Is reddit, dare I say it, /wokerthanpol/?

Is reddit, dare I say it, /wokerthanpol/?

>people can watch murders so it's ok if i watch child porn

Not the argument, lame brain.

actually that's the exact argument this pedo is making, you're just too stupid to realize it

I thought it was more about freedom. But you can't even argue against the pedo point. I think you might be a legitimate brainlet.

You can view a child being killed online? I sincerely doubt it. I've been on the internet for over a decade and, despite posting on Sup Forums for the majority of those years, have never seen an actual gore video featuring a child. I think that's made up bullshit desu. But even if it was true, child porn creates a market for the continuous abuse of children, that's why it's banned. Posting a gore video of a child does not create a market for continuous killing of children. It is a false equivalency. I suspect you are the brainlet here, faggot.

Have you ever been on Sup Forums? There's often threads featuring dead kids. Also, a necrophile might decide to act out on his horrible fantasies just like a pedo watching cp. BRAINLET

Haven't been on Sup Forums for long, have you? Just browse those china threads for webm's of different ways people die in china, including kids.

Now that you mention it, I do remember those videos of children getting run over by terrible Chinese drivers. But my point still stands regardless of whether it exists or not. Posting a gore video of a child does not create a market for killing children, but posting a child porn video does create a market for continuously abusing children. It's not even remotely the same thing.

It's exactly the same thing. There are necrophiles who masturbate to dead children and face no punishment because the law is retarded.

When necrophilia becomes an actual issue then maybe we consider the viewing of it illegal.

What's the incidence of necrophilia vs pedophilia in the general population?

Necrophiles who masturbate to children are statistically insignificant. A market cannot be created because there is not enough demand. However pedophiles are in no short supply and creating child porn does create a market for more child porn because there is substantial demand for the product. It's really not a hard thing to grasp, but considering you go on Reddit, you're probably still in high school.

Terrorists are statistically insignificant also, yet we have massive national security apparatuses to stop them.

Talk to me when a necrophile ploughs through a school.

Ok, protect your little laws like your worthless life depended on it, pleb. It's as simple as this:
>child dead
>A-ok
>child naked
>prison time
Guess which crime the law actually views more harshly? The murder. Yet only the video evidence of the rape is illegal. Why is this?

That is another massive false equivalency. Investing money to stop terrorists directly results in American lives being saved. Investing money to ban child gore is literally unnecessary because nobody is going out of their way to kill children in order to make money from child gore. However when child porn is filmed, it is filmed with the express intent to market it for money, which then leads to more people doing it and more children being abused. That is not the case with child gore, and so they don't care about banning it. Again, it's really that simple.

A more apt comparison is that we can watch ISIS kill individuals, some of them under the age of consent, with the knowledge that ISIS makes said videos in an effort to propagandize. The argument for making under-consent videos illegal is that by viewing the content you are *promoting* the content, either through attention or payment. The ISIS video comparison works because, by watching ISIS behead someone, they see their propaganda works and will behead more people.

Both should be 100% illegal senpai

Pictures of dead children aren't made for people to fap to them, child porn is. With pictures such as the dead refugee child on a beach, it's meant to show something horrible, not to be used for fapping material. Child porn is made for people to use as fapping material.

So by your logic co should be legal if it is free?

This. But what about the filthy redditors point where nothing is permitted or everything is permitted?

Kill pedos and all degenerates

You make the laws that you can enforce and are worth enforcing.

There simply aren't enough potential offenders to make this a worthwhile sin to police.