Give me one good reason as to why anyone, other than SWAT and military, should own a gun

Give me one good reason as to why anyone, other than SWAT and military, should own a gun.

And no, "MUH SECOND AMENDEMENT" is not one - it only applies to muskets. Also, "SELF-DEFENSSSEE" isn't one either; we have the police for a good reason.

give me a reason why you spam this daily
i mean the hot pockets get mocked for doing it for free. but what’s your agenda?

How many times a day do you post this retarded thread?

Because military and SWAT own guns...

Someone has to kill you commies, and the ovens aren't going to light themselves.

sage

Yeah, because they have to protect the people from both themselves and from criminals. Also, in case people revolt, they need to maintain the peace

Because nobody has ever, EVER given me an actual argument

Swat and military are instruments of the oppressive power structure of capitalist society.

Until they are disarmed and deprived of their power, it is necessary to own guns.

can we stop associating BNHA with these libshit bait memes? thanks.

>Give me one good reason
to protect myself, my family and my property.

>tfw response time where I live is 15 minutes
>mfw I can draw and shoot in less than 2 seconds

When day of the rope comes you will regret that you have no gun.

>Also, "SELF-DEFENSSSEE" isn't one either; we have the police for a good reason.
>police

You see the "self" in that right?

>EU flag
oh nevermind

>Belarus

Rare country.

Ummm, no they aren't. Capitalist nations oppress people in other parts of the world, but can't become dictatorships themselves. A dictatorship in Europe or America (post WW2) is IMPOSSIBLE because people can defend themselves. Thus, there is no need to be worried about a fake, hypothetical dictator.

Oh, look. This same moron posting the same worthless slide thread. I'm sure it'll reach bump limit.

>to protect myself, my family
You have a higher chance of being killed by your own weapon than by a mob of escaped jamels

No you don't.

No relevant info?

One post by this ID?

Herbs and Spices
Herbs and Spices

King Explosion Murder > Dekuck

>eu flag
>checks out

oh and that pesky first amendment doesn't apply either, it was meant for handprinted newspapers, and not highly automatic presseries, televisions and the internet. Plus words is literally assault.

...

SO
FUCKING
ORIGINAL

Alright nignog, why should even those institutions have guns, if civilians can't get them?

die of aids, eurofag.

So we can kill Commies and their minions, and consider it self-defense.

The people need to be protected from themselves, criminals and foreign nations. When people are not happy, crime goes up, they might revolt, and nations might invade - the government cannot allow that as it would be a threat to national security

Because fuck you.

to kill assholes like you.

Sage this trash

maybe its bcause im a bnha shill but these memes really grind my gears

I dont have to give you a reason when it says right in the fucking amendment "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" so fuck off

>bnha
nigger

I know this game

sage

That was written 250 years ago. It's outdated as fuck (like your sex life). The Founders would have changed things had they seen modern America. We need to either update it, or throw it away in the trash (or sell it to some history nut).

Why the hell are we going to be run by laws written hundreds of years ago? Do we use medical textbooks from hundreds of years ago too?

What a faggot

Sage

I HATE IT

Historically, obey the state or we kill you and your family has been how dictators get into power.

With most of the weapons in the world being in civilian hands, this makes it a bit difficult for socialist cunts like you to force people to submit to your retarded fucking ideas.

Like actually kill yourself if you think a belief system that has historically only been implemented at gunpoint is a good idea.

You're one for not giving an actual argument. Go back to your hug box where you can stroke off to the piece of shit "President" you have a fetish for. I've always wanted to punch a Kekistani in the face

KYS faggot, I'm more competent with a firearm than any retarded pig out there. Enjoy your European hell hole

...

if founders are alive, they will be even more to the right than republicans. yeah they will love the new guns.

and fuck you.

-because I carry cash and meet people in lonely places for work
-because fuck you, that’s why
-because people have said “fuck you, I’m gonna kill you” to me before, so why should I not take them seriously and want to protect myself?
-because zombies are a metaphor for what normies and niggers will do when society breaks down, and it is breaking down

>we

Fuck off, Achmed.

Then we would have to find new Founders if they're willing to masturbate to some Libertarian fantasy.

>Because nobody has ever, EVER given me an actual argument
this is so cliche to state when you want to justify your redundancy. it’s apparent you don’t want to debate, and your mind is already made up.

don’t post this repost/spam thread again. i’m growing tired of you self righteous shills who have such an obvious MO only an idiot would believe you’re here for genuine reasons or concern.

Self preservation you dumbass, only a woman would ask this stupid question. How will you defend yourself with a damn muskeet with the tyrannical government has fucking automatic weapons?? "Speak softly and carry a big stick"

The only thing we can ever say is truly ours is our mind and the body that houses it. Our right to defend that mind and body is our only true, inalienable right. We should exercise this right any way we can, this includes firearm ownership.

Wait, so you admit that your "President" is a tyrant? And that the people that both of you want to oppress should preserve themselves?

Sweet! Open Season on Nazis and Kekistani fatties! Boy, you're gonna be sweating and sobbing gallons when we chase you!

Waifus don't deserve this treatment.

You don't have any guns you worthless chimp.

>Freedom of speech only applies to the printing press and quill pens. The internet isn't protected by the first amendment.

Now kys

hobby and self defense. As long you are totally mental balanced

Because shooting sports are hella fun.

Never claimed he was tyrannical, I'm just stating what IF the government went tyrannical.

Because having a gun is ultimately a tool a farmer needs a gun to protect his land from predators who would harm his livestock. A woodsman needs a gun to feed his family and put meat on the table. A father needs a gun to protect him and his family from potential intruders.

Only a fucking woman brings up sex.
Fuck off shill. You know the rules TITS or GTFO

How do we make them respect our votes at the ballot box if we can't enforce those votes with force. Do we really want to trust that Trump will "step" down after the next election or two when we choose someone new. Dictators typically declare some sort of "emergency" to override the democratic procedures. Even Julius Cesar did that.

Sage

>Yeah, because they have to protect the people from both themselves and from criminals.
How is an armed force going to protect an unarmed force from themselves? Do you think the government forces will always protect and do no harm because that’s the right thing to do? Is that what they do with the black community? What do you think happened at Waco, Texas?

So we can shoot all the Jews! What else would we use them for?

Why use hero academy for this shit?

for sport and hunting, and the fight against potential tyranny
America would be impossible to invade if every town is armed

There have already been dictators in Europe, even within the last century. The governments of Europe are in a very good position to exploit their peoples, and those governments are.

The United States Supreme Court ruled that the police do not have an obligation to protect you. This was established in Warren V. District of Columbia in 1981 and reaffirmed in Gonzalez V. Castle Rock a few years ago.
The 2nd Amendment applies to all 'arms' as stated in it's text. Trying to apply the idea that it was only referring to the firearms of the time is disingenuous due to the fact repeating firearms already existed some 65 years prior to the drafting of the Constitution, private individuals held ownership of combat naval vessels and heavy field artillery in the 1780's so it certainly did not apply to just muskets.
In fact if we apply your same standards to the 1st Amendment it only applies to literal speech and things produced via a printing press. Any thing put out over radio, television, and internet would not be covered and furthermore the US government could force private citizens to board US soldiers because the documents only applied to Continental Army and British Regulars.

Get fucked retard.