>and yet another thread about this When will this stop
Jacob Thompson
>trading >y won't u compromise? I'm going to need you to turn those unauthorized trips back in to the proper authorities.
Ryan Lewis
eat a dick faggot, enjoy not having firearms in 10 years if that mindset prevails
Carter Hall
Enjoy not getting shot then
Nicholas Sullivan
>implying criminals won't have guns >implying LEOs and military wont have guns
Adrian Robinson
enjoy losing your "assault weapons" in 2018/2020 when congress flips due to the apparent intransigence of your elected representatives, which is actually a possibility unlike your retarded >if the GOP uses their majority to ban one thing, they will agree to ban every thing forever and never say no retard
Alexander Watson
I enjoy not getting shot every day. The day someone tries to shoot me with an illegal gun (pro tip: owning a firearm with the intent to commit a felony already makes it an illegal gun) is the day I enjoy not getting shot EVEN MORE, as I will prevail. If I do not, I will not care, for I will be dead and dining in Valhalla.
Zachary Johnson
wow a cucks lament
Julian Wood
Name one (1) instance in which anything has been traded for in terms of firearms rights.
"compromise" just means "give us what we want right now and maybe we'll wait a little bit before demanding even more. Just kidding, give it now."
William Sanders
agree,Reminder bargaining with people that hate you does not work, cucking never works
Samuel Ortiz
>slippery slope is a fallacy
You're fucking retarded. Guns are one of the issues where it ISN'T a fallacy. You are a fucking cretin if you think they will stop at bump stocks. California, New York and other libshit states pass more and more gun control each year without end. The UK And Australia keep making gun laws stricter. The EU is passing a gun ban proposal.
>b-but muh fallacy
Fucking kill yourself piece of shit shill.
Bentley Torres
>slippery slope fallacy
Except, kid, when the regressive left spends decades trying to ban all guns, starting with anything they can get their hands on, that's not a fallacy.
Literally the only purpose of every single gun control law proposed in the last 15 years is gun confiscation.
That's the only use. That's the only reason they were proposed. That's the only goal.
The stupid bump stock has nothing to do with this conversation.
The nation's largest gun rights defending organization, which takes millions of dollars a year to defend gun rights, just supported an unconstitutional gun law, proposed a new gun law which is unconstitutional, and claimed that there exists guns which fire so rapidly that peons like you and me shouldn't have them.
The nation's largest gun rights organization literally just did the opposite of their job, and helped regressive leftists, which have gullible fucktards like you voting for them.
>maybe if you just did some trading, you might get silencers
The only thing we can trade for that is helicopter rides and bullets.
Jacob Anderson
>fucking kill yourself piece of shit shill.
I agree with this guy.
OP can fuck off back to the regressive leftists that paid him to be here.
Gun rights are civil rights.
We won't have a /k/ without gun rights.
Nathaniel Morris
Have you not realized that anti-gunners won't be happy until you have to trade your first born son for a musket?
And that's only so they can yell at you for being so soulless as to trade your child for a musket.
Matthew Ortiz
The only time someone ever committed a violent crime against me and my family I was living in a country without guns
Have fun explaining that one
Andrew Perez
Bump stocks are already banned in my state, California. Like Tannerite. And NFA weapons. And modern sporting rifles. And standard capacity magazines. And new handguns. And carrying firearms, openly or concealed. And buying ammunition.
No slippery slope here. No, siree.
Asher Ward
just the fact that you called suppressors "silencers" shows you are a cucked noguns,
Elijah Parker
The word "silencer"is the legal term for "suppressor"
They're used interchangeably because they are actually interchangeable terms.
We all know that silencers don't really make guns silent. That's not the point.
Owen Jackson
Silencer is the official legal term. Read the NFA.
Ethan Mitchell
FOPA, but that was the only time.
Oliver Gutierrez
I would argue no because the parts of FOPA we were supposed to get to protect us are still ignored in NYC/California
Thomas Jenkins
...
Lucas Harris
California. Jew York.
Have you heard of these places, you fucking fudd?
Logan Cox
>HAHA ATLEAST I DIDNT GET SHOT >as he lies dying from stab wounds or crush injuries from a truck, things he had no way of defending himself from because he disarmed himself
Mason Green
because your can draw faster than the criminal who is already aiming at you.
let's be realistic pls
Nicholas Brown
>drawing on a drawn gun is a bad plan lol
Oh, no shit? And snow is white? I never knew.
John Mitchell
I don't give a shit about the constitution. I think it's outdated, etc.
I do care about protecting my life and my family. I think that all legality concerning all weapons and accessories should be based solely around home and personal defense. (PRO TIP: The Chad government will never come for you, fucking wizard)
Suppressors? Fuck yeah, I wouldn't want my kids to go deaf when I'm stopping the bad guys next to their room.
High capacity mags? Fuck yeah, why risk a reload in a gunfight? How many intruders are there? Etc.
SBRs? I can't clear my fucking hallway with a yardstick.
I draw the line on all the other stupid shit Chris from your LGS has on his Novesky AR. He doesn't need a bumpfire so his gun looks neater as it's strapped against his no-plates tacvest for his FB picture. He's not a sheepdog, he has no military training. Even if he had access to a fully automatic without bumpfire, he'd still spray up his house and miss Tyrone because he's never trained with it outside of posting that one magdump video on the "KENTUCKY DEPLORABLES 1776" FB group.
You guys are dumb as fuck if you'd choose any type of full auto platform over semi for defense. (Exception is fucking real operators who are like ex-SOF with years of experience)
If you disagree with me you only like guns as an overcompensation and have a Pepe patch on your shitty tac vest.
tl;dr - outside of collecting you don't need a full auto you small penis wizard
Gabriel Cox
>this is literally the only situation that may ever occur and once a criminal draws a gun it is laser locked to you and even he cant point it away from you even if he wants to >even if the criminal knows your armed and can fight back, possesion of a gun automatically makes your arm draw, cock and point at the nearest innocent no matter what >this natural phenomenon is why anyone who has ever broken the speed limit, at any time ever, accidently go on killing sprees, even waking up from sleep and shooting everyone in sight if a gun is put into their hands while sleeping this is what anti gunners ACTUALLY believe
Jaxson Reed
>You guys are dumb as fuck if you'd choose any type of full auto platform over semi for defense.
You don't have to flip the switch to giggle.
Angel Perez
You're both faggots, flip the switch to giggle.
Dominic Thomas
>I don't give a shit about the constitution
I'll fucking shoot you in the face if you try to remove constitutionally enumerated rights from anyone. The number on my right to do so is 2.
Machine guns work fucking great for self defense, and better yet for defending "the security of a free State" - againts fucktards like you.
Michael Davis
hello samefag my old friend
Nathaniel Myers
(you)
How are you going to be an operator when your fat ass can't even run a mile?
>you will never be in a self defense situation Keep jerking it to Funker dweeb
Gavin Diaz
go choke on a dick, shill
Liam Roberts
of all the tactical mistakes to make, assuming your enemy is a fatass simply because he disagrees with you has to be at the top of Sun Tzu's list of pet peeves
Luke Harris
>no free speech >no privacy >no right to a fair trial