What are the chances the federal rulings on gay rights could ever be reversed?
Cis Only
Other urls found in this thread:
chaladze.com
journals.plos.org
ons.gov.uk
thenewatlantis.com
prri.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
en.wikipedia.org
jamanetwork.com
psi.sagepub.com
nature.com
cambridge.org
jstor.org
advocate.com
archive.is
jamanetwork.com
nytimes.com
archive.is
christiantoday.com
en.wikipedia.org
livescience.com
archive.is
archive.is
nature.com
tim-taylor.com
scientificamerican.com
archive.is
hawaii.edu
en.wikipedia.org
sciencemag.org
archive.is
advocate.com
archive.is
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
myredditvideos.com
twitter.com
Cloudy, with a chance of meatballs.
bump
Femboys count as cis too!
No chance, unless there is a drastic change in the zeitgeist of western countries. As new generations have come to power, Gay acceptance has become widespread and will proliferate.
bump
Gay rights SHOULDN'T go away.
But this culture of gay supremacy and the gay mafias that run a lot of medua needs to end.
Faggots are less than 3% of the population amd 46% of media.
They infect our childen with their "mind virus".
Im notnsayig kill em all. Im just saying dot ram your lifestyle down our throats or up our kids asses.
...
Exactly. Yoy proved my point. Stop infecting the youth. Theyre not gay. Theyre impressionable. Big difference.
homosexuality is a mental disorder
gender confusion is a mental disorder
What the fuck is a Homonationalist even supposed to be? This is why the globalists just need to fucking end it all already because I can't even fathom these stupid fucking buzz words anymore.
How do you know they aren't just more likely to come out if they feel they will be accepted for who they are?
dont worry about the gays
If it is genetic, and there are many suggestions that it is at least in part genetic, then in a few generations of homosexuals not producing offspring, they will drop from less then 10% of the population to even smaller than that.
Also, don't worry about the gays in general. Live your life, ignore them, be glad that the gay men take up fewer straight women, and only be concerned once they start to infringe on your rights.
In Mississippi nearly 30% of gays have kids.
Someone in support of homosexuality-based nationalism.
Because it wouldnt make sense biologically if that much of the population was homosexual. I have a homosexual uncle. Suppression of his homosexuality drove him to drugs and ultimately insanity. Im on your side. But as a father i have to watch out for the gay mind virus because its getting to be too much in media.
Im not hateful, but everything has its limits. I know people do not choose to be gay. But let people come out naturally instead of trying to cultivate more numbers.
There will always be de novo mutations and IVF.
yeah but they are not their kids. They don't have their genetic make-up.
Gay people growing up in a straight environment have remained gay in large proportions, and there is no reason to believe that the same would be true for straight people.
The difference is that eventual the genetic patterns that allow for homosexuality will be weeded out simply because the gay people will not be passing it down.
Its a battle of birthrates that they, by definition of their sexuality, must lose.
Ironically, repressing sexuality would lead to more gay people being forced for social reasons to live a straight life, which would mean they would have kids, which would mean more gay genetics.
Yeah, but mutations would be an insignificant number and IVF is wouldn't involve enough of the gay populations to be sustainable. Sure, it might make it last longer, but it cannot replace regular old penis in vagina
A lot of gays, especially lesbians, have kids from prior heterosexual relationships that they then raise as single parents or with other gay people. Surrogacy means a biological connection to your children as well.
In 20-30 years, homosexuality will be eliminated through eugenics, so gay rights are a moot point.
Female relatives of male homosexuals have more kids on average than other females. Using this data a researcher ran a calculation and found that straight men and women carrying the genes for homosexuality could lead those genes to persist at low frequencies without overall harm to the species:
100 fucking percent, my nigger. Don't you understand this is the greatest counter-revolution since Christ drove the kikes from the temple?
Then encourage lesbians to live their sexuality! Give them a generation and boom! no more gay genes.
If repression of their sexuality is leading to the sustainability of the gay gene, then if you want to get rid of the gay gene, you have to, ironically not suppress their sexuality
Lesbians can easily find a man to donate sperm and have biological kids. I think your findings apply more to men who have to pay 50k + a pop to hire a surrogate if they want a decent one.
Ok
I don't think I see your point
yeah, but lesbians are not the entire gay population
unless they are having enough kids from IVF to replace themselves, and their partner AND all the male gay partners, there will be a net lose of gay people
Gays don't extinct because whatever genes cause it make bisexual women have more kids than straight women. It is an advantage to women, a disadvantage to men. This is called sexually antagonistic selection theory.
journals.plos.org
Bisexual women are having more kids on average. Teen pregnancy rates in bisexual female teens are MUCH higher than that of heterosexual or lesbian teens. This could also be an example of a heterozygous advantage wherein one dominant allele confers a reproductive advantage over either two dominant alleles or two recessive alleles.
homosexuals will stop existing when women stop being trash. also a lot of chemical intervention. but at least prison gay wont occur anymore once women stop being trash.
>All three branches.
Do you really have to ask?
Yes.
Why can't you just leave these people alone? For fuck's sake. While you piss and moan about what gays can or must not do, more important things are happening inthe world. Piss off and quit shitting up this board with your closetted bullshit. Let's have your rights reversed, you fucking infant. .
THISSSS
THIS RIGHT FUCKING HERE
Only if we have the right society that is conservative enough to plan to have kids instead of making mistakes.
Oh fuck, nevermind. It's been a fucking day.
Wouldn't CRISPR be used to eliminate trannies first?
All we have to do is meme "Oh I would never date a woman who was bisexual because I could never meet all her needs" and it ends the whole lesbian activism thing. But anyhow, from my POV we have pretty successfully killed off the whole lesbian/feminist thing over the last year. They have abandoned sexual liberation and are trying to preserve muh birth control gibs now.
cmon man, lets be real here for two minutes, seing an otokonoko trap or yuri anime has done more to get little boys and girls questioning their sexuality than ever before. it has nothing to do with retarded media. 50 years ago the only porn you had to chose from was really gay or really straight, now we have a smorgous board of different kinds of stuff that people are free to learn about and explore the granularity of their sexuality. stop focusing so much on the gay itself, focus on the degeneracy, wearing dildos in public, behaving like a slut, not being faithful lovers and polite in public.
...
You seem to be under the impression that Gays have a choice about being gay. They do not, they are biological errors, and that error needs to be fixed.
>effeminate trash as mods
>effeminate trash as members
So much for saying cis only when you basically advocate for estrogen soaked """""men"""""
Ok, sweet
Theses are facts yes. But I believe we could both agree that forcing homosexuals to suppress their sexuality would lead to a higher percentage of homosexuals passing their genes on to the next generation. This would lead to more gays in a population.
Frankly, I don't care. If you're gay, be gay, if you're straight be straight. Be yourself. But to those who say that we should fight against the gay or whatever, that we should repress the degeneracy or what have you, I offer an olive branch.
If the no-gay people crowd got their way through repressive measures, it would backfire on them while simultaneously leading to a large number of people living a miserable lie for the rest of their life. No one wins and everyone is unhappy. If someone wants to be gay, then it is both the best course of action for them and the neck beard internet goof who wants there to be fewer gay people.
No one wins one way, everyone wins in the other.
Also, I didn't mean to convey that gay people would go extinct, I don't think that's possible, but that letting them chose to not reproduce will in the long run lead to a decrease in their total percentage of the population
Except that a lot of people used to hide being bisexual or gay. It doesn't mean, I don't think, we will have a ton more EXCLUSIVE homosexualis, but certainly the number of people who admit to being ok with the IDEA of having gay sex or who have experimented will rise for some time.
* In 2016, just over 1 million (2.0%) of the UK population aged 16 and over identified themselves as lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB).
* The population aged 16 to 24 were the age group most likely to identify as LGB in 2016 (4.1%).
ons.gov.uk
No, the goal should be to find an test that can be applied to a fetus in utero, then abort the fetuses that have "mental illness", because homesexuality is hugely coincident with mental illness.
So at what level of maximum mental illness prevalence would you be willing to state that a population should not be culled in utero?
From the faggots that Ive known in real life? A genetic predisposition for schizophrenia would take care of so much of the gay population that there would effectively be no more homosexuals, or transgenders
No from actual scientific data, not your personal opinions.
That it would cull most jews, blacks and a large percentage of spics would just be cake from the freshest of ovens. You could probably also convince the mothers that what they were doing was humane, because it would be.
Homosexuality is caused by a predisposition to schizophrenia then environmental stresses. That is the state of the art science as we speak.
bump
[citation needed]
No, and it shouldn't. Make it illegal and it gives subversive kikes an inroad to frame it as forbiddon and thus cool, which they can then leverage into the absolute state of dildo-parade degeneracy we have today under the guise of 'tolerance'.
Keep it legal, reform education so it isn't Marxist propaganda, and don't treat it as a controversial issue that comes with free victimhood. Within 15 years, 90% of gays will be gone.
Short term we could impose lewdness standards on the gay bars, get those satanic dens shut down, and accomplish 80% of the same thing..
Not him, but here's from Johns Hopkins.
7% of millennials are gay:
prri.org
>trying to have a meaningful conversation with someone whose ideal world is one in which he decides whether each baby lives and dies.
I guess he's right about that mental illness, though.
This study conducted no new research and was not endorsed by the University. This is the opinion largely of Paul McHugh based on careful examination of fringe studies and ignorance of mainstream science. New Atlantis is a Jewish founded, owned, and operate publication for pro-religious science and is not peer-reviewed either.
Same-sex marriage policies are associated with reduced adolescent suicide attempts:
I don't want to have the say or make the decision. I just think everyone who thinks abortion is a good thing, should have one. When you look at the environmental triggers for various genetically driven mental disorders, and conflate them with "women who think abortion is acceptable", I suspect you will find lots of cross over. Smoking and drinking while pregnant. Single motherhood. Exposure to lead, etc etc etc... I wan't leftist women to be the ones to make the decision. All we need to do is provide the tools, and they will make the correct decision. (exterminate all the gays in utero)
[citation needed]
No they are not. The high suicide rate of faggots is caused by systemic mental illness. If you had bothered to go out and meet your typical run of the mill faggot, you would know that.
So basically you are saying your own personal experience invalidates the findings of trained researchers who have found anti-gay stigma is what leads to increased suicide rates?
>Written by a professor at Johns Hopkins
>cites a professor from Johns Hopkins, as well as many others
>analyzes existing research done by Johns Hopkins and the Mayo Clinic
>I-IT'S FRINGE SCIENCE, BUT ALSO PUSHED BY JEWS
You're assuming that being gay is a genetic mutation when there's plenty of evidence to suggest that homosexuality is greatly influenced by some form of abuse in the developing stages
He did not conduct any research to make these findings. He's just listing his opinions. He hates gay people and trannies, he's entitled to that. But he's offering no new evidence and citing fringe research and ignoring mainstream research efforts that directly contradict him. You realize it is possible to deliberately misinterpret data to come to desired conclusions?
Genetic Evidence of Homosexuality:
Summary of twin studies:
psi.sagepub.com
Female relatives of male homosexuals have 1.3x as many kids:
journals.plos.org
nature.com
doi: 10.1038/ng1195-248
doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002451
Hamer 1993:
jstor.org
advocate.com
jamanetwork.com
doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810360053008
nytimes.com
christiantoday.com
Actually the science shows just the opposite, faggots engage in suicidal behavior (for example anal sex causes anus cancer, irrespective of condom usage or HPV infection), the reasons faggots only have a median age of 40 has to do with the shitty lives they lead, even the faggot suicide rate does not cause their extreme morbidity.
Now faggots can fix themselves, and stop engaging the the suicidal behavior, but that also causes them to stop identifying as gay.
Being a faggot is a system wide disease...
also
>muh appeal to authority
doesn't make his opinions less shitty
Straight males carry gay genes:
chaladze.com
livescience.com
Scientists find DNA differences between gay men and their straight twin brothers:
A novel predictive model of sexual orientation using epigenetic markers.
Authors: T. C. Ngun [1]; W. Guo [2]; N. M. Ghahramani [3]; K. Purkayastha [1]; D. Conn [4]; F. J. Sanchez [5]; S. Bocklandt [1]; M. Zhang [2,6]; C. M. Ramirez [4]; M. Pellegrini [7]; E. Vilain [1]
nature.com
tim-taylor.com
scientificamerican.com
hawaii.edu
Female relatives of gay men have 1.3x as many children:
journals.plos.org
Androgen receptor gene linked to XQ28
sciencemag.org
[citation needed]
Being a faggot is a mental illness. Environmental stress triggers it. People have varying degrees of susceptibility to mental illness. The specific type of mental illness that triggers faggotry, is schizophrenia.
Gay is not natural
When communism strikes back with the Mexicans.
[citation needed]
Then why does it persist through generations?
Also [citation needed]
So true
Sad
I have already cited several papers that show the proven link between schizophrenia, suicide, suicidal behavior, and faggotry.
Its jew shit . we have to many humans on planet
Where specifically in any paper does it say schizophrenia is tied to homosexuality?
>He
You keep pretending like it's one person, when that's not the case at all.
>not conduct any research to make these findings
Is analyzing existing data now homophobic?
>He hates gay people and trannies
There's absolutely no evidence of that, that entire study is trying to help and inform.
>citing fringe research
The Mayo Clinic is fringe reaearch now?
>ignoring mainstream research
From what, the 80s-90s in exchange for more current data?
>You realize it is possible to deliberately misinterpret data
Absolutely, that you're so hostile to even considering this and immediately disregarding it as a hit-piece deom someone who hates gays proves it.
Alright, so you got treated like shit when you were growing up, I don't know how, but it must've been rough for you to go to such lengths to defend the warped persona you created for yourself. Whatever and whoever it was that made you this way, don't let them win.
But good news for you! Stop hanging out with faggots, stop smoking pot, stop smoking cigarettes, and limit your drinking to holidays, and have a good diet, and your faggot feelings will go away.
It was literally two people, and mostly the opinions reflect that of Paul McHugh.
No existing data analysis is not homophobic but don't pretend he actually studied anyone personally to come to these conclusions or was financed by the University.
He is publishing in a Jewish-owned religious social conservative journal with no peer review that exists to push religious opinions against sexual and other minority groups.
I never said Mayo Clinic was fringe. What exactly did they claim and what does he state the meaning is? You have never actually read his study but just for shiggles.
Here have a read this goes more into depth:
advocate.com
bump
LOL, and this is the internet for you. Anyhow, I would encourage anyone to go ask any working medical doctor their opinion on faggots, and you will not get an advocate.com endorsed answer. Literally the only medical professionals who will treat faggotry as a "healthy lifestyle choice" are the clinics run by faggots. LOL, Ambulance technicians won't even touch you guys with out an extra two layers of general precautions because they know what diseased drugged out freaks you guys are.
bump
I needs to be repeated... ANAL SEX CAUSES ANAL CANCER. That is AFTER you control for HPV infection and condom usage. Simply the act of sticking a penis in your poop chute causes cancer!
Anyone wana guess (be honest here, no googling) the trifecta of anus cancer?? LOL
Gays have lower rates of prostate cancer.
Reddit oozes from every word you type. May God have mercy on your children.
Prostate cancer does not kill you! Or even require you cary around a colostomy bag when the surgeon amputates your anus. Oh and you get prostate cancer when you are old, the faggots all died in their 40's (from AIDS or anus cancer)
You can definitely die from prostate cancer. The point is the fact that such correlations exist are likely evidence of a genetic component to homosexuality.
No, people do not typically die from prostate cancer... The current state of the art treatment for prostate cancer is "do nothing" because chemo, surgery and radiation typically do more damage to patient.
...
Link to study about lower risk of prostate cancer in gay men:
bump
That is a survey, not a study...
Also medical knowledge here... Faggots dont get prostate cancer because the all die by the time they are 50...
bump
Gay marriage shouldn't matter to most folks.
Anti-discrimination laws are a problem for everybody. They prevent society from reorganizing in a way that would better suit everybody.
How exactly would society reorganize in their absence?
Maybe if enough people realise that gay marriage can be used to significantly persecute religious institutions (as it already does), then enough people might be willing to reverse it. Otherwise, there's pretty much no chance in such such a progressive world.
Well first off, stay away from niggers. Because there are just not that many white on faggot fag bashing's. The vast majority of fag bashing's are coming from niggers. And... You can't really enforce hate crimes against niggers because hate crimes require intent, and intent generally requires sentience, and niggers well... They don't get accused of intent when they murder that often...
I predict that states will be granted the freedom to narrowly or broadly interpret the meaning of marriage within the next two to three years, and many if not all the states will roll back faggot marriage.