Oh, would you look at China! And dumb, flag waiving, bible thumping, rural retards thought communism couldn't work. kek
>China now has the second-highest number of millionaires in the world, according to a new report. That puts it firmly in second place -- right behind the U.S. China recorded 2,378,000 millionaires in 2013, compared to the U.S.' 7,135,000 millionaires, according to Boston Consulting Group's 2014 Global Wealth Report.
You're an imbecile..
>While China’s government may be officially communist, the Chinese people express widespread support for capitalism. Roughly three-quarters of the Chinese (76%) agree that most people are better off in a free market economy. And since 2002, the Chinese have consistently been one of the strongest proponents of capitalism compared with other publics around the world, even more so than Americans and Western Europeans.
ofco i doe wo
no ove ye ?
pi o
>has 4 times the population of USA
>has less millionaires
>communism w-works g-guys!
Git gud faggot
>COMMUNISM DOESN'T WO-
More like capitalism do work
no you're the fucking retard sweetie communism doesn't equal a Soviet state command redistribution system but a classless society which China will achieve this century under the glorious leadership of the communist partyit's already the largest economy and produces everything from Steel to semiconductors while the US doesn't produce shit only prints greenbacks and Starbucks coffee which is already being ditched by most of the world
>look at China
>look at Taiwan
>3 times richer per capita and people are allowed vote
i know you're a pathetic fucking moron, but i'll mention this fact anyways. China has by far the biggest gap in wealth distribution in the world, you hopelessly retarded bastard.
>muh proletariat
>sweetie
SHILL DETECTED, SLIDE THREAD. HIDE. THIS IS SAGED.
Here's your (you) for the day
It's not communism
Chinese communism was dead in 1976
>smog
>depressed people
>death penalties
>have to install nets outside of windows so people don't kill themselves. people are just that fucking miserable.
C-C-C-C-COMMUNISM W-W-W-WORKS GUYS.....
H-H-H-H-AVE I H-HAD S-SEX YET? n-no...
die faggot
Communism VS Fascism
Communism
strong central bank owned by Jews (namely the Rothchilds)
Jews hold most white collar positions of privilege
everyone is equal (as slaves under Jewish hegemony)
Antisemitism is outlawed
authoritarian rule (with lots of purges)
Fascism
Barter System between nations no central bank
The best for the Job gets the Job (yes even Jews in many instances)
Everyone is equal under the state to flourish
Communism outlawed
authoritarian rule
Communism
Take private property (aka the means of production, or factories)
from the individuals that own them and give them to "the state"
(a small number of people in positions of privilege filled through nepotism)
turning the entire country into private property owned by them with the people still
working in factories they don't own and now will never have an opportunity
to own making less than they did before with a lower standard of living. Or
to make it simple basically a return to feudal serfdom only the lords will
now all be Jews instead of natives that basically consider the gentiles subhuman livestock
find all the answers here Sup Forumsacks
youtube.com
>china
>communist
Man it must suck to be this retarded
Also, when are you moving there? Right, never, because it's a shitty country.
If your entire socio-political system can be BTFO in two sentences then you shouldn't believe it.
Please move there and tell us about your wonderful communist utopian experience, just a recommendation though wear a face mask when you're out in public.
Show your flag coward.
Why do some people consider the PRC to be capitalist? Is it because the Chinese use capitalist methods to grow their economy? If that is the sole basis of their argument, then it is clear these people haven't the slightest understanding of Marxist theory.
Karl Marx himself said this of the bourgeoisie and capitalism in The Communist Manifesto: "The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his 'natural superiors,' and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, callous 'cash payment.'"
In other words, Marx saw capitalism as a progressive historical stage that liberated the forces of production kept dormant by feudalism but would eventually stagnate due to internal contradictions and be followed by socialism.
Like many other countries where communist parties rule or have ruled, China was a semi-feudal, semi-colonial country prior to the establishment of the PRC. If we are to take Marxism as a social science, then capitalism must follow feudalism as a matter of scientific fact, much like a human child must go through adolescence prior to becoming an adult. Therefore, one could argue that the Chinese are the most successful practitioners of Marxism precisely because they understand Marxism theory better than any other country under communist party rule. In essence, they understand that you can't create a successful socialist state by leapfrogging capitalism (which as explained above is necessary to dissolve feudal bonds and liberate productive capacity). One could also argue that the failure of most other communist countries also stems from insufficient development of the capitalist stage in those countries.
Therefore, the Chinese are simply completing a necessary stage of economic development that they never historically experienced. But unlike the truly capitalist US, the PRC does not claim capitalism as the "end of history" (as one American historian put it at the end of the Cold War). Quite the contrary, the PRC has always maintained that in accordance to Marxist theory, capitalism is but a transitive stage leading to socialism. Whether the capitalist stage lasts several decades, several centuries, or several millennia, nobody knows (the Chinese themselves admit this).
A murderer cutting into his victim with a knife is completely different from a surgeon cutting into his patient with a scalpel because the end goal of the act of cutting is completely different. However, if one solely focuses on the act of cutting, then both the actions of the murderer and the surgeon would look similar. Likewise, the practice of capitalism in order to perpetuate worker exploitation is different than the practice of capitalism in preparation for the implementation of socialism though they might look similar if one focuses exclusively on the acts and not the goals.
You are the most retarded neo-comie on this board. Your tranny father and fish sexually inclined mother must be very proud.
>another commie trying desperately to argue
We have these every day, its getting tiresome
>twice as many people
>less than half America's number of millionaires
Isn't it more accurate to describe China as a Fascist single party state now?