Trump the type of nigga to raise taxes on the middle class and give tax breaks to the rich

Trump the type of nigga to raise taxes on the middle class and give tax breaks to the rich

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=arIH19fGP84
youtube.com/watch?v=okHGCz6xxiw
yahoo.com/news/dear-north-korea-president-trump-090051968.html
taxrate.xyz/
commondreams.org/views/2013/09/23/add-it-average-american-family-pays-6000-year-subsidies-big-business
thefederalist.com/2013/09/30/calculating-the-real-cost-of-corporate-welfare/
subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=trump-organization&sort=asc
archive.is/S09fa
subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/subsidy-tracker/ny-trump-world-tower
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/04/what-does-the-federal-government-spend-your-tax-dollars-on-social-insurance-programs-mostly/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Donald Trump is like that one kid who ran for class president in the 6th grade and said he would ban homework and extend recess.

It means a ~4000$ raise for the middle class, but only when you define the middle class as "between 300k and 500k fanily income".

So that's good for you i guess user

Of course there had to be some kind of (((trickery))) behind it

(((This is CNN)))

We have a great twitter intellectual over here I see.

Raise what? Profit or taxes? I see tax plan, middle class, and $4,000 raise. Oh and of course for good measure on CNN. 'Could'. Typical CNN fake news bullshit.

>CNN

republicans have wanted to kill the estate tax for decades. trump says he's gonna do it

youtube.com/watch?v=arIH19fGP84

youtube.com/watch?v=okHGCz6xxiw

A

$4000 annual cut is a lot for the middle class. Not entirely sure which bracket this would be applicable to. Maybe some burger can shed light

This. If some burger can shed light on what is being proposed that would be great.

>inb4 research yourself

if it's on CNN it must be true
sage

This tax plan is pure bullshit drafted by a kike. More tax for the goy, less tax for the (((1%)))

yahoo.com/news/dear-north-korea-president-trump-090051968.html

He really IS a moron

oh jesus please berniefag

>Could

hmmm

Is this another case of
>Could
>Supposedly
>Anonymous sources claim
>Sources who are familiar with how _____ thinks
>Might
>Possibly

Yup

...

...

It's cnn using weasel words to imply the opposite of the truth. Here's trump's proposed tax plan, but congress has been cucking the entire time.

Leaf, wait till you learn the true cost of illegal immigrants.

Also, that medicare number is wrong. T. Work in medicare.

What are these "corporate subsidies"?

taxrate.xyz/

that medicare number is wrong.
link?

You mean would I prefer to stimulate the economy and potentially see returns on my investment with a higher GDP and new products over the years instead of feed Nigger Joe and his 9 baby Mama's 9 babies each high fructose corn syrup?

Yes.

It's straight up lies if you go to the actual sources. I still don't trust them.

No, you stupid leaf, I'm not linking you internal documents.

commondreams.org/views/2013/09/23/add-it-average-american-family-pays-6000-year-subsidies-big-business

>The $6,000 figure is an average, which means that low-income families are paying less. But it also means that families (households) making over $72,000 are paying more than $6,000 to the corporations.

>The IMF reports U.S. fossil fuel subsidies of $502 billion, which would be almost $4,400 per U.S. family by taking into account "the effects of energy consumption on global warming [and] on public health through the adverse effects on local pollution."

>According to Dean Baker, "government granted patent monopolies raise the price of prescription drugs by close to $270 billion a year compared to the free market price." This represents an astonishing annual cost of over $2,000 to an average American family.

Weasely liberal statistics are the worst statistics.

That is because he is looking to end the law that makes you able to cut what you paid on your state and local taxes from your federal tax. Places like California, New York, and other highly taxed (democrat) states will pay more even though taxes will go down for everyone.

Have you ever noticed that Democrats view tax plans in some form of infantile fairness competition? If you make more money, of course you'll get more back in a tax break. It's literally numbers at that point.

Liberals think its fair to tax people who earn more at higher percentages if they're more successful than them, its self-pity and ugly and they think that if they kick the guy higher than them down its somehow fair now.

Don't believe me? Ask them if they support flat tax for everyone at a set percentage for everyone. They'll squirm at that one.

Raise as in u get more money

Just written in a retarded misleading way

they might cut food stamps but nobody's talking about cutting corporate welfare

Nigger, you can't even DEFINE corporate welfare.

Corporate payments = actual get something in return
Gibs = money down the drain.

Also, why is the second paragraph comparing only the "3 main programs" with the total payments to corporations? Wouldn't it be intellectually honest to include all welfare in the comparison?

google us taxpayer subsidies $6000 corporate welfare

free markets sure need a lot of welfare

>niggers be like I dont know what a raise is.

No, I'm asking YOU specifically to define corporate welfare. What does it entail?

I checked the sources for your infographic, and even linked it here, and it was extremely unclear and even used misleading statistics.

THIS IS WHAT WE WANTED!!!! LIBERALS BTFO!!!

taxpayer subsidies when taxpayers give free money to billionaires

>the obama leaf returns
hows the wife and her kids nigger leaf

Isn't median household income in the US like ~$60k / yr. Last time i checked i was i to the top 7% with $190k / yr.

dumb fucking thread. it means 4k reduction in taxes for the middle class.

What the fuck does that even mean? Elaborate and define it in actual concepts and complaints you leaf.

You're complaining about "welfare" while linking subsidy images, that are unsourced, without ever deciding to see what the subsidies ARE and equating it to welfare, because there's no way that large corporations actual bring value instead of welfare niggers bringing down property values.

I swear to god, if this is another fucking leaf that is reeeing about farm subsidies going to "muh rich industry farmers" who never mentions that like 85% of farms are actual mega farms, I'm fucking done.

I linked the original proposed plans, it would have been a god send. Go play with the calculator here.

taxrate.xyz/


I'm still reee-ing at my senators to make healthcare costs come out of your pre-tax amount.

$123 million to help this poor guy make ends meet

EDIT TO ADD:

We need to have a different operation to get our congress faggots to let us deduct all health care costs as pre-tax, not post tax.

Relying on emotional arguments, without linking sources or even being able to discuss what you're talking about, is not how you win people to your side you fucking leaf.

If it did CNN would have said it that way, that's why they called it a TAX RAISE you moron CNN is never wrong

read the federalist society link. even the cato institute thinks there's a problem
thefederalist.com/2013/09/30/calculating-the-real-cost-of-corporate-welfare/

Kinda this:

Consider, wasteful weapons development program, weapon never works or is shelved:
Contractors, subcontractors get work. Thousands (sometimes tens of thousands) employed. Sometimes for decades.
The employed pay taxes on salaries, pay mortgages, spend money into economy. Send kids to college, donate to charities, are usually not criminals..etc etc..

Gibs: Down the drain.

It's amazing how everyone on Sup Forums makes ~$200k per annum. Truly astounding.

Do you have a source on that? Because that would be amazing for me
t. Married 87k income

forbs, libertarians and hardest hardcore rightwingers think corporate welfare is a problem

yeah, and they have so much free time to post on Sup Forums all day everyday

You're only telling me to literally go educate myself. Why is it impossible for you to concisely explain your gripe to guide me in further research? It makes me believe that you don't know what you're talking about.

Also, why do you faggots always lie? I had to go dig up your own sources because you couldn't even have the decency to link them.
subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=trump-organization&sort=asc

Still trying to dig up whatever the fuck they're calling a "mega deal".

This isn't a hard concept, to simply summarize an issue, in a way that makes sense, unless you do not fundamentally understand it.

I dont know if you are trying to be sarcastic or what but it says $4,000 raise. if you wanted to say raise in taxes you would say that to be clear. this is just a headline thread without a link to the article anyway. sage

FUCKING

archive.is/S09fa

It's almost like it isn't really hard to go make a business and put time in. Shit nigger I started an insurance agency in Florida 15 years ago and now make well over $200k a year merely telling people which company to use and collecting a monthly percentage. Only difficult part was setting up a system to pull in people and the rest was just timing. I don't even work 5 days a week anymore.

I don't know wtf you want?
any of the links would explain it

lol says right there pay raise. fucking faggot OP.

...

>the """average"" Starcucks-employed liberal on the (((NeverTrump))) campaign doesn't pay $6,000 in federal taxes in their lifetime
>somehow cutting taxes for the people who actually pay all of the taxes is unfair because no one is gibbing them more free gibs

I hope you get run over by a van by your new chink masters, who then back over you to make sure you're dead like they do back home. You even make leafs look bad, Obamaleaf. kys. Seriously. Do it. Fucking die already.

this has to be wrong. 70% of all taxes goes towards welfare. Look it up

That was literally Bernie Sanders with his FREE EVERYTHING plan.

The left can't even keep their analogies straight.

>What are these "corporate subsidies"?
Tax breaks on things the unwashed masses use every day, like gasoline and farming. Meanwhile the same libshits that whine that we don't have $6/gal gasoline thanks to "subsidies" cheered when King Nigger blew billions giving money to (((green energy.))) Because it no longer counts as an evil corporate subsidy when you're giving that money to the right jews.

no you're thinking of military and police to keep the scam going

How are you this dumb? Take three sentences, summarize the issue for me and tell me what the problem is. That's all I want, for you to demonstrate actual knowledge and understanding of the issue. My bullshit meter goes off the chart when someone can't explain a concept in their own words, can't link to their own sources, and then only spits out some generic articles while screeming "educate yourself".

BTW, that "MUH TRUMP SUBSIDIES" has some hilarious sources.

subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/subsidy-tracker/ny-trump-world-tower

This is like 2/3rds of the posters here. Just like how theres always 5 millionaires, a few doctors and bunches of people making 6 figures a year here. In other words, no one cares about you lying on the internet.

what's you problem the nyt, tax breaks aren't real money? what?

He's not going to explain it because he doesn't understand it. He just has links to websites with statistical fuckery and misleading conclusions, taking their word for it because it confirms his ideological beliefs. He's like a shittier version of obamaleaf. At least obamaleaf is entertaining.

Well you can be triggered that more successful people than you browse the internet as well but I don't really care. Becoming an insurance agent isn't a massive difficult field to get into like a doctor.

I cant get triggered by fake news

You have to be a dumb nigger to realize you can’t “give a tax cut” to people who don’t even pay taxes.

(((CNN)))

Meanwhile in reality,
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/04/what-does-the-federal-government-spend-your-tax-dollars-on-social-insurance-programs-mostly/

Nice strawman. Yes, I doubt the objectivity and quality standards from the NYT after watching them for the last 18 months.

Why the actual fuck can't you just define the problem? Why do you continuously avoid defining the problem.

I'm aware, but you see how I'm trying to actually understand what he's talking about, finding his own fucking sources for him, and linking them for all of you? Like, I'd happily debate it, but I've been noticing that more and more the unhinged left has no ability to debate and acts more as a NPC spewing whatever headline they recently read.

Tax breaks are not public spending, dipshit

We make like 70k together. Cost of living is super low here, as well. We pay $300 a month for rent.

Dude, what user is saying is that he wants to have an actual discussion with you on this, where you argue your points due to your understanding of it rather than linking to disingenuous websites with an obvious bias and agenda. Basically, from my perspective, he's telling you to educate yourself and actually learn what these fucksticks are claiming that you blindly follow and treat as gospel. Because you might be surprised at what you find.

when walmart and burger joints pay so little that
people that work there qualify for food stamps and medicaid, that's a subsidy to capitalist ideology
people pay into social security. how does that cost 24%
we all fund a failed ideology

Social programs are a part of capitalism, since it relies on the private capital of others more well off. I dont get why people call it socialism when no means of production are siezed.

You cannot be fucking serious. You think welfare is a corperate subsidy because not everyone gets paid enough to not qualify for welfare? You are literally so much of a socialist retard that you think of welfare as a fundamental pillar of the universe.

Isn't that the old one from the campaign?

Why do you think Sup Forums is so (((conservative)))? Not everybody works at Taco Bell, you know?

What did he mean by this?

>we all fund a failed ideology
Because we all have such a horrible life here. Totally failed.

No one here makes more than $200k you fucking loser

>walmart and burger joints
Why should businesses subsidize people's children that they had without the ability to take care of them? You're literally saying the economic failures of the workforce should be taken care of by private businesses and if the state that offers assistance does so to its citizens it's somehow giving money to these businesses even though they never receive any of it what so ever in any direct sense.

>could
>cnn
fake news

all the land is owned all the products/ideas are patented and the capitalist says you have to find a way to survive on something else.
the only thing most ppl have is their labor
capitalist make self serving rules and regulations and leave everyone else with few options

PRobably, I'm not attributing what congress does to what Trump is seeking though.

Exactly leaf, minimum wage is for high schoolers.

>people pay into social security. how does that cost 24%
Because it's a socialist pyramid scheme that is not self funded, and when they were self funded, democrats pilfered their coiffers repeatedly.

A commie leaf, this explains why you can't define anything you bitch about, refuse to source your bullshit, and can't even explain concepts besides parroting what other people say.

Goodbye.

Tell me how people can make a living off their labor if it weren't for the businesses that give them the resources to transfer labor into a means of living?

Or that the businesses are bad even though the capital and real wealth they produce subsidizes millions of children that couldn't afford to feed themselves, as if the excess of wealth squandered by people making poor choices is somehow the fault of capitalism instead of people using the success of the free market to incentivize the unsuccessful that cannot create real capital.

Please explain how socialism can use invested seized capital to create more real wealth without a form of incentivized system or competitive means of different business models and if so why hasn't it ever proven as successful in every single implemented form of human history.

Repealing the Estate Tax creates a permanent Oligopoly in America. It doesn't kick in until $11 million so fuck them. Tax their ass.

Letting small groups of people hand huge wealth down to children who may or may not bring value back to the community from where it was generated means fuck them in my book. It could go on for hundreds of years just living off the interest. Nice work if you can get it.

>Tell me how people can make a living off their labor if it weren't for the businesses that give them the resources to transfer labor into a means of living?
exactly, and there's no escape from that system.
there's no other way, you're trapped in it forever

it's a vicious circle you need the oppressive system just to survive

you end up subsidizing your own slavery

and republicans wanna privatize the rest.
I can see the day when some people will have nothing and no options.
even the rain that falls on them will be owned by someone else

>you need the system to survive
So without it the people die?
Does socialism not require the use of labor to in return receive resources from the state?

Also are their no small business owners in a capitalist system that come from a labor class?

Is it impossible in a capitalist system to receive a loan to create a business if the opportunity is there?

Also how is a system oppressive when it gives the opportunity to be paid not to work and opt out of being labor altogether?

And you didn't even answer a single question leaf, your lack o answers has to at some level be making you think your ideology is flawed when these are very basic questions regarding basic living in a socialist system outside a capitalist one.

>Please explain how socialism can use invested seized capital to create more real wealth without a form of incentivized system or competitive means of different business models and if so why hasn't it ever proven as successful in every single implemented form of human history.
the problem with this is you wanna keep the worst part of the system. instead of reforming all of it you wanna fool around at the edges