Is this the final redpill?

is this the final redpill?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=lL506MtS-OI
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

bump

If by "redpill" you mean "novel good only for entertainment", then yes.

Why do none of you understand thread-bumping?

No it isn’t. When cuckservatives rave about something Jewish, no good can come from it.

>is this baby's first redpill?
Ftfy, and yes

I've come to accept objectivism. It's really eye-opening once you understand the idea.

I didn't like the idea first due to prior beliefs.

never read it... should I?

stop making shitty thread you kike faggot.

Interesting. But what about social and tribal bonds? How can a libertarian minimalist state have any sort of national pride?

Objectivism is for the leaders

. . who call on peoples' altruism to impose socialist/tribalist policies to solidate their 'selfish' power.

(selfish has a different meaning in Ayn Rand's sense)

it is a big fat red pill.

yes

I don't see what's contrary to national identity in libertarianism. On the contrary, I think the government serves as a tool for different groups to "passively" carry out all sorts of political warfare and breeds division.

I own 9 copies

No.

Libertarianism/Ancaps are fucking retarded Jew niggers. Literally almost as bad as communists. Only reason why they're even remotely relevant is most try to sneak in and larp as "savior of the white race" and shit.

More like the first of many.

Rather interesting read, like 1984 it's got some fetishy things but other than that if you have the time to read it I would recommend it.

this

This is the ultimate redpill youtube.com/watch?v=lL506MtS-OI

/thread

more like the final toilet paper

...

Leaving the 50 page monologue aside (what a piss-take), it's an interesting book - I'm more of a fan of the Fountainhead, though.
Still haven't gotten around to reading Ideal.

It's good and entertaining, a great primer, but the monologue was godawful and literally 2 hours when in the audiobook.

Wait, really?
Jesus.

Fuck, accidentally the first row
>literally 2 hours in the audiobook

The Fountainhead is the book to read.

nah atlas shrugged so much better

Underrated

I couldn't finish it because her science was retarded as were her points. I hear the fountainhead is better in that regard.

This.

>but guise, joos can’t gain power if there is no gubmint!1!1!

Retarded niggers.

Objectivism is an interesting philosophy that really made me see things in a new light, but it ain't perfect. Nothing really is.

No, it's a simple book you read as a kid before growing up and reading real books which make you realise how fucking stupid Rand's philosophy actually was. It's a good companion piece to the Bible to show what kind of crap people will follow

Bs. I would never have read 'real books' if I hadn't read hers, only thing that pulled me out of leftist thinking.

So you'll follow any philosophy with a half-baked argument. Good for you. She makes Marx look like a god-damn genius.

>She makes Marx look like a god-damn genius.

t. leaf who never read anything written by rand

the reddest pill is realizing that Sup Forums would agree with everything Atlas Shrugged says if you replaced "business men" with "white people"

Summarize the book's premise in one sentence.

I'm not reading Jewish material without a summary.

I just googled "Objectivism".

"Objectivism's central tenets are that reality exists independently of consciousness, that human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception, that one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic, that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness (rational self-interest),"

WOW! NEVER THOUGHT OF THAT BEFORE, DID I?

You fucking retards glorified 1 + 1 = 2 and made it a "red pill".

Sup Forums being as retarded as ever. Fucking pseudophilosophers.

>Summarize the book's premise in one sentence.
communism is bad and the world would be perfect if everyone was Henry Ford

>anarcho-capitalism
Ok retard. Who builds the roads and will I get killed if I step on your lawn you fucking faggot?

That book is for children.

>WOW! NEVER THOUGHT OF THAT BEFORE, DID I?
ok, now write 1600 pages of novel and dozens of essays to actually prove and expand that idea

you are my boys

its infantile to assume you remove power and nothing will fill the void

Garbage ideas delivered over too many pages in some of the worst writing to miscarry from the era. Junk.

>Who builds the roads
whoever the person or people that want a road pays to build it
>and will I get killed if I step on your lawn
I'd probably ask you to leave if you were just trespassing, there's no need to jump directly to lethal force unless you're insane

...

No. Read Hoppe. Maybe read Withur We.

I also liked Anthem.
A lot shorter, written as a post-revolution story.
So many generations under pure collectivist rule produces a permanently forgotten era.

If you're retarded.

Dumbass leaf.
Your neighbor was built and populated on private roads.

>because her science was retarded as were her points.
nigger, this isn't reddit.

Dried up jewess talks about what her disgusting pussy ate and how the goyim needs to be atomised while her tribe stays as one block.


yeah 100% redpill go ahead golem.

This is the final redpill

>You fucking retards glorified 1 + 1 = 2 and made it a "red pill".

what do you think red pill means? it is literally 'simple realities' that blue pilled idiots refuse to accept. go cry in the shower, leftist.

This.
Surprised its coming from a leaf

you being too simple to understand the extent of Rand's moral theory isnt pol's fault

Didn't the game already answer your question?

>I didn't like the idea first due to prior beliefs.
I struggled with the religious notion of self-sacrifice until I read Atlas Shrugged. Rational egoism is the answer in morality. We still need a redpill for psychology though.

It's the ultimate blue pill when you realize the author lived off of social security and medicare. Believe it or not, Little House on the Prairie and the books by that author will red pill you in the same direction, only with more honesty and less suck-cockery. BTW, Alan Greenspan slept with her for years, and was apparently a cuck-pet. Look where that bullshit got us.

there's a atlas shrugged game?

>How can a libertarian minimalist state have any sort of national pride?
Take pride in how badass your culture becomes because you respect free thought and free enterprise.

I was fully down with Minarchist Libertarianism until i thought about the roads. Not once have I heard an argument as to why roads wouldn't be a natural monopoly.

>It's the ultimate blue pill when you realize the author lived off of social security and medicare

hypocrisy doesn't disprove a statement.

Its called biological shocking

I read it when I was 15 and was actually angry when I finished it. Not at any of her ideas actually, just that it could have been cut down to ~20% of the length without losing any impact.

The thing I love about Rand's writing is that she glorifies greatness.

So much attention these days is given to the unsuccessful, to the underprivileged, it's demotivating. J. Peterson is right, youth today aren't motivated because the world doesn't place the kind of value on success that it should. Everything is about helping others, cooperating together etc. Look at the kind of shit they do in kindergarten, it's all about cooperation, competitive games, competetiveness in general is frowned upon, and we end up with a generation of apathetic losers as a result.

OpenTTD is probably the closest I can think of?

strange, I always thought organic trauma dealt with libertinism. anyway, do all your beliefs stem from video games or do you also let TV dictate your thoughts?

>OpenTTD
kek, also thanks.

>it's a simple book you read as a kid before growing up and reading real books
You need to read a real book on logical fallacies.

You Germans really don't have a sense of humor,don't you?
Also the answer to your question is no.

have fun user, it requires an extremely high level of autism but if you meet that requirement it's really fun

>You Germans really don't have a sense of humor,don't you?

no, I'm just a hard case. But on the other hand your attempt at didn't strike me as particular amusing either, that is if I got the joke. Which was it? Your attempt at misnaming a video game or the incredibly dumb/ignorant equation of libertarianism and rands philosophy?

Both

A rational objectivist would oppose a program that benefits those who have no merit.
It's also rational to abuse such a program if it exists, because its in your self-interest.

I think riding a welfare program as dead weight is a fine way to oppose that program.

Oh look, it's baby's first redpill
Wait until you get out of middle school mate, expand your reading

You have nothing better to do than spread lies about a dead author? Pretty pathetic.

serious question: how is that funny?

highly underrated

Its funny because its wrong.
Does funnybot not compute?
Awkward

yes, does not compute. I always was under the impression for such a joke to transport the humorous message the obvious falsehood of the statement has to be clearly known to both parties. This thread clearly shows that the wrongness of the equation of Rand and Libertarianism is by no means common knowledge. As such your joke has a high probability to fail, which I think it did.

If you meant your word play, that's just lame. Anyway, thank you for the clarification. I tip my fedora to you, even though I might have to suspect you're of lesser intelligence, but then again who isn't?

...

...

Yes. Problem is, most won't read it.

>there are people that need an old Jew to tell them objectivism is good rather that coming to that conclusion themselves

MUH FREE MARKET
>most jobs outsourced or automated
>wide open borders
>no minimum wage
>no social security
>no medicare/medicaid
>no welfare
>no public schools
>no workplace safety rules
>no environmental protection laws
>mass poverty
>mass homelessness
Sounds great if you're a sociopath, or a retard who imagines they'll somehow wind up on top in such a shitty excuse for civilization.

This thread is a fucking mess. Ayn Rand (aka) Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum is a filthy kike merchant, who helped deliver Capitalism into the hands of Communist Jews who realized Capitalism could be endlessly exploited.

>muh fiction cant be true

The final redpill is recognizing that it is capitalism that destroys societies as much as marxism destroy economies.

Every time a tradition, a piece of culture, a social value is torn down, it opens up dozens of new markets to sell shit. The only people that fundamentally benefit from this procedure is the wealthy capitalists who have no moral foundation.

Capitalism is the cancer of the west that is responsible for all of the degeneration of social and cultural and religious values that actually built the societies today, as it is in the minds of the moneyed elite nothing more than a hurdle to making more money.

Destroy Capitalism, Destroy Marxism, end semitic influence and put your people, their history and culture, first. That is the final redpill.

She was right that great men change the world. She was wrong that her philosophy is the natural conclusion of that. Think about Kings. Great Kings were never only in it for themselves. Great men should care about more than themselves. This isn't a contradiction. Great men have a responsibility to make the world a better place.

Rand's objectivism =/= general objectivism. Rand's philosophy seems like a weird mutation of stirnerism, and objectivism is mainly used to justify unmeritocratic practices in the US.

>Sounds great if you're a sociopath, or a retard who imagines they'll somehow wind up on top in such a shitty excuse for civilization.

Exactly. And I'd say it's not even for sociopaths, they aren't that retarded.

It's for morons who think they'll be the lucky few.

Every point you raised is accurate. It's such a stupid philosophy. May aswell be a marxist or a communist.

>"Everything will work out, there's no practical problems with the implementation, we all just need to try it."

>it is capitalism that destroys societies
the absolute state of socialists

Can you actually make the argument that marxist leninist economies are weak, considering how their modern decendants (china/laos/vietnam) are faring extremely well?

yes

everybody who has read here knows that. She also took speed so what ?

Read Hoppe, faggot.

daily reminder that the entire reason the character of Ragnar Danneskjold exists is to justify objectivists taking money from the government
nothing she did went against her philosophy

i always get bored after 2 hours. There is no goal.

How's the 10th grade treating you?