Is it possible to be both libertarian and racist?

is it possible to be both libertarian and racist?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/sg0481
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Why wouldn't it be?

If you're free to do whatever you want, you're free to call blacks subhuman apes.

So yeah.

Absolutely. For example, if you want to buy land and build a private city that only allows white people admittance, that is 100% allowed under the NAP.

You're responsible for your own actions, however that may come back to haunt you.

>is it possible to be both libertarian and racist?
Yes
>
>Why wouldn't it be?
This

Yes, if our country was more libertarian and less interfering in terms of things like forcing diversity into white communities, business hiring, etc. we'd have de facto segregation and white supremacy.

Yeah, it's called being a southern burger

It's practically a requirement. You can't have liberty when half your voters are non-white.

Libertarian is the definition of racist, only against white poeple.

What?
> Who is Hoppe
> Who is Rothbard
Half of Right Libertarianism is basically white supremacy/separatism

there's a name for that OP, it's called down syndrome.

Librarians, is it still libertarianism if you want strong borders and nationalism? t. Ideological retard

Libertarians are retarded childs.

Also the girl in your pic is hot af.

Libertarian is code word for racist you dummy.

Right Libertarians aren't real libertarians. Just look at how they praise Pinochet and talk about throwing people off helicopters all the time.

No, you cannot be libertarian and racist. It violates what the founders wanted from the Constitution.

Enforcement of political borders involve the initiation of violence, so no, it's not libertarianism.

Her boyfriend is a chink twitter.com/sg0481

Feels bad man

>thousand cock stare
>hot

how new are you ?

LMAO next you're going to tell me property rights initiate violence

>Whores can't be hot

> Literally creating a white nationalist state
> Blacks were not eligible for citizenship and in all likelihood were not even considered persons/humans
> Not racist

This is the core of American Civic Nationalism

Legalized racial discrimination, just no legal racial violence

No lynching niggers in their own homes or when they are out in public mindin they own business, just shoot them when they attack until they learn not to

Minorities don't understand libertarianism.
They always vote for big government and nanny states.
Libertarianism is only possible with heavily restricted immigration or limits on who can vote.

>is it possible to be both libertarian and racist?
The two are the same.

In a society with no gibs niggers and other non-contributors of civilization would be extinguished and the ones left after mass starvation and chimp outs would be despised.

You don't need overbearing, bureaucratic, authoritarian forms of government to expel unfavorable from a society. You just create a culturing medium (or a culture) where parasites they can't survive.

>until they learn not to

That's why the USA will fail.

America was envisioned to be a white ethnostate by it's founders, that is a fact that even liberal shills can't dispute.

This also allows for based black men to winover whites by being exceptional and thus breaking down racial divides the correct way: with the best of the race (guests) not the worst (invaders)

When are you gonna shoot government thugs who rob you and bully you everyday. You won't, pussy. The biggest threat to you are white people in government, not blacks.

everyone on earth is racist, stop worrying about it so much

We have a lot of guns and are cutting back welfare

Also CA declared the popular vote is unconstitutional

We goin constitutional republic baby

>I want an ancap society
>I want to make a city with rules and shit

Pick one

What's stopping you from doing it?

Being racist violates the NAP. Being a libertarian means believing in open borders. Profit is more important than anything so long as you don't violate the NAP.

checked
yes it is, though you're probably retarded if you are

This image is blackpilling. Indicative of a society in decline. She eats that black cock with an air of arrogance.

anarcho-capitalism is on the far-right side of the political spectrum, you dumb piece of shit - and i'm assuming that ancap are just libertarians on steroids-

The ones in government can be beat by peaceful ways without violence

Violence is only necessary when the opposition brings it because they are too dumb to outsmart their opponent

Niggers too dumb so they just shoot, hence the shoot back that frequently follows

No we are not genociding niggers because if we were THEY WOULD ALL BE FUCKING DEAD

The biggest parasites in society are white people. White politicians & bureaucrats, white people in the military, white military contractors, white banks who survive on bank bailouts, white cops, white border patrol, white teachers, old white people on Medicare & Social Security, etc

>i am a racist, i don´t need reasons just accept my racism i will repeat it again so you accept it

You're wrong on this point too, but you're also moving the goal posts.

No and we both know, that's why you ask.
Lolbertarianism is a meme anyway, same as some socialist utopia.
At some point lolbetarians will probably become dangerous in their delusion, that's when they will swing from lampposts and be gassed in fema camps.

>Her boy friend

twitter.com/sg0481

Life is unfair

Can confirm, racist libertarian here.

i wonder what your real flag is

If you're free to do what you want, you're free to create a gated community with fascist rules.

>t. under 25
How do I know, user?

Good joke nigger now get lynched.

>same as some socialist utopia
u wot m8?

>Libertarian is code word for racist

The thing I don't get about this stupid infographic that commies throw around is that commies don't actually get all the value produced by their labor.
It's impossible without destroying every single job that doesn't explicitly produce something.
How are you going to pay your garbage men? Your quartermasters? Your police?
You take from those who do produce and give to those who don't, just like in capitalism

Voluntary vs compulsory, simple as that. You understand that in the communist utopia some value will still be extracted, otherwise you would have no possible growth, and instead of it being done voluntarily it'll be done by a totalitarian state.

Not really. Libertarians sorta believe in equal rights for all under capitalism, which is essentially designed to phase out any prejudice that doesn't make you money. Racism is literally bad for business. Under the libertarian worldview, however, you are free to be racist.

There is an intelligence requirement upon the general public in order to have a free society. If your populace lacks this basic intelligence, a free society will not function. Say 98 IQ average.

If your society is gonna be free, you must enforce this, which can be done by saying any immigrants from ethnicity averaging below 98 cannot contribute to the free market, and thus is detrimental to it and cannot be allowed in the free society.

This minimum average is of great importance because intelligence is closely tied to long-term planning as well as ability to fore-go instant gratification and instead focus on long-term happiness.

Africa has an average IQ around 70-80. Thus Africa does not qualify and could not be expected to be functional in a free state. Look at Somalia for reference.

Niggers are worse for business than racism.

imho capitalism does a slightly better job at wealth distribution.

White government thugs extorting you and forcing regulations on you are worse for business than "niggers".

Sorry sweetie, white people pay more in taxes than any other racial group. Try again later.

You're assuming people in the government are of the same quality as people on the street and frankly you have to be a moron or an evil bastard to be in a government and white people(And jews are much more capable than other minorities to run government). You could but don't happen to talk about African politicians in Africa which can't run their government as you can see from their current status in the world. Fact is some people are better at conquering.

Yeah, a single tax can ruin business worse than any pack of niggers. Besides, Libertarians believe that you should mow them down with an M60 if they Violate the NAP.

As a white person, objectively speaking, there are a lot of white parasites

Hardly, any mostly nigger city in america is now a worse place to live than anywhere was in Socialist Poland.

Nigga theres a balance between individualism and collectivism

We are too far on the selfish but China is too far on the collective communist ant colony

Greetings, fellow white person

I don't even know where to start, so I won't.
No commie either.
That infograph just shows how lolbertarians (republicans who still live in their moms basement) permanently contradict themselves and constantly struggle to find any kind of direction in their highly artificially constructed pseudo-reality of 'what if'.
Their rertarded ideas are literally stopped by a bump in the road still these people want to tell a gordon gecko like me about economy.
It simply disgusts me user.

>boasting that white people are better at conquering

This is "Right Libertarianism", folks.

Who said there isn't?
Extremes are just that, they will never hold true to real-world 2.0.
It's sad that most americans can only think in categories of either / or.

Because welfare allows low iq people to be able to exist among high iq people, Poland. A socialized system full of whites is pretty bleh but when you have a socialized system with blacks, you start having big problems.

When I walk into a store and give a man 5 bucks for a sandwich or something he didn't steal 5 bucks from me. You picking up what I'm putting down?

Yes, a "single tax" is worse than black people. The government extorts half your income or more every year. People like you have been conditioned to think this is normal.

Sure Kevin.
The problem is you wouldn't even be able to buy that sandwich, if it wasn't for infrastructure getting you there, a healthy fiat system and a defense budget to not get you glassed while riding your donkey.
I am a no ancap, actually I admire the brute force of capitalism, I believe in regulation though.

No shit sherlock

Okay cool but that's not a refutation. You are claiming it's contradictory to claim taxation is theft while complaining about wage labour, I've told you it simply can't be theft if both parties consent and perceive benefit, you've given no refutation, badabing badaboom.

A 100% tax isn't as bad as black people, as I've already said. Socialist Poland vs Modern America majority Black city.

to claim taxation is theft without complaining about wage labour*

That's not what I said.
I seriously don't understand what you even want from me or what you want to distill from that pic I posted.
That's not what this picture is about.
According to your logics blacks consented to picking cotton for a warm meal in the evening because muh leash again.
Badabing badaboom, augustyn.
Besides you as a pole would know that taxes can be beneficial, don't you? Especially if it's other peoples taxes.

as long as you dont use state power to target other races

You don't have to be racist and still achieve your goals. Just say you don't like people with with

That's the point of your image, claiming libertarians are silly for complaining about a compulsory taking of wealth while supporting a voluntary exchange of goods for services. This is obviously not contradictory. You should know you've lost an argument when you try to steer it with petty insults, by the way.

>is it possible to be both libertarian and racist?
would be hard not to be, blinding yourself to race realism would be left wing thereby excluding you from being libertarian.

>libertarian
>not racist
pick one

>Just say you don't like people with with Hate 95% of black people, 80% of sandniggers, 99.99% of abos

That's rayciss.

She's dating an asian fag.

I know :(

White women must be restrained

Yawn, augustyn, seriously.
You elected a government what isn't voluntarily about that?
It's much more complex and yes the pic is oversimplified same as your argumentation.
You do realize that this extracted surplus is dependent on an environment (infrastructure, currency, market access, whatnot) created by taxes as well?

>asking to be told what he cant be
you're not a libertarian.

I'll stick with her friend, crispy. Hell of a lot cuter.

White men must be men again and all the rest will follow.

Creepy as fuck.

She's Hispanic anyway and you can tell by her face that she's not fully White.

She's also Mexican and has Native American ancestry according to her DNA test.

>You elected a government what isn't voluntarily about that?
Actually, other people elected a government for me, you're claiming it would be a voluntary interaction for my neighbors to decide it's time to dip into my bank account to buy that sandwich, not exactly my consent. The fact is that you may think libertarians are dumb for not supporting whatever the fuck it is that you support, but you can't claim they're being contradictory, thus invalidating the image you used.

>whore dates asian
oh no what a great loss for the white race

She's not White anyway. She's Hispanic.

She could have probably been a good housewife if she was raised in a disciplined environment. Now look at what she is.

She's white enough.

What prevents the best gated communities from expanding without halt? As long as the people inside all agree to break outsider's NAP for the good of the community citizens it is doable. Wouldn't it inevitably end in a bunch of countries forming up dividing the world between themselves again?

Hispanics will be considered white in america within 5 years.

Look at her eyes and the shape of her cheekbones in the OP. You can tell she has Native ancestry. You people suck at noticing this stuff and go by skin color alone, which is misleading.

Also, she has a very small frame in full body pictures. Looks underage.