MONARCHY GENERAL
WHAT IS THE BEST FORM OF MONARCHY?
LET'S VOTE ON IT!
strawpoll.me
POST THE FOLLOWING
best Monarchy
best Royal Weapon
what USA would be like if it went HRE
how to restore the Von Hohenzollerns
how to make all countries like Liechtenstein
REMINDER THAT THE RIGHT IS YOUR FRIEND AND THE LEFT IS NOT
>REMINDER THAT THE RIGHT IS YOUR FRIEND AND THE LEFT IS NOT
I meant to say right wing and left wing, it's not about the picture
>america was founded in opposition to monarch-
Hmmm no sweetie
>Generations of students have been taught that the American Revolution was a revolt against royal tyranny. In this revisionist account, Eric Nelson argues that a great many of our “founding fathers” saw themselves as rebels against the British Parliament, not the Crown. The Royalist Revolution interprets the patriot campaign of the 1770s as an insurrection in favor of royal power―driven by the conviction that the Lords and Commons had usurped the just prerogatives of the monarch.
>Leading patriots believed that the colonies were the king’s own to govern, and they urged George III to defy Parliament and rule directly. These theorists were proposing to turn back the clock on the English constitution, rejecting the Whig settlement that had secured the supremacy of Parliament after the Glorious Revolution. Instead, they embraced the political theory of those who had waged the last great campaign against Parliament’s “usurpations”: the reviled Stuart monarchs of the seventeenth century.
>When it came time to design the state and federal constitutions, the very same figures who had defended this expansive conception of royal authority―John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, James Wilson, and their allies―returned to the fray as champions of a single executive vested with sweeping prerogatives. As a result of their labors, the Constitution of 1787 would assign its new president far more power than any British monarch had wielded for almost a hundred years. On one side of the Atlantic, Nelson concludes, there would be kings without monarchy; on the other, monarchy without kings.
based, I saw you post this yesterday I think
Bumping for house of Bernadotte.
I posted more too. Funny how Ive never heard a murican talk about this. From Chile to the USA people revolted against parliament, not king (no wonder they created systems more like a king-centred one than parliamentarism), yet this was buried in history
Feel free to repost some of it if uppity hispanic or burger republicucks show up
BTW how does the dutch republic fare vs the monarchy, and why did you trade one for the other?
>strawpoll.me
A constitution is just a piece of paper. It can be ripped up, amended into irrelevance, etc. You need a physical balance of power.
>be monarcuck
>dumb roastie becomes absolute monarch because "she was the first child"
>media starts shilling strong womyn
>feminists run wild
>career wonyn everywhere
>pet shop industry through the roof thanks to a big monopoly of cats purchased
>birthrates collapse
>autistics kids everywhere
An absolute monarch in today's society and social media will be terrible once a female comes in power, and you just fucking know it.
Only absolute monarch that would work, is something like house of saud, unfortunately. Christcucks always get manipulated in the end. They're too soft, yet still fucking lame.
I dislike Islam, but they'll still be a society in 500 years time. Christcucks and the west won't.
We should restore the Hawaiian monarchy as the the monarch of the US
You must absolutely hate her