Assualt Weapons

I hear people say that we need Assault Weapons to be legalized again, I'm in CA.
Here is the law that people say should be undone.
Assembly Bill No. 1135, Chapter 40, Here is the thing
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB1135
Red pill me on this, Why should we get assault weapons legalized again? Can a pistol not kill a man, an intruder, a corrupt government officer?

Bump

Let the market decide what kind of protection men need. Firearms could still have room to advance, to grow cheaper and more effective with experimentation, and as they do the gap between the strong and the weak will continue to shrink.

Why shouldn't we? Are you some kind of anti-firearm faggot?

Nigga what?

But does the pistols do the job. Why do we need big ass guns that can do mass murders? I just wanna understand man.

These are the weapons of Modern Warfare 2..

Bump.

So you can kill a faggot before he rapes you and pozzes you with only a misdemeanor
>still living in People's Republic of California
Get rekt m8

>Assault Weapons
define what you think this term means.

Full auto weapons only have useful application in wars. Rarely are you hitting anything when you are firing a weapon full auto, but what you are doing is making the enemy keep his head down so your buddies can flank around him and murder him from the sides. For killing unarmed civilians a fully automatic m4 isn't any more deadly than a standard ar15.

semiautomatic centerfire rifle or a semiautomatic pistol that does not have a fixed magazine but has any one of those specified attributes. The bill would also define “fixed magazine” to mean an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action.
This is from the law and I think it covers it well.

Bump

So you're accepting an idiot's definition which can be applied to just about every semi-automatic weapon on the market, with no regard for what actually is used to kill people or what actually has something to do with a firearms deadliness. I don't even need to bring up history or existing law to show this is fucking stupid.

What do you think?

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

There's the problem. That is a blanket definition used to just regulate more. I can tell you don't own a gun and probably haven't even touched one before.

More people are killed by hammers and fists than by shotguns and rifles every year. Of any type. Yet for lawful purposes a rifle or shotgun have great utility, the firearms that least deserve regulation are somehow the constant object of regulator's erotic fantasies.

Again, efficacy of this stupid shit notwithstanding, it's not even close to constitutional.

Kek at this list of weapons very familiar

Bump

>cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action.

Basically any semiautomatic fire arm

Only bolt actions and fucking 6 shooters would be legal under that

Straight up gun grab.

>assault weapons
Made up term, means nothing except that a rifle "looks scary"
Stop using (((their terms))), you're legitimizing them.
The 2A defends the right to bear arms and no person nor government can infringe upon that right, no matter how quickly your weapon fires nor how scary it looks.

>But does the pistols do the job.

Limits you to 10 rounds and vaguely outlaws a majority of semiautomatic pistols

Also do you think the gangs of LA or any major metropolitan area are going to give a shit about the law. Or are they going to spray you with a 100 round drum they can easily get on the black market aka anyone that crosses the state line with this shit they legally bought in another state and illegally sold in your state.

Also multiple people break into your house all armed with pistols with 30 round mags. Better practice your sleight of hand.

Ok you say but that never ever happens.

How about you get robbed and yet again the person robbing you has 20 more bullets than you.

Now hopefully you see why this matters people that follow laws are put at risk.

So to your next point.

>Why do we need big ass guns that can do mass murders?

"assault weapons" were outlawed from 1992-2004

However did that stop the 1999 columbine shooting 14 dead 24 wounded? Nope

You may say well had they had an assault weapon they may have killed more

Ok they also had propane devices that were going to go off but due to a flawed design they didn't.

You can go on and on about the devices used but no matter what you ban you will be left with crazy desperate people that will use any means necessary to carry out their sick twisted plans.

"assault weapons" don't exist.

next.

Except it is infringed upon already, isn't it?

>I don’t understand why the government would use broad terms
>they would never ban more devices than they previously mentioned
>surely they are looking out for our safety
>just look at the mountains of proof on their firearm expertise

Pls stop. Do you have any idea how many gun laws are on the books?

p.s. they are all infringements

most mass murders are done with little pistols faggot. now go play your call of duty and pretend like you know anything about firearms

>chey tac intervention is an (((assault weapon))).
>Walther 2000 is an (((assault weapon))).
Further proof that is right an the use of that phrase simply means
"I'm (((Ignorant))) and this is (((SCARY))"

Gun grabbers have completely discredited themselves with their lunacy, Pic related, .30-06, Semi auto, box mag, commercially available up to 20 rounds. Not an (((Assault Weapon) because it has a monte carlo stock made of wood. That in no way effects the lethality of the gun.

Also sage. If you're bumping this thread you'r part of the problem.

Need

A pistol cannot kill a tank nor can it kill a drone. I want my 50 cal goddammit.

Virginia tech did 30 dead with pistol faggot.

Every time you say 'assault weapons' you hurt my brain.