Discuss

Discuss.

Is this show good any good?

Why all the candidates are girls...?

Fuck you, faggot.

Why your sentence structure is so wrong?

The one on the far right. Everything else is heretical wish-wash.

>citizens being equal = the workers own the means of production
I never understood this. Do you think the french revolution was about socialism too?

I would unironically be a /CruschMissile/ even though I love Emilia.

citizens being equal = classless society

Kill anarchy, fuck purple and marry middle. Conquer the rest.

not really, it's decently fun though

Feet

So, what we have now? Are we living in socialist utopia?

We are not fully equal yet. We still have the rich and the poor.

Oligarchy

Looks like the middle one is the only one that can get things done.

What, you don't notice that the support of the rich and powerful is needed to get anywhere close to the top?

>I'm American and don't actually know ANY history

But no classes. So socialist utopia.

I am pretty sure I will have a few classes this afternoon.

Emilia's position is ideologically vague because "equality" can mean two very different things, unless some concrete meaning was lost in translation.

She could mean that citizens are equal in results, which is hardcore socialism that most interpret it as. She could instead also mean having equal opportunity and equal treatment under the law, not segregated into social / political classes as enforced by the state, which is technically a 'MURICAN ideal. Two very different things.

Crusch is the best tough QT anyway.

1. Tight and will bleed every time.
2. Wide and deep, easily the most comfortable.
3. Most folds and shaped for maximum succ.
4. Small and highly innervated, you will never feel as good as she can
5. Deep as ww1 trenches and equally painful, will grip you like a vice and you'll beg her to let go

>But no classes.
No official ones, anyway. The denominations have been done away with to hide away the fact that there are major differences between what are factually still classes.

>technically a 'MURICAN ideal.
But no 'Murrican reality. It would still be socialism to most Americans.
Making everybody start one the same starting line regardless of how rich their parents were would not sit will with them at all.

She, on top of being populist scum, is openly advocating perfidy. She is without honor.

Rich garbage and poor garbage are not classes.

>No Democracy

>"Democracy"
Maybe if you're Swiss.

I didn't think about it then but why does Roswaal support Emilia when Crusch wants the same thing as him in getting rid of the dragon?

Does it matter what your candidate claims during the election period when you know you will have almost full control over them once they are in power?

>(((Democracy)))

Equal treatment under the law does not inherently entail restricting rich parents from providing more for their children.

No, but equal opportunity does.
Score 1 for selective reading.

So is the elf truly a commie?

ALL HAIL FELT-SAMA.

>the most precise selection system of the world
>gets 4 of the most shitty princesses possible except emilia

waifushit

It's aight.

>no fascism
Dropped

#CrushMissile all the way.

>all the best girls being lefty
>subaru who has the name of a big corporation always being fucked

The author it's trying to say something.

As much as I enjoy flat chest and anarchy, Felt's government wouldn't work during such a volatile time. Emilia's is too naive, Osakabitch's is too short sighted and Ojoutits would be killed in a coup in a month, tops. Crusch isn't my favorite girl but she facilitated the killing of the White Whale. The people need someone who can get shit done.

Crusch 2016

Anastasia also helped in whale hunting too. She is a businessman. She is anything but short-sighted.

Plutocracy is GOAT, but Felt is loveable

I support the genocidal Puck

No, but at least a bit different from the usual moeshit

It's popular so it must be bad.

no

Socialism is the way towards communism.

You're an autist.

If you take the larger context of Emilia's speech, she is not at all communist. She's campaigning for equal rights for beastfolk and the like, in other words elevating them to the status of the typical human. She's more civil rights movement than communist revolution.

>no Philosopher king

Except that Roswaal mentioned that thew status of knights will be in danger. Not only everyone will be equal, but there won't be a caste either.

>more civil rights movement than communist revolution

So she's a malicious agitator as opposed to a complete mental invalid?

I doubt many Americans know the difference between normal civil rights and communism.

>there are people who don't think Crusch would be the best queen
All the other candidates are pretty shit. Crusch is the only one who would be a legitimately good ruler.

Anastasia is an opportunist. I've always believed that business people make the worst kind of people to run a nation. I'm not naive enough to think that government leaders don't see their citizens as human capital from time to time but that's the only way she sees the people she leads. Problems always arise when you people are reduced to numbers on a chart.

Plato's state was basically communism so it's represented there. Or maybe some weird caste comminism with kings, the upper class (guardians or however they were called) and workers. I think he wanted women to have the same chances but on the other hand he excluded the workers (males and females) and slaves so it's some mixed shit I guess although I agree that a ruler should be able to argue and think philosophically, there are too much idiots among those who reign countries.

Yes, but Sup Forums likes to hate on it because it's popular + shitty fanbase.

The purple haired girl is actually the most capable ruler. She may be greedy, but she has not shown to be unfair.
She knows how to argue, make deals and control people, those are some of the most powerful weapons in politics. She also would make the country grow and prosper contrary to more than half of the other candidates so I really think she has the upper hand here.

Can we all agree that a nation ruled by Priscilla would fall to absolute shit? She's basically Marie Antoinette on PCP.

>putting a Jew in control

Good for the country but not for the common people.

Isn't this always the case? It's basically the same shit no matter if it's a democracy, some faschist thing or even communism. The leaders always only do things to get more money or to avoid losing their position and all of them get backed by certain corporations or agendas while they use their power to take the backers under their wings in return.

>Plato's state was basically communism so it's represented there.
No it wasn't. It was a government of the elites.
Communism is not supposed to have any government at all.

Priscilla or Crusch.

You're not wrong but in a Plutocracy that becomes the accepted norm instead of the vilified exception. Would you want to live in a nation where that type of behavior is socially accepted?

A republic is a democracy

The other options are a girl who wants war against a fucking dragon, a girl that can't rule and doesn't want to rule, a bitch who only wants everyone to bow in front of her and a girl who is gonna expend time and money into making everyone "equal" while fucking everything else meanwhile.

What's good for the country is good for the common people at the end of the day. Getting commerce to flow in order for money to come in involves the lower classes having more to work and getting more money.

Yeah it's some own thing. People wouldn't own any property if I remember correctly but the system itself was class based, in which the upper classes were elites he always talked about.

>5. Deep as ww1 trenches and equally painful, will grip you like a vice and you'll beg her to let go

A ruler can have advisors. She can achieve the exact same thing as a diplomat in the service of another candidate, if it came to that.

Anyone who has put any thought to it knows that single-ruler systems, most of all monarchy, are the best system.

So either Priscilla, or Crusch (who is more fascism than republic).

Anastasia, followed by Priscilla.

The rest are less than dogshit.

Well of course not. I didn't say a Plutocracy is better so I agree here. Democracies barely ever function correctly but they are still the least evil and the chances for sueing higher ups and them resigning are the highest there. Same with human rights.

>Communism is not supposed to have any government at all.

That is anarchy.

>Anyone who has put any thought to it knows that single-ruler systems, most of all monarchy, are the best system.

There is a difference between a republic and a democratic republic

Agreed.

Only when the monarch is some all-knowing Jesus. Otherwise the only people profiting from this are the ruler himself and his closest ones.

>What's good for the country is good for the common people at the end of the day.
There are many times when this isn't the case, especially when the government is run by a select few with specific agendas.
>Getting commerce to flow in order for money to come in involves the lower classes having more to work and getting more money.
We called this Voodoo Economics in a democracy, senpai. In a plutocracy it would be an outright lie. The people would work more but earn less money because profits would be controlled by the wealthy leaders of the nation.
Agreed.

Communism, too.
Socialism is about creating the conditions for communism to work - ie better people and a functional law and makes sure everybody gets their fair share.
The dictatorship of the proletatians is supposed to end when the time is right.

The end goal of communism and socialism is anarchy.

Crusch's ideology is National Socialism with strong armament of people and eliminating any exterior threat.

Are the witch's cult and Beteguelse nazists?

Pretty sure they are not in this royal selection.

I suppose that's true. Thinking about it, maybe Emilia and Anastasia or Crush and Anastasia would make the best combination to rule over the country. That way Emilia or Crush could go for their objectives without ruining the country in the process.

But in the case of Anastasia she has been shown to be fair when it comes to commerce. She doesn't just takes away to accumulate money, she also gives something in exchange to whoever she is making the deal with.

More like ISIS. A batshit theocracy that everybody hates.

So Cruschfags are all from Sup Forums then. That explains a lot.

Nothing is stopping poor people from getting rich though. Nothing is stopping a poor person from getting an education or starting a business. It's all a matter of how well you manage your money to create a decent credit score so you can get loans to start up some shit.

What we have is equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. The idea that everyone is the same and that we would all have the same outcome if it weren't for our social conditions at birth is SJW bullshit.

Fair is the word you use when you are striking a deal with an entity with a bargaining power. Common people have no bargaining power.

>smelly unhinged lunatics
More like Muslims.

>supporting half-elves
That's the first step to accepting pure elves into your society.
Next thing you'll know, all your women will disregard your good human males for the elves' feminine penises, and then your population will slowly but surely be replaced by tree-huggers and vegetarians.

>She doesn't just takes away to accumulate money
Everything is finite and by actively accumulating she has to take away from others. My being the leader of a plutocracy she has to establish herself as the unquestioned owner of the nation's wealth. That generally doesn't sit well with citizens in the long run.

>Nothing is stopping poor people from getting rich though.
Yes, there is. It's called reality.
Anybody can become rich, but not everybody at the same time. Also, when 62 people own as much as the poorer half of the world population then there is not a whole lot of space for you to rise up to.
"Everybody can get rich if they just try hard enough" is the lie that makes America function.

Their workforce is what they use to get money so that would be their bargain power. As far as we have seen, she doesn't seem the kind to just use them without giving nothing in return.

Besides, if not her, who else is good for the country?

It sits well with the citizens as long as they don't get negatively affect them negatively. Common people, in the kind of world the series develops, don't care about government and the such as long as they are well.

It's not a lie. The richest people tried hard enough at the right time in the right places. That's a horrible advantage buit the medium-upper class tried their hardest at any point of history. Most people don't try or don't care. A lot of poor people can't do better because they don't know they can do it (see black people in welfare countries like america)

>There are many times when this isn't the case, especially when the government is run by a select few with specific agendas.
Yeah this. Some of the wealthiest countries have the shittiest wages for average workers and unemployment figures kinda lie as well because they count temp work as well as one euro jobs just as "jobs".

>Besides, if not her, who else is good for the country?

Pretty sure Crusch and Priscilla are good too. With Priscilla it is just the old ways all around, nothing will change. As far as I can see the kingdom is doing pretty well.

>The richest people tried hard enough at the right time in the right places
That's also a lie. Many of them already had the money available to do some sort of investment already and many others were already born rich thanks to their family.

What's stopping them? Seriously, what is physically stopping a poor person from becoming rich.

Being discouraged at the fact that they might never be as rich as Bill Gates is just a shitty excuse. You can still claw your way from poverty to an upper-class lifestyle. You can then burn that wealth on stupid shit or create an infrastructure for your kids to maintain and grow the wealth.