Why We Never Talk About Black-on-Black Crime: An Answer to White America’s Most Pressing Question

>police kill more unarmed citizens than blacks commit ANY violent crime

Sup Forums btfo

archive.is/G0MZY

Other urls found in this thread:

bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5137
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

unarmed black citizens?

...

unarmed citizens of any race

>nigger math
I know you're all statistically retarded on average, but come the fuck on. You can't be this fucking stupid, man.

>you're a stupid nigger

Very compelling argument...

>Very compelling argument..
that was the conclusion, not the argument.

Well after reading that anyone who takes it as fact must be a dumb motherfucker.

I'm not even joking. Go back over the maths, then your initial statement. Tell me you don't sound like a stupid nigger. If that's still your conclusion, I'll explain the fundamental mistake that invalidates your entire position.

[spoiler]it's basic mathematics and English comprehension[/spoiler]

...

okay, I've started reading it, then lapsed into skimming after the fifth or so statistical fallacy. the author is an idiot.

we don't talk about blacks killing blacks because they are so fucking bad at it, like everything else they do. it is an embarrassment. if they were good at it we wouldn't have a damn problem.

holy fuck that article
>its real
>but it doesnt matter
>but its important
>but it doesnt mean anything
>but we talk about it all the time
are you even a real person OP?

white nationalist and black nationalist team-up to kill cops WHEN

there's no way that's true. police kill roughly a thousand unarmed people a year. that many die in chicago alone in like 6 months

That made me angry reading.

This not only points out whites are more likely to be killed by another race but it ignores that black on black murders are almost half of all murders.

This some bad fast maffs.

"According to the FBI’s uniform crime-reporting data for 2016, 90.1 percent of black victims of homicide were killed by other blacks"

>It literally just contradicted itself within the first paragraph

Negro friend, is it so hard to read and do some simple calculations? Why have you fled?

> It is a fact (at least for 2016 and 2015) that a black man was less likely to commit a violent crime of any kind than a police officer was to kill an unarmed person.

Literally what?

Negro friend?

Has the evil of white maths defeated you?

Because, honestly, what it looks like to everyone with a normal (read: white+) IQ is that you simply don't understand English and/or numbers.

Like you're a retarded child.

You know. A nigger.

I'm a liberal, but I'd be inclined to disagree with you. 250 black people were killed by police brutality in 2016. Black-on-black crime is NOWHERE NEAR that figure.

>Wyte pippo most violent

>Only 256 murders behind us

Good job niggers your numbers are actually up in something for once!

Maybe try beating us in suicide next?

>Implying you have a brain

bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5137

hlights:

>For the period 2008–12—
>Persons in poor households at or below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) (39.8 per 1,000) had more than double the rate of violent victimization as persons in high-income households (16.9 per 1,000).
>Persons in poor households had a higher rate of violence involving a firearm (3.5 per 1,000) compared to persons above the FPL (0.8–2.5 per 1,000).
>The overall pattern of poor persons having the highest rates of violent victimization was consistent for both whites and blacks. However, the rate of violent victimization for Hispanics did not vary across poverty levels.
>Poor Hispanics (25.3 per 1,000) had lower rates of violence compared to poor whites (46.4 per 1,000) and poor blacks (43.4 per 1,000).
>Poor persons living in urban areas (43.9 per 1,000) had violent victimization rates similar to poor persons living in rural areas (38.8 per 1,000).
>Poor urban blacks (51.3 per 1,000) had rates of violence similar to poor urban whites (56.4 per 1,000).


Why are white "people" so damn violent?

>I cannot support my previous stupidity
>please pretend that this argument is all that I've said
No.

Lol...

>Black on black crime is due to poverty
>Why are black people poor?
>White supremacy

Give me a fucking break. Maybe the black community should address internal issues, such as fatherless homes, dead beat parents, lack of responsibilities, undervaluing education, glorifying violence, etc. Maybe instead of looking for some invisible force keeping you down, you start looking at how black culture is keeping itself down.

Fucking idiot.

>Why We Never Talk About Black-on-Black Crime
but you talk about it all the time. Why all the lies, OP?

This guy is a stupid nigger yes but I want to see someone legitimately refute this. This shows that poor whites are more violent than poor nogs..

Dumb nigger BTFOs nazis????

>Violent victimization
>Victimization

Can you read?

Wrong. Race is still a stronger correlation than poverty. Niggers, taken collectively, have twice the murder rate of all people at or under the poverty line. That statistic INCLUDES niggers below the poverty line as well. Race correlates more strongly than poverty for violent crime.

What you are reading here is VICTIMIZATION you illiterate retard. These people are VICTIMS of said crimes, not the perpetrators.

Can you refute Jews being an inbred people with many genetic disorders?

mefag BTFO'd

Thanks.

No, but Ashkenazi do have higher average IQ than whitey. Although other Jews don't.

woop woop shiggity boo bop bix nood.

It's still a valid argument

I declare OP a mental midget based solely on the obvious absurdity of his statement and nothing more.

OP prove me wrong