Can you guys red pill me on the crimes and atrocities committed by anarchists and commies during the Spanish Civil War?

Can you guys red pill me on the crimes and atrocities committed by anarchists and commies during the Spanish Civil War?

I've just seen a 6-hour long (((BBC))) Documentary on the Spanish Civil War and they showed footage of Leftists burning churches, destroying statues, Bibles, paintings and so on.

But my good friend told me that not only did Spanish anarchists have GULAGS, they also used to routinely GANG RAPE NUNS and perform mock masses ending up with RITUALLY TORTURED PRIESTS HANGING FROM THE CEILING.

WTF??! Are there pictures/videos of this? Apparently (((BBC))) wasn't able to have access to it or something.........

Other urls found in this thread:

insurancejournal.com/news/national/2007/06/18/80877.htm
sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/scofield.htm
strangenotions.com/the-crusdades-urban-legends-and-truth/
m.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1201-1500/horrible-massacre-at-beziers-in-christs-name-11629815.html
earlychristianwritings.com/text/ignatius-smyrnaeans-longer.html
norfolklibrarybookgroup.squarespace.com/the-reading-blog/2013/7/17/barcelona-and-the-spanish-civil-war.html
youtube.com/watch?v=VYfF06CPHMo
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

This behavior also occurred during the French Revolution against Catholics.
Revolutionaries, regardless of the evolutionary stage of liberalism, whether they are Protestant, Enlightenment, Classical liberal, or Marxian, have one thing in common: their hatred of the Church.
Now, the Marxists are in the Church to attempt to destroy it from within.

Catholic armies never raped, tortured or enslaved anyone, why are they so hated by revolutionaries?

What gets me the most is we never hear about this. It seems to be the kind of thing you only find on footnotes on official sources.

It would be better to make a distinguishment here. Some individuals in armies bearing the Catholic name sometimes did some of these things; and when they did, they were dealt with, but there was never a concerted effort that behaved in this manner.
Why do you think? Christendom is Catholic. Christendom is the Old World Order. "Altar and throne" have been overthrown. Christendom is no more. Only secular, neo-liberal republics and socialist/communist States exist.
This was the behavior of the Communist Mexican army during the Cristero rebellion. American government (WASP establishment) funded the Mexican Communists, even sending the Mexican gov't weaponry to defeat the Catholics. Knights of Columbus in America held their own fundraiser to fund the Cristeros.
There is and will always be a war against the Church and the powers of darkness.
Now, they have their own revolutionary on the Chair of Peter; whether or not he is officially a Mason or not, he thinks like one. That is all that is required.

>There is and will always be a war against the Church and the powers of darkness
Obviously I meant there always will be a war between the Church and the powers of darkness.
Because the Church is Christ's mystical Body, She must follow Him in His passion.
Humiliation, betrayal, calumny, torture, via Dolorosa, crucifixion, apparent death, and glorious resurrection.
It seems we are somewhere between via Dolorosa and crucifixion.

I am a lapsed Catholic. I believe in God but I have trouble, big trouble, with the way the current church is going.

Pope Francis a subversive marxist hellbent on destroying the conservative sect of the Church.

Have you ever read Maurice Pinay's "The Plot Against the Church?"

Based. Fuck christcucks and homo priests

Yes, I own it.
You should also read "Athanasius and the Church of Our Time" and Cardinal Manning's three (or was it four?) lectures on "The Present Crisis of the Holy See."
Leaving the Church because of an apparent heretic like Francis is like leaving Christ because Judas betrayed Him. You can't abandon Christ because of the sins of others.
I would say find the traditional Latin Mass and plant yourself in the pew. You are in Portugal; there has to be a traditional Fatima movement near you.

>their hatred of the Church
That's what happens when you fuck children, they hate you for it.

>Protestant
Cathcuck liar, detected.
The murderous Catholic church has no peer.

Well, since 1957 there have been nearly 1,000 more Protestant abuse case insurance payouts but believe the (((media))) if you wish.

>La Santa Inquisición

Don't move the goal posts christfag. The scandal is that the church defended and protected the fag chomo priests.

Yes, one who is ignorant of history (aka, a Protestant) would be one to believe that liberalism just dropped out of the sky and developed spontaneously.
Not recognizing that theological liberalism (Protestantism) begat philosophical liberalism (Endarkenment) begat classical liberalism (American/French revolution) begat Marxism.
Even the cultural Marxist intellectual founder Gramsci knew this.

The Spanish anarchists could be brutal but some of the descriptions of their crimes sound like tall tales.

The Vatican has long banned sodomites from the priesthood. Bishops rebelled and admitted them anyway.
The John Jay College report of 2012 showed that 81% of the abuse had been homosexual in nature.
Of the total abuse, 60% was perpetrated by laity; not priests.

>Catholic armies never raped, tortured or enslaved anyone
lol

>Catholic armies never raped, tortured or enslaved anyone

lmao WHAT

is that all true? what the fuck

Again not addressing the point.

Moving offenders around? That was the common practice for any abuser from the late 1970s through the early 1990s. Remove an offender from the situation and relocate them to an unknown location so that they can undergo psychiatric treatment.
I blame those in the Church hierarchy for listening to contemporary psychiatry and for ordaining sodomites.

>You should also read "Athanasius and the Church of Our Time" and Cardinal Manning's three (or was it four?) lectures on "The Present Crisis of the Holy See."
Will definitely check it out.

>Leaving the Church because of an apparent heretic like Francis is like leaving Christ because Judas betrayed Him.
I was raised baptized but non-practicing Catholic, became "edgy atheist" at age 12, informed atheist at around 21, then about 2 years ago I had to admit to myself that I believe in God because it helped through tough times, but it's a very abstract conception. I am closer the muslim understanding of God, unique and unreachable, than I am with the Catholic God, even though I hugely respect their historic contributions to knowledge.

>You are in Portugal; there has to be a traditional Fatima movement near you.
I am skeptical of the Fatima industry. That's what it is now, institutionally. Many Portuguese priests are critical (and some skeptical) of the Fatima phenomenon.

>Catholic armies never raped, tortured or enslaved anyone, why are they so hated by revolutionaries?
During the unholy crusade they murdered entire cities full of Christians before they even got to Jerusalem because they were brown. Catholics aren't even Christian. War mongering Catholics and Zionists are apostates.

>10Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. 11Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

You dont know the 1st thing about being a Christian, Ponce.

Read this Mr.Satan, you're not fooling anyone but kikes and Catholics.

>Only 40% kid diddlers were priests
Oh wow! That's much better!

Also...
>Anabaptist
>liberal
Fuck off kike.

Never read about the spanish civil war? It was a shitfest and a half.
Referred to as 'Red Terror in Spain' or some shit.

F

>Remove an offender from the situation and relocate them to an unknown location so that they can undergo psychiatric treatment.
Yes, and protect them from facing justice for their crimes, as I said. The Catholic church explicitly tolerates child molestation and faggotry, by your own admission here.

>During the unholy crusade they murdered entire cities full of Christians before they even got to Jerusalem because they were brown.
This is ahistorical nonsense.
I deal with facts not conjecture. When it comes to putting Protestant numbers on the board, 40% of the sects that have the abuse insurance, and of that 40%, 10-15% actually report their numbers. Of the 10-15% of the 40%, the Protestant abuse numbers are higher than Catholic.

Secular abuse is 8 times higher than Catholic and Protestant put together.

>During the unholy crusade they murdered entire cities full of Christians before they even got to Jerusalem because they were brown
One good thing they did.

Yes, the Anabaptists were Judaizing theological liberals. Do you not read history?

>abuse insurance
Father, we should put some hush money aside from this week's tithes.

The Catholic Church is the only Christian church required in the United States to carry an insurance policy for this, even when the numbers themselves show that Protestant sects are much more likely to produce abuse cases.

insurancejournal.com/news/national/2007/06/18/80877.htm
>Church Mutual Insurance Co., GuideOne Insurance Co. and Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Co.
Does not just cover "abuse"

Scoffield Hoax victim?

sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/scofield.htm

"It has been said that when the Crusaders captured Jerusalem in 1099 they massacred every man, woman, and child in the city until “the streets ran ankle deep with the blood.” History and science show this to be poetic hyperbole. A contemporary Muslim source has been discovered that puts the number of the slain at three thousand. Was there violence? Absolutely. In that time, a city that had to be taken by force belonged to the victorious invaders – including people. This barbaric idea actually helped lessen damaging resistance (read Josephus for what happens when this goes wrong) and so served something of a cultural purpose. Thus, while it was a tragedy by today’s standards (although one might wonder at what people in that time might think of our war tactics today), it was not uncommon back then. Further, Muslim cities that surrendered to the Crusaders were left untouched, the people retained their property, and they were allowed to worship freely."

strangenotions.com/the-crusdades-urban-legends-and-truth/

found the useful idiot

>Further, Muslim cities that surrendered to the Crusaders were left untouched, the people retained their property, and they were allowed to worship freely."

The thing about Catholic is they are extremely intelligent spinners. I've read articles justifying what happened to people like Bruno and Galileo.

>This is ahistorical nonsense.
Read a book, Paco. Start with the Bible, papist swine.
During the 4th crusade the Catholics slaughtered more Christians in Constantinople than they killed Muslims and Jews.

Fuck off.

>Admits his church is communist
>calls me the useful idiot

This is the intellectual prowess of christfags

You Have no love for God in your heart, and you will burn in Hell along with the popes and your war mongering heroes.

You are pathetic and entirely worldly. You fake Christians are worse than Jews.

If by "god" you mean Rabbi Yeshua bar Yosef, Jew of the tribe of Judah, along with a "holy spirit" and his father Yahweh the Jewish tribal demon, then yeah I admit I have no love for that god. I also have no love for the horde of subhuman niggers who worship him.

>murdered entire cities full of Christians before they even got to Jerusalem because they were brown.
WTF I love catholics now.

You said
>entire cities full of Christians before they even got to Jerusalem because they were brown
So not only do you not practice Christian charity in conversation, but you also fabricate things to fit your made up narrative. The fourth Crusade was hardly an army of Catholic idealists. It was an army of mercenaries who, against the Pope's orders, sacked Constantinople.

Was burning in Hell part of your plan, Moshe?

Yes. Trying to avoid hell is for hedonistic cowards.

>you also fabricate things
Google it, Pedro.
God only allows His people to be overcome when they have become apostate. If it weren't for the unholy Roman Church Europe would never have been handed over to the infidels like Judah and Israel were.

Seriously, I pay enough taxes for you to get a free education, Pedro.

>harbouring pedophiles within the priesthood
that's a stain that may never be washed away, people should've been hanged over this, not protected from prosecution. it's disgusting.

I think the question is irrelevant, because the soviets were helping the communists to set up their own cheka, and had russian agents kidnapping and executing people. The communists were better organized and had more backing then the amarchists, and had the left won, the communists would have initiated a second coup that would push the anarchists aside.

What's OP's picture though?

>54%

Completely agree. When I read St. Peter Damian's Book of Gomorrah, I felt nostalgia for a time that I never knew: when the Church put sodomites and pedophiles to death.
Kiddo, your sixteenth, seventeenth, eighteenth, nineteenth, twentieth, or twenty-first century religion is in no way a reform of the first 1,500 years of Christianity.
Father Martin Luther was correct when he said his "new gospel" (his oft-repeated words) created a "pope for every individual."

m.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1201-1500/horrible-massacre-at-beziers-in-christs-name-11629815.html

You pretend papists were the only "Christians" in existence for 1500 years, which is a lie and vanity. You are a pagan who prays to a cracker on Saturday and a female co-redemtrix, you are an idolator.

The USA has been brought to ruin because of Catholics, as we fell away from our Protestant roots.

Go back to Mexico, pagan.

Some people say, fucking your children is the main goal of church, all the rest is only a cover-up

>tries to denigrate the Crusades because "Catholics murdered them because they were brown"
>then tries to pin the name Pedro on me, because it's known as a "Brown" name in an attempt to denigrate me
You're either not very bright or a complete shill; and yet I believe it's the former.
Yes, there were other heretics in existence before the Protestants wrecked Christendom.
Why then, did Protestants found the first secular, godless State in recorded human history? Is that a good Christian thing to do? Hell, the National Reform Amendment movement of Protestants tried to fix it, and amend the Constitution to become Confessional and that was rejected as being unconstitutional. Protestant roots, my friend. There's a straight line from the Protestant revolt to secularism.

Let's talk a bit of history, since (most) Protestants are notoriously ignorant of it.
Ignatius of Antioch. A personal friend of St. John the Beloved Apostle. Sat and learned at his feet. Ordained a Bishop by St. Peter.
Had a Bishopric over people of Smryna. Taken to martyrdom by the Romans in 110AD and writes his people.
He writes: "wheresoever the Bishop is, let the people be, even as Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church."
>earlychristianwritings.com/text/ignatius-smyrnaeans-longer.html
He also writes his people to stay away from the heretics (Gnostics) who do not worship with the Christians; they abstain from Holy Communion because they reject that it is the actual Body and Blood of Jesus Christ.

Here we have an account in 110AD of what the heretics of his day were protesting; the Bodily presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
Sound familiar?

>Marxism is next because other things happened in history despite communism, even in theory is impossible hurr

American Protestants are probably the dumbest motherfuckers you will ever come across on this planet

theres a story were they took some 300 Spanish nuns out in Barcelona, doused them in Kerosene, and burnt them alive

Communists ought not be considered human beings, and they shouldn't receive the rights that goes with that recognition

In Christian charity, they were raised to be this way. They mentally ignore the 1,500 years of silence between the Apostles and the pretended Reformers.
I was raised Protestant, the son of a pastor. They honestly don't think in terms of continuity. They open the pages of the Sacred Scriptures and do their very best to interpret, of course, on their own according to their own intellect and bias. Not recognizing that rejecting the authority of the Catholic Church puts into question the very canon of the New Testament the Catholic Church claims is inspired.
It's a scary thing for a Protestant to look at history beyond Father Luther. The Church is painted in a caricature of Satanism and paganism from childhood.
That's the upbringing I had.
All it took was reading the writings of the early Christians for me. Some, on the other hand, will never take an objective look at history.

A nun that was murdered by anarchists>

norfolklibrarybookgroup.squarespace.com/the-reading-blog/2013/7/17/barcelona-and-the-spanish-civil-war.html

>All it took was reading the writings of the early Christians for me.
Liar, detected.
>You read the Bible and are guided by the Holy Ghost... That's not enough, you need to read the (((Catholic))) church (((fathers))) writings becausr the doctrines of men trump the word of God

Why does it seem like all Catholics make up shit and are compulsive liars?

Both sides did fucked up shit.

Anarchists would go and kill nuns and tear down churches and the Nationalists would go into areas where they even thought they had commies and line everyone in there up innocent or not and shoot them

civil wars aint pretty. Your either with them or against them in these types of wars

>read this writing released by the Catholic church to prove they're the authority above not the word of God
You must think we're as dumb as you look, Pedro.

>You read the Bible and are guided by the Holy Ghost
Yeah, actually, this is precisely the reason I began looking outside of Protestantism. Thousands upon thousands of individualistic sects all purporting to be "led by the Holy Ghost" in their interpretation and every single one of them contradicts one another, and all claim to belong to the same Body of Christ where no doctrinal error can reside.
Either the Holy Ghost is schizophrenic or Protestantism is bunk on its face. I believe the problem isn't with God, but with private interpretation and sixteenth century+ innovators.

>Yeah, actually, this is precisely the reason I began looking outside of Protestantism.
You can make all the claims you wish, but I know a liar when I hear one. You sound like that British seminaryfag who spams all Christian threads with his Eucharist garbage with several proxies.

The only way a person can be Catholic is by not reading the Bible, because the Catholic dogma contradicts scripture. Which holds true since you have failed to quote scripture once and have quoted the writings of the supposed (((catholic))) church (((fathers))) several times.

You're not fooling anyone, son of Belial.

I'm actually a white Catholic Southerner, a husband, and a father of five children.
Tell me, where in the Sacred Scriptures does it say that everything that must be believed must be contained within the Scriptures?
If it isn't in there, then you believe something "unbiblical" yourself.

So the goal is to make a giant church in the name of christ and just do the monkey. Got it.

Church's are the same as any culture. They are occult. Obviously Jesus Christ was an anarchist.

>some of the descriptions of their crimes sound like tall tales.
as was the style at the time

commies commit atrocities they then blame on the other side?
this really was the warmup for ww2

The Spanish Civil War was the warmup for what's happening today all over the West

Here's a conundrum for you.
Malachi 3:6 tells us that God doesn't change.
Hebrews 13:8 tells us that Christ is the same today, yesterday, and forever.
Col. 1:24 tells us that the Church is the Body of Christ.
John 14:6 tells us that Christ is the way, truth, and the life.
1 Timothy 3:15 tells us that the Church is the foundation and pillar of truth.

If God doesn't change, and He is truth Incarnate, and the Church is His Body which is the foundation and pillar of truth, then how can we say that God and His Church and the doctrines it teaches should change after 1,500 years because some unhappily left Her?
The Protestant position boils down to: Christ was a liar when He said the Gates of Hell would not prevail against the Church because for 1,500 years the Church was lost.
I will await your decision to throw out the New Testament because the Catholic Church put them into canon in 382AD at the Council of Rome, reaffirmed in 393 at the Synod of Hippo, and reaffirmed again in 419 at the Council of Carthage.

Yeah talking shit about the Pope (authority) will get you fucked up. I hate the meme that Galileo was killed because "they just hate science!"

>Tell me, where in the Sacred Scriptures does it say that everything that must be believed must be contained within the Scriptures?
Several places, larper.
>But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
...[1/?]

You keep assuming Catholics are the only Christians, and that makes you a disingenuous rube.

What is this pic supposed to be?

>Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. 9For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. 10And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power: 11In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ: 12Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead. 13And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; 14Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; 15And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it.

>16Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: 17Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. 18Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, 19And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.

>20Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances, 21(Touch not; taste not; handle not; 22Which all are to perish with the using;) after the commandments and doctrines of men? 23Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.

Thanks for showing that you believe something extra-biblical. That Scripture has nothing to do with proving that EVERYTHING that must be believed must be contained in the Scriptures.
So much for Scripture alone.

>tradition of men; e.g. Pharisaical law
>Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.
>2 Thess 2:14 (2 Thess 2:15 KJV)

Still nothing on I see. There's a good reason why Father Luther said that faith and reason are not compatible, because the conclusions of his new religion was illogical.

>1Then came together unto him the Pharisees, and certain of the scribes, which came from Jerusalem. 2And when they saw some of his disciples eat bread with defiled, that is to say, with unwashen, hands, they found fault. 3For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding the tradition of the elders. 4And when they come from the market, except they wash, they eat not. And many other things there be, which they have received to hold, as the washing of cups, and pots, brasen vessels, and of tables. 5Then the Pharisees and scribes asked him, Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread with unwashen hands?

>6He answered and said unto them, Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.

>7Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

>8For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.

>9And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition. 10For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death: 11But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free. 12And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother; 13Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.

You believe in the traditions of men and not the word of God. Jesus spake in parables so that the rates would not understand. What surprises you so much about vain fools and hypocrites not being able to understand the teachings of God through His word and the Holy Ghost? Zionists and Catholic war mongers...

Communists dug up the bodies of nuns and priests and set them up in public as a joke.

>>tradition of men; e.g. Pharisaical law
>>Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.
The word and the epistles are in the Bible, illiterate whelp.

>Father Luther
>And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
I'm not a protestant or a Lutheran, you narrow minded tare. My church was never and never will be part of the Catholic apostasy.

Hoping to bury me in Scripture that is not even relevant to the subject at hand is a common tactic. I'm not a Pharisaical Jew trying to make you adhere to what became the Talmudic law.
My point was simply to get you to apply your God-given faculty of reason to Sacred Scripture, an endeavor you can only expect from an honest man.
Ah well. I was raised around your type my entire life. It's a fruitless matter.

>whether by word
The traditions of Christ and the Apostles weren't all written down, buddy. Scripture even attests to this.
>But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written.
>[John 21:25]

Ah, that canard. A Protestant claiming to not be Protestant yet enshrine the very tenets of Protestantism; sola fide and sola scriptura. At least be honest with yourself.

Communist are the worst

youtube.com/watch?v=VYfF06CPHMo

>the Catholic apostasy.

Again, it has to be asked: if Catholics are "apostates", which church they did apostasize from? Which church did Christians worship in for 1500 years before Luther came along?

>52And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and entered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him. 53And they did not receive him, because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem. 54And when his disciples James and John saw this, they said, Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did? 55But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of. 56For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.
...
>10Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. 11Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

>18Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints; 19And for me, that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel, 20For which I am an ambassador in bonds: that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.
Contrary to Catholic crusading war mongers who have no faith in God or his Word, but who trust in the flesh. No wonder the gate is described as so narrow...

Wife is calling me to bed, kiddo. Gotta get my five younglings to an über scary pagan babylonian caananite mass tomorrow where we chant hymns to God in Latin like your ancestors' ancestors' ancestors did.
I'll be praying for you there.
May God convert you.

BBC is leftist propaganda. They celebrate it as a victory for atheists when really they are more horrifying than jack the ripper. Communists are scum and mongrels. It's a movement centered around pissing off poor people, blaming religion and business owners, and murdering everyone not them. They are barbarians in the gates.

>The traditions of Christ and the Apostles weren't all written down, buddy. Scripture even attests to this.
You mean kinda like the oral Torah aka the Talmud?

Show me the scripture, kryptokike.

I pity your poor larping soul.

>2Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision. 3For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh. 4Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; 6Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.

Go fight another war for Christendom, worldly tare.

You're talking like an autistic leftist misrepresenting and fabricating history to suit your points, your whole crusade argument reeks of islamophilia.
The crusades were in defense of the west and of christians of the east, the 4th crusade fell apart begore even being launched and the socalled sack of constantinople was pretty much all Venetians and their mercenaries squashing a political rival without religious factor.
The eastern european crusades similarly were starded to defend against pagan incursions but with an additional political factor.
There were massacres commited in the name of Christ but they were commited by men, not by the church.

>Catholic armies never raped, tortured or enslaved anyone

Catholics have been sending their husbands and sons to war for generations, stop pretending your pagan church is some sort of peacenick light to the world. You are war mongers.

Mennonites, Amish, and the rest of the Anabaptist are pacifists which is what Jesus commanded us to be. Any good Christian is antiwar... sorry that doesn't jive with your white nationalist narrative, pol. Jesus will fight for is when He returns, until then we are to follow after his example of love and grace to our enemies and the lost.

Try reading the Bible.

You realize that the crusades were defensive and that the muslims wiped out the middle east chistians about 400 years prior, right ?
Again wars are made by men not by religion, do you really think the small french peasant of the low middle ages wanted to goto war with anyone ?
Furthermore most of the crusaders if not all were nobility.
War is part of the human condition, there is a reason men can repent and confess their sins.

>fighting to occupy Jerusalem
>self defence
Larp harder.
It's like you can't read, or the Holy Spirit keeps bouncing off of your forehead.
>10Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. 11Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

We are to fight our battles with the word of God. If you pick up the sword and charge off to battle it proves that you have no faith in God or His word and are also afraid to die and trust not in the resurection. If a Muslim behead me tomorrow, I win.

You're a moron and the reason.everyone.on this sites hates americans.
You don't know shit yet you have this nasty sanctimonious tone regurgitating garbage without context.
Your beloved anabaptist are afforded the luxury of being pacifist by others.

>24Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit. 25He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal. 26If any man serve me, let him follow me; and where I am, there shall also my servant be: if any man serve me, him will my Father honour.

>27Now is my soul troubled; and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour. 28Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again. 29The people therefore, that stood by, and heard it, said that it thundered: others said, An angel spake to him. 30Jesus answered and said, This voice came not because of me, but for your sakes. 31Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out. 32And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me. 33This he said, signifying what death he should die. 34The people answered him, We have heard out of the law that Christ abideth for ever: and how sayest thou, The Son of man must be lifted up? who is this Son of man? 35Then Jesus said unto them, Yet a little while is the light with you. Walk while ye have the light, lest darkness come upon you: for he that walketh in darkness knoweth not whither he goeth. 36While ye have light, believe in the light, that ye may be the children of light. These things spake Jesus, and departed, and did hide himself from them.

Picking up the sword and fighting lost souls isn't following the example of Jesus.

Jesus told them to sell theor coasts and buy a sword so that He would be counted among the transgressors of the law to fulfill prophesy, as it was illegal for non Roman citizens to carry a sword.

Spanish people are monsters you of all people should know this

>Catholic armies never raped, tortured or enslaved anyone, why are they so hated by revolutionaries?

>Another major target of the Terror were women, with the overall goal of keeping them in their traditional place in Spanish society. To this end the Nationalist army promoted a campaign of targeted rape. General Gonzalo Quiepo de Llano spoke multiple times over the radio warning that "immodest" women with Republican sympathies would be raped by his Moorish troops. Near Seville, Nationalist soldiers raped a truckload of female prisoners, threw their bodies down a well, and paraded around town with their rifles draped with their victim's underwear. These rapes were not the result of soldiers disobeying orders, but official Nationalist policies, with officers specifically choosing Moors to be the primary perpetrators. Advancing nationalist troops scrawled "Your children will give birth to fascists" on the walls of captured buildings, and many women taken prisoner were force fed castor oil, then paraded in public naked, while the powerful laxative did its work.[122]

>Picking up the sword and fighting lost souls isn't following the example of Jesus.

"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." (Matt. 10:34)

>Your beloved anabaptist are afforded the luxury of being pacifist by others.
See
To be a martyr and die for His namesake is one of the greatest honors a Christian can achieve.

You have a fundamental lack of understanding concerning the teachings of Christ.

This world was made to be destroyed, it is meaningless outside of procreation and leading the lost souls to Christ. If you love this life you will lose it. This world is a den for the wicked and lustful. I can't wait for it to be destroyed.

THIS

we need to make being wrong a crime punishable by torture