And it's still worse than that. Fucking 600 casualties. One guy. Imagine two

And it's still worse than that. Fucking 600 casualties. One guy. Imagine two.

I'll give this to them if they give me that the founding fathers would have thought trannies were abominations that ought to be shot on sight.

The founding fathers wanted the people to be able to own any weapon the government could own.
They promoted owning cannons and warships

>>implying you know what they wanted

Fuck you. You hate America.

>americans
>innocent

The constitution can be changed anyway So it doesn't matter what they wanted.

interesting political party to start caring about the secret and personal intentions of the founding fathers
it's almost as if leftists don't actually fucking believe anything and trot arguments out for the benefit of a moment

>what is the future

>burgers
>innocent

...

>freedom of press only applies to town criers and wooden print press.
nigger no

They were also patriarchal white nationalists. They were not pro-niggers-women-and-landless-faggots-having-a-political voice.

Yes, they were.

>trusting interpretations of your countrie's laws from the ms paint memes of some unsourced random bozo on the internet

>they were not pro-assault rifles
Because they didn't exist back then?

These retards don't understand that the event that triggered the Revolution was British confiscation of colonialist guns.
There is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON why several Founders refused to sign anything until the right to bear arms was added.

Lol. Jefferson proposed Darwinian heredity by saying niggers nigggings are genetic and innate and not because of the environment like Lamarckists believe even though liberals attacked him as racist.

Benjamin Franklin wrote about cryogenics.

Geez these men knew times would change. The last living founding father dedicated the first railroad spike lain down in the US.

the founding fathers knew technology would change and thus tyrannical governments will have access to far deadlier weapons down the line, that's why the word musket is not anywhere to be found in the document

to be honest USA dose not follow it's own constitution with that regard, try forming a well regulated militia with training and shooting drills and see how in numerous FBI plants will sprung up and try to expose them as terrorists


try get a hold of automatic weapons, that the army is using and ATF will be deploy it's party vans and swat your ass

Even now people are mushing MORE against the gun rights, using a tragedy with a person using illegaly obtained automatic weapons, that may or may not been a false flag to reduce the said rights even further.

Ya fucking dingus.

This just shows what government dick riders lefties are this days. I don't even consider them to be Americans, they can be unexceptional (((global citizens))) and fuck off to be starved under tyranny some place else. It will never happen here in good ole USA, the shadow government fears the citizen militias, the elected government fears us too! This won't change!

Well one of the first things purchased after the amendment passed was a private warship with cannons.

>liberals **of his own fucking time attacked him as racist.

>innocent americans
HAHAHAHAHHAHA

No one is innocent.

Liberals
>Want to interpret constitution as something that evolves over time.
>Thinks somehow a type of firearm that's newer wasn't intended by the constitution.

These people never cease to amaze me.

Americans were also allowed to own cannon pieces for self defense. If the founding fathers allowed people to own fucking cannons, they would allow assault rifles.

Muskets AND Cannons.

So by extension I should have automatic weapons AND a tank.

This. Have a (you)

>the founding fathers wanted Americans to own the most technologically advanced personal weapons of their time
>what they didn't want us Americans owning the most technologically advanced personal weapons of their time
My almonds... They're activating!

...

>Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts

If you mean specifically select-fire rifles, yes; however, there were several repeating designs in existence at the time, some of them as fast as a modern bolt-action. The Continental Congress tried to procure some on at least two occasions during the Revolution, only to balk at the price.

They were just too rare and expensive to see much use until the development of the self-contained cartridge.

...

Why do you make threads like these?

You know you're wrong.

We know you're wrong.

Literally, what the fuck are you doing?

More like weaponized drones and nukes atop ICBMs.

You can own a tank, just have to disable the cannon first.

We'll take the high score from you one day, Norway.

1 post by OP's ID. Sage, man. Sage.

>nor for giving a single lunatic the ability to shoot 500 americans in minutes
People don't seem to mind that Grant got it done.

>1

The musket was the assault rifle of it's day. The militia is composed of every able-bodied male.

The idea was that rich men would buy lots of guns, and hand them out in times of war. This was motivated by the desire to prevent the USA from needing a standing army. During the same era, sheriffs would deputize people and hand out guns - there was no standing police force either.

>2

"The right to bear arms shall not be infringed."

My right to own everything up to nukes isn't a question, but a divine sacrement promised to me by god.

What should be questioned is the right of the SWAT team that took care of Paddock to exist. As well, the right of the federal government to maintain standing armies should be questioned.

When you also advocate removing every single weapon from the armories of the US military, and disbanding all police departments, then we can begin a debate about civilian gun control.

Do you think the idea of weapon evolution was lost on them? That they thought man had gone from throwing stones, to arrows, and muskets and it would end there? There's a reason they used the word "arms" and not something specific.

This user. gets it. It's the only way for peace; the wickedness must be put away.

>implying you have any idea what the intention of the founding fathers were

The founding fathers were also against women and non-whites voting, and they were pro-slavery. Do you really want to speculate on what you think they might have been thinking?

...

1200
Math

*AnCapistan intensifies*

...

The bottom scenario is highly unlikely, even if guns were banned. There's a good chance he'd still be able to get one illegally, but that's not something the lady in pink would ever do.

See OP is a faggot.

um no sweetie

You think the picture would consider the fact that lady in pink might offer to suck a dick to spare her life.

leftists memes with presidents are always funny because they all hate the Founding Fathers except when it comes to trying to use the founding fathers as a mouthpiece to push gun control agenda.

where was the gun control when Obama was running guns to mexican cartels and arab terrorists? the Deep State is full of lying psychopathic treasonous criminals who are trying to make you a slave to their criminal kike cartel. Refuse to bend the knee you stupid fucking goy.

>When you live in a country where you can procure so many funs.
Funs for everyone, full auto again one day.

user, leftists are only against legal gun ownership.
Criminals can have all the guns they want

wonder what the founders would think of abortion?

84 people died in nice france...... not a single gun was used

>Government created memes

Were's Joseph McCarthy when you need that smug suspicious fuck

GREAT WORK NEW SHIFT

KEEP EM COMING
MORE LIKE THIS

DONT FORGET TO GET SIGNED OUT FOR BREAK IN 2
YOU DONT NEED TO SIGN OUT TO TAKE A 10

KEEP IT UP LADIES

SHALL

NOT

BE

INFRINGED,

FAGGOT.

If 650 people got hit with musket shot, they all would die.

The founding fathers went to war with England over a 3% tea tax. I am pretty sure they would be ok with current weapons.

Pucket gun was a massive failure, only one expedition ever bought them

>A well regulated militia,
Do people need AR's and such to even hunt deer and shit? I'd do it with a side-by-side shotgun.

Extract from Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith

Paris Nov. 13. 1787.
the people can not be all, & always, well informed. the part which is wrong [. . .] will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. if they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. we have had 13. states independant 11. years. there has been one rebellion. that comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state. what country before ever existed a century & half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms. the remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. what signify a few lives lost in a century or two? the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it’s natural manure.

So you're saying assassinate Trump?

...

No because Trump has so far yet to violate any precepts of the Constitution.

SOME of the Founding Fathers (Benjamin Franklin and George Washington) were strict -Semites and White Nationalists. They wanted all Jews to be banned from entering the United States and only white Europeans of good character as citizens... They did not get what they wanted. But they got the 2nd Amendment. The 2nd Amendment doesn't work when Jews, Asians and Africans live in America. Either one or the other...and we will not give up our arms.