Why do you believe in scientific racism when literally no anthropologists...

why do you believe in scientific racism when literally no anthropologists, geneticists or biologists think the claims are valid? We are literally 99.9% the same, and there is more variation inbetween two groups than from. Stop your literal racism before you destroy America. Almost all the problems are based off of white supremacy and of the unequal accumulation of wealth by whites, not insanely racist ideas like black people are dumber and more violent just because of the amount of melanin in their skin. (an adaptation that is very recent btw.) Just stop. Educate yourself. Fuck.
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Racialism
rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Watson
vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/6/15/15797120/race-black-white-iq-response-critics
archive.fo/N7Fio
digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/now-scientists-want-to-tell-you-that-iq-doesnt-exist/
youtu.be/zah5sUBULVM
gwern.net/docs/2003-murray-human-accomplishment.pdf
docdro.id/avPyEsh
docdro.id/e2pEr1E
youtu.be/Nxv2x0DJonk
pastebin.com/Q1hMEC4a
humanbiologicaldiversity.com/
pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622
medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html
cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5
sociology.fas.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1043/2008_Reconstructing_Race_in_AJS.pdf
hrcak.srce.hr/file/8770
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01076.x/abstract
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/on-the-concept-of-race-in-chinese-biological-anthropology-alive-and-well.pdf
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.3660290308/abstract
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11694885
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079384/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22713927
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963424
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289605000917
psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/babies-prefer-individuals-who-harm-those-that-arent-like-them.html
science.sciencemag.org/content/309/5741/1720
en.oxforddictionaries.com/explore/is-a-tomato-a-fruit-or-a-vegetable
archive.is/A5CsE
gwern.net/docs/iq/2015-cofnas.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/07/18/what-the-experts-really-think-about-race-realism-and-white-nationalism-or-at-least-ideas-pertaining-to-it/
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/variation-within-and-between-races/
youtu.be/Ve6uK00AvNo?list=PLaJtMuDnR5KLwrt4z1O8tKmHWmUm3nObV
helmuthnyborg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270739/
youtube.com/watch?v=bvRc7pwnt0U
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>literally no anthropologists, geneticists or biologists think the claims are valid?

Because they're exiled by the scientific community if they agree

Dumbfuck

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Watson

also this. it takes 5 minutes of research to realize racism makes no sense unless your just a failure trying to justify their life's mistakes
vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/6/15/15797120/race-black-white-iq-response-critics

>en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Watson
wow some literal 90 year old has been who basically said "n-word get off my lawn" is a source now? I know he was important... in the 50s... but his research had NOTHING to do with IQ, which isn't even that good of a measurement of geniune intelligence anyway.

>not one scientist
Best me to it user
archive.fo/N7Fio
Absolutely disgraceful how the left denies science

You can't even make your own arguments without resorting to demeaning ad hominem attacks. That's not very progressive is it?

Someone being designated as a "racist" by someone like you is never based upon proper reasoning.

LMAO fucking hang yourself with this weak ass bait

0/10

sage

Is that Ozymandias on the bottom left?
He's an Aryan superman, don't disrespect him by putting him in your shitty meme.

>so irrelevant the entire left establishment ruined his life.
His story alone reinforces how closed minded the left truly is.

It's probably bait but anons should still learn the James Watson story

blacks really are dumber but you do realize this board actually is satire right? most people here don't actually believe kikes are trying to destroy the world or whatever

I don't think there is a general consensus on anything on Sup Forums other than maybe Reddit is for fags and traps are gay.

checked

listen, you're not a harvard geneticist, and i'm not either. because of that, we need to listen to the experts. we can seek to understand the playing field, but we cannot play the game. we need to refer to expert consensus in most things in life. you do it every day, that's how society work.
It is a fact that >90% of scientists will tell you that race is not a functional basis of categorizing humanity. Why? Because it literally doesn't exist. The tried to do research on it but as our science advanced, they found it was utterly unreliable. they didn't do it because they wanted to "silence anybody." they did it because its about as accurate as horoscopes or palm reading outside of a cultural/environmental context.

hell, if we modernized 10k years ago, we'd all be black, because white skin is something that happened around 5k years ago.
digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/now-scientists-want-to-tell-you-that-iq-doesnt-exist/

Thanks, user. And you have nice digits yourself. But I'm not sure it works the way you think it does

>literally no anthropologists, geneticists or biologists think the claims are valid
Bait, but, w/e. Here's reading for lurkers that are curious:

youtu.be/zah5sUBULVM
>Human Accomplishment - Douglas Murray
gwern.net/docs/2003-murray-human-accomplishment.pdf
>Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations
docdro.id/avPyEsh
>Race Differences in Intelligence by Richard Lynn
docdro.id/e2pEr1E
youtu.be/Nxv2x0DJonk
pastebin.com/Q1hMEC4a
humanbiologicaldiversity.com/

>why do I believe in something that stacks up with the observable reality?
Here's another little thought to ponder. Racism does not distinguish true and false. You can declare "2+2=4" and
inherently racist statement, but guess what?
2+2 will always equal 4 user....

>backpedaling and straw manning this hard

Kill yourself you disgusting kike

>and of the unequal accumulation of wealth by (((whites)))

> 90 percent of scientists will tell you that race is not a functional basis of categorizing humanity
False:

Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races. Source:
pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf

Genetic analysis “supports the traditional racial groups classification.” Source:
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

“Human genetic variation is geographically structured” and corresponds with race. Source:
nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1435.html

Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals. Source:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622

Oral bacteria can be used to determine race. Source:
medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html

Race can be determined via brain scans. Source:
cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5

>Morning 2008 - HS Biology Textbook:
sociology.fas.nyu.edu/docs/IO/1043/2008_Reconstructing_Race_in_AJS.pdf
>Lieberman 2004 - Survey of Physical Anthropologists:
hrcak.srce.hr/file/8770
>Kaszycka on Race in Eastern and Western Europe:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01076.x/abstract
>Chinese views on Race in 2001:
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/on-the-concept-of-race-in-chinese-biological-anthropology-alive-and-well.pdf
>Lieberman 1992:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.3660290308/abstract

(2001) Thompson et al., conclude in their own words that, "A genetic continuum was detected in which brain structure was increasingly similar in subjects with increasing genetic affinity. Genetic factors significantly influenced cortical structure in Broca's and Wernicke's language areas, as well as frontal brain regions," and, "Preliminary correlations were performed suggesting that frontal gray matter differences may be linked to Spearman's g, which measures successful test performance across multiple cognitive domains (p < 0.05). These genetic brain maps reveal how genes determine individual differences, and may shed light on the heritability of cognitive and linguistic skills, as well as genetic liability for diseases that affect the human cortex."

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11694885

This further suggests that brain structure, size, and cognitive performance are all heritable and genetic.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079384/

(2011) Joshi et al., study twins to conclude that there is a highly significant genetic contribution to cortical thickness and volume. This is believed to have a significant effect on the neurotubule number and density in individuals and thus a highly significant effect on IQ.

In their own words, "The results showed detailed pointwise genetic and environmental contributions on the whole cortex. Several areas in the parietal and frontal lobes were observed to be genetically influenced."

The environmental factors are believed to be heavily genetically influenced due to how genetics define interaction and determine developmental reactions in the brain.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22713927

it's so sad when people say Sup Forums is nothing but satire... is it really so inconceivable to have a place where whites gather who don't like or want to be around niggers and who refuse to bend over backwards to suck nigger dick?

(2012) Yang et al., conclude that there is a, "greater than 80%," genetic contribution to the prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain associated with reward, attention, short-term memory tasks, planning, and motivation.), a significant genetic contribution to the temporal lobe (the part of the brain associated with Visual memory, language comprehension, and emotion association), a significant genetic contribution to the occipital lobe (dubbed the visual processing center of the mammalian brain), and a nearly 80% environmental influence on the parietal lobe (the part of the brain associated with touch, hand-eye coordination, spatial sense, and navigation).

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963424

(2012) Rushton concludes that there has been no narrowing in the mean Black-White IQ difference predicted by heritable g.

Rushton also invalidates research by Nisbett, Dickens, and Flynn that show black gains in IQ by evaluating their lack of data and use of specious arguments. He shows that the little data they had to prove these points obscured the topic by invoking alleged age and social class interactions and adoption studies of very young children. Their data was based on ideas, not observations. In his own words on the twin studies cited: "There is no evidence of any special cultural influence, such as extreme deprivation or being raised as a visible minority, that operates in one group and not in others."

He shows using a meta-analysis that there has been no reduction in the mean racial differences between Blacks and Whites and that all claims of, "systemic issues," are spurious and unsupported by factual evidence. The credence given to researchers saying that society is to blame for the failures of adopted Blacks comes from a cursory glance at a specious statement - they have no evidence.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289605000917

Traps's aren't gay

I'll get a PhD in Biological Anthropology from Cambridge next year. Race is akin to sub-species, and is a useful taxological classification. Africans are actually a distinct race, but we have to pretend they are not - since I attend an actual university I'll let you know that species is not defined by exclusive fertility!)

Because of leftist homosexuals, dykes and beta hetros, the term 'peoples' or, even more stupidly 'clines' is used in non-scientific fields (most of the -ologies these days). In scientific fields - such as physical and biological anthropology - the term race is used, as the police like to know the race and sex of the owner of some human bones.

You are the gentleman on the left, sir.

>99.9% the same
What about the 1%-5% of Neanderthal genes in Asia and Europe?

>unironically posting ryan faulk videos

(2006) Templer & Arikawa analyze populations by temperature, skin color, per capita income, and IQ and find stark correlations between all of them.

They were able to accurately predict individual IQ by skin color (0,92), mean high Winter temperature of their race (0,76), mean low Winter temperature of their race (0,66), and per capita income (0,63). These findings provide strong support for the idea that colder climates caused selection for higher IQs over an evolutionary epoch.

This helps to explain why groups from hotter climates like those found in Africa are less intelligent and thus earn lower incomes.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289605000917

===

(2013) Karen Wynn shows that infants as young as nine months old prefer individuals who are nice to people of their race and dislike people mean to their race. In addition to this they also like people that are mean to others races and dislike people that are nice to other races.

psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/babies-prefer-individuals-who-harm-those-that-arent-like-them.html

===

(2005) Mekel-Bobrov et al., conclude that the gene ASPM is a specific regulator of brain size, and its evolution in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens was driven by strong positive selection. They show that one genetic variant of ASPM in humans arose merely about 5.800 years ago in Eurasia and has since swept to high frequency across Eurasia under strong positivel selection.

The gene is almost non-existent in Sub-Saharan Africa.

science.sciencemag.org/content/309/5741/1720

>not an argument
Here's your (you)

CHECKER DOE

HILLARY WAS wait huh oh

RACISM IS BAD?? (is this right?)

Science isn't conducted by popular consensus. 99% of Galileo's peers thought he was an insane madman because he thought the earth revolves around the sun.

If we were living in his time you would be arguing that the sun revolves around the earth because a large number of scientists (who are just as corruptible/easily influenced as any other human) support that idea.

The success of white Europeans who moved to a more hostile environment and as such gave our African cousins a "head start" in development, is evidence of the clear superiority of white Europeans. The results do not lie.

Africans needs other races to be handicapped in order for them to be able to compete. The white privilege people like you screech about so often, you act like it was unearned. Our ancestors bleed and sacrificed in order for their offspring to have a better life. It's an inherited privilege. Just because Africans are lazy and have no foresight doesn't mean we have to lower our standard of living to level the field.

Well done.

This.

Africans are actually a distinct species*

Proof i am a genius

This image is Sup Forums in a nutshell

>humans evolved from an animal that is the common ancestor to the chimpanzee. Evolution drove a large part in the intelligence of humanity. Evolution is genetic.
>Intelligence isn't genetic at all

Pick one and only one.

The idea that intelligence isn't genetic only makes sense if you believe in intelligent design rather than evolution.

I can't believe liberals continue to have this doublethink. Maybe this is why they have so many mental problems?

Guess where you're posting, genius.

how am i even supposed to argue with someone who just point blank says "africans are lazy and have no forsight." I doubt you'd have that opinion if you actually knew any black people, and realize we are all the same. ironically, since you hate jews so much, you have a very 'of the tribe' and 'goyim' view of other people. "oh those are just stupid goyim, they have no souls." come on now. We had a black president even, and your current prime minsitr isnt white. go to the doctor's office, good chance you'll have an african or asian doctor.

Lol stay mad you kike. Your women are leaving you for strong Nigger and European men.

Israel will go extinct by 2050. The American Jews will die out by 2030.

>no anthropologists, geneticists or biologists think the claims are valid?

Are any of them allowed to?

Oh shit, real-life Quinton comics.

Oh shit, real-life damage control.

>tfw tomato is a fruit
>youre a faggot
en.oxforddictionaries.com/explore/is-a-tomato-a-fruit-or-a-vegetable

Judaism spreads by the woman.

israel is not going anywhere. it is the strongest state in middle east, and very stable, with a growing jewish population.

Top right since I've actually read books.

I bet your anti-global warming too dispite 99% of scientists saying so.

>Sup Forums facts and logic shall rule in this board
>later Sup Forums fuck facts have a artifact riddled .png and some crime stastistics. There 100% proof all niggers are dumb and subhuman

>Science isn't conducted by popular consensus

You may have a point about rightness but this is patently untrue, reproducibility is literally the core tenant of science. Also like that other guy said this post is totally indicative of Dunning-Kruger effect

no no, since they made a meme that makes their idea true now, that's how they think. they literally use the memes they made at 2am drunk, forget they made them, and pretend they are scientific behemoths by quoting the main containment board of Sup Forums
its fucking ridiculous lol

It's a new kind of hilarious to watch someone who uses the Kekistan flag cry about people being on "mount stupid".

And tons of bribes to the US congress and about 80 nuclear warheads they will arrest you over talking about.

This entire board is the dunning kruger effect.

You learn enough about things to become vocal and angry but not enough to actually know about them. What percentage of Sup Forums do you think has actually read Karl Marx's books? Or have they just seen .pngs instead of reading and finding the flaws in the actual theory

>rationalwiki
lol
if you really want, you can read Sean Last's refutation of their rationalwiki's shitty content on race:
archive.is/A5CsE

>no anthropologists, geneticists, or biologists think the claims are valid?
I could dismiss this as an appeal to authority right off the bat, but let's pick this apart. Outside of "the west", the consensus among those experts lean towards what we believe and not you, and in "the west" it's well documented that race-realism is largely rejected for moral reasons. Intelligence researchers largely agree that genes play a part in intelligence differences


gwern.net/docs/iq/2015-cofnas.pdf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4804158/
thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/07/18/what-the-experts-really-think-about-race-realism-and-white-nationalism-or-at-least-ideas-pertaining-to-it/

>more variation within than between
This is a dumb meme argument that's been debunked a million times. Literally no one who's read up on race-realism takes this argument seriously.

thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/variation-within-and-between-races/

I'm with you broham. White culture is bad ass. We should have our own congregation of like minds.

You are not fit to help facilitate the revolution

Explain why blacks are more violent then faggot.

>being this fucking retarded

k. keep me posted

So I take it the left occupies either one of the "name-calling valleys"?

jews have been working together since recorded history, why would they stop now?

>look mom i blamed the jews again

What degenerate place is this?

>refer to expert consensus in most things in life. you do it every day, that's how society work.
that's actually communism and isn't how society works. Sure, we rely on experts by proxy for our technology, but not much more. There's no "expert consensus" that we rely on.

looks like barcelona

Of course I know black people, unfortunately, it's par for the course in this day and age in a European country.

Black Africans have the highest unemployment rate in my country at 88% unemployment. We have a gay mixed race Indian - Irish prime minister who is unelected. He was appointed by his party. A token prime minister to look good for progressives.

I don't hate anyone btw. I don't hate blacks. I don't have to hate them to not want them in my society. Like I don't want ants in my house and I'll do everything I can to keep them out but I don't hate the ants because they are only doing what's in their nature. It's a silly emotive argument.

also
>far right of graph
You really think that as someone learns more and more about politics and economics they suffer exponential desire to explain to thick-headed plebs how "costs affect prices" or "incentives drive action"?

Mount stupid is a product of the company you keep, every group of people meets on mount stupid in some form; be it the high comfort and low judgement of good friends or the desire to impress other humans. You can't move rightward on the graph without kicking some of your group off the fun mount stupid into the shit below, lowering cohesion.

That image is YOU in a nutshell, with all your strange subconscious habits reflected back at you in such a way you are only capable of seeing in others. Lurk more.

i would definitely liberate her

its by definition white supremacist to exclude people just because they aren't white, so at least be honest

>The Jews did not send blacks to America
The Jewish role in the slave trade is well documented and they are absolutely the ones advocating for more immigration.

>There is no concrete evidence for any Jewish conspiracy
What is AIPAC?

>intelligence is chiefly influenced by socio-economic status
Incorrect. Actually it's the other way around. Socioeconomic status correlates strongly with intelligence, which is why most millionaires are self-made.

You're flatly incorrect on all points. Regardless the fact is that the scientific community's "consensus" is politically motivated. Plenty of research has been done to suggest a racial IQ difference, but anyone who tries this is severely ostracized as a matter of course.

youtu.be/Ve6uK00AvNo?list=PLaJtMuDnR5KLwrt4z1O8tKmHWmUm3nObV

Yeah, only the top scientists in the relevant fields agree with our positions (just not our conclusions on how to deal with it.) Quit being anti-science you brainlet retard.

>something happens over and over
>identify the common elements of said event
>this must be the cause
Perfectly logical.

>Jews expelled over 300 times from Kingdoms, city states and countries
>It's always "anti-Semitism" which has no connection to the behavior of Jews

lul

>Amazons
Didn't exist, this was a Greek myth.

>American civil war
Had something to do with slavery but more to do with irreconcilable political differences.

>Tomato
That's objective fact.

>quantum physics
The only people who pretend to know about quantum physics are liberals who watch The Big Bang Theory, and you know it.

No that’s Quentin, king of Sup Forums

>books by Jews

>Literally talking to each other

Global Warming is fake btw. All projections were wrong.

OP's teeth savagely and brutally removed. Kekistani flag faggot BTFO as well. One-sided, zero contest, total tooth removal.

Pls post more.

its a coincedence. Jewish culture values literacy and intelligence, so many go to university. The disparity was just so great historically because jews always sent their kids to university, and other groups are just really doing it recently. The reason jews had to rely on going to university, is because they were traditionally banned from the trades. but hey you don't know any of that. now you do

> I've actually read books.
>I bet your anti-global warming
>Sup Forums facts and logic shall
I love this meme.

>its a coincedence
Just fuck off already, some part of me tells me you just want attention.

Amazing bait

>Jewish culture values literacy and intelligence, so many go to university.
The majority of Jews have historically been illiterate, hence their name "Kikel"
>The disparity was just so great historically because jews always sent their kids to university
The majority of jews, historically, were illiterate. Their average IQ scores only started to pass gentiles in the 1960s; even today, they don't score as high as gentiles when denominations are separated by race.

helmuthnyborg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf

>we are literally 99% the same

Stopped reading there

user, if you understood basic fucking biology you would realise that 1% is a massive fucking difference. At least understand the topic before you shitpost about it.

In 3rd year of my biomed degree, you're talking shit. Race is a powerful indicator of various social, physical and mental characteristics.

literally what school, and can i report you to your professors? i think they'd like to have a word with you come on, if you are so logical and right, let me tell them about your beliefs

Have you ever lived in a majority black neighborhood user?

Geneticists say that intelligence is 75% inherited you fucking faggot

i can gtd that no study has ever said 75% inherited, and that you are pulling that out of your ass. even the most hardline nutjobs will admit they think its only about 25-30%. How dumb do you think your ancestors from 1750 are? I don't want to believe it, but yes, your ancestors were far dumber and more ignorant than you are somehow. That's how we know environment is BY FAR the biggest predictor.

>It would be reasonable to assume that as we go through life, experiences—Shakespeare's ‘whips and scorns of time'—have a cumulative effect on intelligence, perhaps overwhelming early genetic predispositions. However, for intelligence, heritability increases linearly, from (approximately) 20% in infancy to 40% in adolescence, and to 60% in adulthood. Some evidence suggests that heritability might increase to as much as 80% in later adulthood
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270739/

>rationalwiki
dropped

explain to me why black IQs are rising, assuming we want to pretend stick to archaic iq and forget all other forms of intelligence evaluation. if its so much genetics why is it being overridden?

>black IQs are rising
[citation needed]

Why the fuck is that a thing?

It's like a more pretentious Snopes 2.0

Shill

...

There is essentially a scientific consensus on the Heritability of IQ, the headstart proved that socioeconomic conditions have little effect on IQ in the 60s. Please just fuck off, your foolish "it's just satire" strategy is filthy and uncompelling

I'm just throwing this out here so you guys can use it when she or it or numale decides to claim yhat black behavior is brought on by "generational poverty"

> number of people in poverty in US
>black-11,151,874
>white-28,990,845
> source: US census bureau

Please, enlighten me on other forms of intellectual ability assessment other IQ. Honestly, I'd love to hear about them.

youtube.com/watch?v=bvRc7pwnt0U

>spend 50 years breeding foxes to become pets
>the domesticated foxes have dog-like facial features, such as floppy ears
>scientists attribute this to them having less adrenaline

>he thinks physical features don't correlate with behavioral temperament

You're literally just pulling numbers out of your ass and hoping no one on this god forsaken has the knowledge to disprove your fucking idiocy. Again, as I stated in my previous post, please provide sources, I would love to be bluepilled on IQ.

>99% of scientists
You keep saying this
Who literally cares what some physicst says, or a professor at a uni who has an interest in neeping his job

read the culture of critique, anthropology, genetics, and biology have a large cohort of Jewish Marxists who mix ethnic activism with science in the name of furthering Jewish interests and insulating themselves from racism. for example stephen jay gould would frequently lie in his research and basically thought "punctuated equilibria" was a good idea because it sounded more revolutionary and Marxist to him.

White humans are superior to niggers.
This fact triggers you so much.

>People STILL don't recognize Quentin
Go away, all you stupid election niggers. You aren't wanted.

Humans are so equal that only whites had ultramarine Empires all over the world, we are so equal that superior races defeated every other racial groups through history, really equal, the same in every way, no difference except skin, right.