue their own careers.

This is pol on women. I laugh at op not becuase they are wrong to think this kind of behavior is terrible, I laugh at them because they think you are subversive shills and not the bulk of this boards generalized opinion. this thread should have started with this image.

>She
>Her
>Wah wah I'm a victim of shaming
Fucking pathetic. If I could just bash in your skulls instead of shaming you I absolutely would, ANTI-WHITE FUCKING CUNTS

>Either you don't believe in traditional roles for women, which is all anyone else here has been arguing for, or you have absolutely no idea what those are or how to achieve them
The recent slew of divisive /r9k/ shit is not "promoting traditional relationships." It's driving isolated white guys on the internet into targeting women, and establishing that white identity is the voice of beta whites who can't get women, and who hate women. That's a fucking problem.

>feminism was running rampant in the 70's

This is factually untrue. Feminism was just getting started, and because most of the cultural "icons" we hear about from the media are feminism based, it is common to believe it was. There's no evidence of this, and plenty of evidence to the contrary. Virtually all of what feminists wanted hadn't happened yet, by modern feminists' own statements.

>right to vote.

Which also existed in the 50's. So therefore feminism was running rampant then too? Jesus christ you are fucking retarded. The studies also show that women were happier in the decades before the 70's (back to 40's, with 30's being the only exception and due to the depression, this extended even before that).

You try to use half truths to push your shit like every other woman.

>victim
I never said any such thing. No one cares about your worthless insults, it just shows you are stupid and pathetic. No one just throws around insults like they are arguments like you are unless they know they have nothing of value to offer.

So quick question, how do you propose making white knights and betas like yourself understand the damage women have been causing. Because at this point it's clear you don't understand how fundamentally women are responsible for what's happening right now.
>inb4 he reposts the image showing exactly this

How do you propose fixing it? What is your ideal outcome? You've been asked a dozen times, and you've refused to answer because you are nothing but a retard.

If you expect to be taken seriously in trying to argue against what has been an extremely effective tactic and which has led the movement to grow, you better have an alternative you can prove works. The reality is you don't, because there isn't one.

Agreed, white women will only fall into the arms of shitskins if white men resort to being just as misogynist as niggers. It's no coincidence that niggers are sexist as fuck and also have high infant mortality, divorce, single mothers, deadbeat fathers, domestic violence, etc. while whites are too altruistic to compete. If we resort to that, we won't be as aggressive as niggers and white women wont' see as being as strong as them but not beneficial to be with either, so they'll pick the niggers. Feminism has been bastardized to being women > men, but that's wrong and not equal. I think we should get rid of biased divorce laws like alimony and draft women into combat roles. The soviets and vioetcong had women combatants and they did just fine against the US and Nazi Germany's all-male fighting forces. It's also no coincidence that white women racemix the least out of any group given the above about misogyny. Sexes are just about reproduction of offspring, noting more, all that other shit really are just social constructs and it actually hold society back and that's proven. Shitskin countries with patriarchal social orders do worse economically cause they aren't maximizing the labor pool while still supporting the living of all their women who don't contribute cause they're not allowed to.
Still means white women > others, that's the point.
More white women voted for Hillary than Obama too.

>still means white women>others, that's the point

No, it's not. A rotting piece of pork is better than a mound of dog shit, doesn't mean it isn't still a rotting piece of pork.

ReneGay Tribune, Sinead's Feminist Puppet

>Agreed, white women will only fall into the arms of shitskins if white men resort to being just as misogynist as niggers
That's exactly the goal of this fedora tipping anti-woman bullshit. That's exactly why jews are pushing it here, and why /r9k/ has been led into Sup Forums through shilling their board with cuckporn and the usual

>This is factually untrue. Feminism was just getting started, and because most of the cultural "icons" we hear about from the media are feminism based, it is common to believe it was. There's no evidence of this, and plenty of evidence to the contrary. Virtually all of what feminists wanted hadn't happened yet, by modern feminists' own statements.
god you're dumber than a dump truck, women could work and vote, feminism was born in the turn of the century

historical revisionism isn't going to protect your moronic behavior, and even setting all that aside, even if you where right it STILL WOULDNT BE A FUCKING COMPARIBLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE FOR YOUR SOCIETY WHERE WOMEN CANNOT VOTE AND CANNOT WORK!

>doesn't deal with anything that was said
>hurr durr I win'd

archives.gov/education/lessons/civil-rights-act

>studies that go back into past the 70s
which are never ever cited. but go ahead, I'm waiting. it wont ever matter, you'd need a study from fucking 1600-1700 for it to be applicable to the society you want to create, but I want to see it regardless, because its relevant data to something I care about, even if you're too dumb to fucking make a logical conclusion from it,

If women are restricted to the home against their will they'll fuck the mailman, milk man, your neighbors, your boss and coworkers, guys at parent-teacher conferences and PTA meetings for your kids, etc. Countries with patriarchal social orders do worse economically than relatively sexually equal countries like the US and men cheat on their wives more than vice versa but that's a somewhat recent development as work and earning opportunities have become more inclusive so women aren't cheating as much since women work more than men now.
kfor.com/2013/11/07/study-study-finds-women-work-more-than-men/

yes it does deal with everything you said you dumb nigger. big lie isn't going to change that.

Get your head out of your asshole and quit porn, faggot

I appreciate the sentiment but despite my emotional outburst and thus hypocracy of saying this; you're talking to a wall here, not a person.

White women are still miles better than shitskins of either sex you incel. They racemix less than anyone because of white male altruism, reversing the latter means reversing the former, or in other words, more coalburning white women than there already are. It's no coincidence that coalburning has increased recently seeing as misogynist attitudes are increasingly expressed.

women are that extremely mentally underevolved

that it is simply NECCESSARY to barr them from any political influence.

temove thir rights to vote, ot society WILL collapse into total civil war.

They leech/parasites all societies resources
they have the intelligence of dogs
they promote lies, hate and falsehood wherever they are.
they have LESS ( not more empathy ) than men. That means they are way closer to sychopaths
they lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie
they are lazy
they are unproductive
they invent nothing of value

they are literally worthless as humans,
but are MASSIVE burdens on society

unless they make it all good as sexobjects or birthmachines

Have fun raising some other guy's kids for them.
I don't give a fuck about changing their views, I'm posting cause I know others on here see it as to influence their views.

>women are that extremely mentally underevolved
Kind of like MGTOW incels

Have fun being a paranoid kike-brainwashed faggot pervert

So what this graph shows is that "all" "white" "men" voted Trump in an act of unity across the nation because men actually recognize the jew tricks.

>he even posts arguements for the right reasons
jesus christ stop being so based.

Your parents have been keeping you "in the home" (basement) and look how you've turned out.

Speaking of change...what change have you brought to the world? ....so sorry, hmm, maybe your life in the last 20 years?

MGTOW is anti-white Jewish trickery.
See:

>MGTOW is anti-white Jewish trickery
Amen

You haven't even addressed any of my posts directly so don't call me a "wall", read the IDs.

Germany: Elderly Women Saved Merkel

I know the different ids senpai, I've been arguing about womens rights for a long time in pol.
The reality is pretty fucking clear from personal experiance, most of pol is both against womens rights and thinks that men are mentally superior to us, and most of pol is either retarded or determined to pretend to be retarded on the very topic they claim they have a grasp on, see the very post I made that that other guy whined like a little bitch about.
this is the kind of logic and behavior that accompanies the sexist attitudes of men here on pol. it is not steeped in logic, it is not free from emotion and dispassionate.

This is the world as pol sees it. and they are too stupid to realize they know nothing.

No, you literally didn't. Which is why you made a second post that at least attempts to.

So, your entire argument is feminism was at it's height in the 70's, when women were far less likely to vote, far less likely to be single, far less likely to work, than they are now when women do all of those things at rates close to or above men's?

Your fundamental premise is wrong, feminism is far more powerful, prevalent and authoritative now than in the 70's, and everything you said from there is wrong. Until you can somehow prove feminism was more active and had achieved more of it's goals at that point than it has today, you have no argument, and the 70's data proves my point.

Beyond that, women who are monogamist in marriage are happier:
stateofourunions.org/index.php
Stay at home mom's are happier:
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3634473/The-job-makes-happiest-Housewife-Survey-finds-stay-home-mothers-satisfied-profession.html

These are results that absolutely cannot be true if feminism is making women happier. Not working means a woman is happier. Being married: happier.

About 1/3....encouraged by 1st and 2nd generation Cuban exiles. Hispanics are slightly less cucked Jews and niggers in general though.

>defending roasties

The "Hispanic" community in the US isn't one big group, despite how much the Media wants them to be.

There are illegals/anchor babies, Tejanos, Cuban refugees, and legal immigrants. They're not exclusively Mestizo either, a lot, but not the majority are White/Castizo

Shut up if you can't contribute to the conversation you dumb nigger subhuman

I'm going to try this one more time

What rights should women be allowed to have?

Are you implying that women are just as smart as men?

Give me one good reason why women should have rights other than "muh feelz". Ever since women have been given rights marriages have been failing at higher rates, more children are raised in divorced homes, less white children are being born, bastard conception as well as interracial fornication are on the rise, and infidelity is on the rise. Beyond this, men no longer give a shit about society. Civilization used to be held together by on one simple, unwritten rule, that if you worked and followed laws you could have a wife. Monogamy is the glue that holds men to a productive lifestyle. Now you've got Chads fucking too much to work hard and betas getting nothing so they have no incentive, it's a disaster.

Unmarried white women voted left, married white women voted right. Both married and single men voted right.

Only women who had a man near them voted right, those who were left to their own devices and their own female nature voted left.

Women left to themselves voted left.


A woman behaves properly only when a man tells her to do it.

> Shut up if you can't contribute to the conversation you dumb nigger subhuman

Oh well, there's a great contribution. Right up there next to sub-humanizing half the human poopulation.

How about you shut the fuck up unless you want to meet in a public so I can rip your head off and shit down your whiny little troat? Maybe you can bring daddy's truck and his .45 in case you're scared.

>Being anti-woman is being anti-white.
I have more in common genetics-wise with a black man than with a white woman. Tell me why I should value her above him.

>t. antifa

Last (you) you get lefty

Well, your mother did give birth to you, but seeing as you have the empathy of a slug, she wasn't worth much beyond that. Good thing you won't be reproducing, can imagine you'd choose an equally mentally ill mother-figure to bed.

>flag

Right into the Oven

> teacher teacher! he called me fat!

safe space, happy place

>your mother
back to 9gag
we are talking about women in general
I value my dog above any white male but not any random dog above any random white male

...

reminder for all of human history women couldnt work and couldnt vote

youre not conservative if you believe in womens right to vote

they go to college and they lower to birthrate of white people by joining the workforce instead of being a traditional mom

you are fundamentally a libcuck if you support women like OP does

gee i wonder why the birth rates are so low if they have to go to college and have a career

and then steal all the jobs and get hired for looking pretty and not for anything reasonable and waste resources

if there was no roasties and no immigrants taking all the jobs your value and wages as a man would go up by triple