Pic several btw, and tell me why

pic several btw, and tell me why

if you think anything should be removed or added, say

How would you classify ideologies? How many groups are enough to categorize every ideology?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_ideologies
strawpoll.me/14109144
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You forgot the one ideology that is plastered all over the place here.

covered under nationalist, autocrat, centrist and fascist

>National socialist
>Centrist
Fuck you ANTIFA, the UN says we're centrists.

>no monarchism
Reactionary is a way too broad term in order to represent monarchism. Many political ideologies fall under the banner of reactionarism.

>centrists literally Hitler
And this is how you lost most of America.

I’m a paleo-conservative.

Basically what the founding fathers believed: a white, Christian libertarian country

Isolationist?

I went centrist libertarian nationalist patriotic.

I'm a cultural nationalist at the end of the day.

"absolutist" refers to monarchists who want absolute monarchy.

Extreme fascist. General public is too stupid to take care of themselves, hence needs a strong authoritarian government to guide it properly. Absolute freedom/democracy undermines national cohesion and the welfare of its citizens.

When you ain't got nothing you got nothing to lose.

Almost no ancaps. Did pol thread on snake?

More like you need a strong father figure, kek.

>no monarchist
>no traditionalist

what about a constitutional monarchy where the monarch still has powers?

>democracy
>absolute freedom
What are you on about, nigger? Democracy is the opposite of freedom. If the only reason you think liberty is bad is because of democracy, you're retarded.

Absolutist is an format of monarchist.
Reactionary is boarder definition for traditionalist.

Clearly not on the list, like 98 billion other ideologial variants on this planet.

...

I'm a national capitalist. Heavy on nationalism, and while free market principals work the best, protectionist laws to prevent monopolies, outsourcing and other shitty biproducts of capitalism should be prevented in favor of the peoples benefit.

thats a form of government, not an ideology

you'll see there's no republicanism or something like that either

but it is actually in practice today

>50,2% progress

I tried to make one that's larger, but the wikipedia list alone has like 100 fucking ideologies, most meme-tier
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_ideologies

Protectionism literally creates state monopolies in production,transportation,steel production etc.

Either you have low production costs and cheap goods or costly goods with high production values.

>wanting a monarch to have power but not absolute power
>not an ideology

everyday i think about how much i want to hang my self

Agreed 100%

Checked both Libertarian and Fascist.

which one will piss of christcucks, conservatives, paleio-conservatives, and libertarians the most? I'd pick natsoc if it was on there but seeing how this thread is filled with fucking faggots and faggot capitalists I wont be getting that.

that .2% i might as well just join my local antifa chapter

strawpoll.me/14109144

better poll for my Monarchist friends

Very much appreciated.

There is no really difference between democratic and constitutional monarchy these days desu, since if the monarch uses his/her powers those will most certainly get over-ridden by the parliament.

Federal monarchy, on other hand holds rather interesting prospects of unifying multitude of nations into singular empire.

we should make a monarchy thread to discuss crown jewels and hot princesses

look at Liechtenstein, the only real constitutional monarchy

>Federal monarchy, on other hand holds rather interesting prospects of unifying multitude of nations into singular empire
In practice, the opposite probably would be the case. One nation would get divided in way more smaller duchies, baronies and other small entities with the emperor as protection from outside forces.

Monarchism gets way to little exposure on here, anyway. Seeing some more monarchist threads would be beddy nice.

In Lichtenstein, morocco, monaco and a few others kings have veto power and function more like presidents in a semi-presidential system than figureheads

Central left with strong spiritual focus.

let's get it going

My ideology is that white people need more rights. We have so few left anymore.

Honestly this shit is the problem most of us are the some total of the remnents of a flawed understsnding of the best ideas thought up by the brightest minds of long ago dead people that lived in a completely different reality and paradigm.

It's like we're all trapped inside disney land so we have nothing better to do then argue
over the tea cups are better then the Ferris wheel. I reject the options given kick down the door and go to vegas and eat sushi and get a blow job in a room that looks like the Roman Senate COMPED!

But seriously if you want your fucking ethno utopia grab like minded peeps and pool your pennies and buy a plot of land where ever and do some big boy grown up alpha male shit. Why is there this constant need to actually not do anything beyond trying to drag unwilling participants into your shitty projects by force or coercion you arent right no one likes you and if I'm wrong and you do actually have a good idea we should all listen to then bet your sweet ass those people you want so desperately to help will fucking crucify you for your trouble.

Sorry Mario your princess is in another castle no matter how many times humanity hears this they still keep jumping down the same old pipes.

It's because of this and our everyone trying to be first to be second that we don't have our fucking hoverboards yet!

stop fucking around niggerfaggots and think and do some new shit

This message was brought to you by the America of yesterday tomorrow foundation.

Our mission is to stop lame faggitry by any means necessary

3 globalists

You are so self important. I bet you know everything and I bet you have the most wonderful relationships with women.

I'm a reactionary/traditionalist eco-socialist.

Dude you are so fucking stupid! Preservation of the enviroment is not traditionalist. It is progressive which means we actually more vorward with shit.

Dude, just stop. You really are only hurting yourself.

What the fuck why does this guy have to be such a little bitch of a man.

>no Traditionalist

Because he proborbly just sucks with women.

Whats the different between Islamist and Jihadi?
Is caliphate same as globalist?

where my socialist bros at?

Socialisim has never fucking worked you retarded fuckwith! Jesus christ you are such a fucking dipshit just kill yourself!

socialism means that workers are in control of production and their own industrial fate
please show me a society that did that and fell into barbarism

It's called Capitalisim you fucking retard!!

>no egalitarian

Shit list.

>not having National Socialist

>28 posters
>hundreds of votes

Islamist is anyone who thinks traditional islamic governance should come back, or at least islam should influence government more (everything from "islamic democracy" to the likes of pakistan, saudi arabia, MB and even some theoretical salafis), while jihadis are revolutionaries who want to install a caliphate by force

A global caliphate counts as a globalist scheme 4 me

Its multiple answers and has like 32 options

all of them

>Extreme fascist
OY VEY!!!!!!

radical spectrumism

Fuck off, Sören. Go back to your commune in Berlin and take turns sucking off Jamal with your friends.