Distributism

what does pol think about it?

Other urls found in this thread:

mises.org/library/social-crisis-our-time
mises.org/library/humane-economy
mises.org/system/tdf/Two Essays_Ropke.pdf?file=1&type=document
twitter.com/AnonBabble

If jews are banned and only whites allowed I'm down.

why?

that is my thought on it.

you asked for it.

why ban jews from dsitributism?

do you know where you are my friend?

how do jews make distributism better or worse tho, also change your flag, confederates loved jews

>much worse

now back to israel fagit

>1 new post
t. Judah P. Benjamin

It's a meme divorced from reality just like the Catholicism from which it spawned.

>HURR why don't we just, like, share?

thats not really what they say
its generally in line with what pol says

Another man of culture!
Hilaire Belloc reads like Chateau Autiste, but he's on point.
I want Distributism NOW

how do we get distributism without tyranny?

>t. I don't know what Distributism is
Heretic

fagit jew gaying it up.

fuck off schlomostein.

harvey atleast paid his whores

Honestly, I don't think there's any feasible way that do so WITHOUT tyranny, at least as things stand presently

t. Grant is evil for persecuting jews
would it work or create bad incentives and fail just like socialism?

Sup Forums is wrong on a lot of things and taking positions from generalized entries or your opinion(s) of them is retarded considering the site is an anonymous propaganda meme machine which cranks up satire, irony, memes, and narrative insanity to 11 so you don't actually know what's being got at seriously much of the time.
NatSoc is more in line with Sup Forums generally than distributism.
t. deluded autist

I think if given the chance, it could work, it's been proven to do so. The problem is the opposition it will face from (((capitalists))) and (((international finance)))
Incentivizing small business ownership over chain stores is a great start though

Jews should not follow whites and gay up white nations.

you have Israel, go there instead.

>, it's been proven to do so. Th
when?

>NatSoc is more in line with Sup Forums generally than distributism
Nigger, Natsoc, no Facism, is deeply rooted in Distributism.
>deluded autist
This has worked well in the past, see Natsoc germany, or Europe during the middle ages

The economic policies under a facist regime usually come very close to Distributism, but it really played out during the Middle Ages
Have you read, "An essay on the restoration of property"?

nope

Btw what do you think of Wilhelm Röpke?

He's kind of a mix of austrian+distributist

> Nigger, Natsoc, no Facism, is deeply rooted in Distributism
It really isn't though, Fascism is based in/grew out of syndicalist/socialist ideology and nationalism, not distributism.
> The economic policies under a facist regime usually come very close to Distributism
No, they're essentially regulated state capitalist.

I like Chesterton waaay more than Belloc, just on personality.
I strongly prefer the idea of a single, limited investment in a citizen rather than UBI, which I consider the cancer of the welfare state metastasizing .
I don't think this investment would necessarily be significant acerage and livestock in the 21st century.

No, I'm not very familiar with him
Agreed, Chesterton is a much better writer, Belloc is a bit of an Autiste

A Catholic monarch. It falls to the church to distribute the means of production, and that everyone gets treated fairly.

But distributism is a goal, not technically a system in itself. Create small tight knit communities, abolish usury and the (((banks))), give people the means to survive on their own. Even a little bit of distributism would be good.

People here will keep supporting (((capitalism))) and (((socialism))) like good goys though, not realising there's any alternative.

main books
mises.org/library/social-crisis-our-time

mises.org/library/humane-economy

short essays
mises.org/system/tdf/Two Essays_Ropke.pdf?file=1&type=document

how do we get a catholic monarch tho?

Revolution
Or, more likely, after societal collapse

Fuck this gay earth

revolutions usually fuck things up even more, might end up with the first tranny queen

Probably only possible in Poland or south America for now. Someone along the lines of Pinochet will have to rise to power.
If the monarchy has the support of the vatican, I wouldn't worry about that. Might have to wait for a less cucked pope though.

>If the monarchy has the support of the vatican, I wouldn't worry about that. Might have to wait for a less cucked pope though.
you sure? the vatican is not like it used to anymore, full of homos and socialists

There's still good, traditional people. The younger generation in particular.
There might be corrupt individuals, (there always have been btw) but the church as a whole remains true.

it'll take years till the old ones die and new bishops take their place

Probably... I mean, I don't expect revolutions to be happening tomorrow. Its all pretty hypothetical. Society might just collapse before then, in that case it's not clear what will happen.