Eurocucks finally cucked to the max

I hope you cucks like the EU, because you ain't going anywhere. LMAO. They're literally trying to defund anti-EU parties, and they aren't even trying to hide it from you. I think we got out just in time.

europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-17-3165_en.htm

Thats over a month old and nobody gives a shit what Junkers has to say

>The commission proposing
>Council has QMV
>East says fuck you
>No majority
The EU is done, they commited sudoku in 2002

>Thats over a month old
13th September
>nobody gives a shit what Junkers has to say
>Nobody gives a shit what the president of the commission has to say

Holy shit Euros BTFO. Remember guy YOU'RE HERE FOREVER.

Have you ever looked how the regulatory system of the EU works? The commission simply proposes and passively executes policies through its working groups, which are basically bound to write letters to national administration and ask if they cooperate with them. Junker is the most lame duck ever, basically the boot licker of French and Germany

man, it's really confusing when leftists keep appropriating words and using them incorrectly.

How is it more democratic if you remove some of the options? That statement in itself is contradictory.

Well just so long as it wont pass that makes the fact THEY ARE TRYING TO DEFUND POLITICAL PARTIES THEY DON'T LIKE okay.

No. But this kind of click baiting OP and post without any kind of factual information belongs to a fucking msm comment section or normie book. Not worthy for Sup Forums or red dit

>click baiting
What part of it is wrong? They are """"reforming""" the rules so that euroskeptic parties will be at a financial disadvantage. Regardless of whether it'll pass or not, this is their aim.

>inb4 EU ironically leads to ww3
This time lets kill germany for good

It's Newspeak user.

Its fucking 70's lobby tier shit tactic. The commission is basically powerless. At this time even the cucked parliament has more positive as negative agenda setting and enacting power than the commission. Not even comparable with the council. And do to QMV and Eastern Europe acting as a block when it comes to such SJW proposition, using the FUD narrative is simply a cheap form of click baiting.

The only interesting thing regarding this proposition would be to find out which comitology structure produced it, who works their and which country or rather national ministery OR private company has sponsored that proposition.

>Eurocucks finally cucked to the max
>implying there is a limit to how much you can be cucked

Enjoy your 15 years in prison bong

>more democracy
>let's ban all political parties i don't agree with
Fucking Juncker, lol.

Does this mean anti-EU voters no longer have to pay taxes, since they're getting no benefit?

>The commission is basically powerless.
Except to propose legislation. I don't quite think you're getting this, the issue isn't whether it'll pass in parliament, but that they're proposing it at all.

...

it's still highly confusing, it's like how the appropriated the term "Racism" and "Racist" to be the same as racial discrimination.

Redefining words, and having an army of puppets intentionally misusing the word with it's redefined meaning.

...

>defunding euroskeptic parties that have a many voters
Let's ignore the "democracy" argument for a bit, what prevents these parties to tell their voters to not pay taxes that go to fund the EU? Hell at that point they would get 90% of the vote. Is the European commission suicidal?

>what prevents these parties to tell their voters to not pay taxes that go to fund the EU?
I guess there's nothing stopping them from telling them to stop paying their taxes, but have you ever tried not paying your taxes?

The EU architecture makes having initiative power pretty low key power.
>Be Com or EUP committee
>Have idea for super duper commie legislation
>EUP say yes in the blink of an eye
>Germany, France, Spain, Italy ready to vote for it, whole East says change it from the ground or Niet
>sadfaces.png
The EU lost its reformation power outside of themselves do to their expansive policy and wanting to become more democratic

>I think we got out just in time.

We're not out lad. We're no more out now than we were before the referendum.

We will never leave. They won't allow it.

>using taxpayer money to fund domestic political parties the EU approves of
>democracy
This is all going to turn out wonderfully. Why can't these people learn? Are they incapable of it?

J U S T
U
S
T

That's Juncker for you.

Think of parties like FN in France. They are huge. If FN voters refused to pay even a small part of their tax, it would force government intervention and repression à la Catalonia. That only fuels more rage and backlash with mainstream parties being perceived as oppressive by more and more of the population which will then vote for alternative anti EU parties.
I don't see how they can implement this without causing serious harm to both nationalo pro EU governments and the EU itself

You're still missing the point. It points to their mindset.

Thats true I guess, during the last GE there were all those (((interviews))) with officials telling us how Brexit could still be "reversed". But we're still in a better position than the rest.

How the fuck do you "refuse to pay tax" when your taxes are deducted at source?

Paying tax is not an option you can refuse. It comes out of your pay.

>this level of damage control
Stay enslaved.

>How the fuck do you "refuse to pay tax"
I meant this not as tax on income, but housing/car tax and things of that nature for which you have to either give your bank account credentials or pay them with cheques

They want to turn Europe into Euroland

Well, if you look at it from a beurocracy point if view most people working form the EU do not career about qnyrhingf that wants to dismantle it and thus will do anything to prevent that idea from getting any traction.

I mean, honestly. And arguments against the EU on this issue alone are hard to make from where I am starting. Such behaviour is expected. Entrenchment in a position of power is the norm, and when faced with a potential enemy of the system itself most will unite to take them out somehow.

So they are full on beurocrats? Then this is even more understandable. That is how such machine functions. Also considerations to good friends, attentions to trusted partners, etc...

> It points to their mindset.
Isn't that common sense and obvious to everybody having just one glimpse at what the EU does?

But specifically this document. It is a fucking Junker speech. He hasn't proven very effective in agenda setting, let alone getting policies through. What did he managed? refugee redistribution which is a total fuck up and getting not even half of the funds for his SJW pot of gold. For the rest Eastern Europe pretty much worked tremendously well keeping most shit he tried to pass in check. Not to forget, we will have the next council presidency and that with a centre right or national socialist party which has signaled the V4 that a V 4 1/2 might happen.

The EU is basically a corpse that rots away slowly, but steadily

>It is a fucking Junker speech
Where he points out that the commission is proposing some new rules on the financing of euroskeptic parties.

>So they are full on beurocrats?
Yep. Nothing more. A bunch of corrupt chair warmer that one couldn't keep in the country because they had some kind of shit under their boots. But you point the dangerous part out.
>good friends, attentions to trusted partners, etc...
If having the worst of the worse from national administrations concentrated in one place one can only expect a high grade of corruption.
Yes, and it will not happen. Junker has a pipe dream and not even closely the power to make it reality. He should be mocked, not feared

You did good, Bong. You did good.

>He should be mocked, not feared
I don't know senpai, whenever politicans start coming out with overly draconian, borderline dystopia policies I get a bit afraid, and a little angry.

You need to work on your anger issues. I get the urge to throw eggs and shit on their front door, literally and figuratively

>If having the worst of the worse from national administrations concentrated in one place one can only expect a high grade of corruption

Oh no. That is by design. Corruption favours those with money to spend on bribes and are a hidden tarrif that the uninitiated are unaware of. Also the surveillance services get good blackmail material on all involved so everyone in power gets something out of the pie at the expense of anyone who wants to enter the system and is not one of those three mentioned.