Playboy published Child Pornography

Previous Threads:
Playboy got away with selling child pornography. They had pre pubescent children in their magazines posing nude. The children were sexualised and pimped out by their own mothers to porn magazines. Nobody went to jail. This is concrete proof pedophilia has been no secret in Hollywood and the entertainment industry.
Spread this info. It has been suppressed for years. Normies will be red pilled by this.

theguardian.com/theguardian/2009/oct/03/brooke-shields-nude-child-photograph

>The original picture, for which Shields was paid $450, was taken by fashion photographer Garry Gross in 1975 for a Playboy publication titled Sugar and Spice. It was one of a dozen images of Shields designed, according to Gross, to reveal the not-so-latent sexuality of the prepubescent child.
Those photos can be found uncensored with a quick google search. They are regarded as (((legal))) despite being blatant CP.
Brooke Shields was later casted in Pretty Baby where she played the role of a child prostitute. She had nude scenes in the movie despite being 11 at the time. She was chosen for the role after the director saw her nude photos.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250634/Eva-Ionesco-11-year-old-Playboy-star-sues-mother-Irina-Ionesco-taking-pornographic-photos-her.html

>Now her photographer mother Irina has been ordered to pay 10,000 euros in damages to Eva for taking the explicit pictures of her in the 1970s, when she was between four and 12.
>She made her movie debut at the age of eleven in 1976, playing a child in Roman Polanski's movie The Tenant. In 1977 her mother lost custody of her children and Eva was brought up by the parents of footwear designer Christian Louboutin.
Her mother took explicit pics of her since she was a toddler and sent her to work on a movie made by a known pedophile.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/3wZdFEsf1hQ?t=2m49s
youtu.be/hyOSuFBS7IA?t=17s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

ill give you a bump mate
keep up the good work

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to appreciate Child pornography. The boobies are extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of bottocks or thighs most of the children will just run away then no one gets head. There's also Harvey's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his rape strategy- his personal philosophy draws heavily from psychologically restraining them, for instance. The pedos understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these children, to realize that they're not just sexy- they take something deep for LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike satanic pedo cults truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the joy in a child's existential crisis between fear and pain, which itself is the best part about raping well-raised daughters and Sons! I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those sexy children stretching their holes in anticipation of Dan Schnieder's one way ticket onto the television screen. What tools... who could pity them? And yes by the way, I DO have a pizza tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the kiddos' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they've only just begun puberty (preferably sooner) beforehand.

So fucking what you moron? It wasn't CP back in the day and literally EVERY country has had photo shoots like this in mainstream magazines. Here's another redpill for you: the age of consent only ~100 years ago was 12 for the most part and child prostitution was rampant and very popular. Your ancestors were likely pedophiles by modern definition so you should kill yourself.

its necessary to redpill people on (((playboy))) isnt it??

I can't wait till the day we meet in hell. I'm gonna have fun skinning you.

>It wasn't CP
yes it was kike

At this point you're just spamming, the other thread hasn't reached bump limit, it's just dead.

Fuck off

I don't think anyone thinks that ero magazines are the pinnacle of chastity and morality.

The other thread is a containment thread for shills raiding these threads.

oh c'mon man somebody put a lot of effort into that copypasta no need to be so assblasted about it
also you ain't skinning shit you fucking faggot

don't forget you must send him a bump of cocaine in exchange for his girlfriend revenge porn.

>ero magazines are the pinnacle of chastity and morality.
doesn't mean they get away with pedophilia/CP either you fucking kike.

pedo detected
not the point
not many would know that they showed (((not CP)))

imagine thinking you're going to be allowed to skin people in hell. what a faggot retard down syndrome droolcup cock digesting nigger

now this is art

>that insult
...who are you trying to impress?are you six?

Wow not surprising that big companies got away with this is the 70’s. But what is surprising is how a quick google search will net you hundreds of these obviously child porn pictures of brooke. How do they allow this?

zehahahaha i thought you were talking bullshit but it was real.

google 'playboy eva ionesco'

Fucken MICK just stop already. We get it, Hollywood and pedos. Stop fucken screeching

Nobody cares. This Shields shit is old news. Fucking everyone knows who she is.

>Eva Ionesco
generic romanian name

Just curious, why has the West become so consumed by anti-pedosexual hatred in the last couple decades? Even as recently as 2003, it wasn't that bad (Scarlett Johansson was only 17 in the opening scene where they zoom in on her ass). The West should learn from Russia or Japan, which has a much healthier and natural attitude towards child sexuality:
youtu.be/3wZdFEsf1hQ?t=2m49s
>ages 3-5: innocent children
>ages 6-8: cute
>ages 9-11: reaching their prime
>ages 12-14: prime femininity
>ages 15-17: combination of femininity/maturity
>ages 18-20: can still be attractive, but showing signs of age
>ages 21-23: the last chance for women to have birth without increased risk of genetic defects
>ages 24-26: past their expiration date
>ages 27-29: if you enjoy rotten food, you might enjoy this age group
>ages 30+: you might as well be fucking a corpse

oi what movie you taking about

Scene I'm talking about (Scarlett Johansson was only just turned 17 when they shot this. Anti-pedos in America would go berserk if they released a scene like this in a movie today):
youtu.be/hyOSuFBS7IA?t=17s

its a bit different though when it comes to 10 year olds nude in a magazine mate

Christ you're right - and others too. How disturbing and disgusting that you can find images like that with just one search.

Marrying at a younf age for a strong family unit is not the same as child prostitution or pornography. Equating the two is bullshit.
>haveing sex with your wife is the same as pimping her out
kys.

I stop caring past the age of 15, desu. I was no more emotionally immature at 15 than I am now and I don't think anyone else was either.