Tell me Sup Forums, did I just solve the century old question?

Tell me Sup Forums, did I just solve the century old question?

Conservatives: IF YOU GIVE TAX CUTS, RICH PEOPLE INVEST IT

Liberals: IF YOU GIVE TAX CUTS, RICH PEOPLE KEEP IT

So let me make it simple...

Cut the taxes on the rich, but legally force them to invest it. Everyone's happy.

Did I literally just BTFO everything?

>Sup Forums is literally mind boggled

Everyone should be taxed the same rate
No punishment for being successful
Liberals should of thought of this before doing drugs and getting a useless degree

>Sup Forums is literally mind boggled
you idiots that is literally national socialism, im sure Sup Forums will be real opposed to it. fucking retards.

Fuck off, leaf.

Shut the fuck up, dad.

Never has anyone put it so simply as I.

I literally just opened the eyes of 200 people.

>i'm so btfo i can't even respond so i'll just drop a "leaf" comment to try and discredit this guy messing up my jewish plan

>Everyone should be taxed the same rate
Wrong. Nobody should be taxed.
Taxation is theft.

If you make someone do something with their money it is a tax.

Also liberals also claim only rich people invest and that's hrashly incorrect. Plus investments often make money.

Since liberals don't understand economics they will never be happy till they magically get rich and then hate the poor for being "dumb trash" and hate those richer.

Jesus Christ someone call Trump

how is this a good idea, all this will lead to is no one will invest ever again because when you do you can never get those money back because you will be forced to invest it over and over again.

Hitler did turn the economy of germany around, but he wasn't given the opportunity to make his economy work in the long term because of WW2.

if you want to know the real problem with your plan its because it doesn't incentivize excellence or success.

much of the reason socialism and communism fail is because once you take the incentive out for people everything falls to shit. you get less innovation, you get less growth, you get less people putting work into their projects.

so no, you didn't just "solve the worlds economic problems".

absent a situation like hitler used where the government literally owns all of the businesses and is in a perpetually heightened military state (providing jobs, manufacturing, but not actually growing itself in a real economic sense) it is bound to fail in the long term just like other socialist plans.

the reason hitlers economy succeeded is because socialism always works in the short term. it works AT FIRST because it capitalizes on existing infrastructure but one of the biggest problems it has is there is no incentive for growth afterwards, so everything collapses.

fuck man. just accept capitalism it truly is the best way and it has given you everything you have in life. focus on deregulation and ending corporate subsidies if you want to make things better and end corporate slavery.

Thats exactly what happens, rich people arent keeping thier money in sofa cushions you retard.

you're right

Isn't that what we do already? The Fed creates more currency to devalue it and to encourage people to spend it instead of hoard it.

...

he isn't right, no incentive = no growth, no innovation, and a stagnant economy. history has proven this time and time again.

the income tax is truly the greatest con ever conceived

and now people will even fight you for the right to be taxed

>Cut the taxes on the rich, but legally force them to "invest" it
Yeah, that's what we're missing, more money taken out of the real economy and dumped into the speculative economy.

>inside the mind of a 15 year old leaf
>"force investment" is a well thought out idea

This.

/thread

Do you believe taxation is theft due to your independence?

If the latter, do you agree that you should be able to opt out of taxation, but if you are caught using the property of a nation you will be thrown in jail or executed for illegal trespassing / appropriation of property?

How do you reconcile the fact that your property is only guaranteed by the established nation that you live in, and without that guarantee anyone can come and remove you and claim it for themselves without legal repercussion?

We also just had mostly dirt roads, railroads brought about by the gov't creating and funding railroad companies, and gov't built schools which were primarily funded by ebil tariffs.

>Did I literally just BTFO everything?
No.

The benefit from capitalism is that the planning of the economy is distributed. Centralized control of the allocation of resources is too computationally complex. That does not make capitalism ideal, just more effective.

American industrial competitiveness derives directly from public spending. The Internet evolved from two different public programs: ARPA and NSF. The space program is another example.