>Fully automatic guns are illegal!
>$100 bump stock that takes 5 minutes to install turns any AR or AK into an automatic rifle is totally legal
what's the point? for the record, I'm a gun owner, but bump stocks shouldn't be legal at all.
>Fully automatic guns are illegal!
>$100 bump stock that takes 5 minutes to install turns any AR or AK into an automatic rifle is totally legal
what's the point? for the record, I'm a gun owner, but bump stocks shouldn't be legal at all.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
grabcad.com
twitter.com
>turns my ak full auto
what did he mean by this?
How hard would it be to make something like that yourself if you really want it?
Maybe full auto guns shouldn't be illegal? Make them like $100,000 each instead.
don't even try arguing semantics. bump stocks achieve just about the same rate of fire as an automatic variant.
You mean like they already are under the NFA and artificial shortage created by the Hughes Amendment?
It simulates fully auto . It doesn’t magically make your gun full auto
you can convert an ar to full auto with a paperclip.
machining skills
>no your not, and you’re alao a faggot larper with a nigger tier flag making a slide thread.
Kill yourself you fucking faggot, and
SAGE THIS SHIT YOU RETARDS
I agree, full auto guns shouldn't be illegal.
that must be why hillary had to tweet about "silencers"
youtube.com
and if anyone thinks bump stocks are a meme, check this out. you can install these in the same amount of time it takes you to make breakfast.
>I'm a gun owner
LOL NOPE.
>what's the point? for the record, I'm a gun owner, but bump stocks shouldn't be legal at all.
They're primarily a novelty and provide shitty as hell control. Plus full auto is only useful for suppression.
And no, all weapons should be legal. There's literally no reason to have any of them banned.
Here, have another ATF mindfuck: pic related is a pistol.
Do you wear pants with a belt loop? It's easy.
Oh, and no, it doesn't actually turn the weapon "full auto". It just makes it to where it's easy as fuck to hit the trigger really, really fast.
Yes, this is a very real distinction and one that matters.
what's the difference when you're ripping rounds through a music festival?
do you think someone laying on the floor filled with bullets used his dying breath to say, "wasn't exactly full auto, mate."
You seriously can't.
I actually don't get why bump-ski's binaries, and cranks are legal. I know it's an unpopular opinion but it just gives the anti gunners more ammo and I legit don't even find them fun, I've used my buddies bumpski plenty of times before and it never is that exciting just a quick way to waste a ton of ammo and not hit anything.
Or a 3d printer
That's not what the definition of automatic is.
Btw you can bump fire without a bump stock.
>slide thread
saged
not going to take our focus off the possible leftist politics of the shooter.
>can bump fire without a slidefire stock
>can put in an echo trigger
>can put in any other competing trigger
>can just train a bit and dump a 30 round mag in 5-6 seconds with a standard GI trigger regardless
Congrats, you just made a successful argument for repealing the NFA and Hughs Amendment so we can buy actual new production machineguns again.
Do you even know why they call it a bump stock?
Sure, some rifles with bump stocks were found in the Las Vegas shooters room. That doesn't mean he used them. There were 23 fucking guns up there, including one ACTUAL fully automatic.
The idea that you can lie down with a bipod and still "bump" your firearm is laughable. You don't even know how the fucking mechanism works. You have to be able to move the front of the gun back and forth, i.e. no gun rest. Just standing and shooting.
If you think a 64 year old man is standing around with a bump stock with 100 round magazines somehow aiming at things...you are retarded.
Those bump-style firearms were sitting on the ground or were fired into the air pointlessly.
The difference is if you used even somewhat aimed fire instead of full auto, then you'd be looking at 100+ deaths instead of 60.
stfu your not a gun owner you larping faggot
if you have machining skills you can just make a real full auto
Kill yourself you dirty statist nigger
shh
either way it's not hard to manufacture a drop in auto sear mechanism especially if you have a little money, a 3d printer and know how to cast metal out of molds
Because you're just firing one round for every actuation of the trigger. There's seriously no way for them to make them illegal.
You can with a file and some free time
>What's the point?
Indeed, what actually is the point of banning fully automatic weapons, when it's so easy to fire guns in a rapid manner?
When you're throwing lead into a packed crowd, aiming doesn't count for shit. that dude probably hit 80% of his targets before anyone knew what the hell was going on.
an ar reciever is aluminum
He was doing nothing other than shooting in the general direction of the crowd. Not hard to hit something when you've got 20k people packed together.
>for the record, I'm a gun owner
I have been reading that alot lately.
fully automatic sprays more bullets
that's my point exactly. the wannabe operators in this thread want to believe that they'd have nothing but headshots with a bolt action and racked up 300 kills.
exactly
Machine guns are not illegal if manufactured before 1986 you cock sucker
They're just expensive...which is complete bullshit
www.subguns.com
...
not hard, they're only like $100-$150 anyway. You can also make a gat crank pretty easily or buy one for cheap. All totally legal. Pretty useless unless you're right in front of a huge crowd that's not shooting back and also a standard AR barrel will melt pretty quickly firing that fast.
I have both for shits and giggles, it wouldn't be coming with me in a SHTF situation because like I said, full auto (especially since with either of these you're not holding the firearm properly) is pretty useless and a waste of ammo except in rare instances. Should they be banned? No, because since they're so simple to make and can be made from plastic (so, undetectable), anyone like the LV shooter with that sort of goal in mind would still have one anyway.
and this is a point because?
grabcad.com
even an abs plastic one will last long enough for a killing spree if put in multiple rifles. If you want one that lasts longer you take the pieces you made from abs, create a mold and poor any kind of molten metal into it. It's not hard, stupid.
...
>what are ID tags
nice try.
>When you're throwing lead into a packed crowd, aiming doesn't count for shit.
It's the difference between hitting center mass or a leg which is the difference between a dead target and a casualty.
which is why you have almost 60 fatalities and 500 wounded. I'm curious on how many were killed/wounded from stampede and injuries from jumping over shit
so this guy kills over 50 and wounds 500 and you think this was all crappy aim? it was thousands of people packed into a square, shoulder to shoulder. you don't exactly have to be Chris Kyle.
I know. That's all my point is. It's not wannabeoperator to say that aimed fire is more accurate than pointed fire.
>Federal Government bans bump-fire stocks
>the next shooters use a piece of string
>gun owner
>against gun ownership
pick one faggot.
Only s dumbfuck liberal would use a bump fire like this. Thank god he wasn't a true gun owner taking well aimed semi-automatic shots. Would have been much worse. Sage faggot
>I'm a gun owner, but bump stocks shouldn't be legal at all.
nigga you gay
>so this guy kills over 50 and wounds 500 and you think this was all crappy aim?
It literally wasn't aim. Have you ever tried using a bump fire/slide fire? They're even worse than actual full auto for accuracy.
>it was thousands of people packed into a square, shoulder to shoulder. you don't exactly have to be Chris Kyle.
Aimed fire would have turned at least a third of those wounded into kills.
for the record youre a faggot and a kike, now GTFO
I'm too lazy to google. What is a bump stock and why would changing the stock (that's the back part of the gun you rest against your shoulder, right?) change anything about the firing mechanism?
I mean I assume that's the joke, but what are these "bump stocks" doing that makes a difference?
Agreed. Bump stocks and gat cranks are nigger-tier garbage
t. Also gun owner.
Calling a bump fire stock full auto is similar to calling a pocket pushy real sex with a real wkman.
It simulates full auto. Bump fire can only be done with a semi-auto.
if you're a trained marksman, yes. most of the signs are pointing to this guy not being much of a sharpshooter. the bump fire elevated his kill potential for THAT specific scenario as an amateur.
It allows the entire rifle to slide back and forth between your shoulder and your trigger finger making you shoot a shitton faster.
I disagree wholeheartedly.
There is a Canadian behind this flag.
>>Fully automatic guns are illegal!
>Fully automatic guns are licensed and expensive as fuck.
ftfy
Gun owner here and I got to say that I agree with you. Sure, full autos are fun but you can still shoot them on a commercial range, no need to have bump fire stocks or any other illegal devices at home!
it's just a little physics loophole to make the rifle slap back and forward really fast and simulates a high rate of speed that gets close to full auto.
the semantics lords in this thread will complain that it's not full auto because it's one-pull, one shot, but does it really matter for the Vegas scenario?
>oh hey guys, gun owner here, haha I love guns and all but don't you think it's time to start restricting them? I mean let's be real here, nobody really *needs* a gun, right?
You can do the same shit with a pointer finger and a belt loop in 10 seconds.
They should be banned as well.
This.
it doesnt change the firing mechanism at all. When you want to shoot in a simulated full auto with a bump stock, you press forward on the front grip, which slides the stock back into your shoulder, revealing the trigger (hidden under a little guard in the stock. You pull the trigger, the recoil causes the rifle to push backwards, pushing your finger off the trigger, until your body naturally pushes the front forward again, revealing the trigger again, which you can then fire again. Repeat. Since it takes a deliberate action (one pull of the trigger) every time the rifle fires one bullet, its is totally legal and does not change the classification to "machinegun".
hey dumbfuck...since we are all ready to legislate guns out of existence...
consider this: your snowflake anus can't magically un-invent the gun...you being a whiney lil girl will not make guns UNEXIST...
so try and not be a lil bitch...and try being a man...dumbfuck
you should go and try to un-invent whiney bitches like you from having female urges...
Where is your proof? He hit less than 5% of the crowd and killed less than 1%
KYS faggot
that's fine, but you can't look at a massacre like Vegas without doing some soul searching or, at the very least, some head scratching as a gun owner. you have to have a bit of humanity.
The only effective measure to prevent this scenario would be to rid America of all liberals
The NRA is okay with that. As long as they make a buck it's okay.
You can bumpfire an AR and AK without a special stock, just takes more skill
Sure I can because I don't lie to myself about laws being able to keep guns out of bad guys hands.
I mean, you are aware that Chicago and NYC have some of the strictest antigun laws in the country, right?
KYS cucked German bitch
...or just hooking your thumb in your belt loop, then pulling the gun forward.
>you have to have a bit of humanity.
>m-muh feels!!!
Just because some faggot took the rights of others doesnt mean i should have to give up my rights too. After all, if you ban something, it wins. Right leaf? Show your real flag.
Uhm no Sweetie :**
FAAAAAAAG
...
you can't make an auto sear and bcg from a file.
corny argument. you act as if there are stormtroopers at the border of Illinois searching trunks. Carrying illegal guns into an anti-gun state is as easy as ordering pizza.
We should probably consider passing a law against shooting people too, now that I think about it
well, you can convert an sks to full auto by not cleaning it
Right. I'm surprised how many Americans don't know this. I think an M-16 runs like $30k yes?
This is an argument for the deregulation of full auto, not for the regulation of bump stocks.
The NFA is completely and utterly obsolete, and 2A doesn't apply to semi autos only.
sage
really activates my almonds
try $10k.
>so lets ban more stuff since criminals follow laws
strawman
I donate to the NRA every time democrat politicians mention them. Also the SAF and GOA every once in a while.
Who gives a shit if it's corny? It's true.
>Carrying illegal guns into an anti-gun state is as easy as ordering pizza.
And if all guns were banned tomorrow, what does that tell you about the efficacy of such a ban?
>25cent shoe string that takes 1minute to install turns any AR or AK into an automatic rifle is totally legal
what's the point? for the record, I'm a gun owner, but shoe strings shouldn't be legal at all.
Calling something by a different name makes it more dangerous.
You're a faggot
to the anti gun crowd who doesnt know jack shit about guns, they think "automatic" means full auto like the ones in cowadooty. They seriously think bubba and crew are running around with full auto AR's and AK's having a blast everywhere they go blowing through thousands of dollars of ammo every weekend.
No about 30k dumb bitch
www.subguns.com
You don't know shit
Sage unless you kys on livestream