Le mein kampf is a poorly written book. le ramblings of a madman

>I tried reading Mein Kampf for Banned Books Week, and I couldn't read past maybe ten pages. I am not the type to give up easily, but it was too highfalutin and heavy-handed for me.
>And that not only sums up but exemplifies all one needs to know (or could ever glean) from Mein Kampf.
>Sometimes the things we want to ban end up actually being their own worst enemies in that they're poorly writter, unpersuasive and illustrate the writer's weaknesses.

what did he mean by this?

I randomly stumbled across a thread talking about banned books. These are the first 3 posts.
This is pretty much the only criticism I've ever come across. It's like a slogan at this point. Everyone who pretends to be intellectually honest and fair recites the same Jewish Critique™. Dude Hitler was a bad writer lmao. dude hitler was a shitty artist lmao. dude hitler was actually a coward in ww1 lmao.

whatever. everyone here already knows this why the fuck am i wasting my time FUCK

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qTYSv_YQOVo
alphahistory.com/nazigermany/hitler-and-mussolini/
m.youtube.com/watch?v=syI_B8a5IV4
antisex.info/en/contin.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

no its really good, he even sounds like a rational human

He's right, it's a shit book

what version are you reading user?

Getting normalfags to actually read Mein Kampf is the biggest best red pill you can give them on the Hitler question. The problem is that 90% of cunts that claim to be readers just read other people opinions and parrot them. If someone claims they read it and it was shitty, just ask them what they thought of Hitler's take on the trade union question. Obviously this only work irl when they don't have half an hour to Google it before replying.

It's not "really good" but considering Hitler wrote it while he was in prison, it's fairly written. The book itself is more valuable for the author rather than for what's written in it.

...

Mussolini thought Hitler was the most boring and redundant person he had ever met.

What do you think an Italian is gonna say?

AAAYYYYYYY MACCARRRRONIIIIIIII, SCUZZIIIII

Well considering Mussolini contrary to popular belief was a very well read and knowledgeable man I would say this sentiment holds a lot of weight.

You can say what you want, m8. Personally, I don't think that even the biggest leftycuck could refer to Hitler as boring and redundant.

That was the same experience I had and I read the entire turner diaries.

I thought the book was both extremely well written and clearly understandable.

Seeing as Hitlers Nazis regime created more technology than any other dictators regime it only makes sense that in his book when he claims that the jews wanted to kill all the intellectuals and smart people while they were really doing that in russia one could assume that one was following the other, unless you accept that the fake jews (ashkanazi jews) were the main pushers of intellectual genocide then well idk

youtube.com/watch?v=qTYSv_YQOVo

reddit """intellectuals"""

I know it's in Jonah (((Goldberg's))) Liberal Fascism, but I found a similar quote - "here In private, however, Mussolini was scornful of Hitler and his party. The Italian leader described Mein Kampf as “boring” and thought Hitler’s ideas and theories were “coarse” and “simplistic”" There are similar events described in the Mussolini chapter in Liberal Fascism. Essentially the claim was that even in private conversation Hitler would redundantly talk about the same nine or ten points over and over again.
Here's the (((website))) for the quoted description. Didn't look into how viable it was.
alphahistory.com/nazigermany/hitler-and-mussolini/

>genocidal
>rational human

dam neato

most people haven't read Mein Kampf and never will. Let's be honest, you have to be somewhat interested in Hitler to actually pick up the book and read it cover to cover at least once. And you'll have to read it at least a second time to really grasp things. And actually reading the whole thing will most likely have a profound effect on the reader, regardless of who it is. There's no mention of "Mass extermination" everywhere. It can be boring since Hitler rambles on about his life and the Hapsburg dynasty a lot, but it's worth reading. And the poorly written thing is just a meme. It's well written, anyone who says otherwise just doesn't like his prose

My first bluepilled redpill moment in life (aside from the basic stuff like disliking niggers) came when in the movie Seven, Morgan Freeman says if you check out books like Mein Kampf or Helter Skelter, your name automatically goes on an FBI watch list.

actually a coward and yet received 2 Iron crosses, thats the equivalence of two medal of honors or a medal of honor and a navy cross... OP YOURE A FUCKING HOMO KIKE AND IT'S OBVIOUS

Ive read about half of it. A lot of run on sentences. He never states anything simply.

A trypical mein kampf sentence reads like this:

It is because of these points, the ones I have just explained, and the related problems inherant in them, with all of the physical and social norms discussed, as much as those norms can be taken to be norms, are the consequence of these norms discussed, finding that the inextricable social might of the Germanic people, whether it be in Germany or abroad, should in itself, by whomever can lift it to such heights, draw back to these conclusions, as they have always been.

I love Hitler's ideas, but his writting is shit.

JEW SLIDE THREAD

>Liberal Fascism

that book is bullshit. There's actually a chapter in it titled "Adolf Hitler: Man of the left." That's ridiculous considering that Hitler explicitly stated his enemies were the leftists. I don't remember the author saying anything about Fascism being third way because that would probably be way too redpilled for conservaplebs to understand

The first chapter is pretty boring

...

Mussolini also found it unfathomable how this shoddily dressed autistic guy could not feel humiliated showing up with an oversized trench coat and fedora and all that.

Then again Hitler felt the same thing when he met Franco and found him a small pudgy high-voiced miserly mercantile type like a Jewish caraciture so bad that Hitler said he'd rather get his teeth pulled at the dentist than deal with Franco again

>Hitler would redundantly talk about the same 10 points over and over again
Hmmmm..... Sounds familiar
Either way, I'm not saying that Mussolini didn't say those things, just that I think they're wrong and were probably said due to the fact that he was salty about playing second fiddle to Hitler. I'm sure Hitler had similar critique of Mussolini's brand of fascism.

I ordered a copy from amazon. I guess I'm fucked

them nazis invented sonic weapons too, sure they werent that practical, but they looked funny

kikes, who cares they all did amazing things for their country and fascism is the only answer to sustainable way to prosperity.

>poorly written book
You idiot it's a speech, not a book

>highfalutin and heavy handed
Either you are a pleb or you got a shitty translation

>exemplifies all one needs to know from mein Kampf
SAD. you are missing out on so much

I dont know where you got these reviews from, but they clearly can't read

Just because someone hates jewish people doesn't make them conservative. Look at his policy, it's much more progressive than it is traditionalist in all aspects except cultural. There is a point to be made even if I do agree that a lot of (((Goldberg's))) points are weak.

it is better to listen to Mein Kampf as an audio book, preferably the Ford translation. it is not meant to be read as a book, but is rather meant to be listened to as a speech (with the book being a speech's transcription).

The passage from Chapter 7 in which Hitler talks about the surrender of Germany / the revolution, where the realization of the loss is called back to the time mustard gas nearly blinded him permanently - that is something best delivered from the emotional tone of speech

granted, but Hitler was anything but leftist. Centralization =/= Leftism

David Irving doesn't even think Hitler wrote it.

Hess dictated it for him. Mein Kampf isn't a fixed work

It’s written in a curious way, and it depends on the translator. Some versions were written to make Hitler appear to inarticulate, wordy and full of hot air. German to English also makes for some awkward sentences. I prefer the speeches myself.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=syI_B8a5IV4

MK is somewhat needy book, which requires from you a lot. First, you need correct version (there are some fake ones which are literally rambling - Stalag/Ford edition (?) in English should be the best). Then it's good to know at least a geopolitical basics in the Germany of that time and surrounding countries as well. And most importantly, you need to have some sort of basic understanding how power works, how it affects the society and human interaction.

After that, it is one hell of a book which is also pretty much the education of the highest order in that aforementioned political power.

Everyone should try reading it.

Hitler had the most succinct analysis of Jewish trickery ever written up that point. It's so far ahead of its time it's astonishing really

>jewish memes

kek
i thought germans had shit humor

Masturbation has ruined your intellect and ability to read.
You can't read longer than a few seconds because pornography & habitual masturbation has irreversibly destroyed your subconscious and corrupted the thought patterns. the verbal area associated with reading is incredibly close to the area where the sex drive is. This is why it's too "heavy-handed" you probably got up and looked at porn within minutes to a few hours after reading it.

You are what you repeatedly do. You're nothing now. You're like a heroin addict. You ruined the finest piece of equipment in the world, the human brain on its sexual indulgences. What did you accomplish? NOTHING. if you consider the sum total of all your time spent, you did nothing but waste time. the time wasted is more than you think, if you would consider how high proacktine levels will be for HOURS after jacking off. This is why people shill for pornography and recreational sex so hard in the media, because it ruins the minds and robs them of simple tasks like reading a book. Reading is now a challenge for you. All you care about is that next hit. You dont have original thoughts flowing through your brains.

the greats of the past new ALL OF THIS
antisex.info/en/contin.htm
the media hides the truth.

knew

He didnt even mention Jews. He said leftists aand he is right. The NSDAP was NOT leftist or on the right. They were third position kill yourself cuck

kek i read feder and plato not intending to be edgy

>never read anything but VICE articles
>founds reading a book dificult
>It must by the writter hehehe, they are not as the 22 y.o. sjw 70 IQ journalists i read
Facebook intellectuals are showing

In my experience "oh yeah I like to read too" actually means "I like to read wiki summaries of books and let my entirely smug Facebook feed determine my world view."

I was going to ask about this. Has anyone read "Hitler's second book"? (which Irving says is Hitler's real book)