If 2 women can marry why can't 3 women?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=FVJEwrUCif0
youtube.com/watch?v=UaXYrUeZP7A
youtube.com/watch?v=TQ13YVnzSH4
utilitarian.net/singer/by/2001----.htm
news.ubc.ca/2012/01/23/monogamy-reduces-major-social-problems-of-polygamist-cultures/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

If two women can marry why can't I marry a 10 year old.

Equality is a myth

legalize rape

Love is love

Why dont we have human rights for polygamy too?

Marriage IS NOT about 1 man 1 woman!

Slippery slope is not a fallacy

Why can't I marry my dog?

>3 women
What would these three women look like? I'm having trouble imagining the situation

lol lets legalize pedophilia and incest too XD

love is love m8

If two women can marry why can't I get a gf

great motherfucking Idea.

I'm voting yes to keep religion out of policy.

Only if they consummate on film

...

its not slippery slope it is the irony of the cognitive distortion of the faulty logic that has lead to the oppositions observed conclusion.

Wtf im voting no now?!

there is a religion based wholly around you voting. by voting you have involved religion in your vote.

give it to me in english doc

take one red pill daily.

Hi there!

You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of Sup Forums are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making!

Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bait to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!

There will come a day when you will realise the folly of rejecting religion on material premises. Men can't live on bread alone. The Christian faith is one of the pillars holding up our heritage and culture, but you would profane it

>there is a religion based wholly around you voting.
It's called democracy...

don't care.

...

Nope. Not rejecting religion in its entirety, only in the space of public policy.

If a man and a woman can marry why not 95?

And instead you're voting to lionize homosexuals who will then advance gay sex education, equal standards in blood transfusions and adoption, and parade around your cities in gimp suits performing sexually suggestive acts in broad daylight.

i know

love is love

just get on with it!

equality, human rights, what do gays and straights think they deserve them but polygamists dont?

really fucking hetero homo normative lads

>Things they're doing anyway and already have.
Voting no does not change any of what you mentioned. Should the law let SS couples marry? Yes.

This could actually work as a tactic against gay marriage.

Use the left's tendency to purity spiral against it. Make the left demand "polyamorous" marriage and promote voting against it as a protest if this is not included.

Butthole with timestamp.

>Should the law let SS couples marry? Yes
no*

fixed faggot

Quality post there friendo

please don't antagonize people with childish taunts, use wit and skill.

Is there hard data to prove polygamous societies suck?

I need sources because leftists would sooner argue for polygamy than stop arguing for SSM

Love yes, marriage no.

You fucking idiots spout equality so fucking much you think you would have a grasp on its meaning.

Why are you're rights more important than the Christians who started the term marriage but are against homosexuality? They gave you the option of calling it a "union" or something else but no apparently that is treating you lesser, I say no you stupid cunt that is the middle ground between both sides.

Human rights for everyone goy. They're not just for christians.

polygamy occurs when there is extreme social disparity. if you start taking several wives you incur an air of true misogamy and create social in equity. basically polygamy causes jealousy and the grounds of social counter justice as egomaniacs are attacked for their abuse of wealth and absorption of vital social resources. hence a mistresses and not multiple wives.

additionally promiscuity begets promiscuity. a polygamous man will likely have promiscuous wives.

the christian basis is on the grounds of human biology and functionality. citing the bible is just a habit of most. you can easily cite a book of human biology and point out trying to put a pussy in a pussy to a dick in a dick is not the same as a dick in a pussy. the issue is than of trans-humanism's failure: procreation.

True and noted. But notice the conversation is about marriage outside of your religious experience.

I did, I never spoke of religious terms just that of human biology, based in religious practice, but in terms of non religious argument.

same sex "marriage" is kind of silly if you know what gay men are truly like

You're using biology to validate how Christians view the world, which boils down to gays shouldn't be allowed to wed. I see what you're doing and calling you out mate. Invalid argument.

marriage between a man and woman predates christianity, the ancient germanics defined marriage this way

we've already seen what allowing "gay marriage" does, pretty soon you'll be forced to accept gay adoption, then you'll be forced by the state to do business with them. and it just gets the ball rolling further in eliminating free speech and free association.

Based

Why not marry for a decade contract, or marry a whole gangbang, or a kangaroo. Or why not just not call any of it marriage wrt the law?

Gays can adopt and have equal opportunity to conduct business though. Marriage doesn't change any of that.

to me they are one and the same. I learn about the reality of the world and use that to question my religion. when I find what is and is not true I then check the source (as the bible has many writers) and compare that to what was most likely meant. then I complete the circle by seeing if there is a logic break. I have not found one that is not explained by the context of a writing and the bias intent of the specific writer.

Legalize it
Tax it

the psychopathology isn't the same of a homosexual couple. they encourage deviancy in their adopted children and to great effect, there are many who get the appropriate parentage but that is by luck. ultimately there shouldn't be orphans, and if there is there is a bigger problem.

flag checks out

Ok, I concede you have a logical argument. The Bible tells you homos can't and shouldn't marry, cool.
Voting yes or no for SSM does not change nor encourage that scenario. The mechanisms for it are already in place, which is self evident because you've observed it.

let me restate it in a way that is more applicable to what really happens.

gay couples who "adopt" have in many instances adopted a child of one of the couple had with a sexual partner out side of the union. they "adopted" the child, but the child is raised by the mother and father respectively with outside support of an "aunt or uncle." most children born this way don't view the gay partner as a mother/father, but as a friend of their mother/father and conscious or sub-conscious view only their mother and father as their true parents.

those who are truly adopted often suffer from several and various social disorders. children of a male couple will often lead to social anxiety and children of a female couple will be promiscuous and anti-social.

LOVE IS LOVE YOU FUCKING CUNT

rape is love.

fuck off

KEKLORD

If you say so. Reminder gays in my country can adopt legally memeflag and is a sidetrack to the core question if gays can marry or not.

you purposed the argument, I retorted. do not blame me for your failure to defend your position, that is why your country is currently holding a referendum, as much as mine is pushing for a change of intolerable acts.

He's destroying the "science" behind gays you cocksucker.
The "can gays marry?" question is a sidetrack from the fact they want to expand the porno market to include child porn so they're attacking the family.

Your children are going to get gay married by chinese centerlink workers and they'll do sex work as their work for the dole activity.
There is nothing you can do about it.

also faggots it has been 100 threads now, we don't want to talk about you anymore and all the arguing is fucking done. wait for the result like a normal human being would

Friendly reminder that gays use medicare big time they cost millions and they never ever stop costing.
Same with all the boomers who did this, they're about to all come of age within the same decade.

You are fucked.

I appreciate the support, but I can defend my arguments. and please don't antagonize people.

>marriage is a human right
no its a christian creation, how stupid are you?

>please don't antagonize people

this. just because one of us doesn't consent doesn't mean our love is any less valid than any other couples

the arguing, the learning is never done. even after this referendum another can be held, and there have been surprising changes at the last minuet.

Rev up those polyamory arguments cocksucker LOVE IS LOVE

Everytime I post on reddit why 3 men cant marry I get banned :(

I'm Pan-amorous and you're all bigoted disgrases of human beings.

Pic related is my religion.

Nope, but there is no hard data to suggest incest, bestiality, necrophiliac and pedophilia societies suck too.
Although you could argue that pedophilia is child abuse because no appropriate consent has been given, you can't make that case for incest and bestiality or event consensual necrophilia.

Let's see Yes voters argue against those without backtracking on their "love is love" "equality for everyone" garbage.

And before anyone pushes the "bestiality is animal abuse" meme:
youtube.com/watch?v=FVJEwrUCif0
youtube.com/watch?v=UaXYrUeZP7A
youtube.com/watch?v=TQ13YVnzSH4
utilitarian.net/singer/by/2001----.htm
You're brainwashed and homosexuals are no more normal than animal fuckers.

All men already have the right to marry any woman and vice versa. gay marriage is not equality, it's a special privilege to account for a defect.

i know the counter to equality

it's "get the fuck over it"

human right are based on the distinct observance of natural truths and their relation ship to immortality.

>humans must breath
>humans must drink
>humans must eat
>humans must grow
>humans must procreate

the right is of natural facts of the human life cycle stylized as "our God given rights."

>Implying there's an objective reality

Actually laughed out loud.

As I understand your defence of why gays should be able to be married is they can't procreate, think of the children and we know this cuz jesus. Marriage today is not about starting a family under God. I know that's how you see it and how it should be as it always has been, I say no. Two consenting adults wanna marry, yes.

lol autism the post.

They do. Only compounds if they're obese too. Like voting no in a survey changes that dynamic.

nah youre full of shit

news.ubc.ca/2012/01/23/monogamy-reduces-major-social-problems-of-polygamist-cultures/

Yeah, we can get babies from a test tube. Marriage has nothing to do with children they are two distinct areas of your life.

see above. you are just making shit up.

Yes or no the bitching will not stop.

They have a homo god in their atheist pantheon but no aids god because they don't understand science and medicine.
Liberals are a reduced, primitive tribal people.

>love thy neighbor
well aware.

Hate to break it to you. You don't have to be married to have kids. It's nonstandard practice culturally, but so is fucking a man in the ass. Both legal tho.

Oh so I can just fuck a man in the ass with a hote iron rod can I? I wanna get fucked in the ass with a hot iron rod and I want you to pay for the surgeries afterwards.

Just think about all the school children who love getting fucked up the arse with hot iron rods before you give your answer cunt.

Sure can if consentual. Will pay. Same for obese people smashing maccas or iceheads peeling off their skin.

and the institution of marriage was created as a social service to create a community status quo of sexual partnerships based in a martial union. by helping a reproducing couple a community can create a support for growth and development in a secure condition. this grows the community which provides for more security and stability.

gay marriage in this perspective degrades that as it causes more issues that it provides solutions. the couple cannot procreate and takes up valuable social resources for self indulgence. a literal parasite.

Seems to me everyone has forgot one thing about marriage.

I should be allowed to have a wife and wife(male).
My dick is bigger then the average and thus I am entitled to both.

Agreed

Love is love

Let me marry fifteen bitches

There are kids out there who get thrown on the street as soon as centerlink stops paying the parent. It's over 15% of all Children in Australia.

How can a baby consent to getting thrown out and have it be enforceable by a court?

I apologize if I misunderstand you, but Isn't that just the slippery slope

shitty ass fucking parents.

If I identify as an attack helicopter can I marry pic related?

no. it is parody.

Speaking as someone who worked at Social Security/Centrelink for 20 years that statement is utter bullshit. The standard consensus for parents in housing commission is to swap kids the moment they are entitled to claim Young Homeless Allowance. It's called maximizing their benefits. Don't believe everything you read in the papers.

Yeah but yoiu're the guy who makes it all happen.
It's like a seagull, you keep giving it food and never show it anything else the seagull will eat until it can't walk.

Are you trying to say the op picture is a joke?

Love

Is

Love