Atheism is killing off the European race

It's true.

There is a direct correlation between atheism and low birthrates.

Church attendance in western Europe is somewhere around 2%, and the birthrates are less than 2 children per woman in every western European culture.

There is a direct correlation between atheism and left wing thought. The majority of atheists favor socialism and open borders. Atheists are more amenable to world government than Christians. Atheists welcome "refugees" at the train stations.

America is barely over half-white, and we still manage to elect Trump, while western Europeans elect people like Macron and Merkel. Sad. Obviously the average atheist is about as right wing as the average Muslim, African, or Mexican.

"Spiritual but not religious" is still an atheist.
>pretending to meditate on a force which you are already convinced isn't real.

"Neopagan"/larpagan is still atheist.
>pretending to worship legendary beings which you don't believe actually exist.

OK, I understand that you like what you THINK they represent, but that isn't the same as actually thinking Thor is real. You don't believe that the World Tree is real, you think everything came from nothing completely on it's own, after the big bang, in which something appeared and exploded and gradually formed into everything.

Atheism literally makes everything pointless, since everything is ultimately going to amount to nothing, you may as well enjoy and then KYS. Obviously having kids and getting married mitigates the pleasure seeking

pizzagate is real.
.

Might be. I wouldn't put any level of evil past the Democrats. Same goes for the reprobates in Hollywood.

Youre right, but no one here will care.

too much reading?

...

Correlation does not mean causation.

The Chinese gov't was part of the whole trendy pushing of atheist books about a decade or so ago. :/

christians are the only group in armerica and canada thats keeping the white birthrate up.

*america

Most atheists prefer uncommitted sex over marriage. If I were an atheist I wouldn't have gotten married either.

>pretending to meditate on a force which you are already convinced isn't real.
I fall into the "spiritual but not religious" category. Consciousness is, on the surface, seemingly impossible to explain without doubting a purely materialistic explanation of the universe. Don't give me that "consciousness is just an illusion" BS -- you can't have illusions without consciousness to begin with.

I thought you guys were against religion sure atheism doesn't give a girl a turn on to marry you because you don't have a priest so basically yes it would stop the average house hold from having families and woman just don't want sex and a baby without a belief of something or evolution to grow the family tree.
sure you got that but can we be some what agnostic?

This.
But there is hope, I'm already converting people to Christians.

The only way you can argue that Christianity is for race mixing is if you strawman scripture and take Jesus's words out of context and some cherry picked images (despite there existing scripture that contradicts the argument, yet critics of Christianity never look that deep into the bible). And logically thinking, who do you think would be more for furthering the existence of their race, even if they never get to see the fruits of their labor? The nihilist that thinks nothing matters and after death we just wither, all our actions and commitment in life equaling nothing? Or the theist who knows that his existence has meaning and is reinforced with a religion that promotes traditionalism and family, the ideals that carved out western civilization?

>Reddit spacing

Jesus Christ is Lord

Kill yourself. Atheism is reality. I'm not going to accept some retarded nonsense just because it'll increase birth rates.

Truth >>>>> reality

God doesn't exist. Science has made God unnecessary and useless. The Big Bang, quantum mechanics and evolution explain our reality and how things came to be. God has no place in modern Life unless you're a retard who needs to inferior an imaginary being to find some meaning in life.

If you had any understanding of science then you would know atheism is neither reality nor possible.

Science requires OBSERVATION before a hypothesis becomes a fact. Your atheist/evolutionary timeline conveniently posits all it's key events at a time before there were allegedly any human beings, making observation impossible.

It is literally impossible for everything to literally come from nothing completely on it's own. It is literally impossible for life to come from non-life. You would have to violate the following scientific laws:
1st law of thermodynamics.
2nd law of thermodynamics.
Virchows Cellular Law

-and-

Germ theory.

Scientific theories aren't allowed to break scientific/natural laws and still be called a theory. The only reason evolution is perpetuated is because it serves the NWO/globalists, and every other kind of despot with ambitions towards fascism and communism.

Technically atheism is pantheism, because it attributes the act and force of creation to the universe itself.

>It is literally impossible for everything to literally come from nothing completely on it's own. It is literally impossible for life to come from non-life.
And yet you don't put the same constraints on God. How did God came to be? Who created him? Isn't that life from non-life? Isn't that something coming by it's own? Why don't you apply the same logic to nature and the laws of physics? Attributing the end cause of all things to the law of physics makes more sense because we can see the effects of the laws of physics in reality. We have yet to observe God.

Also given the vastness of our universe with it's billions upon billions of galaxies and the fact that an infinite amount of multiverse exist.. life is inevitable.. and the universe is filled with life because of just how many stars and galaxies exist.

Also Physics shows that something CAN come from nothing as nothing is really unstable. See the works of Lawrence Krauss and Stephen Hawking who explain how nothing can indeed produce everything.

Science explains it all and the gaps in our understanding will be filled in the future. AI will also help us solve all the mysteries so we can conquer the Galaxy and the universe.

>See the works of Lawrence Krauss and Stephen Hawking who explain how nothing can indeed produce everything.
Hawking is wrong.

Those four people sure have a lot of pets.

Women belong to having children not as employees.

>Attributing the downfall of western civilization to pseudo-intellectual manchildren and thinking that 2000 year old LARP book club can save it

High class le 56% face logic.

Being this ignorant.

But how can this Atheist be so Amazing?

Scientific theories tell us nothing about what reality actually is. They are useful insofar as they give useful predictions about the physical world- but no matter how accurate their predictions, they cannot actually tell us what our existence is. Saying God isn't real because "muh science" shows a complete misunderstanding of what science and religion actually are.

The laws of physics can't create ANYTHING, and as such cannot be the first cause. The first cause must be some sort of eternal, ominpotent entity... whatever name you ascribe to it

>The majority of atheists favor socialism and open borders.
bears repeating that this is absolutely false you are a complete idiot with serious mental issues. how do you even sleep when there could be an atheist bogeyman under your bed?