Why is it so hard to believe that a 64 year old dude decided to shoot up a concert then offed himself? It’s unlikely...

Why is it so hard to believe that a 64 year old dude decided to shoot up a concert then offed himself? It’s unlikely, not impossible

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/141096258/#q141102703)
youtube.com/watch?v=gpMrm1xUJ40)
youtube.com/watch?v=7SzDfqKQ0UQ&feature=youtu.be)
archive.is/9TR5u)
youtube.com/watch?time_continue=642&v=mBbOFwWquAw)
archive.is/h4A6h
hooktube.com/watch?v=OVDn1FvRyiU&t=43m10s)
usatoday.com/story/news/2017/10/05/las-vegas-shooter-had-booked-room-augchicago-augumay-have-had-help-but-investigators-have-no-idea-wh/734824001/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

I think about shooting my neighbours every day. Who the fuck plays the bagpipes at 6 in the bloody morning?

Why is it so hard to believe it was an arms deal with ISIS that went south and it is being covered up by the FBI because they don't want another fast and furious scandal. It’s unlikely, not impossible

Because Occam’s razor

It's not hard to believe he was part of it, but it's hard to believe it wasn't a Deep State operation.

Thread where the attack was predicted 3 weeks beforehand: (archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/141096258/#q141102703)

Police scanner audio confirming there were AT LEAST two shooters and two shooting locations (youtube.com/watch?v=gpMrm1xUJ40)

Eyewitness adamant there was at least two shooters and at least one shooter on the ground (youtube.com/watch?v=7SzDfqKQ0UQ&feature=youtu.be)

Another eyewitness saying multiple shooters (archive.is/9TR5u)

Taxi driver video where it can be heard that there were shots from multiple locations. Muzzle flash seen on a lower floor of Mandalay (youtube.com/watch?time_continue=642&v=mBbOFwWquAw)

Woman at the concert stated that there was a Hispanic-looking couple harrassing people an hour before the shooting, the woman saying "you're all gonna die" and "they're all around you." archive.is/h4A6h (indicates multiple shooters).

Automatic gunfire 40 minutes AFTER Paddock found dead (hooktube.com/watch?v=OVDn1FvRyiU&t=43m10s)

He was a highly successful multimillionaire.
He doesn't fit the usual MO of a spree shooter.
He lived a "secret life".
He bought his guns in October, 2016.
He had 1600 rounds and 50 pounds of Tannerite in his car.

More importantly, the evidence recovered in his hotel room suggests he had prepared his escape.

The pieces don't fit.

>Why is it so hard to believe
>BELIEVE
DS getting nervous as not even normies buy their story and having used the Mos..isis card even this narrative might blow into their face. Autsch.

>Why is it so hard to believe
>BELIEVE
DS getting nervous as not even normies buy their story and having used the Mos..isis card even this narrative might blow into their face. Autsch.

Why not simply admit that it was a planned FBI set up that went terribly wrong? Oh yeah, too late

Thanks user, some good points. Multiple shooters is a lot more plausible than arms deal theory

I don't think it was him. I think he was a hostage and the gunman offed him once he was done, then escaped.

Occam's razor favours the arms deal.

Because gun dealers don't do business on the 32nd floor of a casino. How retarded would that be? They go somewhere WAY less public, dumbass.

CCTV will reveal all. If it doesn’t get released, I’ll believe you

you are asking logic from rural and suburban retards who voted for drumpf...

>it’s unlikely
/thread

The fact that he brought 20+ assault rifles up to his room.

i can understand if you were going to shoot up a whole bunch of people that you'd want to bring a bunch of extra guns if something malfunctioned. But 20+ guns?

let that sink in

>hating bagpipes
>hating having an alarm clock neighbour

lad

Or a city whose actual ad campaign is "Don't Ask. Don't Tell"

>"they're all around you."

That quote is nowhere in the article or included video at that link.

Its either this
or

He had someone with him that pussied out and ran or killed him.

It's not hard to believe at all. Of course it happens. What is actually hard to believe here is this Swiss cheese of a bullshit story our media is trying to cram down our throats. Absolutely nothing about this story makes any sense at all. There are details that are almost ALWAYS released after a tragedy like this, and our media tells us NOTHING. We are not being told the full story.

Because gun trafficking Jewish ISIS false flagging is more logical.

this

THE SHEEPLE WERE IN THE PADDOCK
STEPHEN WAS A SHEPHERD
AGAIN AND AGAIN HE WATCHED OVER THE FLOCK
UNTIL HARVEST
STEPHEN PADDOCK WAS DEEP STATE/MOB/ABCAGENCY/ISIS/ PLACEHOLDER FOR HAPPENINGS

RICHMOND HAPPENING CANCELLED BECAUSE IT COULD COST DEMS THE GOVERNORSHIP IN NOVEMBER
CHICAGO HAPPENING CANCELLED BECAUSE MALIA OBAMA WAS AT LOLLAPALOOZA
VEGAS HAPPENING GREENLIGHTED
BECAUSE OBAMA HATES VEGAS AND VEGAS HATES OBAMA
usatoday.com/story/news/2017/10/05/las-vegas-shooter-had-booked-room-augchicago-augumay-have-had-help-but-investigators-have-no-idea-wh/734824001/

like what they're (the news) telling us everything they know. we didn't have the full details of the aurora shooting until the trial.

Meh. My dad is 81 and still drives himself around and messes with his guns on the weekends. I have no problem believing it.

I doubt we will ever hear the real story on the motive though. The whole story when it comes to the money and actual act is incredibly fishy.

Sup Forums has always looked for inconsistencies with the official story when shit like this happens. 80% of it is schizo-tier. But the 20% that is legit usually sparks some very interesting questions.

The media is riding the government cock, so they haven't looked for inconsistencies in the last 30 years. Somebody's got to do it.

is unlikely and impossible

The fact is there where a minimum of 7 active shooters at the time, 7.
I am only going to post this once.
these are the facts
>Dude is a CIA weapons dealer
>A Trump supporter
>He was in LA making a weapons deal with the Philippine ISIS branch
>The weapons where located at the private airport next to the concert venue
>The deal went bad
>The weapons and ammunition where stolen at the airport earlier that day.
>He was awaiting payment in the hotel room.
>He was subsequently shot just before the shooting at the killing field
>3 gunmen opened fire on the killing field
>1 from the top of the fuel tanks at the airport with a automatic machine gun
>2 from the hotel
>4 other hotels also had shootings in the area at the very same time

All of this information is available online via leaks eyewitnesses and police scanner recordings with exception of the fuel tank shooter, the fuel tank shooters position was obtained via forensics.

I understood all but the fuel tank, why would they shoot at their own men to blow up a fuel tank he could easily blow up himself?

Your neighbours, obviously.

they've had enough time to make a video of whatever they want

I've bought multiple large felonies of distribution quantity cocaine in vegas hotels, why are guns any different?

>that foregrip position on the rifle on the floor

Because it's dark and the best firing position to mow down the whole field of people.
>only 70 or 80 foot high.
>short distance but still out of sight
>no one around
>easy access to escape, via plane or car.


seems its all fitting together now.
makes way more sense than the official story

He got 400 lbs of equipment up to a room with nobody asking questions, but yeah, Vegas is totally out of bounds for illegal transactions in comfortable suites.

>Why is it so hard to believe
Because if Steve can do this, anybody can do this. We are in deep shit user.
What you have to understand about Steve is that he was a doer, he could literally do anything. And he did! The madman really did it.

It's just, that Steve was no Taco Bell nigger, he wasn't a loser, he was a high roller who threw around his money and went to restaurants (like the fusion restaurant in wynn that I can highly recommend) where he and his brother ate thousands worth of sushi, not everybody works for Taco Bell, you know.

I really don't get why he did it, if he did it, because he had so much to loose and he was a genius. He made millions through gambling, invested thqat gambling money in rel estate to turn a clean profit for himself and his brother, and he even rented those houses out under the market price because he needed a clean flow of cash and had a heart of gold, unlike losers who work at fucking Taco Bell.

It's just weird that steve did that. We're just praying for at least some data points, because otherwise it's like the bug in Men In Black put on a Steve suit and went and did this.

It just makes no sense.

Don't forget he worked for Lockheed Martin, and his private plane is connected to a defence private contractor.

Look here you fucking Frenchie (obviously you don't understand English as you completely ignored my point) WHY would they shoot at a tank to explode it when a man is already on it? Not only this but the guy on the tank can pen and explode the tank. Yeah it's a good vantage point but it was shoot at from the hotel.

Your grammar and diction are confusing.

Is English like your fourth language?

Doesn't mean anything.