I prefer Democrats as president, because when they are NOT president...

I prefer Democrats as president, because when they are NOT president, the entire media cannot SHUT THE FUCK UP about politics for a second.

When Clinton was president, when Obama was president, life seemed better because the media is on their side and it's easier to focus on other things. But with Bush/Trump, the media is all against them so all we hear in everything, is politics 24/7. All the news, shows, movies, games, books, everything is about politics now when Republicans are in office.

Anyone else know what I mean? I hate the Dems but goddamn if life doesn't seem better under them, for the sole reason that everything becomes less political

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=xNoNAjomYVM
youtube.com/watch?v=8hRji6DpMVE
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

100% agreed. I am a red-pilled Democrat myself and I just wish my party was more pro-white. REAL white people from the North-East vote Democrat

Also, Democrats are better at being president.

>posting same fake stats that have been demolished literally hundreds of times

...

Wow you are so dumb. Like really really dumb, you are dumb

How do you two feel about a JFK-like president?

They're real. Trump embraced them the moment he took office.

Good luck in 2018

Today JFK would be ripped to shreds for being far-right. The left would hate his guts.

>Put a Dem I'm office so it don't ruin muh (((TV))) time
>Sacrificing your morals and future
How does it feel to be so tired? You should get some sleep.

Democrats love and embrace JFK. We honor his legacy.

You filthy right wing shills and cucks for the billionaires and wealthy elites would call him a socialist for his 70% top tax rate.

youtube.com/watch?v=xNoNAjomYVM

That is how they sway you towards the left you moron. They're normalizing degeneracy, so that when you think "LGBT" or "BLM" or "Feminism" you think "peace".

Oh shut up, cuckold.

youtube.com/watch?v=8hRji6DpMVE

Missed you obamaleaf. Oh the good old days of roasting right wing retards on this board. It was fun, but apparently in vain.

>media wont shutup during a republican president
about how the election isn't fair and they only ramble on with their same rhetoric but you dont talk about that

Never in vain. Always fun.

Agreed. Though it's mostly because Trump can't stop saying dumb shit every goddamm day.

Get some actual fucking work done, faggot.

You seem to be implying that Trump has nothing to do with the media shit storm. It's all caused by him

Oh god not this faggot again. Looking forward to your 150 autistic responses in 30 minutes, every single one proclaiming victory

...

> REAL white people from the North-East vote Democrat
> white people
> Democrat
Why do white people continue to vote for a party whose platform at this point is literally "Death to Whitey"?

>"legacy" unraveling every day
>no nigger will get elected again for 100 years, if we make it that long
>easy as sin to add back jobs after a total crash with the help of the money wizards Jew overlords at the Fed
yeah your boy Obama really changed everything

>can't even repeal Obamacare

This is... exactly why Dem presidents are so bad. The media acts like a closed-minded propaganda organ that puts religious people to shame.

>still have 7 years
McStain will drop dead before then and maybe Arizona will elect the right person for the job

>While it is true that the United States had a 90 percent top marginal tax rate, the first thing to point out is that this was a top marginal tax rate. So, for example, if you make $30,000 a year and there’s a 20 percent marginal tax that kicks in on income above $25,000, you only pay 20 percent on the $5,000 of income above that threshold. So in this example you would pay $1,000. Your marginal tax rate may be 25 percent, but your effective tax rate is only 3.3 percent.

>Back in 1955, the top marginal tax rate was 91 percent, but it didn’t come in until a wage earner earned what amounted to $3,426,776 (in inflation-adjusted dollars) when filing jointly. (Only applied to the 0.1% top earners)

If we reapplied this code today, it would apply to almost no one, and those affected by it could easily avoid it by adjusting their income streams.
Let's see how this plays out.
>[Stupid Communist Canadian that never learns]: Hey people that make $3.5 million a year, we're raising income taxes on you!
>[CEOs and bankers] uh... company, most of my income is already in company stock... but can we adjust it so my salary is below $3 Million and the rest is paid in stock?
>[Board] Sure! Sounds great. See you on Monday.
>[Congress] Hey commie, your tax plan didn't increase revenue, get the fuck out of here with your 70 year old bullshit!

>Leaf
>Obongo_Greatest_President64.jpg

Can you not...?

sorry Kikes and Shills, but (((/yourguy/))) (((Zuckerberg))) will EPICLY FAIL in 2020!

(((Zuckerberg))) will be the (((Democrat))) choice in 2020.

TRUMP will BTFO (((Zuck))) the Cuck in 2020, and Paint all America Red.

(((Zuckerberg))) will be a (((Bernie)))/Jeb!-tier Failure, and because of his catastrophic Failure, a (((Democrat))) will never be in the White House ever again. the (((Democrats))) will throw him because he is the closest thing to a (((Bernie))) 2.0, (.(((Bernie))) will Die before 2020, so they need a younger Candidate.) meaning another Kike smart and good looking enough to Trick People into believing in his Lies.

(((Facebook))) will go BANKRUPT because (((Zuckerberg))) will spend ALL his Fortune on the Titanic-tier Shipwreck of a Campaign he will have.

also, since Trump has a Twitter Account, and (((Zuckerberg))) owns (((Facebook))), the 2020 Election will Literally be Twitter vs (((Facebook))).

after (((Zuck))) the Cuck loses, (((Facebook))) will go BANKRUPT, because he will spend ALL his Fortune on the Campaign.

TRUMP 2020, Make America Great Again, Again!

We're all sick of their whining but all you have to do is turn them off. They're all proven liars and that was never more evident than during the 2016 election. Their goal is to make you depressed and to make you turn against Trump because they're scared shitless right now. It's like a bunch of children screaming and crying because you got 2 scoops of ice cream and they only got one.

>I prefer Democrats as president,
>because the deep state is so confident in their evil plans they don't have to ramp up the propaganda machine
I wish nothing but monstrous suffering on you and your ilk.

Republicans freed the slaves. There was no switch. Without a media you have nothing

If the media isn't throwing a bitch fit then we aren't doing our jobs as citizens

Epic parenthesis!

I'm pretty sure this is their goal. Complain so much, a d so loudly about everything so the people just get so tired of it, they elect a black tranny as the next POTUS. Then they can talk about how beautiful "she" is all God damned day.

>>Back in 1955, the top marginal tax rate was 91 percent, but it didn’t come in until a wage earner earned what amounted to $3,426,776 (in inflation-adjusted dollars) when filing jointly. (Only applied to the 0.1% top earners)

lol u retards do realize that the tax bracket right before it was 88%. Yeah 91% was the top one but there were a whole bunch before that.

You've never seen this table have you?

You fucking retards argue like morons.

oops correction the tax bracket before 91% was 90% lol. Then 89%, 87% etc

everything is a marginal tax rate, and the effective tax rates were NO WHERE NEAR the 70% you advertised.

If implemented today, you would see a vast movement of lawyers, engineers, and doctors moving to be paid their excess salary in company stock or 401k.

lol holy shit you're retarded

Yeah no fucking shit 91% was the top marginal rate. Their effective rate was around 70% because they're paying those lower rates at every income increment.

Are you retards retarded?

91% applied to income ABOVE $3.2M inflation adjusted.

You retards have no clue how tax brackets work. you prove it every time

and I'm not arguing for that today. I'm saying that's what it was back then.

The billionaires you shill for sure as shit don't need tax cuts today tho. I get that u want George Soros to get a tax cut but I don't think he needs 1.

He's baiting for (you)s. It's not his fault the media is retarded.

>For every year between 1952 and 2014, the government has brought in between 17 and 20 percent of GDP in tax revenue and between 7 and 9 percent of GDP in income tax revenue. Furthermore, since at least 1980, the percentage paid by the top 20 percent has gone up. In 1980, the top 20 percent paid 55 percent of all income taxes. In 2013, they paid closer to 70 percent. It appears pretty obvious that, while yes, there was a 90 percent tax rate on the books, no one actually paid it.


Income taxes collected from the rich by percentage of total tax revenues have only INCREASED since the 1950's.

So going back to your retarded plan would lessen taxes on the rich.

> Indeed, the top effective tax rate was probably somewhere between 50-60% because of a tax code full of loopholes. Now, that’s still higher than today’s top effective tax rate of around 30%. But those 1950s tax rates actually generated less tax revenue than subsequent periods of lower rates

hmmm... Commie leaf BTFO again!

>It appears pretty obvious that, while yes, there was a 90 percent tax rate on the books, no one actually paid it.

Lol the 91% rate applied to income ABOVE $3.2M

And what about all those other rates? 90%, 89%, 87% etc

Lol u don't even understand what you're talking about do you? You're just greentexting some heritage.org shill bullshit that you're paid to copy and paste. You're just here to shill for tax cuts for Soros. Fuck off man.

The billionaire globalist elites you're here to shill for don't need tax cuts.

There are WAYYY more loopholes in the tax code NOW than there were then.

Lol how fucking retarded are you?

It's like you're trying to be wrong about everything.

Use that off switch.

Quote from a far-lefty economist Thomas Piketty on why your idea is shit

>Does the fact that the United States did it in the past necessarily imply that we should immediately return to 80-90 percent top marginal rates? Of course not. … It could be that the right level is 70 or 60 percent. … Most importantly, I said very explicitly that I was talking about very, very high incomes, and that at least 99.5 percent of the population would be unaffected by this new top rate. … I firmly believe that imposing a 70 or 80 percent marginal rate on large segments of the population (say, 25 percent of the population, or even 10 percent, or even a few percentage points) *****would lead to an economic disaster*******. And I made very clear that the reason I propose to focus on the very top end because this is where the labour market and the pay determination process are not working properly—or, more accurately, have completely gotten out of hand.

I see what you mean. It seems anytime we elect a right or slightly right leaning president, people act like its the end of America even though things feel about the same since the last (D) was in office. People autistically screech over any conservative policies but open their assholes for left leaning ones.

You're a bot aren't you?

You don't even know how to read.

>and I'm not arguing for that today. I'm saying that's what it was back then.

(((oy vey)))

dear god...
I'm taking only quotes and figures from LEFT WING SOURCES and they all say your idea is shit and wouldn't work.
just drop it and admit you're only posting facebook tier meme pages that experts laugh about

You don't know enough economics to use that chart responsibly.

Really cause all the left wing sources came out very strongly against Trump's tax cuts for the rich today.

...

Read Tom Woods' Meltdown.

I know more about economics than the rest of /pol combined.

I also know that ancaps are the biggest of all right wing retards.

You need to be renamed to billionaire globalist shillcucks.

You faggots just need to get over it

you're saying that 70% tax rates worked back then.

The issue was almost no one was making those high wages, so there was no political pressure for those tax rates to drop. Once more people started making those high wages, the taxes naturally dropped.

You're arguing it worked better, when it didn't. The government wasn't making money at those bracket levels because NO ONE WAS IN THEM.

and obviously the left doesn't want to simplify the tax code because they're the ones that benefit the most from it. People who make less than $25k or so today currently receive a net benefit from taxes.

and they continually whine they have the shit end of the stick. The middle class has been paying for your welfare forever and you're crying because you don't want Trump to give the middle class their money back.

>the entire media cannot SHUT THE FUCK UP about politics for a second.
Tbqf it's your own fault. Gallows exist for a reason.

Lol they did work. They worked for decades.

It did work better. That was the Golden Age for the American middle class. You don't understand how tax brackets work. You've made that completely clear.

Look at your first post You only looked at the top tax rate of 91% and claimed nobody paid it. That's wrong. Any income above $3.2M was taxed at that rate.

But here's the key. You're so fucking retarded, you didn't know about all the other tax brackets until I showed you. You can clearly see the very progressive tax system with many, many brackets. People paid much higher tax rates all the way up. That's what u don't get.

You're just here to shill for tax cuts for billionaires. You're pathetic. You are a total and complete shill for the wealthy elites. You dont even try to hide it.

Fuck you. Life under Obama was absolutely miserable. Things in this country were getting visibly worse by the fucking week if you lived anywhere outside of some rural hillbilly no-mans land or rich suburban enclave. You could actually literally see you environment deteriorating around you with time. The fact that the media kept applauding it and people ignoring it was what made it so infuriating.

Its a VERY good thing the media is being antagonizing over everything and Trump has unleashed their rabid beast from within. Their former silence was so loud it was deafening and only sheltered idiots couldnt pick up on it.

Are you fucking stupid? The only reason why you would support a candidate is just so that the media can be happy? That alone makes you a pawn of the media. Kys

>You only looked at the top tax rate of 91% and claimed nobody paid it. That's wrong. Any income above $3.2M was taxed at that rate.
NOPE. LOOPHOLES DUMB LEFT WING RETARD

There are way more loopholes now than there were then. Not even close

see Lol you paid shills are just here to shill for tax cuts for billionaires. It's honestly so fucking pathetic. You can't even hide it.

You don't even understand what I'm saying
>tax revenue collected as a percentage of total revenue by tax brackets on the rich was much lower in the 1950s
the tax rates on the rich were higher, but there were fewer rich people to tax. No one complained, because the high tax rates only hit a few people. and most of them were able to dodge it through loopholes. Even your lefty economists are saying this.

left economists propose tax raises only on the 0.05% richest, but your average lefty wants to raise them on the middle class by using that stupid 1950s argument.

for the record I'm fine with increasing tax rates on the rich. But every lefty just wants to raise them on the middle class. Or they get easily distracted by the kikes.

It's the fucking kikes that are all in that 0.05% tax bracket, and when you assholes went to protest them, you know what happened? They played on your idiotic equality notions and changed you into white-genociding assholes. Now its all about "white privilege" and everyone forgot about the banks.

Yep it's official. You're actually trying to be wrong on everything.

So do u admit that those were the tax rates in 1955?

Wrong.

kys

>i get a job
>i start a 401k
>my 401k buys stock
>corporate tax rates get cut
>corporate profits go up
>stock value grows
>my 401k grows
>i retire
trickle down 101

Obama did more for white people than any Republican president

>There are WAYYY more loopholes in the tax code NOW than there were then.

Evidence of this? Your image proves nothing about it.

Break those jobs down by high paying and min wage service sector jobs, please

yeah, i admit that. but as i said 3 times now, there was no political pressure to lower those rates to be competitive.
Do you know the reason? Because no one was in those tax brackets.
I'll state it 4 times so maybe you'll get it.
We are collecting much much more money (as a % obviously) today at lower tax rates than we were in the 50s, because there are more people, as a percentage in those brackets now.

The basic principle is the more people you have in a tax bracket, the more political clout they have to create loopholes, or basically negotiate a lower marginal tax rate.

i haven't read about trumps cuts, just glanced, he wants to reduce corporate rate from 35% to 20%
I've been saying this is a good idea for years.
If you do the research, only 10% of businesses pay the full 35% rate and its the small businesses that can't afford accountants & lawyers & lobbyists to deal with the loopholes.

It's official, you're ignoring 90% of my post content because you're enjoy being a snarky leftist

Median income set new record highs under Obama.

Adjusted for inflation?

Ask any fucking unbiased economist. Heritage.org doesn't count. LOL you haven't seen how badly special interests have raped the tax code in the past few decades? Lol u Republicans love it when the billionaires you serve buy up politicians and then you're surprised they manipulate the tax code?

why are you blaming this on republicans? Democrats, as you pointed out, had presidential, congressional, and senate majorities for several years at a time you credited them for economic growth.
When did they do anything to simplify the tax code?

>keeping a file saved on your computer of random anonymous people on the internet complimenting you

Literally how much of a loser do you have to be lmao

Lol you just keep making up bullshit. The 70% top tax rate stayed all the way up until Reagan. There wasn't pressure from Americans to lower it. The conservacuck Reagan bamboozled Americans into cutting top tax rates by 2/3

I'm not a Republican. It's strange you get so upset and assume I am.

So you have no evidence then?

It's called REAL median household income. What do u think the REAL is for?

I'm a winner. Harper is the loser

Democrats repeatedly raise taxes on the rich. that's why right wing retards have been programmed to hate them so much.

your argument is with the press, the fake news, the jews. They want you to #neverforget which is why they won't shut up.

What? This is the most glorious shit-posting era in history. Salt biz is booming, get in on the action and enjoy!

Are you denying there are more loopholes in the tax code now than there were then? ARe you denying it?

You know that u were programmed to shout "LOOPHOLES" anytime that someone brings up that the rich paid much higher tax rates back then. You guys were programmed to do this so that u won't try to raise taxes on the rich again. Your programming is very strong. I know u retards all too well.

Racist Canada

Ottawa - 74% European canadian , Toronto 50.2% European canadian
Vancouver - 52.5% European canadian ,Montreal - 67.7% European canadian

Liberal America

Detroit - 7.8% European american , Miami 11.9% European american ,
Chicago - 31.7% European american , Houston 25.6% European american

>Less Crime than US city , Less corruption than US city
>Cleaner than US city , More Middle class

Stop being Racist , Faggot

> The conservacuck Reagan bamboozled Americans into cutting top tax rates by 2/3

You mean the new middle class that was increasingly in the 50-60% tax brackets created in the 50s gained more political power (by increasing in numbers) and negotiated a lower rate by electing Reagan.

But your post just proves you were lying about only wanting to tax billionaires. Now you're talking about the "40%" Obama wanted, which was solely aimed at the middle class. And you never acknowledged my point that it was the very Jews you claim you want to tax are the same ones that derailed your Occupy movement.

You are the one defending the kikes in the 0.05% tax bracket.

thank you sharia blue

Yep you're a real winner. I bet you weigh over 300 pounds and have grease stains all over your obama shirt you fat faggot fuck. You sit on here all day reposting the same graphs, continuously getting BTFO'd, all the while declaring victory while you secretly cry yourself to sleep knowing the right is surging again.

Also, notice the big dip in the graph at the end of 2015 when selfie man was elected. Yeah, that was Harper's fault too lmao.

I'm asking for evidence. You cannot provide it despite claiming your MS Paint graph showed that and instead act like a snarky child throwing a tantrum.

I will be sure to avoid your posts in the future. Thanks.

Don't change the subject you fucking kike. I asked about the tax code complexity that YOU were complaining about and brought up.
This complexity allows the loopholes YOU were complaining about.
Democrats raise taxes on the rich, but obviously that didn't work because you're still here complaining about the loopholes that still exist. Or don't they because the democrats removed them?

Even your ultra-leftist politifact says the bush tax cuts didn't cause the recession.
>The Great Recession emerged "in large part because of tax policies that slashed taxes on the wealthy, failed to invest in the middle class, took their eyes off of Wall Street, and created a perfect storm. [MOSTLY FALSE]

Commie liberal presidents are horrible. MEDIA? Watching at tv instead of improving your life with that time. Have not watched tv in 10 years. All i know is when democrts are in charge the country goes to shit economically and socially.

Let's reiterate this for the stupid moose-fucking syrup-sucking hockey puck Chinese colony subject here

BREAK
THOSE
DOWN
BY
INCOME
YOU
FUCKING
L
E
A
F

It also includes the richest 1% of Americans. You've argued that the rich have gotten to rich. How can the average household income rise, if the richest 1% are hording the money?
The concept seems counter-intuitive.

CAD is up under Trudeau. Keep being triggered bitch. Harper was shit, destroyed the Canadian economy and got btfo by Based Trudeau

You are a zilch, and your mal-education has only deceived you. That you might be a junior pursuing an economics degree doesn't provide you with greater knowledge than those of us that are in business.

the 2001 crash was caused by the housing bubble which was created by leftist economic policies in which the government guaranteed loans to SUB PRIME lendees who were never going to pay the money back. Even politifact admits it. Pathetic!

>Democrats raise taxes on the rich, but obviously that didn't work

Obviously it did work u fucking retard. The economy soared and Based Bill balanced the budget and Obama cut the GOP budget deficit by 2/3.

your worst nightmare

Your entire fucking ideology is slashing taxes for the wealthy elites and exploding the budget deficit.