2020

Say it with me:

>MADAM PRESIDENT

Other urls found in this thread:

nytimes.com/2017/10/06/us/politics/puerto-rico-florida-voters.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

LOL

Hillary 2.0 will never win. It's generalissimo trump for at least 20 years

If Trump doesnt get actual legislative wins, I think Dems will either take back the House in 2018 (and impeach Trump) or someone like Joe Biden or Mark Cuban will run in 2020 and will be tough competition for Trump, particularily in the Rust Belt and white working class.

If Clinton survives to see 2020 than we already lost boys

>both maine districts go red
>2 votes still go blue

do you even understand how this works?

I come from the future. These are the results of the 2020 election. The liberals ree'd endlessly because Trump BTFO a woman for the second time in a row.

If Jeb couldn't secure the Republican Nomination, then Harris won't secure the Democratic Nomination. 2020 will be a bloodbath for Dems between Socialists and Neoliberals. 2016 was the last year the Dems managed to remain unified as a party.

>t. Drunk.

>Florida
>Red

nytimes.com/2017/10/06/us/politics/puerto-rico-florida-voters.html

what makes you think they wont rig it for Joe Biden to ensure they have a good chance at running against Trump?

NYT - retard.

>Warren
shes even dumber than hillary. not as corrupt, but still unbelievably stupid

Dems are dumb user. Joe Biden is the wrong color/wrong gender. They like to preach to the choir and reinforce their confirmation biases, like Soviets liked to do before the fall of their empire. Successful people win first and then fight. Unsuccessful people like to fight first, and then figure out how to win. It's why the Dems are historically at their weakest since Reconstruction. They have already decided their failed strategy, and are trying to figure out how to make their failed strategy work. So they think, if we invite a POC female, then turnout will rise, and then we'll win. BUt it's wrong. Oh so wrong. So drunk.

I find something innately disturbing about the idea the 90% of the landmass of a country can vote for someone and that person could still lose.

Land doesn't vote.

Wisconsin wouldn't turn Blue under OP's scenario, if PA goes red. So his fantasy is totally off even by his own standard.

> implying Wisconsin doesn't love trump
> implying Florida doesn't love Trump
wow a 40 point swing just like that

It's far more likely that Trump would beat Warren by losing NC but winning PA again. PA hates leftist identity politics and Warren is the epitome of SJW idiocy.

Kamala Harris is an extremely dumb person. You might as well run Maxine Waters.

Florida will be filled with pissed off Puerto Rican people next time. Kamala Harris really drives up the African-American vote in Milwaukee. That’s it for Donald J. Trump. He is now a one-term president.

Alexander the Great once said that he feared an army of sheep led by a wolf rather than an army of wolves led by a Sheep. But what he didn't understand, is that sheep choose sheep as leaders rather than wolves, thus, there is no such a thing as an army of sheep led by wolves in the first place.

I'm too drunk to play along with your fantasy. The urban vote WAS already rigged for Hilary and it still wasn't enough. Also. You have no idea what is in store for 2020 when /r Latestagecaptalism declares war on /r Neoliberal. It'll be one half of the country versus a divided two quarters of the country. Harris is a Jeb-Tier candidate, a projection of what the elite want voters to believe they can control. But the masses are smart, user. Can't fool all the people all the time,

You guys should really be hoping that the nominee is Cory Booker. Most of the left absolutely hates Booker. Booker would get his ass handed to him in 2020.

The latest CNN polls show Hillary has a 98% chance of winning the 2020 election.

>Joe Biden is the wrong color/wrong gender. They like to preach to the choir and reinforce their confirmation biases
This i'll be incredibly surprised if the Dems run a white man ever again

Those same polls gave her that exact chance before the 2016 election numbnuts. Unless, of course, you're just kidding.

Are you sure the poll is dated 2017? Sounds like the polls they have released a year ago

...

...

Same NYT that predicted hillary a 95+% chance at winning.

Ok

Chris Murphy, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Al Franken, Sherrod Brown, and Andrew Cuomo are good options.

a woman will 100% not run they just lost 2 billion on that card

Won't happen. Especially after the way she and her supporters acted after the election. And all of this leftist violence and obstruction isn't helping either.

OP
Say it with me

>Nader 2020

Change Harris to Winfrey, and you are correct

You don't get it user. Let me tell you what I would never say sober. People are like lemmings. They believe what they believe, and would sacrifice their first born son rather than contradict what they believe. The Establishment Dems will sacrifice everything to reinforce their confirmation biases because they would rather spend three billion dollars on a failed idea rather than half a billion on a successful idea. That's just how people are. Stubborn as fuck.

The Dems operate under the motto "If it feels good, do it." This is how inferior tribes get conquered by superior tribes.

>a woman will 100% not run they just lost 2 billion on that card
They ran a corrupt, establishment robot and only lost by ~80k votes. Oprah will run and win

I think Oprah is too smart to run for president against an incumbent, honestly. She'll lose her media empire in exchange for a chance at the White House, to which, she probably doesn't want to make the trade.

Arizona has a chance of going blue in 2020 if things continue, among others.

>MADMAN PRESIDENT
FTFY

...

I agree

This. Trump would actually win according to op's map

Why should cities get less of a vote just because they have more people?

That map looks like civil war, and a good one for the red states.

where my hilldawgs at?