In every single thread about the Las Vegas massacre I see a bunch of anons spouting this bizarre theory that the shooting was actually part of a CIA/FBI arms deal gone wrong, even though there's not one bit of evidence for this and it sounds more like the script of a plot hole-riddled action flick than than something that could actually happen in real life. So who is pushing this retarded narrative and what are they trying to slide?
The arms deal theory
Jackson Thomas
Other urls found in this thread:
fourseasons.com
youtube.com
myredditnudes.com
twitter.com
Levi Adams
It's fucking obvious, you autist CIA goy
Luis Rodriguez
I really want to believe in the arms deal narrative, but I can't. Here's why.
If those guns were brought there to be sold, why the 32nd floor? Why up so high? It makes everything more complicated. If some autistic user can provide building specs that show those rooms were in proximity to staff/freight elevators or stairs, I'd be more likely to buy it. But being up that high makes EVERYTHING more complicated unless there's some reason we're not considering. But what those rooms were particularly good for was having a vantage point to fire on that crowd. That's really all they were good for.
I can't help but believe that when those guns were taken there, they were actually taken there to do what was done with them. Nothing else makes sense if you think about it. In spite of wanting to believe otherwise, I really can't.
Is there more going on with this? Of fucking course. Paddock may not have even been the shooter. This photo looks staged as fuck for a bunch of reasons. There's any number of other things wrong with the whole situation. But even when it's spun as he was the buyer, I just can't get totally on board with it
Luke Baker
What does it matter what floor it is when you can use a fast elevator?
Dylan Sanders
Somebody fucking explain to me how an arms deal gone wrong ends up with raining down terror on hundreds of civilians? Please?
Jack Long
The arms dealer theory could work if you believe he was the man providing a specific group with weapons, and he was part of that group as well. Perhaps it's a bunch of muslim looking dudes, and he's the only one who wouldn't arise suspicion buying all the weapons. The group decided the didn't need him anymore, carried out the attack they had planned with Paddock, but left him for dead. Who ever was on the room with him probably thought Paddock was better off dead than getting caught.
Matthew Wright
There's no evidence for any theory because they won't tell us his fucking motive
David White
If he was selling weapons to a terror group. And he had purchased the weapons, and booked the room for them to carry out the attack. Who ever this group is, decided they didn't need him anymore, carried out the attack, and killed him.
Christopher Wilson
this
Hudson Martin
The idea is that he was selling guns to terrorists, and they decided to do the attack right then and there for some reason.