Jobs in the future will require an IQ of 130+ due to automation

Is Sup Forums prepared for mass unemployment and NEETbuxing in the near future due to superior AI and automation?

theinstitute.ieee.org/ieee-roundup/blogs/blog/will-automation-kill-or-create-jobs

linkedin.com/pulse/ai-rewriting-john-keynes-equation-employment-denis-sproten?trk=eml-email_feed_ecosystem_digest_01-hero-0-null&midToken=AQHmo1_qHzLgKw&fromEmail=fromEmail&ut=19NA2Uk_Abg7E1

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/WSKi8HfcxEk
youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
youtube.com/watch?v=FRZN7IzvCVs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

sup kikes

>tfw to smart to be unemployed
I'll at least get a waifubot, like all the NEETs, right?

...

Yes. I assume we'll all get bux or else there will be a riot so I've basically given up on a high paying career and am just enjoying my life of leisure.

>tfw highly intelligent (offline test) while also already NEETbuxing

FUTURE PROOF

>progs making music
and it sounds like shit because it doesn't know how to shred.

this is why guitar is king.

>program now can write music
Yes, shit music

>guitar is king
>shred
How fucking disgusting

Daily reminder that technology progressed over the last few decades and employment rate is still stable. Why? People come up with new demands, then people try to supply those demands and therefore create jobs.

138 here
not worried
I work in real estate. I own warehouses in a major urban area. I dont give a fuck what they put inside as long as I get my check every month.

Seriously though, you guys want to make money in the future? Get into LIHTC subsidized housing and industrial.

New automation can replace any job. There are programmers coding programs that write themselves. Everything can be done better by artificial intelligence in due time

Yeah, I agree, let's take all those blue collar workers and put them into prostitution or something. That'll work, right?

We don't even have the infrastructure to support automation. It's like how we have 4k video now, but the entertainment industry is still struggling to achieve 1080p and 60 fps. Grocery self checks shit themselves constantly. Kiosks are out of order most of the time. Boomers are still in charge of the world and have no idea how to implement change without screwing over their bottom line. Our information highways are still relying almost entirely on a rotting network of coaxial cables laid down 40 year ago.

Universal basic income will be required in the far future. We are good for the next 20 years or so, but we are gonna see mass unemployment in the coming years because of automation.
Take self driving cars for example, they will put the human taxi and trucking industry out of business.
There will become a point where most jobs are automated and the few that remain are just going to be ones that require human imagination, such as politics and art.

Well yeah, the US is a third world shithole. Can't even get proper internet in half the country for less than 60 dollars.

>There will become a point where most jobs are automated and the few that remain are just going to be ones that require human imagination, such as politics and art.
Yeah, until AI develops to the point where it can do those things better than humans as well. Then fleshy humans become obsolete.
I for one will cast away my God-given form and join the metal legions, all praise to our new machine overlords.

>Lets assume weaving required a machine with IQ 80

Lets not, because thats the dumbest thing I've read all day. If you made a wheat thresher or a loom, it doesn't translate it into having an IQ or intelligence

We have to be careful to make sure AI have to serve us and never harm humans.
Asimov's laws but upgraded with no loopholes, then we all live in luxury while robos do all the work for us

There are a few sectors that are in real danger. The freight transportation industry is rapidly changing. My father works at a freight company and the new trucks can back in full trailers on their own. Short routes don't require a person in the cab at this moment. How are we going to employ 30 million people in the near future?

Nah. Let's kill off all but a few hundred thousand elites, augment these few into superior beings that rule over all the machines, then go conquer space

Mean IQ of Sup Forums is close to 130. We'll be fine.

>Jobs in the future will require an IQ of 130+ due to automation
hot tip: no they won't

It isn't just the future, it is happening now.
I found the comparison of Netflix with Blockbuster the most fitting in this video
youtu.be/WSKi8HfcxEk

We are currently already creating 1 Job for every 5 that are replaced.

Nah they will just go haywire eventually. Ever used computers for heavy duty work? They are ok at the start but soon start glitching and fucking up. Only good for inflating buerocracy. Ivory tower niggers don't appreciate their systems are quite shit.

I've been saying this all time. The (((free market))) cucks were saying "oh, no, the market will find its way - there will be whole new job opportunities - the invisible hand will solve everything". But it's clear as fuck.

Basic Income will be temporary. Military will be automated before barbers, just because of sheer amount of funding. That will solve all rioting.

If we have a whole AI robo army why now have a decent population of whites to be served, perhaps the elites would still rule as overlords, but keep humans to still help colonise and repopulate.

good thing I watch Rick and Morty then

I'm preparing to learn a trade in Electronic so yess.
Someone needs to maintain that automation.

>currently in engineering uni
>pretty much all the work relates to replacing people
I feel bad for the low IQ labourers. Unless we get some proper cultural change, there's going to be some real mental health issues amongst the new NEET populations.

>They are ok at the start but soon start glitching and fucking up
Then they're either poorly designed or misused. Misuse is most likely, stupid people are fucking awful with computers, or any ICT, really.

Why would you have humans? What's the point? Stupid, slow, weak fleshbags?
Maybe if they're genetically manipulated into superiority and thoroughly augmented via cybernetics, then it would be worth it.

So the majority of /pol will be unemployed...

We pretend to be retarded and they pretend to provide un-throttled internets.

> New automation
Just like old automation? Technology "destroyed" jobs for 150 years. People even smashed the machines to protect their job. It was so bad, that England punished people with death for destroying machinery. They did just find new jobs.

I even work as a software developer. The idea, that the neural networks are producing any useful codel is laughable. Or why are the biggest corporations still employing programmers? Did you watch some youtube video and are now convinced, that the machines take over, even though we don't even have music in the charts made by robots? Can they just say

I think there will be other jobs than prostitution, just like people came up with other jobs in the past.

>I think there will be other jobs than prostitution, just like people came up with other jobs in the past.
And what in the fuck would those be? In the past you couldn't just replace labourers, because the machines still needed to be operated, there still needed to be leaders, mechanics, maintenance workers, etc. but all those can be replaced by far superior worker machines.
What could those people do? Service work? Who would they service?
Bureucratic work, that too being replaced by machines and software?
Just put them into some bullshit job just to make them work?

131 IQ reporting for duty

>We came up with new jobs for thousands of years
>Suddenly we won't come up with new jobs.

World will keep on spinning.

> Service work? Who would they service?
The service sector is expanding for decades. Do you think the turning point is right now, 2017, October? I don't think so.

> Bureucratic work, that too being replaced by machines and software?
Machines and software aren't perfect, they need a lot of work. The government is employing more bureaucrats than ever before.

Also machines aren't perfect and not as flexible as humans. Just because Amazon uses some robots for their biggest warehouse doesn't mean that restaurants will have those robots to stock their food room. Amazon robots also took hundreds of hours of programming. Thinking you can solve every specific problem with it is foolish.

My friend helped build a robot that makes door hinges, It replaced 7 workers on the one line. Im also in engineering and theres allready been a robot to take mah fucking job. Luckily the robot got priced and im cheaper i guess. Also my mate said the robot was trialed overseas and fucked up so im safe for now. Not that i care much. Its hard to say i think i would try being a farmer, fireman , or go into mining. Neck minute the robot does those jobs too lmao.

>We came up with new jobs for thousands of years
>Suddenly we won't come up with new jobs.
What I mean is that we came up with jobs on the very basis of humans being needed to perform labour. That simple fact has granted jobs to everyone through time. Humans are NEEDED, but that will not be true in the future. What jobs can you find for beings who are less useful and cost more than machine equivalents? Working a checkout? Already stores have self-service that's both faster and more popular than their service counterparts.
>The service sector is expanding for decades. Do you think the turning point is right now, 2017, October? I don't think so.
What work would there be in the future, for your average blue collar worker? What will Joe from the factory, or Bill from the mine do in a service job? Prostitute themselves? Sell automobiles? Phone salesmen?
>Machines and software aren't perfect, they need a lot of work. The government is employing more bureaucrats than ever before.
Yes, in the present, but not in the future and that is the point. Things are fine now, but they will not be in the future. Automatization is coming and we need to prepare.
>Also machines aren't perfect and not as flexible as humans
Yeah, aren't, but will be better in the future.
> Amazon robots also took hundreds of hours of programming
Yeah, the programming took hundreds of hours, but once it's done, you can just load it onto the robot, initialize it and it's off to work. Cheaper, faster, better, than its Mexican illegal counterpart.
>Thinking you can solve every specific problem with it is foolish.
When machines supercede mankind, what's there to stop it?

> What I mean is that we came up with jobs on the very basis of humans being needed to perform labour. That simple fact has granted jobs to everyone through time. Humans are NEEDED, but that will not be true in the future. What jobs can you find for beings who are less useful and cost more than machine equivalents? Working a checkout? Already stores have self-service that's both faster and more popular than their service counterparts.
>The service sector is expanding for decades. Do you think the turning point is right now, 2017, October? I don't think so.
What work would there be in the future, for your average blue collar worker? What will Joe from the factory, or Bill from the mine do in a service job? Prostitute themselves? Sell automobiles? Phone salesmen?
I already told you I can't see into the future, I can only look at the past and the presence. And the trend for the last 150 years has been stable. Could people predict that software engineer would be such a demanded job 50 years ago? Or consultant?

> Automatization is coming and we need to prepare.
Automation is happening for 50 years. I worked on a production line, half of the work is done by robots. Employment rates have been stable.

> Yeah, aren't, but will be better in the future.
Machines already replaced a ton of people. But we keep finding new jobs. And as long as we can't make working printers, I'm sure machines won't catch up.

> Yeah, the programming took hundreds of hours, but once it's done, you can just load it onto the robot, initialize it and it's off to work. Cheaper, faster, better, than its Mexican illegal counterpart.
Hahaha, program it to work in every household and I'm with you. But for now it was programmed to work in this specific warehouse. In hundreds of hours.

> When machines supercede mankind, what's there to stop it?
Supersede in what? Strength? Cool with me, we have cranes to help us building houses. If we're at Star Trek/paradise level, we can talk again.

time to get into riot control drones

>machines taking care of hydraulics on a ship
I'll be fine

brainlets genocide incoming

What's going on big guy?

this is now a rare Sammy thread

>130 IQ
>hasn't met a actual engineer or office worker

I work in engineering and a majority of the engineers are complete dipshit with a IQ of 90. Office workers have a IQ of 70

Music written by computers is a meme because they can't establish proper intent and context within the tradition

You are doing the mistake that you mistakenly believe that the future can be told from looking at the past. The word ''automation'' is the same, but what we mean by it has changed. The simple machines replaced human and horse muscular strength. Automation of the future will not only replace your strength, but your mind. There will of course be new jobs, but you think a robot won't program a robot to do it better than you?

''Educated and intelligent people will have jobs'' will also become untrue. It's just a mental defence people say because they don't want to realize that they are replaceable.

NO JOB REQUIRES HUMAN WORK!

It's just a matter of time before they do any of that

Whoever wrote this tripe is an idiot, anyone who believes this should be treated as such.

> You are doing the mistake that you mistakenly believe that the future can be told from looking at the past.
I'm looking at a trend. No one can tell the future, not even you.

> ''Educated and intelligent people will have jobs'' will also become untrue. It's just a mental defence people say because they don't want to realize that they are replaceable.

Le everyone who disagrees doesn't want to realize, only I took red pill meme. I think the unemployment rate will not go over 5% in the next 5 years.

> NO JOB REQUIRES HUMAN WORK!

All time high of absolute employment is right now.
youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
This video is 3 years old now, where are the robo-DJs? Why aren't the self-driving cars already driving?

Judging by his grasp of punctuation, this person doesn't have an IQ anywhere near 130.

Under National Socialism welfare recipients had to prove that they were active in some productive way.

Like building their own house or taking care of their garden.

It could be this way in the future. That way there is no need to sponsor sloth.

The problem is twofold. Most of what I’ve read (and I’ve read pretty extensively on this subject) has stated that technology is not there yet, and it may not be for some time. Some automation and employment displacement is expected in the short term, but not anything the likes that Kurzweil has predicted. The next evolution is man with machine. That is machines taking on a more important role as helper. That of course is all predicated on no major leap in computer technology, like stable quantum computers, or something. Another problem is, if everyone gets replaced, who buys the stuff? If I owned a business and I was taxed out of my mind in order to provide neet-bux so people can buy my stuff, I’ll just go to Asia and set up business there and hope a new middle class emerges in the region. One, I wouldn’t have to pay neet-bux to.

A lot of ditches will still need to be dug by hand.

this is how we make Atlantis and the rest of he plebs fall back to farming
130iq mofos ain't going to innovate just to feed mohammad and his 12 kids

Yeah, having a 130 IQ is like having a 9 inch dick, its not really fucking common.. And its not like all high IQ people gets to realize their potential, or even have an interest in doing so.

oh darn, i'm 129 IQ does that mean i get NEET bucks for the rest of my life?

129iq plebs have to compete with 60iq nigs in he neetbux lottery
protip:being white isn't a privilege anymore

>leftists flood country with cheap labor to fuck up the labor market and make American homelessness skyrocket while justifying it by pusing the "white privelege" narrative.

>everyone gets replaced by automation when leftist graduate from college, find their degrees worthless due to Rodrigo and Pajeet getting all the good jobs and demanded Mcdonalds give them $15 an hour

>in the end only brown people who benefitted from white economic marginalziation from the high pay jobs will have all the wealth


Why do I feel like somewhere out there the likes of Zuckerberg, Soros, and Obama are laughing their asses off?

Daily reminder that never before in history has a technology been specifically developed expressly for the purpose of removing human interaction, it's merely been a side effect. To say that automation will not replace people is to declare automation a failed technology, when it's clearly succeeding and growing.

low level finance jobs are on its way to being automated.

only phd math tier will be able to get finance jobs in the future

>IQ of exactly 130
>get stuck writing the garbage collection and ditch-digging algorithms
Think I'd rather be a brainlet on the government daycare dole.

Socialist income is only temporary. The real solution is the culling of the dirty underclasses in a major war follows by a fabricated alien invasion situation (Projecr Blue Beam)

>polspastics sincerely think that that LE EBIN RUBOTS will be plumbing , fixing their sink , installing new pipes , laying the roof, erecting scaffolds in always new and unpredictable cicrumstances and constant need of creative on teh fly problem solving

kek
im incererely starting to think that the median iq on pol is 80
you people are literal cretins

bluecollar and laughing at you cucks
in 2017 there still hasnt been a singel robot created even 1/100th close to our capacity

you can make a box write code but if youll want a robot moving physically youll have an anologue 80 year old grandma
MUH TECHNOLOGIES ahahahahhaa

>in 2017 there still hasnt been a singel robot created even 1/100th close to our capacity

exactly,but Sup Forums for some retarded reason don't know that,and believes that robots are taking over jobs,but then what to expect from people who unironically like traps

There are only so many maintenance jobs to go around though. If everyone who is displaced by technology tries to become a plumber, suddenly plumbers make next to nothing and you can't even find a job as one.

>tfw high IQ
>but too prone to panic attacks to continue my education

neetbux right around the corner.

youtube.com/watch?v=FRZN7IzvCVs

If future jobs will require a bare minimum of 130 iq, isn't that a good argument against basic income and welfare in general? It promotes people who aren't qualified for these jobs to have children, and inhibits people who are from having children.

Basic Income would just create more sub 130 iq people that you'd have to tax the above 130 iq people more to support, meaning they'll have even less children.

This will be what brings radical authoritarian nationalism back. When commies are trying to whip unemployed workers into a frenzy, when half the population is sinking into poverty, when inflation is pushing the prices of everything out of reach of the desperate masses, communism and nationalism will battle it out again and that will be our chance to throw down the neoliberal/neocohen world order and come out on top

I tested at 156 sometime ago, though I'm sure it's gone down. Everybody at work thinks I am a moron. Which is great. They leave me to quietly do what it is that I'm supposed to do, and they do not pester me about other bullshit.

Peter Flom, I have a PhD in psychometrics.
Answered Feb 9
If we assume that IQ is normally distributed (not exactly true, but close) with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15 (true for Americans taking the WAIS) then the answer is 2.3%.

So in the US that's less than 7.5 million in the whole US. Of course with higher IQ there's more mental illness like schizophrenia, bipolar, and anxiety so those actually capable of work. Plus those too young or old to work. So would be probably way less than that.

But fits with the globalist Illuminati guide stone of keeping the global population at 500 million. So there's that.

I know exactly that stone you're talking about and it has nothing to do with globalism. Globalists (neoliberals and neocons) want to keep the population growing because our current model of capitalism depends on infinite, constantly accelerating growth

>programmers need between 100 and 120 IQ

yeah, shit programmers.

>programs write music

it's really, really, really bad. when programs can write music on the level of Beethoven, then we will have created a general AI.

Same
154

>Is Sup Forums prepared for mass unemployment and NEETbuxing in the near future due to superior AI and automation?
The Googles are literally rebuilding the tower of Babylon now.
God is going to care of this.