Why do we hear all about when a white guy shoots people but the media never makes a peep about niggers mass killing...

why do we hear all about when a white guy shoots people but the media never makes a peep about niggers mass killing people?

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4886374/Teen-launched-school-shooting-teach-lesson.html
nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Man-Sentenced-in-Robbery-of-Chinese-Food-Delivery-Driver-439283103.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

why do you ask a question you already know the answer to

Jews/elites are at war with whites, globally. Niggers are their favorite pawns in the war.

...

never heard of these but I hear about every time a white farts. Is black violent crime just so commonplace that it isn't newsworthy?

Is a 19 year old not a teen?

I mean 8 seem like nothing compared to recent white shootings. Not to be a black apologist, but 8 death < over 50 with many injured.

>19 isn't a teenager
What the fuck is this image supposed to mean

Yes.
Weekends in Chicago are just free range nigger shoot-a-thon.
Doubly so if it's a holiday.

But oh no, don't dare bring that fact up, it makes you a racist if you believe statistics.

Under 18 is teenager in court.
18+ is tried as an adult.

Underage =/ Teenager
You are a teenager up to 20 years old, you might be an adult, but you are still a teenager.

go find an article with a white 18-19 year-old committing a violent crime where the white is called a "teen" in the headline. my bet is they say "white man"

go ahead and find it, i'll wait.

once you are 18 you are tried as an adult so no.

the media is manipulating language to protect niggers. it they're white and 18 then they're white men. if they're nig and 18 then they're just teens who dindu nuffin`

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4886374/Teen-launched-school-shooting-teach-lesson.html

>Caleb Sharpe, 15,
what part of
>go find an article with a white 18-19 year-old committing a violent crime where the white is called a "teen" in the headline
gave you trouble, you dumb bean?

this. it's all in the Associated Phaggot writing manual.

Gee user you are making it really hard, maybe if whites could hold up their killing intent 1 or 2 years I would have more proof. I can't find one because all white shooters are either late 20s or under 17.

How about you find me an article where they refer to an 18 year old as man, which by the way, there's nothing wrong with that.

because whites don't shoot enough people to tire out the media reporting on them? something is "big news" worth reporting only when it's out of the ordinary and gets ratings.

>How about you find me an article where they refer to an 18 year old as man, which by the way, there's nothing wrong with that.
that's part of my argument you unbelievably stupid spic

So you wouldn't say that guy is a man?

you don't understand the point i made here, do you?

Not really, I seriously don't understand what could possibly be the problem with the media calling shooters "man" or "teen" IF they are less than 20 year old. Both apply and I can hardly see what's the fucking difference when there's 18 years old in the title anyway.

>Not really, I seriously don't understand what could possibly be the problem with the media calling shooters "man" or "teen" IF they are less than 20 year old. Both apply and I can hardly see what's the fucking difference when there's 18 years old in the title anyway.
so you don't understand. you must have a room-temperature iq

The media reports news, not regular occurrences.

What's there to understand? 18 year old is a man AND a teenager, you thinking it's some type of conspiracy against white fucking shooters might just be the stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard
>Sir! We have reports of an 18 year old white person killing a couple of people, how do we make it so it's even worse?
>Oh I know, we'll just say he's an 18 year old... MAN! HAHAHAHAHA

Like honestly? Are you this retarded? Is that really your point?

>mexican intellectuals

No un argumento, amigo.

that is what happens.

>white 18 year-old violent criminal: man
>black18 year-old violent criminal: teen

i have provided evidence for my position. you have not provided any evidence of your position.

My evidence to your retardation is that both are correct. Man and teen are both correct.
>white 18 year old violent criminal: man
What's funny here, it's that the only part you care about it's that they call him a man, like it fucking matters. 18 year old is already there, retard, that's being a teenager. So you are complaining they are saying
>white teen violent criminal: man
>HURRR WHY DON'T THEY CALL HIM TEEN, HUH?????
Really makes me think.

>like it fucking matters
the language that you use when describing people matters. it matters a lot. certain words represent certain ideas. are you retarded?

Mexico, stop. You're actually embarrassing yourself, you can't understand what point he's trying to make??
Let's break it down for you, Juan.
>two 18 year-olds commit the same crime
>the white one is called a "man" in the news
>the shitskin one is called a "boy" or "teen" to obfuscate the truth
Get it now?

>doesn't understand context
>defends the depiction of adult niggers as teenagers
Man, this is why this page usually doesn't take Mexicans seriously.

So? The media aren't lying. They are men, they are white/black, they are 18 year olds, they are teenagers. You can't be mad at them because they report what's happening just because they use certain words to objectively describe the person they are talking about.

It doesn't even happen all the time.
nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Man-Sentenced-in-Robbery-of-Chinese-Food-Delivery-Driver-439283103.html
This faggot is getting named a MAN for something he did when he was 14. What is this article somehow invalid now because it doesn't suit your narrative or is the media actually impartial?

>eight people
>mass
mass in weight but not in numbers perhaps this is just a normal day desu

8 dead by gunfire would be a national tragedy in sane countries...

>context
>white boi didnu nuffin

Shooters should be executed and thrown in jail regardless of how do they look or how old they are. Muh context of they being men or not doesn't matter when they kill people, retard.

Toward the end of Animal Farm when the formerly revolutionary seven commandments have been rewritten to "All Animals are Equal... But Some Animals are More Equal than Others", what began with the promise of equality has reverted to an authoritarian caste system. America's civil rights revolution similarly began with, "All Americans are Equal" and ended up with, "All Americans are Equal... But Some Americans are More Equal than Others."

Liberals have seized the commanding heights of the moral high ground by presenting themselves as the protectors of minorities and vowing to replace one racist system with an equally racist, anti-racist system. But caste systems aren't just black and white and the rainbow coalition has internal conflicts. What do liberals do when different groups within the rainbow coalition conflict and how do they make that determination?

It's not a new question. Black men got the vote before white women did, and that very issue led to a heated debate over universal suffrage in the Fourteenth Amendment, which was written to include black men, but exclude women. Suffragists were told in Fredrick Douglass' words, "This is the Negro's hour." To explain why that was the hour on the clock, Douglass brought out what would become the Victim Value Index.

"When women because they are women are dragged from their houses and hung upon lamp-posts... then they will have the urgency to obtain the ballot equal to our own," Douglass sneered. Women had been dragged out of their homes and subjected to horrors because they were women for far longer than the brief few centuries of African slavery in America, but Douglass' real point was, "My suffering beats your suffering, so my rights beat your rights." In contemporary progressivism this is expressed in the sneering "White Women's Tears" meme.

Suffering is the central ideological component of the Victim Value Index. "He Who Suffers Most Wins." But suffering, as in the Douglass debate, is relative. Ego means that people feel their own pain first. And even when they feel someone else's pain more than that of their own group, this is a personal egotistical identification, a selective empathy that derives from their own background and psychological makeup.

Historical suffering transmuted into guilt is the gold standard of liberalism, but suffering is relative. In our wonderful multi-everything society, there are so many groups with so many claims to pain. Everyone agrees that the Heteronormative Caucasian Patriarchy of Doom is to blame for all of it, but that still leaves the question of dividing up the spoils of the system and all the privileges to be gained from denouncing privilege. A caste system doesn't work without priority, and calculating the priority of privilege claims by the perpetually underprivileged is complicated.

Without the Victim Value Index, understanding how these priorities work can be confusing, even for liberals. It's particularly confusing for conservatives and libertarians who don't understand the system and dismiss it as liberal insanity. It is insane, the way all cultural taboos are, but there is a method to the madness.

The first thing to understand is the dirty little secret of the Victim Value Index. While loud vocal assertions of suffering are very important, the substance of such suffering is unimportant when moving up the ladder of the Victim Value Index.

If historical justice for suffering were the barometer, American Indians would be at the head of the line. While conceptually they are, progressives respond to praises of America by bringing them up, in practice they are somewhere near the back end of the middle. The group currently at the head of the line, Muslims, have the least claim on historical justice, but are at the center of civil rights activism.

Actual suffering doesn't matter. Neither does historical justice. Both of those are easy to make up, and in a dogma-ridden environment no one will look past the politically correct line anyway.

The Victim Value Index is calculated based on one overriding factor: Disruptiveness. Those who are most disruptive go to the head of the line. This can be mistaken for a "Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease" phenomenon, and occasionally in the micro it is, but in the macro it goes to the question of why progressives value minorities and for what purpose.

To be a progressive is to be committed to perpetual reform in the name of perpetual grievance for perpetual power. Grievance is to their government feudalism what the Divine Right of Kings was to feudal rulers. It justifies their right to agitate and undermine, to seize power by any means necessary and to implement their programs legally or extra-legally.

Reformers need their bleeding sores, their cries of outrage and their muck to rake. Those who give them that often go to the head of the line acting as their secular clergy, blessing their rule and anointing them as the protectors of their faith in hope and change. But that's just part of it.

Progressivism is a revolution in slow motion, and revolutions need revolutionaries. Disruption is more than just grievance, it's violence. Those who are willing to ruthlessly attack the status quo clearing the ground for revolution are the ones who go to the head of the line and the dais of honor on top. A little murder and mayhem, and progressives will trot out "moderate" versions of the murderers and mayhemists, usually linked to them, and offer to represent them and tamp down the violence in exchange for meeting their demands.

Anyone who is shocked that the left would make common cause with Islamists has forgotten the Black Panthers. From the left's point of view they are doing the same thing by bringing on board a group with some revolutionary energy and a willingness to overthrow the system. Associating with them gives the left some revolutionary cred and the supposed ability to turn the violence on and off.

f you think that's farfetched, what do you think happened in 2008 when a completely inept hack blew through Hillary Clinton and John McCain on a pledge to end the wars and repair our relations with the Muslim world? Why exactly do you think the Democrats chose a man with no experience except a few books about growing up in a Muslim country and Hussein as his middle name? Why was that man then awarded a Nobel Peace Prize for no discernible accomplishment?

September 11 and its aftermath is why Muslims have gone to the top of the Victim Value Index. The left may swear up and down that they are interested in Muslim civil rights, but if the Muslims were Sikhs, they would merit a place somewhere in the back. Before Muslims began prominently blowing things up in the United States, the left barely paid any attention to them. Once they did, they began outweighing every other group in the country because killing 3,000 people is the gold standard of revolutionary mayhem.

The Victim Value Index places the most disruptive groups at the front, the somewhat disruptive groups in the middle and the least disruptive groups at the back. The status of groups within the Index can change with their behavior. Muslims used to be shelved in the back with Asians, Indians and Jews. The War on Terror dramatically upgraded their status. The other groups are stuck there because they are relatively successful and aren't rioting or blowing things up.

10 - 12 = Tween
13 - 18 = Teen
18+ = adult

Latinos are still somewhere in the middle. Native Americans are in the back along with most unclassified minorities. Homosexuals are somewhere near the front, but behind African-Americans. Their status tends to drift wildly depending on current events, but they cannot overtake African-Americans or fall behind Latinos. Not unless some drastic events take place that change their status. Women are, and have always been, in the back.

The practical value of the Victim Value Index is that it mediates internal conflicts. For example, a bias attack by a member of a high-value group on a member of a low-value group is much less likely to be treated as a hate crime. However, an ordinary attack by a member of a low-value group on a member of a high-value group is more likely to be treated as a bias attack even when it isn't.

High VVI status carries with it the caste privilege of assumed persecution. A high-status VVI can blame a great many things on persecution. This is more difficult to do for a lower-status VVI. A claim of discrimination by a low-status VVI is more likely to be mocked than a similar claim by a high-status VVI, and is less likely to lead to politically correct reprisals. Jokes relying on bias and stereotypes can be made with greater freedom about low-status VVI's than about high-status VVI's.

It's not newsworthy at all. One black guy shooting a bunch of other black guys is a near daily occurance. No one cares. Same thing when a black kid disappears. Who gives a fuck?

White men have the lowest VVI status imaginable, and are fair game for racist jokes and bias attacks, but Asians, who have a fairly low VVI status, are also fair game. VVI status is group based but can be forfeited by an individual who engages in counterrevolutionary behavior, thereby forfeiting a status awarded to his group for its revolutionary disruptiveness. Any minority group member who aligns with conservatives is immediately assigned the same VVI status as a white male. A low-status VVI who offends a high-status VVI group may be treated the same way.

Speech codes are an easy way to determine VVI status. As a black man, Juan Williams was a high-status VVI, allowing him to make otherwise politically incorrect observations. He was only purged for offending Muslims, a group with a higher status VVI. But black sportscasters who make jokes about Asian men are rarely reprimanded because Asians have a lower VVI status. Jokes and politically incorrect remarks about lower-status VVI's such as Asians, Jews or women are permitted within liberal circles. Making those same remarks about middle-status VVI's is dangerous and generally frowned on. High-status VVI's are completely off limits to anyone who is not a member of that same group.

Because thats what niggers do, we dont need the news to know that

Blacks kills so many people, every year, it's not a surprise.

This is more than just a guide on how to safely be politically incorrect, it's a map of the caste system under which we live. The caste system determines what jobs we get, what things we can say and what is expected of us in everything from job performance to conspicuous displays of social justice. It is how we live now, and it is vitally important to understand that it really is this way in every place that falls under the shadow of government mandates and the progressive Kulturkampf against equality.

In the grip of the left, we have become a culture that rewards destruction and disruption, that feeds the worst behaviors and then blames their repetition on society's failings, rather than their own calculated tactical assault on the country. We can be a country where all Americans are equal or we can be a country where all Americans are equal... but some Americans are more equal than others in the name of remedying inequality.

because you cant convince a nigger to take responsibility for a damn thing.

Because a small shit in a big loo is normal, but a loo in a huge pile of shit is rare

Stupid bean

...

you’re paying for the wall.

Sure, after we get amnesty

LOL

>Animal behaves like animal
Nothing to do here

>Human behaved like animal or... Human is set up that it is believed they behaved like an animal

Better shove it down everyone's throats to show how we're one and the same while white piple are rayciss an sheeeeiiit n open borders

he's saying white and black people get different treatments. When a black commits a crime they try to frame it like its a confused, innocent teenager who didnt know any better. While if a white person of the same age commits the same crime they're framed like ruthless, adult murderers.

Eight dead including a cop is pretty high, man. Dylan Roof got national attention and Obama gave a tear jerker speech about it.

The black one deliberately portrayed the offender as a teen despite him being a legal adult. Yes, technically he is still a teenager but come on. The white one straight up says man and displays his age clearly so there is no confusion. I honestly think the media doesnt report black crimes because theyre so common, and if they reported on black crime, there would be so many articles they would be labeled rscist.