Lutz: It’s possible that, with the morphology of this canine tooth being so similar to more recent examples from Africa, the species could be related. That would mean that a group of primates was in Europe before they were in Africa.
researchgate.net
What does this mean about the Out of Africa theory?
Other urls found in this thread:
daily.
archive.4plebs.org
twitter.com
WE WUZNT KANGZ AFTERALL
It means we're different species.
fossils were put in the ground by the devil to trick us
daily. ai/2yDd1sm
you guys don't see the new narrative forming?
>we wuz europeans
...
There has been evidence like this for decades. Even one of my teachers told me there were theories like this based on evidence 30 years ago. It's suppressed of course just like all things. Sub Saharan Africans are a different species.
Whites are litterally another species
>Sub Saharan Africans are a different species.
Yep.
Northern Africans are the same species as Euros and various ME groups.
Asians are probably a different species too. Same with Abos.
They got it right with: Caucasians, Negroids, Mongoloids, and Australoids. They call them "races", but they're really different species, and it has nothing to do with skin color, because you can get black Caucasians (North Africans).
Germany is really the place to find these things, there have been many in the last years - can anyone explain? They even found the oldest musical instrument there, made out of vulture bones - 40.000 years old.
White devils be stealin' a nigga's history. Muh dick.
All pre-human races evolved globally and separately.
Western white humans are the result of neanderthan and cro-magnon DNA merging.
It's that simple. It's already well-known that "out of Africa" theory is bullshit.
and also the pro-Africa narrative that light skin and blue eyes are genetic accidents is complete bullshit, and derive from our pre-human ancestry.
they are going to bury it all
...
Not fully.
Caucasians are one, and where they evolved, determines their "race". Caucasians are made up of various races.
Negroes are a different race. Asians are too.
>Negroes are a different race. Asians are too.
Different species I mean
>the stories of the Garden of Eden are the remaining verbal record of early European humanity witnessing the coming of the previous glaciation period
WE TOLD YOU ABOUT THE MASTERRACE BRO
YOU WOULDN'T LISTEN
you fell for the jew trick evolution.
humans have been here for millions of years.
It's not so simple. Europe has received multiple migration waves from Africa at different periods in time. The first of which produced species like the Neanderthal and the Denisovans, and the later of which produced Sapiens-Neanderthal-Denisovan hybrids (this is what modern Europeans and Asians are). The current scientific understanding is that we share recent common ancestry with modern Africans in both of these cases. The question is whether the difference in genetic admixture of these groups is large enough to constitute the distinction of different sub species or races.
The IQ of the average poster on this board must be -50
...
kek
>tfw not even white
Lmaoing @ your life
oh well then that explains the envy
We wuz monkeys?
Nothing to envy to degenerate cucks, gueilo
WE WUZ KRAUTS UND SHEISSE!
shiiiiiiiieeeeeeet
Yup.
>see goy, Africans are the true Europeans! We need to let them in!
checked, you swedes seem to another species too. nothing personal senpai
There are effectively 4 races (with mixed 'buffer' zones, naturally)
1. Caucasoid
2. Australoid
3. Negroid
4. Capoid-Mongoloid
Capoids and Mongoloids are the same race because asians are mixed
What about Native Americans? Where do Afro-Asiatics fit in? Indo-Europeans originated in Central Asia, whereas Basques and Finno-Ugrics have been in Europe even longer than we have.
Then what are you? Surely you have something to be protect.
Native Americans are mixed between Caucasian and Capoid/Mongoloid however Cuacasian traits are less common and concentrated in North America. There also appears to be small traces of Australoid in far the south.
if a call a nigger "negroid", would it be offensive?
>sup ma negroid
Afro-Asiatics are the southmost culture of the 'caucasian' cultures, of which Indo-Europeans were the North-most.
Don't you mean
>10 Million Year Old Primate Fossil Found in Germany bearing the Inscription "Praise Allah"
>tfw this isn't a shit post
>they actually use this kind of mental gymnastics
>fossil evidence
>animals, wind, and water move a human tooth to europe
>kangs debunked
Did a threads on humanities origins, it can be found here:
[KB archives(take the time to read all OP's): archive.4plebs.org
>water move a human tooth to europe
>africa science
What about an African swallow?
redpill me on the implications of 'out of Africa' being a) questioned b) bullshit
Out of Africa is the origin of homo sapien man. Older hominid fossils aren't relevant to the theory, you need to find modern man remains in places they couldn't have been before the 'great migration' out of Africa 100k years ago.
Specifically, finding a good post glacial-like homo sapien of that age would truly be monumental.
sorry not pol. Frank is here so /x/
>African swallow
someone is knows monty python
no paternal line similarities, your argumant is therefore invalid
Someone explain to me how all of mankind is traceable to a single ancestor on the Y-chromosome if Out of Africa is false
>What does this mean about the Out of Africa theory?
That newfags should lurk moar, since out of africa was already BTFO by genetics.
>>africa fallacy
I said other things can take effect. It's 10 million years old, migrating animals, storms, torandos, tidal waves, etc. can move things. Not to mention it's literally just a tooth and not anatomical bones.
It's because we've got enough money to get people to dig up places in Germany.
You probably could find fivefold the amount of stuff if you let people dig around in Egypt or the Levante or Ethiopia.
ay nigguh we wuz kaisers n shit