What does it mean to be politcally correct?

What does it mean to be politcally correct?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DzHVv_U6L-k
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Imagine if you had to appeal to every demographic group and not offend any of them.

It means to step on eggshells and stay quiet for the rest of time.

To do as the Jews say

Not saying n word

Its literally brainwashing.

Politically correct as in your opinions are correct. The opposite is being politically incorrect as in your opinions are wrong.

The opinions we tell you to think = good
The opinions you want to think = bad

Get it right little goyim.

Not voicing "wrong" opinion

It means you notice nothing. Those patterns you're noticing, you're not really seeing them. At least, you can't tell other people that you see them, because they "don't see" them either.

If you don't sit like this, you're a rapist.

Nordic

in the words of the person who created the term
to agree with the general political consensus
think the soviet union should have more than two newspapers? and more free speech?
incorrect politically in other words your political opinion is wrong

It means that you are what other people want you to be.

To not offend anyone. Don't call negros black, call them African American. Don't call spics greasy beaners, call them Latinas and Latinos etc.


But the big problem is stuff like crime statistics related to race. For example negros commit an insanely disproportionate amount of crimes yet we could never say this as it would offend negros and LGBTs who would commit crimes in protest.


Why are you asking? Also take that frog down it's a white supremacist symbol.

This. Funny since SJWs always cry about being victims and abused, while using the tactics of abusers to silence, shame, and bully people they don't like for arbitrary made up reasons.

Watch this.

youtube.com/watch?v=DzHVv_U6L-k

I swear to god this picture FUCKING MOVED don't FUCK with me user, what wizardry is this?!

It means you got controlled.

It means to be not correct

delete this

...

Ignore facts and instincts in favour of feelings and what the media tells you is okay.

Jews contribute between one-third and one-half of all campaign money in federal elections, the donations motivated by “Israel and the broader Jewish agenda”. Jews are thus overrepresented in campaign contributions by a factor of at least 13 based on their percentage of the population and are overrepresented by a factor of approximately 6.5 if adjustment is made for their higher average income. In overseas donations, the Jewish lead is even greater. For example, in the 1920s, before the post-World War II explosion of Jewish giving to Israel, Jewish Americans may have given as much as 24 times more per capita to assist overseas Jews than did Irish Americans to assist Ireland in its struggle for independence from Great Britain. Yet this was the period of peak Irish ethnic philanthropy. The disparity has become much greater since World War II. Salter has adopted a preliminary conservative estimate of Jewish ethnic mobilization as four times that of white gentiles, based on comparison of per capita donations to non-religious ethnic causes.

In the Blalock equation influence is affected not only by mobilization but also by the resources held by the group. Salter estimates that Jews control approximately 26 percent of the “cybernetic resources” of the United States (i.e., resources as measured by representation in key areas such as government, media, finance, academia, corporations, and entertainment).

creating rules with the explicit purpose of exploiting the loopholes its how they operate they avoid direct competition

...

It should be clear by now that whatever Americans say about diversity, it is not a strength. If it were a strength, Americans would practice it spontaneously. It would not require “diversity management” or anti-discrimination laws. Nor would it require constant reminders of how wonderful it is. It takes no exhortations for us to appreciate things that are truly desirable: indoor plumbing, vacations, modern medicine, friendship, or cheaper gasoline.

When they are free to do so, most people avoid diversity. The scientific evidence suggests why: Human beings appear to have deeply-rooted tribal instincts. They seem to prefer to live in homogeneous communities rather than endure the tension and conflict that arise from differences. If the goal of building a diverse society conflicts with some aspect of our nature, it will be very difficult to achieve. As Horace wrote in the Epistles, “Though you drive Nature out with a pitchfork, she will ever find her way back.” Some intellectuals and bohemians profess to enjoy diversity, but they appear to be a minority. Why do we insist that diversity is a strength when it is not?

It is precisely because it is so easy to point out the weaknesses of diversity that any attempt to do so must be countered, not by specifying diversity’s strengths—which no one can do—but with accusations of racism.
This is a very effective way to stop criticism. Race relations are difficult, sometimes agonizing. The harmony for which the country yearns is not at hand, and may never be achieved. Because whites are generally blamed for making race into such an enduring problem, white racism has become not just a moral failing but the worst moral failing. Our society forgives sexual misconduct, abuse of office, dishonesty, and incompetence far more readily than it does any action by whites that could be described as “racism.”

To comply with the uncertain conditions your government sets, and only applies to white males.

Promoting diversity is a way for whites to demonstrate virtue. Diversity policies benefit non-whites by encouraging their immigration, employment, promotion, or admission to university, and to support diversity is the most readily recognizable way of demonstrating opposition to racism. For whites, diversity therefore has moral rather than practical goals, and this is why it does not require justification in ordinary terms. Americans attribute unrealistic, exaggerated benefits to diversity because they support it for emotional rather than rational reasons. They call it “America’s greatest strength” not because they have weighed all of America’s strengths and come to a rational conclusion about which is greatest. They are expressing an emotional commitment to something they feel they must support in order to prove they are not racists.

Non-whites promote diversity because they profit from it. It increases their opportunities at the expense of whites. Celebrations of diversity also flatter them. After all, they are providing what is claimed to be America’s “greatest strength.” There is more than a hint of arrogance in this view—that the United States was lifeless and incomplete before Hispanics or Asians came in large numbers—but it is now common even for immigrants to insist that diversity is central to our identity. Whites have been persuaded to support diversity—even if it restricts opportunities for them and reduces their numbers and influence—because they have been taught that not to support it would be racist. This is truly astonishing: Whites are supporting something that is not only against their own interests but that is manifestly untrue.

those who cannot survive on their own need a tribe to protect them from other tribes what better way to survive than to destroy all tribes in an attempt to be free from their weakness?
what better way to survive as someone who cant compete than to trick others into competing with each other for your own benefit?
its how small cuttlefish procreate why not a limp wristed liberal?

not saying any word...

opposite of being politically correct

Don't offend any group that is "marginalized"

A pussy

There's still hope for us brother.

Obey without question.

They say "a woman is more than her hair, her make up and her short dress" you agree, without hesitation.

They say "a man can become a woman by altering his hair, wearing makeup and a short dress" you agree, without hesitation.

It only matters that you obey.

r selective k selective
immediate threats prolonged threats
avoids competition competes for fun
polygamous monogamous
abundant resources lack of resources
a genealogy of morals and petersons social hierarchy both point in the same direction
that politics is the art of getting others to want what you want and we all want to procreate and survive our morals our values and our politics are expressions of our deeply rooted psychology the liberal and the conservative are two different ways of surviving

Nobody is going to destroy all tribes. It will end up being purely Sharia.

Here's my evolutionary take:

We humans are not born with the motivation to discuss and interact with each other for the sole purpose of growing smarter. Human interaction and discussion is just one of the complex means of achieving our very basic natural calls, ie. mating and gaining power.
To this extend we are deeply context aware. Everything we say is calibrated prior to the context we are in.

>When people discuss here on Sup Forums, we don't aim to enlighten each other, but to feel good about having friends or feeling that you outsmarted your opponent.
>When you are on a date, you don't give a flying fuck about the content of the conversation - you only care about the impression you left her with, so that she will pick you over another dude.
>When politicians (especially in a democracy) say a lot of feelsindifferentman.jpg in public, they are not doing it for your good or because it's true. They are doing it because it enables their own life and primal goals. Generally speaking in a public context puts a lid on what you are able to say without getting punished from it.

The second point is what lead us humans to develop our intelligence beyond other mammals. In order to ensure a mating, we have to use sophisticated tactics and manipulation over of violence and rape.

And the latter is political correctness.

Sometimes I feel sad that humans are this dishonest.

>Politically correct
>"Niggers are to be called African Americans"
>"Illegal immigrants are to be called Undocumented Immigrants"
>"Retards are to be called something less degrading but everyone keeps getting fucking offended anyways so we just end up downplaying it to them being a regular person but then they get offended for calling them normal when they really aren't so we just call them-"
Being Politically Correct is a liberal's way of making something sound okay when it's really fucking not.

what they want is to create an environment where they can survive an r selective environment
government handouts and wealth distribution means abundant resources loose sexuality means easy procreation and the love for everyone means no more conflict and therefore no wolfs to eat them
wont happen of coarse it'll mean they all die and humanity gets a long term reset until it happens again

Sup Forums and wikileaks is being subverted for about a year minimum. Nothing new to be honest. Sup Forums is a big mountain of bullshit at this point and best leaks got deleted, but the occasional goldnuggets make it worthwhile.

this guy gets it strauss howe is like boom and bust cycles of economics
I first thought it was like supply and demand two opposing forces are continually being balanced but i thought it was the r and K selective mentalities that were the cause until I figured out r and K are ways of surviving in different environments then it clicked the environments themselves are the supply and demand
the politics are a way the people are trying to achieve an environment more suited towards there own survival
and our own success at creating an abundant rich society is what creates our downfall thats why we have an even longer boom bust cycle as described by spengler

It means changing your thought patterns to assuage the guilt of lessers.

It's simply being conscious of other people's feelings.

Its just empathy.

Empathy is a mark of intelligence because it takes a lot of high cognitive function to put yourself in another persons shoes, which is why are murders and rapists are often stupid people

Empathy isn't lying about what you think.

It's pretend empathy, because you don't understand the people you're trying to assuage.

and so if this is correct it could mean we could shift our environments like shifting supply and demand which means we could prolong societies or even keep them running indefinitely without decline or downfall by shifting the environments themselves

You mean being aware of your prejudices and deciding it's not fair until you actually get to know that person?

I know, that's what I said

Political correctness is all about censorship of ideas that debunk leftism.

Let's look at a few examples.

Lefties: All races are equal, we're all the same.

"Nazis": Actually IQ and crime statistics say otherwise.

Lefties: RACIST! NAZIS! SHUT THAT SPEECH DOWN!

Lefties: Women are equal and contribute to our economy.

"Nazis": Actually women have fewer neurons, lower IQ scores, and have kept working and middle classes wages from rising by flooding the labor market.

Lefties: ANTI WOMAN BIGOT SHUT UP! I DEMAND MORE SPEECH CODES TO KEEP THIS MISOGYNY OFF MY CAMPUS!

>It's just empathy
Lol fuckin no. Empathy has fuck all to do with agreeableness. Being empathetic towards another doesn't mean you approve their views or goals.

No, but it means you aren't going to call scientists and doctors niggers

following the consensus and not questioning what those whole mold thought and pop culture for you to consume, basically being an imbecile incapable of free thought and speech