Lolbergtardians BTFO

lolbergtardians BTFO

Other urls found in this thread:

gommies.gom/fug/
gommies.gom/starve/
gommies.gom/ohfugme/
gommies.gom/ohshid/
gommies.gom/1984/
gommies.gom/guck/
gommies.gom/probaganda/
gommies.gom/XDDDD/
gommies.gom/hiwherearethefood/
gommies.gom/benis/
islamiggommunism.gom/
oilru.com/or/23/390/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease
o5m6.de/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studebaker_US6
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Capitalist_regimes
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_graves_in_the_Soviet_Union
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_graves_in_the_United_States_of_America
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_defectors
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_defectors
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_defectors
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_am_a_massive_communist_faggot,_please_fuck_my_face
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Bourgeois writing philosophy justifying and promoting the bourgeois is the same as the bourgeois writing philosophy promoting the proletarian
>A monarch writing philosophy idolizing monarchy is the same as a monarch writing philosophy idolizing serfs

I dunno senpai.

you are capable of more thought than %100 of right-wingers.

>private property fetishist: life is unfair fuck the poor
>communist: let's steal from the rich
>private property fetishist: but that is unfair

everyone should just become a Stirnerist so that there may be authentic politics

>character assassinations are now proof of economic theory

Top wew, I love this style of discourse, it's one step above literally shitting on my computer but just a hair below an audio recording of two downies having sex on a malfunctioning transformer

>Private property advocate: life is struggle, fuck the lazy
>Commiefaggot: let's steal from those who work the hardest
>Private property advocate: watch your step

Fixed that for you, good goy

More BTFO

>wealthy
>work the hardest
ever heard of inheritance, nepotism, corruption i,e the real world? if you think wealth is a result of hard work then you must believe Jews are the hardest working minority ever, they make up %48 of the top %1

addendum
>working for your wealth
>calling others good goy
fucking lmao

>Jews are the hardest working minority ever
Yes they are
>thinking there is anything wrong with inheritance and nepotism
Someone had to work hard to accumulate the wealth that people inherit at some point and nepotism is not inherently bad for example a shop in the minority community that only highers members of that community creating jobs for the community you only think nepotism is bad because you where taught that it is wrong to look out for your own interests and the interests of your group.
The linear optimization sure worked out well for the comies considering they won the cold war oh wait....

Leftypol if you want to shit on libertarians please refrain from poisoning this board with your disgustingly shitty memes.

Meme proves u have not the slightest idea of what free market is. Pretty pathetic.

>Be communist
>Question others perception of reality

Oh lawd, please help this wayword child
All of those things happen no matter what system you are in. At least in a free economy, everyone has the CHANCE to improve their lots in life. Is it easy? Fuck no. Is it FAIR? Fairness doesn't exist. But it's POSSIBLE, however slightly, that everyone who participates in a free, open economy, in a libertarian society, can make their lives better.
Which is infinitely more than you could say for other societies and economic systems.

...

Well said Georgia. Best state, southern belles are prime wife material and the countryside is gorgeous.

ჯორჯიას დედა შევეცი ქართველი ვარ შე ყლეო!

This

Commies don't want to tear down the top 1%, they want to tear down the top 51%. The top 51% doesn't want to be torn down.

for you

How does that not make you cringe? It's optically unappealing. Also Stalin is closer to what right-wingers would like. If you want to "le ebin trollface" on the Nazis use Trotsky and that other retard Stirner you posted earlier.

...

you are both fucking retards

>Fairness doesn't exist
fairness doesn't exist but robbing the parasitic elites is """""""wrong"""""""?

hmmm, makes me wonder who is behind this post?

>they want to tear down the top 51%
nice strawman, as long as you don't own a private jet you are irrelevant

>Someone had to work hard to accumulate the wealth that people inherit at some point and nepotism

are you an exploitation-denier do you honestly believe that it is not possible to become wealthy off the backs of others?

You defend nepotism, it must be working out great for you. I see you don't give a shit about fairness, neither do I. don't expect me to adopt the values of the elites, for i am not one of them and will never be. If you are not an elite you should realize this too. If you have realized this and are okay with being a servant to them, than I don't know what to tell you except to have some dignity.

...

...

Fascists are literally against all these things. Also your memes are still extremely low quality. Not funny, to much text, horrible graphics.

...

...

nepotism can only work in a non-free market.

only the more reason to adopt feee market policies :^)

these are some of the most forced and awful memes i've ever seen regarding left or right. come on don't bring this shit to pol..

>freed
Dude you've never lived through communism. It's really a lot more boring than you think.

>filename
Why do these people try to attach their names to everything?

>free market
why not just become rich, bribe politicians, have them enact laws in my favor?
there is no way to stop it, except by eliminating money not based on labor hours.

where the maximum labor credits you could get for one hour of labor is 10 (or some other number everyone agrees with) and the minimum is one labor credit per hour.
one labor credit for one hour of easy work
ten labor credits for working with radiation or doing difficult surgery, etc.
sure there will be some inequality but not to the point of serious country destroying corruption.
the point is that no one person can corrupt the system due to the numerical limit on exchange-value a person can have

...

>his entire argument is literally just "y-you too"
lmao leftists are faggots

...

...

>the (((lobbyists))) will just buy the politicians to do what they want!
>this is why we shouldn’t make the government smaller and weaker

>anecdotal evidence trumps millions of deaths

>why not just become rich, bribe politicians, have them enact laws in my favor?

I'm not a statist, kiddo.

>labor credits
1. inefficient, since the job market won't be able to adapt to market needs (as it would with a price system). the market only adapts after the voting.

2. or some other number everyone agrees with

really, EVERYONE? you think 300 000 000 people will uniliterally agree on anything? top fucking kek

>Marxists
>blowing out anyone
At least no libertarian has ever starved to death. You commies are the bottom of the barrel and can't make fun of any ideology better than yours. Which is all of them, including libertarianism.

>trusting drivers
not even once

>free market
>having politicians
Also how the fuck does your labor credit shit account for supply and demand?

Literally what people who lived under Hitler said. Just switch fascism with Bolshevism. You can't be that retarded. Also why do you keep bringing up Stalin? He's literally the best communist dictator in the sense that he actually could get shit done, as opposed to most of the absolute morons that followed.

Is this the commie shitpost thread?

>19 year old college student: AKCHULLY

THAT'S WHAT WE LOST WITH DEATH OF STALIN:
1. STYROFOAM WAS MADE OF MILK.YOU COULD FEED CHILDREN WITH IT.
2. GRAVITATION WAS LESS THAN ON THE MOON BY 80 PERCENT. PEOPLE COULD JUMP RIGHT ON ANY ROOF.
3. PEOPLE WERE LIVING FOR 150-190 YEARS. DISEASES DID NOT EXIST EXCEPT WORKER'S CALLUS.
4. IF SOMEONE FALLS ON THE STREET - EVERYONE RUNS TO HIM, PUT MONEY IN HIS POCKETS, KISS HIM IN LIPS, OFFER TO DRINK AND BECOME RELATIVES.
5. RABBITS AND CHICKEN WERE JUMPING IN THE FRYING PAN THEMSELVES.
PEOPLE WERE AFRAID TO GO FISHING - BURBOTS WERE JUMPING FROM THE WATER RIGHT INTO THE KETTLE
6. GRANDFATHER TOLD ME: PEOPLE WERE WAKING UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT FROM LAUGHTER. IN THE MORNING PEOPLE USED TO POUR COLD WATER ON THEMSELVES
7. PREGNANCY PERIOD WAS ABOUT 4.5 MONTHS. CHILDREN WEIGHED 12-15 KILOGRAMS, HAVING WHITE HAIR, BIG BLUE EYES, AND INTELLIGENT FACES - IMMEDIATELY ASKED TO LET THEM GO TO WORK
8. WATER IN VOLGA WAS SWEET AS SYRUP, YENISEY WAS FULL OF DARK BEER
9. IN WINTER AVERAGE TEMPERATURE WAS ABOUT -300 *C, EVERYONE HAD RED CHEEKS
10. BERRIES WERE THE SIZE OF A CAT, CATS WERE THE SIZE OF THE DOG, DOGS - OF THE COW, COW - OF THE WORKSHOP, AND IN THE WORKSHOP MEN WERE PLAYING BY BOTWINNIK'S METHODIC - CHECKMATE IN ONE TURN!

im not a communist. i just hate libertarians more

This is.a violation of the NAP.
Remove thyself or face recreational nuclear war.

>I'm not a statist, kiddo.
what is to prevent mercenaries from fighting it out to establish their own tax collecting entity?
>not reading the labor credits proposal
>Also how the fuck does your labor credit shit account for supply and demand?
what do you mean? labor credit will vary with difficulty of work

That whole argument is based on a straw man you create at the start. You probably wrote this and screenshotted it. Wow, bravo

Kek /thread

>Stalin cared about people

what prevented Stalin from starving his population? oh wait...

you know marx has absolutely nothing to do with libertarianism? pick up a book you inbred mongrel, preferably hoppe
sage

Why do thw left use fantasy like star trek and harry potter and believe it makes a point. Also if i were to choose a fantasy world to live on l, its not going to be the borin, faggoty world of star trek. Its going to be the rape and pillage one.

Ayn Rand was an extra not a B-list actress, and she’d been writing since childhood. She was also trained in philosophy and history in Russia. The others are probably equally wrong.

We had the same in canada without the wholesale murder of white people.

>inheritance
Lol fucking what? Do you actually know how many people come into "I don't have to do anything with my life" amounts of money from inheritance?

>Food
It's already innacurate

>ever heard of inheritance, nepotism, corruption i,e the real world? if you think wealth is a result of hard work then you must believe Jews are the hardest working minority ever, they make up %48 of the top %1

All this still requires work.
Inheritance is literally the parents passing the fruits of their labor to their direct kin. Why should YOU be entitled to it? Their ENTIRE REASON for working their entire lives was to benefit their children and give them a better life than they had.
Nepotism is useless if the position they're entering isn't successful, which means someone worked to make it so.

You're just jealous that your own parents never cared about you enough to secure your future.

How many Nazi Panzers touched Canadian soil

>filename
1 shade of gay is all I see

Libertarianism and marxism both suffer from the problem that both first create a model, and then try to describe the world according to it, which makes them both more or less useless. However, some derivatives of marxism like dengism have shown great potential, which is something that libertarianism hasn’t.

If you meant this to be satire it's pretty funny.

>Milton Freidman never talked about working for change on the dollar or being poor growing up. Also, you point out he works but try to down play his career.

Lazy bait.

It's funny how when commies want to criticize libertarianism they always go after Rand, Friedman, Rothbard, Hoppe and all the other sub-par shitty economists/philosophers.

The one they always exclude without fail is Hayek. Why? He's without a doubt the most prominent economist to call bullshit on Keynes, Monetarism and Marxism, and yet they never mention him.

The strawman is that the opinion of marx is invalid because he mever worked, this is just a response to that
also
>2015

Hello gomrades! X_DDddDD Dis general is for disgussion of margsism-lebonnism, da ideology of ebin revolutionary socialism and gommunism.

Gommunism is da next stage of guckery following real society.

Wat exagtly is gommunism according to gommies:

>Gommunism is a stage of guckery in which the produgtive infrustrugture runs away from gommie country, and no goods are produced and beeple starve. X_-DDDD
>Gommunism in full form is obressive, statist society dat follows maxim "gib gib gib!" :-DDDDd
>To achieve gommunism we must replace broduction with murderous obressive rulers liek me, fug working glass beeple. XDDDD Struggle while I liquidate you all FUG. When capitalists run away we win and I gill you all. Eventually the fungtions of state stob and state becomes murderous and indistinguishable from other gommies. Da state withers away liek da people.
gommies.gom/fug/
gommies.gom/starve/

GL uses philosphy of gib and starve, see here:
gommies.gom/ohfugme/

It is recommend you kill yourself so you can avoid starving.

Resources:
gommies.gom/ohshid/
gommies.gom/1984/
gommies.gom/guck/
gommies.gom/probaganda/
gommies.gom/XDDDD/
gommies.gom/hiwherearethefood/
gommies.gom/benis/
islamiggommunism.gom/

Da sdages of gommunism.

>Sdage one
Bourgers aren't allowed to vode :-DDD but otherwise da system is digtadorshib of gommies. Everything is stole by digtadors and digtadors rule all.

>Sdade two
Withering
All beeple who aren't digtador glass starve. XDDD Once glass disabears and we steal everything more beeple wither away. Bolice begome unnecessary as beeple are dead lol :DDDDD Central blanning begomes unnecessary begause sgarcity caused starving. (BENIS :_DD)

>Sdage three
Gommunism.
No beeple. No food. My money. Much benis.

>Sdage 4
Nod real gommunism. Nexzt gountry. problems werent. :-DDdd

How much money was given to stalin by capitalists to fight said panzers.

Hayek assumes central economic planning won't turn the most resources into currency the most efficiently.

communism seeks to create decentralized autonomous communes that use resources to meet their needs.

Hayek's criticism doesn't apply.

>replying to a question with a question.
a fucking leaf

impossible, without centralized power of the people, they cannot seize all the means of production. Even if they manged to stay decentralized, they merely have created smaller functional states, therefore when it fails, you can say "not reel gommunism"

You seriously want me to believe you are a worker? Because all I have seen are college students that would get the Rope if communism ever won

Bretty gud

>Even if they manged to stay decentralized, they merely have created smaller functional states
How is any private corporation different from a smaller functional state?
Does Hayek's criticism apply to central planning at all scales or just the national scale?
>impossible, without centralized power of the people, they cannot seize all the means of production
centralized armed forces are necessary, but do you don't need a centralized bureau of tomato growing.

I answered your question. Go beg for more money commie parasite.

>ad hominems are bad so here are three ad hominems

With capitalism the rich depend on the poor
With communism the government decides your occupation and worth
Anarchy for lyfe

>centralized armed forces are necessary, you dont need centralized tomato growing
Then the means of production are not availible to all the people, and are a form of exclusion or exploitation.

>"To sum up the results of the lend-lease program as a whole, the Soviet Union received, over the war years, 21,795 planes, 12,056 tanks, 4,158 armored personnel carriers, 7,570 tractor trucks, 8,000 antiaircraft and 5,000 antitank guns, 132,000 machine-guns, 472 million artillery shells, 9,351 transceivers customized to Soviet-made fighter planes, 2.8 million tons of petroleum products, 102 ocean-going dry cargo vessels, 29 tankers, 23 sea tugboats and icebreakers, 433 combat ships and gunboats, as well as mobile bridges, railroad equipment, aircraft radar equipment, and many other items."

oilru.com/or/23/390/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease

o5m6.de/
>Do you know how many fucking trains the russians built during the entire course of the war? Twenty they built twenty fucking trains. Without American help the russian army would have had no clothes and no boots. The first thing they did when they got our tanks is tear the leather off the seats to make fucking boots.
DO YOU SEE THIS TRUCK, ITS A FUCKING STUDEBAKER
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studebaker_US6

>Antifa
>Communists
But otherwise kek

Thx burger.

...

no you didn't. I will ask you again
How many Nazi panzers touched Canadian soil?

>communism
>government

The left can't meme.

I guess it's too hard for you to understand that one was protesting the existence of his own class, while the others weren't

the means of tomato growing will belong to the comrades who grow tomatoes, nominally they belong to everyone in the world, but in practice it will be tomato growers coordinating with people in their area who will be managing the place.

no one is getting exploited. Exclusion also does not equate exploitation. exploitation is not owning the means of production at where you labor.

>labor credit will vary with difficulty of work
In order to efficiently distribute labor it needs to take labor's supply and demand into account as well, not just how physically demanding said labor is.
Yeah, they seek decentralized stateless classless utopia after centralizing all power in the hands of the state. Communists are anarchists in the same way that the Heaven's Gate cult were astronauts.

...

this might be the gayest thread I've ever seen

>Yeah, they seek decentralized stateless classless utopia after centralizing all power in the hands of the state. Communists are anarchists in the same way that the Heaven's Gate cult were astronauts.
what is you definition of a state?

tu quoque: the picture

>I judge capitalism by it's practice and not by it's theory
>I judge socialism by it's theory and never by it's practice

i judge both by their practice

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Capitalist_regimes

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_graves_in_the_Soviet_Union

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_graves_in_the_United_States_of_America

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_defectors
>The following 26 pages are in this category, out of 26 total.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_defectors

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_defectors
>Eastern Bloc governments argued that strict limits to emigration were necessary to prevent a brain drain. The United States and Western European governments argued that they represented a violation of human rights. Despite the restrictions, defections to the West occurred.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_am_a_massive_communist_faggot,_please_fuck_my_face

Communism basically justifies all its failures with that.
>N-not real communism! I-its just the proletariat dictatorship haha...
>r-real communism has no government! therefore it has never failed as it has never existed! haha...
You can't win when arguing with communists.

I judge both

georgian filth

see

im not a communist. I reject both as materialist trash