Itt we trigger lolbertarians

Itt we trigger lolbertarians.

Other urls found in this thread:

motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xykkkd/why-american-farmers-are-hacking-their-tractors-with-ukrainian-firmware
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tendency_of_the_rate_of_profit_to_fall
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Your waifu still won't be real.

...

...

nobody is paying for your healthcare you obese subhuman yank

...

>implying corporations would have any power without government regulation enforcing barriers to entry in any marketplace
W E W L A D
E
W
L
A
D

What do either of these have to do with libertarianism?

...

>haha reading these idiot libertarians really makes me wish I had less rights

Libertarianism is simply Confederate Lite.

...

"Fuck government regulation, who needs anti-trust laws?"

>ancaps: muh private property!!1
>also ancaps: I rent from a landlord/ I rent from the bank through a mortgage
>mfw

The libertarians are sleepwalking into bondage. Without a government, they would be living like serfs. It would not be a celebration of their "muhh freedoms" and their "muug pruperty", but a consolidation of power for the landlords and the banks. They don't actually own private property, and most people in the West don't. Most never will.

...

>anti trust laws
taught about extensively in schools, talked about a lot, applied almost never

>anti competition laws
talked about never, applied thousands of times per day, without exaggeration.

...

"You can own me, my family, and my property, as long as I have the right to spread Marxist propaganda!"

"God damn tyrannical gubmints protecting people's intellectual property!"

>MUH MONSANTO
Just about everyone I know that gets their panties in a bundle over monsanto is a mouth breathing retard that either cites """trustworthy""" hick farmers or cries about "muh chems".

how does jp morgan tread on me?

>"intellectual property"
"i can own an idea i had" is the most jewish load of horseshit i've ever heard.

>defending intellectual property
Holy hell, just how Jewish can you actually get user?

"Big corporations should be able to steal the innovations of upstarts and cut them out of the market before they've even established themselves!"

"Now let's talk about all those barriers to entry, heheheh"

>jewish load of horseshit
Project all you want.
Christ I hate you slimy faggots.

>Big Corporations should be able to own literally all of the technology that the world depends on for survival
ftfy

have some oc

lmao they really need to keep upping the ante to keep making freedom sound like a bad idea, don't they?

I'm not the kike that shills for free markets with no government intervention.

That's (((you)))

...

i don't think you get how it works, numbnuts.

without government enforcement, there are no patents. without patents, 90% or more of the big corporate enterprises would be gutted within a few years by lean competitors from around the world.

you people have no critical thinking ability whatsoever, you just parrot the most socially-acceptable sounding thing you hear.

Have some more

...

...

Whomst more autistic? Chris Chan, Ancaps, or Communists?

You literally don't depend on a single service or good for "survival." No one on earth does.

>le nazibol
you

"What do you mean monopolies aren't natural? I know, let's make it literally illegal to use the innovation we developed!"

Remember how to spot the Jew, kids.

>tries to debunk argument under terms that are only applicable in his shitty system
>inadvertently demonstrates why his system is shitty
What a smart cookie you are.

"The big corporations only survive because of their patents. If we let everyone use them, they'll be replaced by more efficient and vigorous competitors."

"But of course, naturally, those competitors will remain small and lean instead of expanding to increase their profits, heheheh."

socialist europe eats chocolate made by legit child slaves already. keep living in your soft, doughy, fantasyland where freedum is eebil you absolute untermensch

fucking idiot. without john deere tractors alone, this country would starve. like 80% dead in a year starve.

you know fuck-all.

We already know how to spot the jew. Also, refer to

if only there were vast streches, throughout the US and Canada, where land was dirt cheap because it was outside cities

>wants monopolies
>not a Jew
Nice try user.

they can't grow past a certain size without government barriers to entry helping them

it's basic crabs in the bucket stuff.

What the fuck is intellectual property?
If I violate it, who am I depriving of property?

"John Deere should be able to steal the new designs anyone comes up with for better tractors. After all, they have more resources and could put them into circulation faster. Who cares that this just means we're more dependent on them?"

>monopolies
>unnatural
bottom lel, post proofs

sounds like you don't hunt or grow your own foodstuffs bro. You fell for the auto-tilling jew you faget. Learn how to provide for yourself instead of lapping at the teet of someone else.

No goy, don't you understand that drawing a picture of Mickey Mouse is literally the same as theft?

meanwhile in the "world of things that are actually happening"
motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xykkkd/why-american-farmers-are-hacking-their-tractors-with-ukrainian-firmware

Burden of proof is on the one making the claim

kek and everyone in the USA is going to become a subsistence farmer? top jej please stop. Doesn't about 80% of the US population live in urban areas?

Get in here. Concrete proof of pedophilia in Hollywood.

>Sup Forums isn't majority libertarian anymore
>Sup Forums is more reddit now than ever before
hmm really makes you think

Neither of our systems are actually happening, faggot.

>can't rebut argument
>can't even give a reply
>not a jew

most of us grew out of it.

>communist detected.

scarcity is a basic fact of living systems, not a capitalist invention, brohan.

The only thing that matters to your (((people))) is your shekels, yes.
Ideas are only speculative in that regard, so of course you don't believe in them.

the free market never wins.
true freedom requires complete centralized regulation

>Standard Oil doesn't real
>BossesOfTheSenate.jpg
People were complaining about monopolies influencing government before any laws to regulate them ever existed. Now you tell me how the fucking Gilded Age wasn't real capitalism.

How to spot a subversive Marxist
>constantly framing communism as the sole opponent of capitalism as he tries to use capitalism to destroy society.

>supports Jewish economics
>doesn't reply
>not a Jew

Explain one major flaw of capitalism.

?

welcome to the era of unwarrantable and untreatable STDs.

Why are you talking to yourself now, Schlomo?

That's because abolishing private property is the sole opponent of preserving private property, you private property preserving bullet receptacle.

>debunks his own point in his post
If the monopolies had the senate in their pocket then obviously they couldn't have been natural monopolies. Although Standard Oil was actually pretty beneficial to the economy even though it was a monopoly.

it created the zuckerberg

>destroy society
i mean, realistically, how much worse could it get? 2/3 or so of the planet is actually starving under whatever system it is that we have.

>supporting racketeering
Holy shit Shlomo, just stop already.

"Our sourcing of oil being controlled by Rockefellers is beneficial to the economy"

This is the fastest I've ever seen a (((lolbertarian))) get outed.
Usually you can hang on for a couple dozen posts.

>debating the obviously dumber of two libertarians in the thread
lol brainlet

>how much worse could it get?
Yep, done.

>being libertarian means being ancap

Except coca-cola has never infringed on my freedom. Nice try though.

When it comes to the economy? pretty much.
Never "tax breaks" or "patents", always just government regulation.

If lolberts were smart, they wouldn't be lolberts. Even lolbert """philosophers""" are brainlets, ignorant of history, when they whine about how ebul gubmints are. And need to be reminded that Congo Free State was a private corporation.

National bolshevism is future, son

>Standard Oil was actually pretty beneficial to the economy even though it was a monopoly

Didn't John Rockefeller help create the Federal Reserve(something libertarians complain about endlessly)?

>not sure if he thinks this is an especially insightful reply or just grasping
basically all of the things people claim will happen in ancapistan already happen

>retards think the market can regulate itself
>retards think people will not buy from unethical companies, even though they already do
>being so retarded that you think corporations can only be big with government influence
>being so retarded that you think big companies would ever be out competed by small ones

Because he's the one who I actually believe is libertarian.

>bolshevist anything

>says the man supporting monopolies and racketeering
The JIDF sure is quick to come out of the woodwork whenever these threads pop up.

ancap = corporatism

it's really quite the opposite. which is why corporate politicians expend so much effort attempting to make it seem foolish.

as i said before, you people have no critical thinking ability whatsoever. you're the worst kind of redditfag "intellectual"

>Not understanding the basics of what he criticizes
Ok user

Free market economies actually have something to show for it. Hong Kong, Singapore, Switzerland are all very free market and very rich.

Your shitty ideology has never worked and always results in mass death. Marx was the biggest charlatan throughout history, a fat fucking kike who lived off his friend. Literally NONE of his theories have worked.

sorry, i meant
>ancap = corporatism

It wasn't insightful or grasping. Just an acknowledgement that I saw your reply.

>who needs laws against insider trading right guys?
The absolute state of lolbertarians.

Still talking to yourself?
I appreciate the (you)'s, I guess

Meanwhile, in the real world.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tendency_of_the_rate_of_profit_to_fall

>wanting corporations to exist

>>fuck freedom /pol 2017
Is their longing for Hitler/strong man to take the reins of the country and shove his dick in their asses in a non degenerate way and tell them how to live and how to talk, think, procreate a symptom of the sickness/hidden homosexualism or just plain stupidity?

did you get this from a handbook called "how to talk to libertarians" or something?

insider trading laws are hardly ever enforced. once a decade they drag someone like Martha Stewart ($60k lol) through the mud to make people think the gubmint is on their side.

it's the most transparent type of cheap shit trickery yet it works. every. time.

Tbh,Third Reich was as free market as it gets. If you want an example of planned economy with fascist/nationalist regimes, try Italian fascism or Stalinism

TRPF existed in 19th century economics, not applicable today and Adam Smith wrote about it before Marx. Why are you such a slimy kike? Marxism is a fucking failure. None of Marx's theories or solutions have worked, yet you try and try again. Truly utter insanity.

Third Reicj a free market?
Yeah
National Socialism screams free market.
Absolutely.
So the Nazis controlled everything but the market?
Yeah...

Authoritarian society can't exist with a free market.
Because free market requires free thinking and, again, free thinking is not an authoritarian way of doing shit.
Marxism, Nazism, Dictatorships all are, in the nutshell authoritarian. None of these can exist with freedom of choice.