Can someone explain this?
Can someone explain this?
Other urls found in this thread:
desuarchive.org
twitter.com
The best art in Z was better than the best art in Super and much much better than the average.
The worst art in Z was about as bad as the worse art in Super, but it was less rare, because Super has bad art almost every episode and scene.
believe it or not but a lot of the staff working on this show has changed
Toriyama's art style does not look good in modern digital animation.
*more rare, my bad.
...
Everything got better
Going digital for anime at the end on 90's was the right decision
Hand drawned anime with paints were always dirty looking and poor quality
Nice cherrypicking
11/10
still beter then pic related
Both look good.
...
>cherrypicking
>worst looking shit you could tryhard still looks better in motion than new DB
Both look great, should just have used this:
Which is a much more obvious downgrade.
Ones a weekly tv show and the others a movie
>Trunks TV special
>movie
And people still argue that the dub didn't confuse things.
And i'll stop here, don't feel like getting in another DB animation argument, all the DB series' have shit animation, but people just like to cherrypick the good DBZ moments
>Accuses of cherrypicking
>Scrapes the bottom of the barrel to make a point
I mean your caps barely look worse than the average Super art, and it's about as bad as it gets in Z.
yeah, still better
If you can't admit Super's average is well below Z's, DB's or even GT's, you're delusional as hell.
1993 : important moment in the story during a huge fight ==> need really good quality
2016 : flashback that here just to remember a thing ==> no need for much detail
The moment are of equal importance in 1993 and 2016... but too bad for you, 1993 is extract from a TV OAV (Dragon Ball Z: Zetsubou e no hankou!!) so your comparaison is invalid (more time, more budget)
...
...
Yup Super sucks just like the rest of the DB series