/valhalla general/ Daily reminder Jesus (((Christ))) is a marketing tool

Abandon Christian pacifism now, cultural survival is at stake. Beliefs true to the (((founder))) of Christianity must be abandoned, they are counter-productive to our survival

Religious syncretism, which allowed us to survive and thrive, has always been untrue to the beliefs of Jesus Christ. Those who hold on to Christian pacifism will perish in the long run

Christianity is a name (((applied))) to a culture which has next to nothing to do with Jesus Christ of the New Testament, and everything to do with militaristic nation-building of the (((Old Testament)))

The (((American))) gospel of wealth (God is on the side of those who are powerful and wealthy) justifies exploitation of the powerless and weak, nationally and globally. It is still used as a justifying device for the atrocities of neo-imperialism

The West is still under control of people with a looting mentality. They have combined Germanic/Norse raider mentality with the OT's concept of a divine nation, as a means to increase their loot

Smart play, using Jesus as a marketing tool to become rich and powerful beyond imagining

I'm advocating for the creation of free (ethno-, idea-) states on earth, disconnected from a globalist minority that would else govern us

Religion, for most, still plays an important part in identity and can therefore play a major role in creating those states. Christianity cannot accomplish this as it has become, and always was to a certain extent, a (((religion))) that promotes globalism

Once the states are established, every group/state can decide what domestic socialism means to them

If a group/state wants to stay Christian, no problem here

>a friendly reminder: Joshua ben Joseph (Jesus) had a devoted father named Joseph. Joseph was a Hebrew of the Hebrews, albeit he carried many non-Jewish racial strains which had been added to his ancestral tree from time to time by the female lines of his progenitors
>race-mixing resulted in (((Jesus)))

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=leK2WkAHLYk
youtube.com/watch?v=D9regMSrqCI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead_of_poetry
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Germany#From_Rome_to_the_Crusades
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Odin's gay and why would you drink horse semen? There's a reason why this cringy religion faded. Even degenerates knew it was retarded.

>be odin
>drink semen like a bukkake cum whore

Seek professional help. Seriously.

...

...

...

HAIL ODIN!

...

Stop being degenerate

...

...

...

ITT: christcucks who don't understand that the literature that makes out paganism to be homosexual is written by kikes

they also don't realize christains fought in a desert during the crusades only to leave their children to muslims, maybe thats why they have brown eyed shitskin genetics lmao

...

...

just because you're a raging athiest it doesn't mean that the world is going to give you a free country all to yourself. if you want a country, then pick up a gun and take one like everyone else did.

...

Kiketians fuck off to your desert god, you are slaves to the semites

...

...

...

...

...

your sandnigger temples Is meaningless at least a WHITE family took their time building stuff from nature dimbfuck

...

...

...

I still have to see a pagan outside the internet. Just saying...

>SLUURP

...

Christianity is degenerate by definition.

All the gay orgies and whore temples are pagan stuff.

...

...

...

...

stone doesnt come from nature?

I HAD NO IDEA that spending my whole NEET life learning paganism adn dead languages would be so damn useful.

Loki is not meant to be moral, doofus.

Augustine was literally a nigger and a rapist.

Aquinas was a plagiarist whose only good ideas were ripped off from the pagan Aristotle.

ITT: permavirgin metalheads

>inb4: roach lol, raid,jpg, etc.

Homosexuality is widely frowned upon in the ancient world. Even in the most "liberal" greek city states if men took part in that degeneracy, they were still expected to be fathers and MEN: Your kike slave priests not only behave like worthless eunuchs without a family, they still partake in pedo-gay orgies

...

Abrahamic religions do STATE that homosexuality is a sin and degenerate, pagans didn't consider it degenerate and even had top and bottom relationships. So it wasn't taboo in the ancient world. All the sluts and "indipendent slutty women" stuff is also pagan stuff.

Hey Thomas Aquinas in Summa Theolociae always cites Aristotle. he doesnt' plagarize, he cites.
Aug., City of God, book 1, ch. 20: We do not, because we have heard that, "Thou shalt not kill," deem it therefore unlawful to pluck a twig, according to the error of the Manichees, nor consider it to extend to irrational brutes; by the most righteous ordinance of the Creator their life and death is subservient to our needs.

Also Augustine hated blacks

>Congregation of the Lord typically mean the Jewish community

You don't say

It's true IT WAS THE JEWS AGAIN

>Odin - god of hitting people with hammers

>Jesus - god of being nice and giving hugs

>Odin followers literally blown the fuck out to the point where they don't exist any more except as a niche interest group by Jesus followers, who now rule the entire western world

ha ha

Remember it was the God of the Jews that did this too you. You made him very angry

>Loki is not meant to be moral, doofus
Where does it say that?

>list of great pagan minds
Aristotle
Plato
Marcus Aurelius
Diogenes
Archimedes
Hippocrates
Homer
>list of great christian minds
Adolf Hitler
Nikola Tesla
Henry Ford
Galileo Galilee
Copernicus
Machiavelli
Isaac Newton
Leonardo Da Vinci
All of the Founding Fathers of America
Thomas Edison
St. Augustine
Thomas Aquinas
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Beethoven
Johannes Sebastian Bach
Brahams
William Shakespeare
Fyodor Dostovetsky

>SLURP
CITATION NEEDED

>SLURP
>>SLURP
>SLURP
>>SLURP
>>>SLURP
>S
>>L
>>>U
>>>>R
>>>>>P

Jesus was an actual Jew.
The Khazar's that call themselves "Jews" today are not Jews. They were Moloch worshipers that simply decided to declare themselves Jewish on the orders of their king, who was looking for a religion to maintain control over his disparate tribes. He actually considered Christianity but rejected it to choose Judaism.

In other words, when Yahweh declared the Jews "chosen," he was NOT talking about the Ashkenazim, as they were just Khazar's living in the region around modern day Ukraine, at the time.
And as there was no way to convert to Judaism at the time the Khazar's claimed to do so, the Ashkenazim were never really Jews, and are not really Jews to this very day.
The Semitic Jews have not really been the assholes that the Ashkenazim have been. They never created a central bank syndicate to screw the nations with, nor entered other countries & promoted degeneracy to corrode them.
The "Jews" we hate are not really Jews...they are Khazar, originally Moloch worshipers, who now claim to be a different religion, but still commit evil as Moloch worshipers are known to do.

How come all Paganism seems to be is bitching endlessly about Christianity?

There's not enough surviving material for neo-pagans to create a religion around so they have to tear down Christianity and European history in order to form some kind of identity.

Sucker for ancient propaganda, aren't you?
Faggots said the same thing about Greeks, and accusations of faggotry has been a method of denigrating & insulting somebody else's culture for thousands of years.

But it takes a special kind of faggot to actually believe it.

...

...

youtube.com/watch?v=leK2WkAHLYk

>tfw i'll never have the comfy pagan Varg life with house filled with happy white children
>youtube.com/watch?v=D9regMSrqCI

>SLURP

...

>Hey Thomas Aquinas in Summa Theolociae always cites Aristotle. he doesnt' plagarize, he cites.
He still has to steal pagan wisdom because there is none to be found in the Jewish bible. If christianity were true, the theologians would not need to steal all of their ideas from pagans.

>Also Augustine hated blacks
Augustine was black. He was also a rapist.

Most of those were not Christian. Just for examples, Hitler was a deist and Newton was an occultist (basically a pagan).

>steal
Steal what Thomas goes "St Augustine says this and teh Philospher says that, plus with this scripture verse and a rejection of Platonic Forms we can CONCLUDE X. Theres no we wuzing by Thomas, he is mroethan proud to let everyone know that he cited Aristotle hes not pretending that it came anywhere but from Aristotle. Or any other man. But he does have new ideas, he did not just repeat ad verbatum.
Meanwhile you are all "WE WUZ RENAISSANCE"

>Augustine was black
>WE WUZ THEOLOGIANS N SHEEIT

If you're too sutpid to understand nigger I am saying youre a hyprocrite. In every manner

Jesus Christ is not a marketing tool. He is used as one, but his purpose was just. To say he is is just out of non-think tier paganism.

...

lmao

If you only knew how heretical things really are

...

>user says the magical mead is just magical mead and blood but doesn't alcohol IMPAIR JUDGEMENT?
kek'd, is this the top of the anti-pagan apologetics?

Khazar hypothesis has been proven false by genetics. Modern Jews are Levantine sandniggers, aka kikes. And the ancient Jews of the old testament act exactly like modern Jews today. The story of Esther, for example, where a Jewess seduces the king and then convinces him to kill his own people for the benefit of Jewry, exactly the same as present day Israel-first zionism. Or the Jew King David, who cheats in a duel to defeat a superior warrior, same as lying cheating present day Jews. Or the story of the Pharaoh giving an order to kill all the Jewish children, an ancient version of the holohoax.

I see no reason to believe that modern kikes are not descended from biblical kikes, since they act identical and much of the bible is an obvious collection of Jewish revenge fantasies similar to what they still create today.

I thought you said the same Varg in your video on alcohol. because thats HARAM isnt it?
Keep scrolling dirty old hobo

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead_of_poetry

TWO 19th century Latin Lexicons > goypedia

I prefer to adopt old roman gods because I'm not nordic descendant

What are you going to do you dirty old arab cock sucking hobo? Link me goypedia again and tell me that Pausanias isn't reliable? When it actually did?

Right Wing politics are concerned with the long-term survival of Civilization
But Christianity is only concerned with personal salvation to become part of a nebulous afterlife for which no evidence exists, and for which this world needs to be sacrificed, which is best expressed in the way early christians like Martin of Tours refused to fight enemies of their nations, insofar killing in this world could cost them heaven; this is also why more modern christians like Martin Luther said (I quote):
- "it is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence" - Martin Luther

When Jesus says "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"...
... he isn't kidding, or meaning the opposite, but setting down a morality where the world is a lie and only the afterlife is the real deal, so destroying your life in this world, "carrying your cross" as he says, is completely logical
While christian churches seem to be very well of this (including orthodox leader Patriarch Bartholomew), Sup Forums "christians" seem to believe Jesus actually meant the OPPOSITE of all that, and that Jesus wants you to defend your family, that Jesus wants you to kill your enemies, to become prosperous, well-fed and rich in this world, and to avoid persecution and death!

Only a person that does not actually believe in the Heaven for the persecuted, the meek, and the martyred would actually re-interpret Christianity as a cult of earthly power which declares "the strong shall inherit the Earth", "my kingdom is of this world" and "you must destroy the enemies of your nation"
Only some one that just wanna use Christianity as an empty shell devoid of any true religious promises would claim that Paul and Peter misinterpreted Jesus when they submitted to their enemies and died to them while praying for them, instead of fighting the romans back and establishing a crusader kingdom, thing that one would expect them to do if Jesus meant "be a fighter and impose your will on your enemies" when he said "love your enemies and lend all they need to them without expecting anything in return"

But using Christianity as a shell devoid of any religious promises simply allows its poisonous morality to survive into the next generation.
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "I didn't come to bring peace", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing what Jesus wanted is for them to put christian morality above the good-being of their own families.

You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times)
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!

That is not going to fly.
Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".

You probably smell like dirty garbage. because youre a filthy goy

Christian Morality attacks the foundations of the monarchy and capitalism, thus its spirituality is left-wing

Jesus saying that for the rich, powerful, strong (i.e. a monarch) it is almost impossible to go to Heaven, while the poor will inherit the Earth, you have a recipe for spiritual marxism that will become the real deal as soon as the Church losses its ability to prevent people from reading the Gospel directly
Under Christianity, a hobo is holier than the king, a beggar is holier than an entrepreneur, that contradiction can't last, and it didn't last

It is not an accident Europeans were the first people to violently remove their monarchs to replace them with utopian ideologies
it is not an accident either that every christian church outright rejects whatever version of "true Christianity" you may claim to be the truth.

The people devoted to the cult, working for it 24 / 7, spending their entire lives on it think that your interpretation makes no sense

They think that when Jesus and Paul said something they actually meant it, the people joining religious missions because the Gospel inspired them, the people that go to Africa and adopt babies, the people that actually wanna follow the lives of the early Christians like John Chrysostom (which you constantly claim is a "true Christian" because he didn't like jews, while ignoring everything else he ever said) and live a life of self-denial and poverty to feed others, people like Mother Teresa that lived surrounded by filth and excrement in India...
But you don't. You wanna pretend to be a christian while living a life of a roman
Jesus himself said that if you wanna be like a roman and love your friends and hate your enemies, then pretend to follow him, you are a hypocrite
What kind of argument can you even make to actual devoted christians that go on missions to Congo and India and even DIE for it, to tell them that their version of Christianity is corrupted and damaged by jews?

If Christianity is "the enemy of Jewry", then they don't need any friends. "Based Christian" Charlemagne, the father of Europe according to Christians, for killing pagan saxons, gave Jews their economical power
> Charlemagne (800–814) readily made use of the Church for the purpose of infusing coherence into the loosely joined parts of his extensive empire, by any means a blind tool of the canonical law. He employed Jews for diplomatic purposes, sending, for instance, a Jew as interpreter and guide with his embassy to Harun al-Rashid. Yet, even then, a gradual change occurred in the lives of the Jews. The Church forbade Christians to be usurers, so the Jews secured the remunerative monopoly of money-lending. This decree caused a mixed reaction of people in general in the Frankish empire (including Germany) to the Jews: Jewish people were sought everywhere, as well as avoided. This ambivalence about Jews occurred because their capital was indispensable, while their business was viewed as disreputable. This curious combination of circumstances increased Jewish influence and Jews went about the country freely, settling also in the eastern portions. Aside from Cologne, the earliest communities were established in Mainz, Worms, Speyer, and Regensburg.[15]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Germany#From_Rome_to_the_Crusades

Their christian "punishment" against the "evil jews" was to receive a lucrative financial monopoly of "sinful high financing that no christians shall ever benefit from" and to move to the next country to fleece when the peasants got too riled up.

Christianity can't cure a disease it caused

Pagan Romans were fundamentally free of the chains of jewish power, so much that they almost exterminated them all in their own homeland after the rebellion of Bar Kocheba
It would be Christian Europe that would fall under permanent jewish influence, with the jewish-controlled churches banning europeans from financing and loaning, giving them as a monopoly to jews

By the modern era, Christians were so throughly judaized, that they started to actively wish for the restoration of Israel so that the end of the world would finally come around and their civilization would die!
And why would it be otherwise?
A religion which such obsession with death, with promise is the end of the world, is fundamentally a time-bomb in the basement of a civilization

Do you really believe that the early christians that embraced their martyrhood to the lions said to themselves "I am dying to this lion so that the white race can survive, fuck jews!" or any such anachronistic reinterpretation that you have decided to give to their death cult?

(((Christianity))) is a tool of the Jews! Don't fall for their lies!

- there is no "white genocide", what is really going is white suicide, with christian morality as its main driver
the abortion issue is a perfect example of white christians openly fighting against their own interests by wanting to increase the birthrates of blacks and other democrat sub-groups that do abort
Tell me: do you really believe that USA would be better off with twice as many blacks? (The entire South would be deep blue for starters)

- That Jews took control of european finances and loaning and then global finances by proxy, is another example of how Christian Morality screws whites over
If the Churches had not been issuing numerous bans on white christians from practising usury (which is simply a way of saying "high risk financing"), jews would have never taken over that niche market
Far from destroyin them, Christianity made Jews the masters of Europe. The occasional progom more than paid for itself

- Support for Israel is a third way Christian Morality screws whites over, and it is far from a recent occurance or corruption. As early as 1600s, puritans already believed that a jewish Israel in the middle east was a prerequisite for the Apocalypse
- Christianity does not allow for racial divisions among Christians either "there is no jew or greek" makes it quite clear.
Citing Paul made extremely easy for the anti-segregation preachers of the 60s to get the majority of whites on their side
It also makes no historical sense, christian preachers from 1700s (before the supposed "jewish take over of Christianity") actively travelled to dangerous parts of Africa and South America to convert tribes even when it very often costed their own lives, and when they were converted they fought against conquerors for equal rights for the new christians (see: bartolome de las casas). Numerous preachers of all churches were massacred in Japan (which remains immune to the moral paralysis that is destroying Europe... really makes me think).

> BUT le JEWsus was BASED and his teachings were corrupted by KIKES meme

Literally all the followers of Jesus, and Jesus himself were kikes.

Among his followers there were many zealots, the most radical jews of them all, that wanted wars against Rome
But sure, he was "le anti-semite non-kike that kikes hated" right?

Now you are going to talk about how he disagreed with pharisees or whatever.

But why would the pharisees be discussing mosaic law with a non-jew? Never mind, what exactly did he denounce the pharisees for that makes him not a kike? Have you actually read the Gospel?

Can you point to a single value that Jesus denounced that wasn't valid?

Because the denounciations of Jesus were idiotic, insane, even marxist
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to punish a slut! (Jesus didnt like slut shaming, quite liberal if you ask me!)
There he denounces the rich pharisees and promises the earth to the meek and the poor! (... and marxist)
There he denounces the pharisees for wanting to live, instead of embracing death like him!
There he denounces them over a disagreement on how Mosaic Law is applied! (but Jesus was not a Jew I swear!!!)

You blindly may say "he disagreed with the kikes" as if that was something we needed to applaud!
I have to ask you "christians" of Sup Forums, what are these supposed teachings of Jesus that supposedly got corrupted by kikes? "Hate your enemies"? "Save treasures for tomorrow"? "DO resist evil"?

The opposite of everything Jesus said?
I mean really, is "but kikes killed Jesus" your only argument?

Muslims are hated by Jews as well, but Jews are smart enough to use them as a tool. The same way they use the insane anti-morality of Christianity to corrupt the ancient world and give themselves a privileged financial spot!

But if Jews don't like the own poison they created, that means that we shall drink it, according to you!
wtf I guess I love ISIS now!

> inb4 Turning the other cheek does not mean pacifism. Letting someone else slap your face with the back of his hand was a form of social rebellion back then

no it wasn't. that shit was made up by radical black-nationalist liberal theologist Walter Wink to justify social rebellion in South Africa.

There are NO sources to it outside his books, nothing of what Josephus wrote about life in the ancient Middle East mentions anything close to offering the cheek or giving to your enemies your coat being an insult to them.


In the Greek-Roman world, love meant "common feeling of mutual interest born out of shared experiences"

Early Christians expanded it to a commandment of loving people that we don't know, that we don't care about, just so that we can fill ourselves with misguided pride about how we are friends of mankind itself
Agape never has conveyed any sort of violent or agressive implication, as some Sup Forumslacks imply

Among christian writers it has always meant means "a selfless love that is passionately committed to the well-being of others", no implication of tough love whatsoever
see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity

Christian semantics are enough of a mess as they are, and then Sup Forums christians wanna add an extra layer of absurdity and mental masturbation: That is where the schizophrenia of right-wing christians kicks in
Only a christian could claim something as absurd as love for his enemies

your shitty picture proves nothing though and it doesn't even imply it means semen

also found another funny gem
>I also note that while "there is life in the blood" it can revitalize, hence vampires. It does not grand any fertility, wisdom, or creativity in any stories. For ex, the blood of Christ does not grant fertility or knowledge. It grants eternal life.
made me kek

Only a right-wing christian could take that absurdity to the next level by killing his enemies while declaring his love for them. So here they want us to believe that the Crusaders loved every single damn person that they slaughtered in Constantinople
Because, according to Sup Forums christians, Love is not about shared interest, it is about telling to yourself "how I love that guy" right before cutting his head off (mental masturbation, really)

dude, if you wanna hate your enemies, just do that, and stop mentally masturbating about how better and so much more heaven-deserving you are than your enemies because you somehow declared that you loved him while killing him

> le pope is le anti-Pope meme
> le christianity is corrupted meme
Question for Sup Forums "christians" claiming that the Pope is the anti-Christ

How would you prove that interpretation of "do not resist evil" by Pope or any mainstream christian leader is twisted, corrupted and out of context?
The context of the story is how christians should behave the opposite of gentiles, who love their friends and families, and hate their enemies

The larger context is a Gospel where all the main figures mentioned allowed their enemies to kill them without slaying them back: Jesus, Peter, Paul

What is true context of the paragraph?
How do you turn "Do not resist evil" into "FUCK OFF MUSLIMS!"?
YOU are the Anti-Christ, Christian of Sup Forums. You deny the words of Jesus because you don't wanna give up your earthly interests.
You "christian" people of Sup Forums/ seem to believe that Paul the Pharisee and Peter the Jew the grabbed their swords and killed the romans that wanted to execute them, come on

They were well aware that their religion demanded them to be submissive to their enemies and finally die to them, that is exactly the lesson they wanted the goyim to learn
Look, I know that you actually don't believe in the whole "infinite treasures in Heaven" thing, so you are trying to justify fighting for survival in this world where you can get actual treasures, but don't try to rewrite history please

Christianity is anti-traditionalist in the biological sense, it has no worldy interest in our beings as animals
Everything animal about the human being is considered sinful


Paul was anti-natalist, as things like wife and family would get in the way of getting people to worship his jewish god.

If unmarried men followed the words of Paul, there would no be any civilization to begin with, people would stop marrying as it would interfere witgh their mental masturbation being a "good person" by telling others that they will go to hell

See:
> 8 Now to the unmarried men and women, and for the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.
> Are you free from such a commitment? Do not look for a wife.
> 32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— 34 and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord’s affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. 35 I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord.
t. Paul the Pharisee

Paul makes it EXTREMELY CLEAR that the main concern for every christian is the spread of this virus-like cult at the expense of their own tribe, and his main worry is that Christians may not devote 100 % of their time to the spread of the cult

the organic self-sustaining self-interested self-preserving society that Sup Forums wants is fundamentally incompatible with the "do not save for tomorrow, leave your family and spread my cult" dogma that both Jesus and Paul saw as the main duty of a christian

Jesus made it even clearer:

> "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't become my follower me"- Jesus

If his Kingdom is of this World, as Sup Forums Christians claim... if Christianity is a religion of earthly power, why didn't it save the Western Roman Empire then? Why did Saint Augustine wrote that it was not a christian concern the existence or not of wordly kingdoms?

Why were Christians unable to save even their fucking holy land from the Muslims, if they are the religion of earthly power that you believe they are?
Why is the North Africa now muslim, if it was once christian and roman?

That they didn't manage to screw things completely over was an accident of history, not for lack of trying

and most importantly of all questions, why has Christianity become an enabler of the muslim invasion of Europe, if it is such religion of earthly power and "the strong will inherit the Earth" as you seem to believe?
why are all the christian mainstream churches pro-refugee, if christian doctrine says "hate your enemy, and do not lend to them all they want" instead of the opposite as you claim?

The strange thing is that "christians" like you are a minority within Christianity itself that they claim to represent, with everyone from the Pope to the Anglican Churches to the Protestant Churches actively cucking for the destruction of the West
The Pope literally points to the same verses that I do to justify his doctrine, yet you come here to tell me that he is wrong, and I am wrong, and even damn Jesus and paul were wrong tho, because some medieval crusader decided to recreate christianity as a earthly cult of power in order to sack Constantinople!

Go and form your atheist commune then, nobody cares. I would never help anyone set up a country predicated on atheism.

Jews are a very successful group that has become successful by monopolising finances through ethnic networking and promoting ideologies that demonize their own actions so that the goyim won't copy their success
so they promote anti-nationalistic Communism among the goyim while endorsing Zionism for themselves
that is why they promoted universalist Christianity among the goyim while keeping Judaism for themselves, and including it as the Old Testament within Christianity, so that they would remain the most important people of the world.
So there is no real contradiction once you understand how Jews work: Do as I say (Christianity), not as I do (Judaism, Old Testament).
then christians wonder why Jews dominate them!

The problem with Sup Forums christians' claims of modern misinterpretations if Christianity is that those were the ACTUAL interpretations of Early Christians

Whatever Christians would not wish others to do to them, they do not to others. And they comfort their oppressors and make them their friends; they do good to their enemies…. Through love towards their oppressors, they persuade them to become Christians.
—The Apology of Aristides 15[13]

How can a man be master of another's life, if he is not even master of his own? Hence he ought to be poor in spirit, and look at Him who for our sake became poor of His own will; let him consider that we are all equal by nature, and not exalt himself impertinently against his own race[...]

—Gregory of Nyssa, Homilies on the Beatitudes[18]

Who is more likely to have a corrupted version of Christianity?

a) The Early Christians that Roman authors characterized as an extremely docile people that was a frequent target of free loaders
b) The Crusaders that sold children as slaves and destroyed Constantinople

>larpagans
lmao

> "If only we had more Chrsitianity in these times of equality and brotherhood, sacrificing your own material wealth to help the poor and to forgive your transgressors." - Sup Forums christians

The West is not dying because gays fuck their butts (heck, even muslims fuck each other all and goats the time, and they are the civilizations expanding the most right now, while the west collapses)

The West is dying because of pathological altruism, and i quote Paul himself in his interpretation (insofar whenever Jesus said this you always say "Jesus means the opposite"):

> 14 Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse.
> 17 Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone. 18 If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. 19 Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,”[d] says the Lord. 20 On the contrary: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him;
> if he is thirsty, give him something to drink.
In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.”[e] 21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Your Old Testament morality has nothing to do with the Jesus and Paul that you claim to follow, and no church father ever pretended otherwise

You are a larper that does not give a fuck about what Paul actually said, and needs to pretend that Mosaic Law applies to him
Yet I am quite sure you work in Saturday and eat pork, lol

If you wanna be a jew, and then go on and convert to Judaism, and stop pretending that Christian Churches want anything to do with you