Sup Forums writes law

Sup Forums writes law.

ITT: We write create a new set of laws for a fictional country.

ARTICLE 1: All black men shall be executed freely.

Other urls found in this thread:

polparliament.wikia.com/wiki/Parliament_of_Sup
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

2. Being gay is a degenerate behavior and a crime

article 2: op is a faggot.
article 3: life above everything. this includes rescindment of article 1.

4. Abortions are illegal
-Punishment for abortions is death penalty

4.this will be the new flag.

Jews shall be slaves for infrastructural development purposes.

Do we want elections, parliaments, and a democracy? Or should we go for a dictatorship?

Obviously no communism or socialism. That's for faggots.

Your Honour, in construing the provision I am inclined to believe that Parliament only intended that 'happy' people, as opposed to 'homosexual' people, be guilty of an offence.

>calls socialism faggotry while using a natsoc flag
wew lad.

5. Women shall not vote

When, counsel?

Further, what does it mean 'to be' gay?

7.Only people with an iq above par can vote.

From the current situation and the time in which these laws are created it is obvious that gay stands for faggots, the past meaning of the word has been perverted

Thank you counsel

men who fuck men, women who fuck women

Needs more stars. Needs more stripes.

Article 2.1: One shall be defined for now and for eternity "gay" if the said person is of male gender and has taken a cock in the mouth or the ass in the past.

Must the man only fuck men?

Article 2.2: Women fucking women is allowed for the pleasure of the viewer. However, it must never be done in privacy.

All good white men shall keep and carry firearms freely.

7. No child nor adult is allowed to undergo sex chgange, promoting ideas such as sex change is punishable by up to 10 years in work camps

Thank you counsel, if we are to depart from Western tradition and punish retrospectively, is the individual 'gay' for the purposes of the law if this occurred without his consent? Can he then truly 'be gay'?

Age of consent is 12

ARTICLE 1b) unless they are the property of another white man

8. Women cannot vote because of them being too emotional beings and thus they often have clouded judgement

2a. Being 'gay' will be hereafter defined as being sexually attracted to any person of the same gender as yourself. 'Gender' will hereafter be defined as 'male' (an individual born with a penis and testicles) and 'female' (an individual born with a uterus and ovaries).

You bring up a tricky question, indeed, my fellow man. Non-consentful cock-taking will be deemed gay if the person is understood to have enjoyed it. A person is said to have enjoyed the aforementioned gay sex if the person does not kill themselves, thereby solving our conundrum.

if a man cannot deflect gay rape he is too weak and thus considered a faggot by law

9. The mere mention of communism will earn the person up to 5 years in working camps

too high, and in any case I move that women be hereafter defined as property, and as such only the consent of her owner is required.

Persistent Non-Cisgendered behaviors are responded to by first mandated behavior modification, then by tying the individual up and tossing them into the sea. Just like we used to do in the 1800's. The good old days.

I propose to rewrite Article 8 to
>8. Women can not vote.
Giving a reason is weak and gay.

Thank you counsel. Some fine legislative drafting.

10. Men with unnatural hair color will have their voting privileges taken away

Excellent my learned friend

dont forget to put some weight around them

granted

each man will be allocated one submissive sissy-boy with a tight ripe little boipussi.

12. Taxation if theft. If taxation is to be introduced then the amount of votes being able to cast in an election depends on the amount of taxes paid.

I propose this because it's a good way to hold taxation and the government in check. People with many votes will vote to lower taxes thus decreasing government power. Also grabbing power by means of money will be harder.

I move that voting should be per household rather than per individual, with the male head of household casting the vote. Single men may vote but their vote shall count as half a vote. Single men under 25 will count as a quarter of a vote. All voters must be gainfully employed, not currently incarcerated, and have no criminal record for at least the past 5 years in order to vote. Women and children under age 15 are regarded as property of the male head of household and as such are not allowed voting rights.

Although I like the first rule, I wish not to live in this country since it's main politics are busy all day with finding definitions and rules for/against gays and homosexuality

Anyone overweight shall henceforth be banished to the labour camps

Anyone mentally ill shall henceforth be banished to the labour camps

Anyone who indulges in video games shall henceforth be banished to the labour camps

Anyone who is of unkempt appearance shall henceforth be banished to the labour camps

Anyone who spends the majority of their day online shall henceforth be banished to the labour camps

Anyone who identifies as 'pagan' shall henceforth be banished to the labour camps

11. Men with no STEM education, surviving skills, useful talents that to some extent contribute or can contribute to society will have to take an IQ test before being able to vote

well what do you want rules about then, smart ass?

Articale 11: Any person who identifies as anything outside of Him or Her, in direct correlation to the Sexual Organs one is born with, shall be executed

Article 13: non whites need not apply. Miscegenation is punishable by public torture and execution, as well as for the race traitor's entire family.

NICE

Communalism with a dictatorship

Why would anybody think this place is a pit of human garbage with moral consistency like this.

I propose we couple voting power to economic output. People who create more value for society should have more voting power.
A 25year old business owner should have more to say than a 50 year old father of 5 whose family lives off social welfare.

Obviously - No Jews allowed.

No, they can't be trusted.
Absolute Emperor

Usury and speculation is a no no

>voting
>le dememeocracy meme
fool, have you learned nothing?

12.1 If an individual wants to contribute to society he must do it thru donations since taxes do not exist.

12.2 Women can donate more then 100$ only with permission of her husband

12.3 Public services are based on donations while private ones are based on payments for their work

very good additions. I support.

fuck off pedo

13. Women working full time is not allowed until the children are raised and then she must get husbands approval when seeking employment

should people who don't donate be able to receive services? I'm fine donating to pay for roads and sewers and such, but if my neighbor's not going to chip in I don't see why he should receive the same services as me.

Or law could stay that women are to be paid strictly by the value they bring. This would eliminate any desire of most females to work.

But we wouldn't miss out on the one in million female like Ayn Rand. Most women are human garbage but a very few can be actually contributing to society/civilization beyond being mothers.

s/stay/state/

well. don't donate then. that's the beauty of it. we would have "social institutions" on paper but in reality poor people would to get a job or starve.

you are right

12.4 Those that do not donate but use the public services will have to pay for them since for them it becomes a private service , the price will be the average of the last single donations made

we would have to see how it works but by putting resticons by having to have husbands approval it would be the duty of the head of the house to determine if his woman can work

natsocs have to take mandatory cuckoldry training.

article 88 : the sanction for any infringement is death

shut up frenchie, why don't you go somewhere and surrender

I was watching Mad Men recently. Seemed pretty OK. Young girls in their 20s are secretaries, get paid shit and when they find a husband they stop working.

Of course female voting rights degenerated this system over time. But nothing says we couldn't go back.

I think natsocs, being socialists, would be executed on sight. So that problem should solve itself.

This is the fucking pinnacle of stupid, the absolute epicentre of pure fucking autism, the very fucking embodiment of mental disability, You most certainly are a faggot holy fuck this law has more gaping holes than a prostitute in LA (take that as you will) how the fuck do you determine if someone is "good" You dense piece of shit. Unironically this is the fucking most idiotic thing I've read all God damn month none the less day. I couldn't help but feel a large amount of my brain cells decide to commit mass suicide and just fucking end it after reading that fucking atrocious wit-nitted """""post"""""", that post was so fucking awful it's driven me to shitposting this block of pure fucking hatred.

He has a point. Obey the law or be removed. Clearly you have something to be afraid of you degenerate.

Article 89: The sanction for being French is death

13. In case of big private companies since the public government cant be bribed (it is a crime) and if they are found influencing public policy in any manner they have two choices

1. - separate themselves from society and establish their own country

2. - become a public company

3. - replacing its leadership and being forced paying an equal amount of money spent to influence public services to the public military, but remaining a private company

89a) French have to wear a white star on their jacket.

14. Those that are subscribers and users of private deals are subject to the laws of that private company whos services they are using, the public service cannot help if one has not read but signed a private contract.

Personal responsibility is in power when dealing with private business

Should we allow public companies? Public companies encourage short term thinking and general degeneracy in the management. If you have to please the shareholders every quarter to keep your job you're not going to implement any serious long term plans that might - in the short term - generate less profits.

I think only privately owned businesses should be allowed. Where one owner acts in the business' long term interest because it's his property.

sounds like an admission of weakness of your article 89

We are giving a choice the men or the market will decide

No gurlz allowed!

Last Article - You are all faggots and should end yourselves.

15. False accusation regarding someone being a fagot will result in life in work camps

5. all wayd pepel a ebil

all faggots killed

indeeded

Are we bringing back the Sup Forums Parliament?
polparliament.wikia.com/wiki/Parliament_of_Sup Forums_Wikia

Jewish heads shall be tennis balls.

Article 69. Anyone previously or presently having used site Sup Forums or any of its equivalents will have their testicles removed and their mouth permanently sealed. As they have nothing to provide to the future generations and nothing useful to say.

Article 69a. This only applies to Australians.

>12
>not 0

16. Buthurt people wil end in workcamps

All drugs are now legal and everyone gets free krokodil

making fun of fat people is a national sport

>calls others faggots
>wants black men to live
You are either a cuck in search of a bull or a faggot hungry for BBC. Which one is it

Article 69a.1
NO U

You can have up to 4 female slaves of any race as long as you get them spayed.

Your honor I would like to propose a clause to this article:
Traps are not gay and there for do not fall under this ruling.

You hang with the rest faggot.

traps are gay

8. Traps are gay, no exceptions.